Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Fairfield Meadows

Small home·Licensed for 6·Fairfield, California

Licensed since 2004Licence #486801529
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,650 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,850–$5,750
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedJanuary 30, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJanuary 13, 2026CDSS inspection record

Fairfield Meadows is a small care home in Fairfield — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2004.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Fairfield Meadows

Is Fairfield Meadows licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Fairfield Meadows licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Fairfield Meadows been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2004, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Fairfield Meadows still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Fairfield Meadows cost?

$4,650 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,850–$5,750. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 23 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size across Solano County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,721 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,550 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Fairfield Meadows take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Salvador, Potenciano & Salvador, Maria, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Northbay Medical Center is 2.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Fairfield Meadows keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Fairfield Meadows license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “FAIRFIELD MEADOWS”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #486801529. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Salvador, Potenciano & Salvador, Maria, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2004, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 2004, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2004, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2004, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is January 13, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved by the state
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 2 residents
  • BedriddenApproved by the state

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
6 MAY BE NONAMBULATORY, 1 BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM #3. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,650a month to start

Likely $3,850–$5,750

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,650a month

Likely $3,850–$5,950

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,650likely $3,850–$5,750

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 23 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,850–$5,950
$4,650
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,450–$9,050
$6,650
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 23 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

24 homes like this within 23 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$6,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 4526 Tolenas Avenue, Fairfield, CA 94533Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 9 visits since 2004. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated December 30, 2025.

On file since
2022
State visits
9
Most recent visit
January 13, 2026
Occupied · January 30, 2024 visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated January 30, 2024. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2004.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2025330202423020231102022110

The last 36 months — 6 of 8 documents

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 30, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At approximately 1:35 pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Stevenson arrived unannounced to BEGIN a required 1-year annual inspection and was greeted by Rose Marie Vister, Designated Responsible Party (DRP). Administrator Maria Salvador was contacted via telephone and advised of the inspection. Facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with six (6) residents in care, all of whom were present during today's inspection. Facility has a Dementia Care Plan, a Hospice waiver for two (2), and is approved for all non-ambulatory residents with approval for one (1) bedridden resident. At approximately 01:45 PM, LPA initiated a tour of the facility with DRP and observed the following: Facility is a one story home, was a comfortable temperature, and passageways were free from obstructions. LPA continues to see evidence of on-going rodent treatment with various traps below kitchen sink and garage used as additional pantry with foods in storage devices. LPA observed large hole in the exterior wall behind garage wash machine and dryer that represent and easier access point for rodent into the garage being used as a pantry/storage. LPA observed worn carpeting with staining throughout the facility as seen in the last annual inspection performed. A drawer face to the left of the stove was loose and evidence of water intrusion into the sheet rock in the bathroom walls was evident. In addition, LPA observed two (2) rotten deck boards outside the living room sliding door that represent a tripping hazard. 4 of 8 smoke detectors either required new batteries or did not emit the proper volume of alarm and a Plan of Correction (POC) was made to address a number of the facility issues.A repeat citation 87303(a) for grounds out of repair and civil penalty is being assessed. (See LIC809-D page) Water temperatures in residents' bathrooms measured within the allowable range of 105 to 120 degrees F per Title 22 regulations. LPA observed a supply of clean linens, and hygiene, incontinent care, and paper products available for residents. Cabinets containing cleaning supplies and medicines and other items that could pose a risk were locked. Continued on LIC809-C continued from LIC809 LPA will return at a later date to continue the annual required inspection to further inspect facility repair and upkeep, as well as, facility, staff and resident files. LPA will request updated copies of upon completion of final inspection visit including: 1)Updated Liability insurance 2)Updated LIC500 Personnel Report 3)Updated LIC9020 Register of Facility Residents. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ies), on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. This report was reviewed with Rose Marie Vister (DRP) and Appeal rights were given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 30, 2025

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Mar 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

At approximately 9:45 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Julie Florio arrived unannounced to conduct a case management -- annual continuation visit to issue citations for deficiencies observed during initial annual inspection visit on 2/14/2025 (see LIC809Ds) and met with RoseMarie Vister, Designated Responsible Party (DRP), and Christian Salvador, Designated Responsible Party who left at approximately 1:00 PM. Prior to leaving today, Christian explained to LPA that the facility was awarded a grant from the county to complete facility renovations since the facility houses and cares for residents who are a part of a county program that qualified the facility for this grant. The facility is currently awaiting word from the county on when renovations will begin as the county is coordinating the entire project. Additionally, Christian informed LPA that facility intends to apply for a new license to change from a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) to an Adult Residential Facility (ARF). LPA provided Centralized Application Bureau information for facility to begin this process. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ies), on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, or repeat violations within a 12 month period, may result in a civil penalty assessment. Exit interview conducted with DRP, whose signature on form confirms receipt of documents. Appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2025

The state marks this report as 16 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 8. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Feb 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At approximately 12:00pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Julie Florio arrived unannounced to conduct a required 1-year annual inspection and was greeted by RoseMarie Vister, Designated Responsible Party (DRP). House Manager, Christiane Salvador was contacted via telephone and arrived at facility at approximately 1:30pm. Facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with six (6) residents in care, all of whom were present during today's inspection. Facility has a Dementia Care Plan, a Hospice waiver for two (2), and is approved for all non-ambulatory residents with approval for one (1) bedridden resident. At approximately 12:30 PM, LPA initiated a tour of the facility with DRP and observed the following: Facility is a one story home, was a comfortable temperature, and passageways were free from obstructions. LPA observed egress devices deactivated on all facility doors while two (2) dementia residents were in care. DRP activated them immediately. Additionally, rodent bait was observed in the facility entryway coat closet. House Manager states that with recent construction nearby, the facility has experienced an influx of rodent issues. Further, House Manager states that pest control have been out to the facility three times since mid-December and are scheduled to come treat the facility again soon. LPA observed worn carpeting with staining throughout the facility. Water temperatures in residents' bathrooms measured within the allowable range of 105 to 120 degrees F per Title 22 regulations. LPA observed a supply of clean linens, and hygiene, incontinent care, and paper products available for residents. However, LPA observed shower towels, face rags, and washcloths in client bathroom. DRP removed them immediately and agreed to ensure the facility is in compliance with regulation moving forward. Residents' bedrooms were inspected and observed to have all the appropriate furnishings as outlined in Title 22 regulations. However, two (2) of six (6) residents did not have their own designated chest of drawers for clothing storage. Cabinets containing cleaning supplies and other items that could pose a risk were locked. Continued on LIC809-C... Continued from LIC809C... LPA observed sharps such as two pairs of scissors and a kitchen knife not secured in the kitchen. Additionally, LPA observed a lock installed on both the refrigerator and freezer in the facility kitchen. DRP removed the locks immediately and agreed to ensure the facility operated in compliance moving forward. Facility has at least two days of perishable food and one week of non-perishable foods, as well as an emergency water supply. LPA observed uncovered meat and food in the refrigerator and freezer, as well as food that was not dated or labeled after opening or repackaging. LPA also observed two unlocked plastic storage bins with diabetic residents' insulin in the facility refrigerator. All remaining medications were observed centrally stored and locked. There is a shaded seating area in the front and backyards with outdoor space for activities. LPA observed damage to the living room ceiling consisting of two holes larger than a dollar bill and an approximately 3 foot by 12 foot section of Sheetrock damaged in the garage. House manager states that the facility was approved for a County grant for renovations and improvements to board and care facilities and the facility plans to fix these areas of concern as well as replace the flooring throughout the facility, redo the bathrooms and kitchen, and paint throughout. LPA also observed an unlocked storage shed with chemicals inside. Residents were observed laying around for the duration of today's inspection except when performing personal hygiene or eating dinner. LPA did not observe any further activities taking place during today's inspection. Facility has internet service available to residents in care and the telephone was tested an operational during inspection. Facility's fire extinguisher was observed charged and was last serviced 03/2024. Smoke and Carbon Monoxide detectors were tested during inspection, one (1) of which was observed missing, and four (4) others where inoperable. The remaining smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were operational during today's inspection. Facility conducts bi-annual disaster drills, and the most recent drill was conducted 11/2024. LPA informed DRP and House Manager that drill shall be conducted on a quarterly basis moving forward, and both agreed to bring the facility into compliance. LPA observed the facility's infection control plan, and facility has a first aid kit, PPE, and emergency supplies for emergency preparedness. LPA reviewed facility's emergency disaster plan which was last updated in 2003. Continued on LIC809C... Continued from LIC809C... At approximately 2:00pm, LPA conducted file review. Facility has four (4) staff and all four staff files were reviewed. Three (3) staff files reviewed were missing proof of some or all of their training hours, two (2) staff files were observed missing proof of negative TB results, and the administrator did not have a copy of their current certificate posted or present in the facility. DRP and House Manager were unable to provide LPA with a LIC500 Staff Roster (schedule) showing who works when and how many hours per week. Two care staff live in the facility. LPA informed House Manager that the Administrator shall be present in the facility a sufficient number of hours to ensure the facility operates in compliance per regulation. All staff have proof of current First Aid and CPR certification. LPA reviewed six (6) of six (6) resident files which were each observed missing at least one (1) of the required documents. Four (4) of six (6) residents in care are under the age of 59 and the facility does not have an exception or waiver for this. House Manager states that the demographic has changed over the years and the facility may want to apply for an Adult Resident Facility (ARF) License rather than remaining a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE). House Manager states that the residents' family members or county case managers coordinate residents' medical and dental appointments and transportation to and from visits. However, facility staff are available to assist with transportation to these appointments as needed. Medications and medication records were inspected and the logs were observed to not be maintained in compliance with regulation, and LPA observed medications pre-poured five days ahead. Facility does not handle P&I. LPA will return at a later date to complete this annual inspection and will issue citations and possible civil penalties at that time. No deficiencies cited during today's inspection. Updated copies of the following documents are to be submitted to CCL within 30 days of this visit: LIC500 - Personnel Report (updated) Proof of Liability Insurance (Updated) LIC308 - Designation of Facility Responsibility LIC610D - Emergency Disaster Plan (updated) Current Administrator Certificate Exit interview conducted with DRP whose signature on form confirms receipt of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 14, 2025

The state marks this report as 19 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20242 state visits · 3 documents
Jan 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff member pushed the resident agressively

At approximately 10;00am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above allegation and met with Chet Salvador, Administrator. Complaint alleges staff member pushed the resident aggressively. Per interviews conducted, resident revealed to Reporting Party that the staff at Fairfield Meadows pushed and bullied a client. During the most recent incident, staff yelled and pushed noted resident, resulting in resident hitting the wall. Per interviews conducted, outside parties and witnesses have never observed the staff being aggressive with residents or yelling at residents. Per LPA’s interview with noted resident, staff is aggressive with them, sometimes hitting them. Per LPA’s interview with witness, it has been reported that staff has been aggressive with a resident. However, staff being aggressive has not been directly observed. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated.Nothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2024 · control 21-AS-20231214092330
Jan 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

At approximately 10;00am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christi Coppo arrived unannounced to conduct a case management and met with Chet Salvador, Administrator. In the course of investigating LPA learned facility does not currently offer or provide access to any activities. However, per facility's Plan of Operation, activities are offered per their activity program: cognitive and physical activities such as games and exercise that develop and maintain strength, coordination, and range of motion are supposed to be available. Per Admin, there currently are not any activities available for the residents that would facilitate cognitive and physical activities as stated in their Plan of Operation. Per Title 22 regulation 87219 Planned Activities (i) Facilities shall provide sufficient equipment and supplies to meet the requirements of the activity program including access to daily newspapers, current magazines and a variety of reading materials. Special equipment and supplies necessary to accommodate physically handicapped persons or other persons with special needs shall be provided as appropriate (deficiency cited, see 809D). Deficiencies cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation and the Health and Safety Code. Appeal rights given and discussed with Licensee. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted with Administrator and a copy of this report was given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87219(i) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 5, 2024

87219(i) Facilities shall provide sufficient equipment and supplies to meet the requirements of the activity program... necessary to accommodate physically handicapped persons... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA observation and Admin confirmation facility does not currently offer or provide access to any activities, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2024

Plan of correction: Admin to purchase a variety of cognitive games and offer activities that encourage physical activity. Admin will submit LIC9098 self-certifing appropriate activities now available along with pictures of purchases and residents engaging in activities by plan of correction due date of 2/5/2024.

Jan 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

01/23/2024 10:15 AM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Knight arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year inspection. LPA met with care staff Rosemarie Vister and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Maria Salvador was unavailable for the visit and gave permission for LPA to conduct the visit with staff. LPA Knight and staff toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to four (4) resident rooms, common areas, two (2) bathrooms, kitchen, storage areas and back yard. Staff and resident files were reviewed. All employees requiring background checks are cleared. The facility has a hospice waiver for 2 residents. Bedding, linens, and towels for residents were observed and found to be clean and in good repair. There is an adequate supply of toiletries for the residents. Medication is locked in a cabinet. The facility was observed to be at a comfortable temperature. HCommon area was clean and in good repair. All bedrooms had required furniture, bedding, and lighting. Bathrooms were clean, in good repair and contained necessary grab bars and non-slip floors. Kitchen was clean and in good repair. Food appears to be stored and prepared properly. Facility has required (7) seven-day non-perishable and (2) day perishable supply of food. Fire extinguishers fully charged and were inspected by the fire marshall. Smoke detectors are all operational. No pools/bodies of water are on premises. No firearms are on premises. LPA requested the following documents to be sent to CCL Santa Rosa office: LIC 500- Personnel Report Most up-to-date Liability insurance In the areas toured no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of today’s inspection. Technical assistance was provided. Exit interview conducted and copy of report was provided to Rosemarie Vister.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 23, 2024

The state marks this report as 2 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Solano County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Solano County