Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Early Bird Care Home

Small home·Licensed for 6·Jurupa Valley, California

Licensed since 2023Licence #335530128Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,500 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,550
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedOctober 25, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · September 23, 2026
  • Last state visitJuly 30, 2026CDSS inspection record

Early Bird Care Home is a small care home in Jurupa Valley — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2023. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Early Bird Care Home

Is Early Bird Care Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Early Bird Care Home licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Early Bird Care Home been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 7 state visits over the same years.

Is Early Bird Care Home still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Early Bird Care Home cost?

$4,500 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,650–$5,550. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size in Jurupa Valley that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $4,500 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Early Bird Care Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Wp Enterprise LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Can Early Bird Care Home keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Early Bird Care Home license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “EARLY BIRD CARE HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #335530128. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Wp Enterprise LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 7 state inspection visits since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 7 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 30, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY.BEDROOMS 2,3,4,5 APPROVED FOR NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,500a month to start

Likely $3,650–$5,550

From 13 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,500a month

Likely $3,650–$5,750

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,500likely $3,650–$5,550

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,650–$5,750
$4,500
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,300–$8,850
$6,500

Costs & moving in

How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

13 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,000–$5,650.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 13 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 11860 Confluence Dr, Jurupa Valley, CA 91752Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2024, the state has filed 7 documents for this home, and its records count 7 visits since 2023. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 30, 2026.

On file since
2024
State visits
7
Most recent visit
July 30, 2026
Occupied · October 25, 2024 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated October 25, 2024. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2023.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020251102024450

The last 36 months — 7 of 7 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Jul 30, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection LPA met with staff Juan Fuentes and was granted entry to the facility. The facility is a (4) bedroom, (3), bathroom home, with a kitchen/dining area, living room, and attached garage. Licensed capacity is (6) current census (6). LPA was accompanied by staff Juan Fuentes to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of residents in care. Facility has a variety of food available for residents . Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Record Review: LPA reviewed (3) resident file for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA also verified (3) resident's medications and (2) Hospice Files. LPA also reviewed (2) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, trainings, and health screening. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) was discussed and provided to staff Juan Fuentes.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 30, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Nov 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection LPA met with staff Juan Fuentes and was granted entry to the facility. The facility is a (4) bedroom, (3), bathroom home, with a kitchen/dining area, living room, and attached garage. Licensed capacity is (6) current census (4). LPA was accompanied by Administrator Patsara Chantharaseth, to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of residents in care. Facility has a variety of food available for residents . Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Record Review: LPA reviewed (2) resident file for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA also verified (2) resident's medications and (2) Hospice Files. LPA also reviewed (2) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, trainings, and health screening. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) was discussed and provided to Administrator Patsara Chantharaseth.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 3, 2025
20244 state visits · 5 documents
Oct 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff handles resident in a rough manner. Staff isolated resident from other residents in the facility.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Licensee William Choi and Licensee Patsara Chantharaseth explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of staff interviews, resident interviews and record review. LPA Rico conducted (4) staff interviews and (3) resident interviews. For the allegation, Staff handles resident in a rough manner. During staff interviews, 4 out of the 4 staff stated they have not handled their residents in a rough manner. 4 out of the 4 staff also stated they have not witnessed a staff assist a resident in a rough manner. Unsubstantiated During resident interviews, 2 out of the 3 residents stated staff have not assisted them in rough manner. 1 out of the 3 resident’s was unable to corroborate on the above allegation. In addition, LPA requested video surveillance from the facility’s common areas. LPA did not observe R1 be assisted in a rough manner. For the allegation, Staff isolated resident from other residents in the facility. During staff interviews, 4 out of the 4 staff stated they have not isolated resident from other residents in the facility. 3 out of the 4 staff stated that they encourage residents to be in the common areas and participate in activities. During resident interviews, 2 out of the 3 residents stated they are allowed to spend time with other residents in the living room, dining area and patio. 2 out 3 residents stated they have not felt isolated. 1 out of the 3 resident’s was unable to corroborate on the above allegation. Based on the evidence found during the investigation, the two (2) allegations listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to Licensee William Choi and Licensee Patsara Chantharaseththe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 25, 2024 · control 56-AS-20241001132605
Oct 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff inappropriately touched resident in care. Staff forced resident to be spoon fed.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Licensee William Choi and Licensee Patsara Chantharaseth and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of staff interviews, resident interviews and record review. LPA Rico conducted (4) staff interviews and (4) resident interviews. For the allegation, Staff inappropriately touched resident in care. During staff interviews, 4 out of the 4 staff stated they have not touched a resident inappropriately in care. 4 out of the 4 staff stated they have not witnessed a staff inappropriately touch a resident. During resident interviews 3 out of the 4 residents stated they have not been touched inappropriately. 1 out of the 4 resident was unable to corroborate on the above allegation. Unsubstantiated For the allegation, Staff forced resident to be spoon fed. During staff interviews, 4 out of the 4 staff stated they have not forced a resident to be spoon fed. 4 out of the 4 staff stated that residents are independent with meals but will assist resident’s when needed. During resident interviews 3 out of the 4 residents stated they have not been forced to be spoon fed. 1 out of the 4 residents was unable to corroborate on the above allegation. Based on the evidence found during the investigation, the two (2) allegations listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to Licensee William Choi and Licensee Patsara Chantharaset.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 25, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240503162127
Oct 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico met with Licensee William Choi and Licensee Patsara Chantharaseth to initiate case management visit. The investigation consisted of observation, interviews, and a review of pertinent documentation. During record review, LPA Rico review staff criminal record clearance and staff schedules. LPA Rico observed S1 has been working at the facility since 9/8/2024 without a criminal record clearance. In addition, LPA asked the Licensee if S1 had received their clearance letter. Licensee indicated S1 fingerprint is in process. LPA informed the Licensee that S1 is not allowed to work at the facility until they have an eligible clearance. During today’s visit the facility a deficiency will be issued and Civil Penalties were assessed with the amount of $500.00 for S1 An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC809), (LIC809D), (LIC421BG) and Appeal Rights were discussed and provided to Licensee William Choi and Patsara Chantharaseth.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 4, 2024

87355 Criminal Record Clearance (e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (1) Obtain a California clearance... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interview, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not obtaining Staff #1 (S1) criminal record clearance before allowing S1 to work at the facility since 9/8/2024 which pose immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee stated to not allow S1 to work at the facility without obtaining the required Criminal background clearance and submit copy of Staff Schedule and Personnel Summary Report (LIC500) to LPA Rico at Plan of Correction due date. POC 10/4/2024

Sep 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto visited the facility unannounced to complete a comprehensive annual inspection. LPA Prieto met with Chantharaseth, Patsara Licensee explained the purpose of the visit. Today’s inspection included a facility tour, record review, and interviews with staff and residents. The facility is five (5) bedrooms and three (3) bathrooms of which four (4) bedrooms are used for residents in care. The facility also has kitchen/dining area, living area, covered patio, and attached garage. Licensed capacity is six (6), and the facility is at maximum capacity. Physical Plant: There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility temperature is 76 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; each room included required furniture such as mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were functional. LPA Prieto observed adequate furniture and lighting throughout the facility. The hot water temperature tested at 117.0 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility has operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms, which LPA Prieto tested during the visit. LPA Prieto observed personal rights posters, Licensing documents, and the disaster plan posted throughout the facility. LPA Prieto observed that cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items are kept secure and inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated storage space for client/staff files. LPA Prieto observed medications locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for residents in care. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient in number for residents in care. The facility has a variety of food available for clients. Dishes, cups, and utensils were also appropriately stored. Care & Supervision: The facility staff is sufficient in number for the care and supervision of residents in care. All staff members working in the facility have criminal record clearance through the department. Record Review: LPA Prieto reviewed three (3) client files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. Medications were audited randomly and appeared to be dispensed appropriately by staff members. LPA Prieto reviewed three (3) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, training, and health screenings. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. LPA Prieto conducted an exit interview with Chantharaseth , where a copy of this report was discussed and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 19, 2024
May 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On 05/07/2024 at 01:30 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPAs) Melody Brown and Sarina Ramirez met with Licensee/Administrator Patsara Chantharaseth to initiate Case Management Visit. The investigation consisted of observation, interviews, and a review of pertinent documentation. During the facility visit today, 05/07/2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Melody Brown and Sarina Ramirez requested a copy of the facility’s Personnel Report (LIC500) and LPAs Brown and Ramirez reviewed document received and cross reference Guardian database and observed that Staff #2 (S), and Staff #3 (S3) have their background clearance, but they were not associated to the facility as their criminal background clearance was not transferred to the facility. Moreover, during the facility visit today, 05/07/2024, LPAs Brown and Ramirez informed Licensee/Administrator Chantharaseth that deficiency will be issued and Civil Penalties were assessed during the facility visit today with the amount of $300.00 for S2 and $200.00 for S3 and will continue to be assessed of $100.00 per day per citation until corrected for not transferring criminal record clearance for S2 and S3 for not S2 and S3 criminal background clearance to the facility. In addition, during the tour of the facility, LPAs Brown and Ramirez observed two (2) beds set-up in the common area of the home. LPAs Brown and Ramirez explained to Licensee/Administrator Chantharaseth that no room commonly used for other purposes shall be used as sleeping room. Deficiency will be issued. Furthermore, LPAs Brown and Ramirez observed that no staff's schedule to work at night shift and per documents review, the facility has a dementia resident and LPAs observed no night supervision at the facility. Deficiency will be issued. An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC809), LIC809D, LIC421BG and Appeal Rights were discussed and provided to Licensee/Administrator Patsara Chantharaseth.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 7, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: May 17, 2024

87355 Criminal Record Clearance (e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing... (2) Request a transfer of a criminal record clearance...This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interviews and records review, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not transferring Staff #2 (S2) and Staff #3 (S3) criminal background clearance to the facility before allowing S2 and S3 to work at the facility which pose potential safety risks to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 7, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee stated to transfer S2 and S3 criminal bacjground clearance to the facility and submit proof to LPA Brown on Plan of Correction (POC) due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87307(a)(2)(B) · Plan of correction due date: May 17, 2024

87307 Personal Accommodations and Services (a) Living accommodations and grounds shall be related to the facility's function. The facility shall be large enough to provide comfortable living accommodations and privacy... (2) Resident bedrooms shall be provided which meet, at a minimum,...(B) No room commonly used for other purposes shall be used as a sleeping room... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interviews and records review, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above by using the common room as a sleeping area for staffs which poses potential health, safety and personal rights risks to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 7, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee stated to transfer staffs sleeping area to a bedroom and submit proof to LPA Brown on POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87705(c)(4)(A) · Plan of correction due date: May 8, 2024

87705 Care of Persons with Dementia (c) Licensees who accept and retain residents with dementia...(4) There is an adequate number of direct care staff to support...(A) In addition to requirements specified in Section 87415, Night Supervision, a facility with fewer than 16 residents shall have at least one night staff person awake and on duty if any resident with dementia is determined... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interviews and records review, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not scheduling a staff to work on a night shift to provide night supervision to a dementia resident which pose immediate health, safety, and personal rights risks to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 7, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee stated to schedule a staff to work on a night shift for night supervision and submit proof of updated staff schedule or Personnel Summary (LIC500) to LPA Brown on PLan of Correction (POC) due date.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Faith, culture & language

  • Languages spoken by caregiversKorean · Thai · Spanish

    Reported on aging.networkofcare.org · seen September 9, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Riverside County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Riverside County