Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Crest Villa
Mid-size home·Licensed for 15·Norco, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$4,750 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,750–$6,250
- Home sizeLicensed for 15Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit14 of 15 beds occupiedApril 21, 2026 · not a current opening
- Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · August 9, 2026
- Last state visitJuly 27, 2026CDSS inspection record
Crest Villa is a mid-size care home in Norco — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 15 residents since 2019. Dementia care is not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Crest Villa
Is Crest Villa licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Crest Villa licensed for?
15 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Crest Villa been cited?
0 Type A and 5 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 21 state visits over the same years.
Is Crest Villa still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Crest Villa cost?
$4,750 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,750–$6,250. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 20 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 161 other homes of a similar licensed size across Riverside County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,800 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 161 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.
Does Crest Villa take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Crest Villa LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Kaiser Foundation Hospital Riverside is 4.2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Crest Villa keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 5 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Crest Villa license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “CREST VILLA”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #331880604. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 15 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed to Crest Villa LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 21 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 5 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 21 state visits in that period.
- 9 complaints and 6 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is July 27, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved by the state
- Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 5 residents
- BedriddenApproved · covers up to 5 residents
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 15 AMBULATORY OF WHICH, 5 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY AND 5 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 5.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 5 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
4 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation not on file
Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,750a month to start
Likely $3,750–$6,250
From 20 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$4,750a month
Likely $3,750–$6,400
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$4,750likely $3,750–$6,250
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 20 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,750–$6,400
- $4,750
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,500–$9,350
- $6,750
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 20 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
20 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,650–$5,500.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 20 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Alicia Pines Residential CareRiverside · 1.9 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- A Silver Amore Senior HomeEastvale · 2.2 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- La Sierra Senior HomeRiverside · 2.4 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Eastvale Manor Assisted LivingMira Loma · 2.4 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Heart of Joy Home CareCorona · 3.2 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Morning Mist HomecareEastvale · 3.3 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Eastvale MeadowsCorona · 3.4 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Avery Garden Assisted LivingJurupa Valley · 3.4 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Casa MiaMira Loma · 3.5 mi · Mid-size home$2,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- The Galleria View Villa IIRiverside · 3.7 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Allwise Residential HomeEastvale · 3.8 mi · Small home$4,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Gold Living Home CareRiverside · 3.9 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- A Dressage Home CareRiverside · 4.0 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Victoria Ann Elderly CareRiverside · 4.5 mi · Small home$3,600Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Live in Comfort CareRiverside · 4.5 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Royalty Senior LivingJurupa Valley · 4.5 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Apple Senior Care of CoronaCorona · 4.6 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Allwise Residential Home 3Jurupa Valley · 4.9 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Emanuel Home CareRiverside · 4.9 mi · Small home$4,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Michael Andrew CenterRiverside · 5.0 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 4014 California Ave, Norco, CA 92860Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2022, the state has filed 18 documents for this home, and its records count 21 visits since 2019. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 27, 2026.
- On file since
- 2022
- State visits
- 21
- Most recent visit
- July 27, 2026
- Occupied · April 21, 2026 visit
- 14 of 15 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 9 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated June 16, 2023 to April 21, 2026. 9 of the 9 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 9 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 9 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations5typical 0
- Substantiated allegations6typical 0
- Total complaints9typical 1
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 327 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2019.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 16 of 18 documents
Jul 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On 07/27/2026 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez conducted an unannounced visit to follow up on complaint 56-AS-20251125220805. LPA was granted entry to facility by staff Nestor Frijas. During visit, LPA interviewed (4) residents in care regarding complaint allegations. LPA contacted Facility Administrator Oscar Ramasar to inform of today's visit and read over case management documentation. Administrator gave permission for Staff Nestor Frias to sign report. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to Staff Nestor Frijas.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 27, 2026
Apr 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek medical care for resident in a timely manner
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the allegations above. LPA met with Staff Nestor Frijas and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of facility tour and staff interviews On 11/25/2025, the department received a complaint regarding staff not seeking medical care for resident in a timely manner. Interviews revealed that Staff #1 noticed Resident #1 (R1) face to be swollen Sunday night on 11/23/2025 but did not take R1 to the hospital or call emergency services. R1 was then taken to hospital next morning as swelling began to worsen. Based on the evidence gathered during today’s investigation, the allegation listed above are deemed SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation are valid because the preponderance of evidence the standard has been met. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report (LIC9099) and (LIC9099A) was discussed and provided to Administrator Ghislaine Ramasar along with copy of appeal rights. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 21, 2026 · control 56-AS-20251125220805
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: May 7, 2026
87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following: (2) to be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. Based on record review and interviews, the licensee did not comply with sectioned cited above by not ensuring Resident #1 (R1) was accorded safe and healthful by not providing care to R1 in a timely manner, which poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 21, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee stated to complete an in-service training for facility staff and send to LPA by Plan of Correction (POC) due date.
Apr 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with Administrators Oscar & Ghislane Ramasar and was granted entry to the facility. Licensed capacity is (15) current census (11). LPA was accompanied by Administrator Ghislane Ramasar to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature at 71 degrees F. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, night stands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a office area. There was a designated office for resident/staff files. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for residents in care. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of residents in care. Facility has a variety of food available for residents. Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Record Review: LPA reviewed (7) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, pre-placement appraisals and needs and services plans. LPA observed no updated reappraisals for Resident #1 (R1), Resident #2 (R2), Resident #3 (R3), Resident #5 (R5), and Resident #7 (R7). Deficiency will be issued. LPA observed no updated needs and services plan for R1, R2, R5. Deficiency will be issued. Moreover, LPA reviewed (7) resident medications. LPA observed medication for Resident #2 (R2) to not be documented and maintained on Medication Administration Record (MAR). Deficiency will be issued. LPA observed PRN medication not documented properly in Medication Administration Record (MAR) with date, reason, response, and time for Resident #2 (R2). Deficiency will be issued. LPA also reviewed (5) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, training's, and health screenings. No issues were observed. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) and (LIC809D) was discussed and provided to Administrator Oscar & Ghislane Ramasar.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 21, 2026
Mar 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are mismanaging resident's medication(s) while in care. Staff are not adequately supervising resident while in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero arrived at the facility to deliver investigative findings. LPA met with Facility Caregiver Edralene Jane Frijas and explained the purpose of the visit regarding the allegations stated above. First allegation: Staff are mismanaging resident's medication(s) while in care. Regarding the allegation stated above, LPA conducted a review of records during the review of records LPA discovered that on 8/28/2024 Resident #1 had arrived at the Adult Day Health Care Center looking upset. In addition, based on record it was later discovered by program staff that Resident #1 had medication in their possession. During further review LPA discovered that Resident #1 had a total of four (4) pills that were later identified by staff pharmacist to be controlled substance. Report also indicated that Resident #1 could not communicate where the medication came from. LPA conducted a file review pertaining to Resident #1 during the file review LPA discovered that Resident #1 cannot manage medication and that the facility is responsible for the storing and administration of medication for Resident #1. Substantiated Second allegation: Staff are not adequately supervising resident while in care. Regarding the allegation stated above, LPA conducted a review of records pertaining to Resident #1 upon the review of records LPA discovered that on 8/28/2025 Resident #1 arrived at the Adult Day Health Care Center visually upset and crying, informing staff that five days ago Resident #1 had sustained a fall at home and was having pain on their right (R) rib. Based on the report LPA observed that the Care Center offered Resident #1 pain medication however, Resident #1 had pulled out a small bag with medication. In addition, records show that Resident #1 had slurred speech and could not communicate with staff. Based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, staff were not competent to observe Resident #1 condition and still allow resident to attend the Care Center while having medication in their possession. This determines that the above allegations are Substantiated. A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the findings are valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Title 22 regulations Incidental Medical and Dental Care (h)(2), Personnel Requirements-General 87411 (a), from division 6, chapter, article 6, is cited on the attached LIC 9099 D. An exit interview was conducted where this report, appeal rights, and LIC9099-D was discussed, and a copy of the report was provided to Facility Caregiver Edralene Jane Frijas at the of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 28, 2026 · control 56-AS-20240828143219
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 10, 2026
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care....(h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored:.... (2) Centrally stored medicines shall be kept in a safe and locked place that is not accessible to persons other than employees responsible for the supervision of the centrally stored medication. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on interviews, record review the licensee did not follow " Incidental Medical and Dental Care" resulting on Resident #1 to have controlled substance on their possesion, which poses an immediate Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 28, 2026
Plan of correction: The Licensee has agreed to read over: Incidental Medical and Dental Care regulation and provide training to all staff managing medication. And discuss the importance of keeping medication locked and secured, and following the proper measures to ensure medication is being taken by the resident. Proof of training will be emailed to LPA by POC 4/10/2026.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 10, 2026
Personnel Requirements - General....(a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. In facilities licensed for sixteen or more, sufficient support staff shall be employed to ensure provision of personal assistance and care as required in Section 87608, Postural Supports. Additional staff shall be employed as necessary to perform office work, cooking, house cleaning, laundering, and maintenance of buildings, equipment and grounds. The licensing agency may require any facility to provide additional staff whenever it determines through documentation that the needs of the particular residents, the extent of services provided, or the physical arrangements of the facility require such additional staff for the provision of adequate services. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on interviews, record review the licensee did not follow "Personnel Requirements" to Resident #1 to observe residents change of condition, which poses an immediate Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 28, 2026
Plan of correction: The Licensee has agreed to read over: Personnel Requirements - General regulation and provide training to all staff regarding observation and properly responding to residents change of conditions. Proof of training will be emailed to LPA by POC 4/10/2026.
Dec 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On 12/03/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez conducted a unnanounced visit in regards to complaint 56-AS-20251125220805. LPA met with facility staff Nestor Frijas and explained purpose of visit. Upon visit, LPA observed facility did not follow appropriate reporting requirements in regards to Resident #1 (R1) medical emergency. LPA observed incident occurred on 11/24/2025 and has since then not been reported to licensing department within seven days of occurrence. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, a deficiency was cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) (LIC809D) was discussed and provided to Staff Nestor Frijas. Along with a copy of the appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 3, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 10, 2025
87211 Reporting Requirements: (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency... (1) A written report shall be submitted to licensing agency... (D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident... Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with section cited above by not ensuring a written report was submitted to licensing for incident regarding Resident #1 (R1) within seven days of occurence, which poses a potential health, saftey or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 3, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee stated to read over regulation 87411 Reporting Requirements with facility staff to ensure compliance. POC will be cleared.
Sep 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility fire system is out of compliance
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrators Ghislaine and Oscar Ramasar and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of facility tour and staff interviews. For the allegation, Facility fire system is out of compliance. LPA observed Staff #2 (S2) on 08/08/2025 placing batteries into beeping smoke dectector. S1 stated fire department came to facility on 08/01/2025 and did not replace batteries due to not being able to find them. A previous licensing report was issued on 02/05/2025 giving notice of the same violation. Because you have been cited for repeating the same violation within 12 months, the following civil penalty shall be assessed until the violation is corrected. An immediate civil penalty of $250 is hereby assessed for the date of 09/03/2025. Substantiated Based on the evidence gathered during today’s investigation, the allegation listed above are deemed SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation are valid because the preponderance of evidence the standard has been met. During today’s visit, a deficiency and Civil Penalty was cited/issued per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099), LIC9099D, (LIC421FC) was discussed and provided to Administrator Ghislaine and Oscar Ramasar along with a copy of the appeal rights. For the allegation, Facility staff are unable to provide emergency fire personnel information about the resident's medical condition. LPA conducted (2) staff interviews. 2 out of the 2 staff stated facility staff will provide emergency fire personnel with residents ID/Emergency contact sheet, medication log, and any allergies they may have. S2 stated when emergency personnel arrives they are provided with current medication log and resident information. Based on the evidence gathered during today’s investigation, the allegation listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted and this report (LIC9099A) along with other reports were discussed and provided to Administrators Ghislaine and Oscar Ramasar.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250802215035
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 10, 2025
Maintenance and Operation 87303 (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times... This requirement is not met as evidenced by Based on observations, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not ensuring all smoke detectors were in working ability, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2025
Plan of correction: During visit on 08/08/2025 staff replaced smoke detector with batteries. Plan of Correction will be cleared.
Apr 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with Administrators Oscar & Ghislane Ramasar and was granted entry to the facility. Licensed capacity is (15) current census (14). LPA was accompanied by Administrator Oscar and Ghislane Ramasar to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, night stands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. LPA Hernandez observed cleaning supplies, scissors, and a hammer unlocked accessible to residents in care. Deficiency will be issued. There was a designated office for resident/staff files. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for residents in care. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of residents in care. Facility has a variety of food available for residents. Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Record Review: LPA reviewed (7) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, pre-placement appraisals and needs and services plans. LPA reviewed (7) resident medications. LPA Hernandez observed Resident #1 (R1) Medication Administration Record (MAR) to not be documented for AM medication. Deficiency will be issued. LPA Hernandez observed Resident #1 (R1), Resident #2 (R2), Resident #3 (R3) and Resident #5 (R5) to have no Pre-Placement Apprasial completed. Additionally, R1 is missing a Reapprasial form and no updated physician report. LPA Hernandez observed Resident #4 (R4), Resident #5 (R5), Resident #6 (R6) and Resident #7 (R7) to not have a Needs and Services plan completed. LPA Hernandez observed R5 to not have a completed Admission Agreement. Moreover, R1, R2, R3, R5, R6 and R7 do not have a Functional Capabilities Assessment. Deficiencies will be issued. Additionally, LPA also reviewed (5) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, training's, and health screenings. No issues were observed. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) and (LIC809D) was discussed and provided to Administrator Oscar & Ghislane Ramasar.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2025
Apr 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On 04/09/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez conducted an unannounced case management visit to the facility. On 03/26/2025 LPA Hernandez delivered findings for complaint number 56-AS-20240319145136. The findings were substantiated, however, LIC9099-D page was unable to be printed due to technical issues. LPA Hernandez will deliver findings for allegations listed on today's visit. During today's visit, a deficiency was cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) and (LIC809D) was discussed and provided to Administrator Oscar & Ghislane Ramasar. Along with Appeal Rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1569.31(e) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 10, 2025
1569.31 Basic Services Requirement (e)Monitoring the activities of the residents while they are under the supervision of the facility to ensure their general health, safety, and well-being. Based on interviews, licensee failed to meet this requirement by not ensuring staff were properly supervising residents, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee stated to submit proof of staff training on supervision rules to LPA Hernandez by Plan of Correction (POC) due date.
Mar 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident left in soiled diapers for extended amount of time.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrators Ghislaine and Oscar Ramasar and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of staff and resident interviews. For the allegation, Resident left in soiled diapers for extended amount of time. LPA Hernandez conducted (5) resident interviews. 5 out of the 5 residents stated they have not witnessed any residents left in diapers for a prolonged time. Additionally Resident #1 and Resident #2 stated they wear diapers and staff do not leave them in their diapers for a prolonged time. LPA Hernandez conducted (3) staff interviews. 3 out of the 3 staff stated they do not leave residents in their diapers for a prolonged time nor have they witnessed facility staff leaving residents in diapers for prolonged time. Unsubstantiated Based on the evidence gathered during today’s investigation, the allegation listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. During today’s visit containing to these allegations, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to Administrator Oscar and Ghislaine Ramasar.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2025 · control 56-AS-20230821115822
Mar 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure resident care needs were met
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrators Ghislaine and Oscar Ramasar and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of resident interviews and record review. For the allegation, Staff did not ensure resident care needs were met. LPA Hernandez conducted (4) resident interviews. 4 out of the 4 residents stated the facility does take care of all of their personal needs. Additionally, Administrators stated some clients at the facility deny showering and medication at times. Unsubstantiated Based on the evidence gathered during today’s investigation, the allegations listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. During today’s visit pertaining to the allegation listed, no deficiency was cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to Administrator Oscar and Ghislaine Ramasar.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250121144847
Mar 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate supervision, resulting in a resident leaving the facility unsupervised.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrators Ghislaine and Oscar Ramasar and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of staff and resident interviews. LPA Hernandez spoke with Administrator Oscar and Ghislaine Ramasar. Administrators stated Resident #1 did leave the facility without staff knowing. LPA observed R1’s physician report which stated R1 is unable to leave the facility unsupervised. Additionally, R1 has now moved to different facility that is more secured. Based on the evidence gathered during today’s investigation, the one (1) allegation listed above are deemed SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation are valid because the preponderance of evidence the standard has been met. Substantiated During today’s visit containing to these allegations, a deficiency was cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report (LIC9099) and (LIC9099D) was discussed and provided to Administrators Oscar and Ghislaine Ramasar along with a copy of appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2025 · control 56-AS-20240319145136
Mar 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On 03/26/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez attempted to deliver findings for complaint 56-AS-20240319145136. Due to technical issues LPA Hernandez was unable to print copy of LIC9099, LIC9099-C, and LIC9099-D. LPA Hernandez reviewed all reports with both Administrators as well as explained purpose of findings. LPA Hernandez will provide copy of reports to both Administrators at a different time.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2025
Mar 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On 03/26/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez conducted a case management visit at facility. According to Complaint 56-AS-20240319145136. Administrator Ghislaine and Oscar Ramasar failed to report to the department Resident #1 (R1) leaving the facility. within 7 seven days of the occurrence. R1's physician report states they are unable to leave the facility without supervision. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, a deficiency was cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) (LIC809D) was discussed and provided to Assistant Administrator Ghislaine and Oscar Ramasar. Along with a copy of the appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(1)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 1, 2025
87211 Reporting Requirements (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency..seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified..(D)..unexplained absence of any resident. Based on record review, licensee failed to meet this requirement by not ensuring disapperance of resident was reported to licensing agency within seven days of occurence, which poses a potential health, saftey or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee stated to submit written report of all occurences within seven day such as those stated within regulation to licensing department.
Feb 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Smoke detectors are not operable
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrators Ghislaine and Oscar Ramasar and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of facility tour and staff interviews. LPA Hernandez observed one (1) smoke detector to not be working. During investigation, LPA Hernandez was accompanied with Corona Fire Department Inspector Daniel Calabrese where it was observed one smoke detector located in facility hallway did not have battery placed into it correctly as well as it not being hard wired. Substantiated Based on the evidence gathered during today’s investigation, the one (1) allegation listed above are deemed SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation are valid because the preponderance of evidence the standard has been met. During today’s visit, one (1) deficiency were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) and LIC9099D was discussed and provided to Administrator Ghislaine and Oscar Ramasar along with a copy of the appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 5, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250205105800
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 12, 2025
Maintenance and Operation 87303 (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, the facility administrators did not comply with the section cited above by not ensuring all smoke alarms were in working ability. This poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 5, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee stated to ensure all smoke alarms are hard wired and batteries are replaced to ensure alarms are in working ability and submit photo documentation to LPA Hernandez by Plan of Correction (POC) due date.
Dec 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff handled resident in a rough manner.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrators Oscar & Ghislaine Ramasar and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of staff and resident interviews and request of documentation. For the allegation, Staff handled resident in a rough manner. LPA Hernandez conducted (4) staff interviews. During the staff interviews (4) out of the (4) staff stated they have not handled any resident in care in a rough manner or witnessed any resident being handled in a rough manner by staff at facility. LPA Hernandez conducted (7) resident interviews. During resident interviews (5) out of the (7) residents stated staff at facility have not handled them in a rough manner. (5) out of the (7) residents stated all staff treat them with respect and help them whenever they need assistance. Unsubstantiated (2) out of the (7) residents in care stated they have witnessed staff treat other residents in a rough manner. (2) out of the (7) residents stated staff have not treated them in a rough manner. Based on the evidence gathered during today’s investigation, the allegations listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to Administrator Oscar and Ghislaine Ramasar.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2024 · control 56-AS-20241025110240
Mar 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with Licensee Ghislaine Ramasar and was granted entry to the facility. Licensed capacity is (15) current census (14). LPA was accompanied by Licensee Ghislaine Ramasar to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected client bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to clients in care. There was a designated office for client/staff files. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of clients in care. Facility has a variety of food available for clients. Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Record Review: LPA reviewed (5) client files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA reviewed (5) client medications. LPA also reviewed (2) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, training's, and health screenings. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) was discussed and provided to Licensee Ghislaine Ramasar.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 15, 2024
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Riverside County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Crest Home for the Elderly
Norco · Mid-size home · 0.5 mi away
$3,850 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Zencare
Riverside · Small home · 1.6 mi away
$5,300 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Early Bird Care Home
Jurupa Valley · Small home · 1.7 mi away
$4,500 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Early Bird Care Home 2
Jurupa Valley · Small home · 1.7 mi away
$4,750 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Lagoon Home Care
Jurupa Valley · Small home · 1.7 mi away
$4,900 a month to start · Covelight estimate
All About Caring Home 1
Norco · Small home · 1.8 mi away
$4,900 a month to start · Covelight estimate