Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Elixir Care Home
Small home·Licensed for 6·Sacramento, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$4,500 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,550
- Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit4 of 6 beds occupiedMarch 23, 2026 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitMarch 23, 2026CDSS inspection record
Elixir Care Home is a small care home in Sacramento — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2024. Bedridden care is not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Elixir Care Home
Is Elixir Care Home licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Elixir Care Home licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Elixir Care Home been cited?
0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 5 state visits over the same years.
Is Elixir Care Home still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Elixir Care Home cost?
$4,500 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,650–$5,550. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 19 other homes of a similar licensed size in Sacramento that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,046 to $4,461 a month, and the middle figure is $3,500 (n = 19 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Elixir Care Home take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Elixir Care Home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Sacramento is 1.2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Elixir Care Home keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Elixir Care Home license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “ELIXIR CARE HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #342701336. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed to Elixir Care Home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 5 state inspection visits since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 5 state visits in that period.
- 1 complaint and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is March 23, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
- Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
- BedriddenNot on file · ask the home
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,500a month to start
Likely $3,650–$5,550
From 12 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$4,500a month
Likely $3,650–$5,750
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Starting monthly rate$4,500likely $3,650–$5,550
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,650–$5,750
- $4,500
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,300–$8,850
- $6,500
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
12 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,100–$5,200.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 12 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Courtyard TerraceSacramento · 1.5 mi · Mid-size home$4,345Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunny Beach VillaSacramento · 1.8 mi · Small home$3,200Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Marconi VillaSacramento · 1.9 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Eastern ManorSacramento · 2.9 mi · Mid-size home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Norris Senior HomeSacramento · 3.7 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Marylou's Home CareSacramento · 3.7 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Abundant Love and Care for the ElderlyCarmichael · 3.8 mi · Small home$3,300Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Kentfield Estates Ranch RCFESacramento · 4.2 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Twin Rivers at NatomasSacramento · 4.2 mi · Mid-size home$2,750Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Ivy Ridge Assisted LivingSacramento · 4.2 mi · Mid-size home$2,600Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Cozy Home CareCarmichael · 4.5 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Madison Square Senior Living IICarmichael · 4.8 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 1440 Hood Road, Sacramento, CA 95825Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2024, the state has filed 5 documents for this home, and its records count 5 visits since 2024. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on March 23, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”
- On file since
- 2024
- State visits
- 5
- Most recent visit
- March 23, 2026
- Occupied at that visit
- 4 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated March 23, 2026. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations1typical 0
- Substantiated allegations1typical 0
- Total complaints1typical 0
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2024.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 5 of 5 documents
Mar 23, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Illegal eviction
On 03-23-2026, Licensing Program Analyst, Arvin Villanueva (LPA), arrived unannounced at this facility to conduct a follow-up complaint investigation visit and deliver findings of the allegation noted above. LPA met with licensee/administrator, Maria Dulay, and stated the purpose of the visit. The investigation into the above allegation consisted of record reviews. On December 12, 2025, the Department received documents from the facility regarding the planned eviction of resident R1. After reviewing the information provided, it was determined that the facility did not follow Title 22 requirements for issuing an eviction notice. On November 17, 2025, the facility issues an eviction notice via email to the responsible party. The documents included emails and letters from the administrator explaining that the resident’s care needs had increased, especially due to hygiene routines and long bathroom use, and that the facility wanted the resident moved out by December 31, 2025. The facility did not provide a formal written eviction notice as required by regulation. The materials sent were mostly emails and informal letters, which do not meet the legal standards for eviction. {1 of 2} Substantiated Title 22 requires that a facility give a resident a 30-day written eviction notice that includes a clear and legal reason for eviction, the effective date, and information about the resident’s appeal rights. The notice must also be delivered to the resident, the responsible person, and the Licensing office. Some of these items were not included in the documents reviewed. The facility also did not provide an updated reappraisal, which is required when a resident’s needs have changed and the facility claims it can no longer meet those needs. The emails stated that staff were overwhelmed, and that the resident’s behaviors were difficult to manage, but the facility did not show proof that they completed a reappraisal or attempted interventions before deciding on eviction. Additionally, Title 22 requires that when a facility believes a resident’s needs exceed what they can provide, they must document the steps they took to support the resident and must help the resident plan for relocation. The documents did not show any relocation planning, referrals to other facilities, or evidence of care-planning meetings meant to resolve the issues. The information sent also did not include any written house rules that the resident allegedly violated. Although the administrator mentioned concerns about long bathroom routines and water use, these behaviors were not tied to any written rules given to the resident at admission. LPA Kimberly Viarella consulted with the licensee to update the eviction notice and reissue to R1 and their responsible party. The updated eviction notice was reissued to R1 on February 1, 2026. Based on the review of all documents provided, it was determined that the facility did not issue a proper eviction notice and did not meet several Title 22 requirements related to eviction procedures. The materials submitted on December 12, 2025 do not meet the legal standards needed to proceed with an eviction, and the facility is not in compliance with Title 22 regulations. Therefore, the allegation was substantiated. A finding that the complaint allegation is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, the following deficiencies are cited on the 9099D during this visit. Licensee was provided a copy of their rights (LIC9058) and their signature acknowledges receipt of these rights. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. {2 of 2}the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 23, 2026 · control 27-AS-20251230164715
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87224(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 30, 2026
Eviction Procedures The licensee may evict a resident for one or more of the reasons listed in Section 87224(a)(1) through (5). Thirty (30) days written notice to the resident is required except as otherwise specified in paragraph (5) This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the initial eviction notice submitted on 12/10/25, the facility did not issue a formal 30-day eviction notice. Additionally, the required components – including the legal reason, effective date, appeal rights, proper service to the resident, and reappraisals. This poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risks to person in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 23, 2026
Plan of correction: Prior to this visit, the licensee corrected the eviction notice and reissued the updated notice to the resident and their responsible party on February 1, 2026.
Mar 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 3/20/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Tamayo arrived at this facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. Upon arrival, LPA met with Care staff Rasela Changkwan (S2) and explained the purpose of today’s visit. S2 called the Administrator, Maria Gloria Dulay (S1), and informed them of LPA’s presence. S1 arrived around 11:00AM. This Residential Care Facility for the Elderly facility is a single story building licensed to serve 6 non-ambulatory adults within age range of 60 and over, with a hospice waiver for six. The census is 4 residents and two staff, S2 and Roman Murallo (S3). LPA Tamayo inspected the physical plant including but not limited to the common area, kitchen, dining area, resident bedrooms, bathrooms, laundry room and outside courtyards of the facility to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. LPA Tamayo observed the facility to be free of odor, clean and in good repair. There are no bodies of water present. LPA toured the physical plant and observed the following: KITCHEN: Appliances and fixtures were clean and functional. LPA observed seven day non-perishable and two-day perishable food supplies. Meals are prepared by the Staff. Knives and other sharps are locked inaccessible in a drawer. Kitchen and house cleaning supplies are stored in a locked cabinet. LPA observed a weekly menu to be posted. COMMON AREAS: Common areas include the Living Room and Dining Room. All furniture was observed to be clean and in good condition, with enough seating for clients in care. There was space to accommodate both indoor and outdoor activities. LPA noted an Activity Calendar in the living room area and activities stored in the in the dining room area. The dining area was set up to celebrate resident 1’s (R1’s) birthday (R1). Continued on 809-C. INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLAN: During today’s visit, the LPA reviewed the facility's infection control plan as well as the facility's emergency disaster plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are within regulation. Both documents were observed to be complete and recently updated. Emergency disaster drill is conducted quarterly per regulation. EXTERIOR: Exterior passageways were clean and clear of any obstructions. There is a backyard patio area for client and visitor use with furniture observed to be in good condition. There are no exterior gates. BEDROOMS: LPA inspected facility bedrooms. The facility has five (4) total client bedrooms and (1) staff bedroom. All bedrooms were observed to contain furniture, bedding and linens within regulation. Extra linens are stored in the hallway cabinet. Client bedrooms had no visible hazards or inconsistencies observed. BATHROOMS: There are three bathrooms. All bathrooms were observed to be clean and sanitary, and supplied with paper towels. Water temperature was tested and measured at 121.1 degrees F in the kitchen and 105 degrees Fahrenheit in resident bathroom sink, which is not within the required regulation, S2 adjusted the water temperature during this visit to ensure water temperature is within 105 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Grab bars and non-slip mat were observed to be stable and in good repair at this time. MEDICATION REVIEW: LPA reviewed medications which are centrally stored in a locked cabinet in the common area near the facility entrance. LPA observed the centrally stored medications area to be locked and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed the fire extinguisher(s) and first aid kits were up to date. Fire drills are completed monthly. LPA observed smoke and carbon monoxide detector(s) in the facility were in good repair. All emergency exits were clear from obstructions. LPA requested client and staff files for review. LPA reviewed 6 resident files and 3 staff files, including criminal record clearances. A review of staff records indicates that all facility staff or other individuals who require caregiver background checks are fingerprinted and associated to the facility. Administrator holds certification Administrator Certificate # 7001763740 and expires on 11/10/2027. The following documents were requested to be sent to the Regional Office: (1) LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility (2) Insurance verification (3) LIC 610 Current Emergency Disaster Plan (4) Surety Bond (5) LIC 500 Current Personnel Report As a result of this annual visit, the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulation no deficiencies were cited. An exit interview was conducted with the Licensee, and a copy of these LIC 809 reports were left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 20, 2026
The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Apr 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Unannounced Annual Inspection visit was made by Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Viarella and Sommer Hayes to this facility on 04/22/25. LPAs identified themselves upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with the Licensee/Administrator, Maria "Gloria" Dulay. A brief interview followed. LPA presented Licensee/Administrator with a list of documents to be collected during this visit: LIC 500, LIC 9020, LIC 308, LIC 400, LIC 402, LIC 610E, a copy of liability insurance, blank admissions agreement, updated facility sketch, and a copy of the Designated Facility Administrator's Certificate. The inspection began in the kitchen. All knives were locked and inaccessible to residents in care. The food supply was adequate for 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable. LPAs observed packages of bread and leftovers that were not packaged and dated as required. LPA provided technical assistance. LPA compared the facility sketch to the current floor plan and they were identical with no changes. LPA inspected 6 resident bedrooms, 2 staff rooms and an office. All resident rooms had the required furniture, furnishings and lighting to be in compliance at this time. LPA noted soap, paper towels, and trash cans in the 4 bathrooms. The hot water temperature was measured at 108 degrees Fahrenheit and was in compliance. The fire extinguisher was last serviced on 09/18/24 by Sentinel Fire Equip. Comp and was also in compliance. The exterior of the building was inspected by the LPA. There were no bodies of water present and the yard was completely fenced in. LPA observed that all screens and gutters were in good repair. There were shaded areas in the front and rear of the building for residents to enjoy. LPA observed pesticides that were left unattended in 2 places in the yard. The Administrator removed them immediately to ensure that they were inaccessible to residents in care. This deficiency was cited on the LIC 809D page. The LPA observed medications were stored in a locked cabinet in the kitchen. LPA also observed some over the counter/staff medications in another unlocked cabinet. LPA explained that all medications need to be locked up and inaccessible to residents in care. This deficiency was also included in the citation on the LIC 809D page. LPA reviewed storage, dosing, and destruction procedures. A review of the First Aid kit by the LPA found it to be complete and in compliance. A file review was completed by the LPAs. LPAs reviewed 2 resident and 2 staff files. The resident files were in compliance at the time of this inspection. LPA provided technical assistance stating that training needed to be documented in each of the staff files. Copies of completed annual online training had not been printed out. The Administrator stated they will be sent to Community Care Licensing by 05/02/25. LPAs compared the LIC 500 (Staff Roster) with the Guardian roster to ensure that all staff had the appropriate background clearances to care for the residents. All were in compliance at the time of this inspection. According to the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, any deficiencies that were cited during today's inspection were cited on the LIC 809D page. A copy of this report was provided along with APPEAL RIGHTS and an exit interview was conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 22, 2025
The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Apr 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Prelicensing
On 04/02/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Viarella made an unannounced visit to this facility to conduct a pre-licensing inspection. LPA identified herself upon arrival, stated the purpose of the visit and asked to meet with the Licensee/Administrator. LPA met with Maria Gloria Dulay and a brief interview followed. LPA noted the Administrator/Licensee, Maria Gloria Dulay's certificate, # 7001763740 expired on 11/10/25. The inspection began in the kitchen. All knives and sharps were locked and inaccessible to residents in care. The food supply was adequate for 2-day perishable and 7-day nonperishable. Opened packages in the refrigerator were dated appropriately. LPA inspected an additional pantry and 7 items were randomly selected. All had valid expiration dates. LPA inspected 6 resident bedrooms and 2 staff rooms and an office. All resident rooms had the required furniture, furnishings and lighting to be in compliance at this time. LPA noted soap, paper towels and trashcans with lids in the bathrooms. The hot water temperature was measured at degrees Fahrenheit and was in compliance. The 2 fire extinguishers were last serviced on Sentinel Fire Co. on 02/9/24 and were also in compliance. The exterior of the building was inspected by the LPA. There were no bodies of water present and the yard was completely fenced in. LPA observed that all screens and gutters were in good repair. There were shaded patio areas in the front and rear of the facility with furniture to accommodate the needs of residents in care. LPA tested both of the gates at either end of the facility. One had a self-closing mechanism, the other did not, however, when this was brought to the Licensee / Administrator's attention, she had it immediately repaired prior to this LPA finishing the inspection LPA toured the garage as well and observed refrigerators and a food supply for staff as well as a separate location for staff to rest during their scheduled breaks. The LPA observed medications were stored in a large locked metal cabinet in the kitchen and inaccessible to residents in care. Medications were primarily the pill packs provided by the pharmacy. LPA reviewed storage, dosing, and destruction procedures. A review of the First Aid kit by the LPA found it to be complete and in compliance. LPA spent time reviewing PRN documentation to ensure that staff documented the results of PRN administration. Licensee / Administrator added an additional column to their log sheets to ensure that staff made the appropriate notes regarding medication effectiveness. LPA reviewed 2 resident records and 1 staff file and all the required information was present in each. LPA completed Comp III with Licensee Administrator. According to the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, there were no deficiencies observed or cited during today's visit. This facility passed its pre-licensing inspection. A copy of this report was provided. Exit interview.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 2, 2024
Feb 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Office
COMP II by CAB successfully completed Method: Phone Call at CAB Applicant/administrator participated in COMP II at CAB telephone call with analyst at CAB. Identification of the applicant and administrator was verified by presenting photo ID via phone. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed the understanding of Title 22. Component II was successfully completed. Applicant and administrator were advised to email/fax signed LIC 809 with copy of photo ID to CAB. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2. Staff qualifications and responsibilities 3. Applicant and Administrator qualifications 4. Program policy: Abuse, admission agreement, medication management, reporting incidents to CCL, restricted & prohibited conditions 5. Grievances, Complaints, Community resources 6. Physical plant, food service 7. Application document review and technical assistance: Criminal record clearance, Health screening, Fire clearance, First Aid/CPR certificate, Administrator certificate, Financial verification, Pre-licensing inspection, Compliance history, Control of propertythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 7, 2024
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Sacramento County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Cyon Samala Family Care Home #2
Sacramento · Small home · 0.1 mi away
$3,600 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Rowena Care Home
Sacramento · Small home · 0.7 mi away
$4,450 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Carlton Senior Living Sacramento
Sacramento · Large community · 0.7 mi away
$4,695 a month to start · Listed by the home
Carlton Senior Living Sacramento Atrium
Sacramento · Large community · 0.7 mi away
$4,700 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Valley of Hope Facility
Sacramento · Small home · 0.8 mi away
$4,550 a month to start · Covelight estimate
The Chateau at River's Edge
Sacramento · Large community · 1.1 mi away
$4,550 a month to start · Covelight estimate