Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Cottages at the Colony of Sherman Oaks #4

Small home·Licensed for 6·Sherman Oaks, California

Licensed since 2022Licence #195850184Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,250 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,250
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedJuly 28, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · August 9, 2026
  • Last state visitJuly 28, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderColony Care of Sherman Oaks/Valley Glen, LLCSince 2022 · 3 licensed homes

Cottages at the Colony of Sherman Oaks #4 is a small care home in Sherman Oaks — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2022. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Cottages at the Colony of Sherman Oaks #4

Is Cottages at the Colony of Sherman Oaks #4 licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Cottages at the Colony of Sherman Oaks #4 licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Cottages at the Colony of Sherman Oaks #4 been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Cottages at the Colony of Sherman Oaks #4 still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Cottages at the Colony of Sherman Oaks #4 cost?

$4,250 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,500–$5,250. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Cottages at the Colony of Sherman Oaks #4 take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Colony Care of Sherman Oaks/Valley Glen, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Colony Care of Sherman Oaks/Valley Glen, LLC — at least 8 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Sherman Oaks Hospital is 0.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Cottages at the Colony of Sherman Oaks #4 keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Cottages at the Colony of Sherman Oaks #4 license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “COTTAGES AT THE COLONY OF SHERMAN OAKS #4”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #195850184. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Colony Care of Sherman Oaks/Valley Glen, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 28, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM #5. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,250a month to start

Likely $3,500–$5,250

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,250a month

Likely $3,500–$5,450

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,250likely $3,500–$5,250

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,500–$5,450
$4,250
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,100–$8,600
$6,250
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

24 homes like this within 9 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$7,500.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 5430 Tyrone Avenue, Sherman Oaks, CA 91401Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 9 documents for this home, and its records count 9 visits since 2022. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on July 28, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2021
State visits
9
Most recent visit
July 28, 2026
Occupied at that visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated June 10, 2024 to July 28, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2022.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262202025220202422020231102021220

The last 36 months — 6 of 9 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff speak inappropriately to a resident in care Staff do not treat a resident with respect

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Quoc Huynh conducted a subsequent visit to deliver findings for the above allegations. The LPA arrived at 3:14PM and met with Administrator Anna Lee. Entrance interview conducted. On 06/03/2026, LPA Huynh conducted an initial complaint visit. Between 2:01PM and 4PM, the LPA conducted a physical plant tour and interviewed four (4) residents, two (2) staff, and the Administrator. Records were provided via email on 06/04/2026. During today’s visit, the LPA and Staff toured the physical plant at 3:17PM, and no immediate concerns were observed. The following was then determined: Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated Allegations: “Staff speak inappropriately to a resident in care” and “Staff do not treat a resident with respect” It was reported that Staff #1 (S1), Staff #2 (S2), and the Administrator spoke inappropriately and did not treat Resident #1 (R1) with respect. R1 described S1 as “rude” and “obnoxious,” stating that S1 would often badger R1 after they asked simple questions. R1 did not provide information regarding S2’s conduct and reported that the Administrator was very helpful in resolving concerns. R1 stated that they could no longer tolerate the treatment they received and requested relocation. They further disclosed that they also had conflict with other residents and their families. R1 expressed satisfaction with the facility they were relocated to and stated that the two (2) facilities “were like night and day.” Interview with S1, S2, and other residents revealed that R1 was frequently disruptive, initiated arguments with staff and residents, and was not satisfied with the accommodations made. Staff reported responding to R1’s behavior by remaining calm and explaining the facility’s rules and expectations, which R1 refused to accept. When staff needed assistance in managing resident behaviors, they communicated with the Administrator for guidance. Residents did not have concerns regarding staff conduct or level of service provided. They stated that S1 and S2 go above and beyond to ensure residents’ needs are met and remain respectful. Residents acknowledged that R1 frequently caused trouble with staff over minor issues and often complained; however, the residents did not agree with R1’s claims. The residents additionally did not observe S1 or S2 act maliciously or treat R1 with disrespect. The Administrator expressed no concerns regarding staff performance and was confident in staff’s ability to handle all situations appropriately. For more difficult situations, staff maintained open communication with the Administrator and utilized them as a resource. The Administrator stated that due to R1’s mental diagnoses, their perception of reality was severely affected, and R1 frequently attempted to manipulate staff into bending policies for their benefit. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Due to R1’s frequent complaints, the Administrator relocated S1 and S2 to another facility to mitigate ongoing issues. R1 continued to complain about the replacement staff because they did not operate the same way S1 and S2 did. R1 was ultimately relocated to another facility operated by the same Licensee and Administrator, where it was reported that R1 was doing well and happier. Physician’s Report dated 05/31/2026 documented diagnoses for R1 including schizophrenia, depression, bipolar disorder, and anxiety. Psychiatric visit summaries indicated R1 saw their psychiatrist once a month and experienced “persistent paranoia, anxiety, and inconsistent reporting of incidents involving facility staff.” R1’s paranoid behavior was worsening, and medications were adjusted or discontinued accordingly. Staff were to monitor R1 and maintain a calm, structured environment. Based on interviews and record review, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the violations did or did not occur; therefore, the allegations are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No deficiency cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was reviewed and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 28, 2026 · control 29-AS-20260602080806
Mar 10, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Quoc Huynh arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 10:30AM. The LPA met with the Administrator Anna Lee and informed them of the reason for the visit. Entrance interview conducted. Beginning at 11:08AM, the LPA and Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards, and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: OUTDOOR AREA: The rear yard had a shaded patio area equipped with furniture in good condition for resident and visitor use. Exits and passageways were free of obstruction. There were two (2) emergency side exits with a self-latching gate. There was a shed that contained storage and emergency water. The facility had a secured garage that was converted into two (2) staff rooms and had general storage and laundry machines in operating condition. COMMON AREAS: At the time of the visit, living room and dining room furniture was observed to be in good condition. A fireplace was observed in the living room that was screened and inoperable. Required postings were observed in the entryway. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature throughout the visit and nightlights were observed throughout the hallways. Report Continued on LIC 809-C KITCHEN: The LPA observed knives stored inaccessible in the kitchen. Kitchen appliances were clean and in operable condition. The facility had a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Food in the refrigerator and freezer were observed to be properly stored with labels and dates. Emergency food was stored in the pantry with a secured medication closet nearby. BEDROOMS/RESTROOMS: There were seven (7) total bedrooms: six (6) private resident rooms and one (1) secured staff room. The facility was approved for one (1) bedridden resident in Bedroom #5. Bedroom #6 had a direct exit to the outside. Bedrooms were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Extra linens were stored in the hallway cabinet. There were three (3) total restrooms in the facility: one (1) private and two (2) shared. Restrooms were clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-slip surfaces. All restrooms were sufficiently stocked with soap, paper products, and displayed hand washing signs. Hot water was tested and measured between 107.6 degrees F and 110.7 degrees F which is within the required range per regulation. RECORDS: Record review began at 11:29AM. Resident records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, physician's report, admissions agreement, and consent forms. All records were in order. Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All records were in order. INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLAN: During today's visit, LPA reviewed the facility's infection control plan and emergency disaster plan. Both documents were observed to be complete and reviewed annually as required. Fire extinguishers were observed and last serviced on 10/07/2025. Emergency disaster drills are conducted quarterly, with the last documented drill on 03/02/2026. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were tested at 11:56AM and were operational. Report Continued on LIC 809-C MEDICATIONS: Medication review began at 11:59AM. Medications were centrally stored and kept inaccessible in a closet. Medications were observed for two (2) residents. Medications were labeled and checked for expiration dates and were properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. No errors observed during the medication review. No deficiency cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was reviewed and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 10, 2026
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Apr 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Martha Arroyo conducted an unannounced Annual Continuation Visit to the facility to continue the annual inspection visit initiated on 02/25/2025. Upon arrival, the LPA was greeted by staff who then contacted the Administrator, Anna D. Lee telephonically. The Administrator arrived at approximately 10:22 a.m., and at this time, the reason for the visit was explained. Entrance interview. During today’s visit, at 10:24 a.m., the LPA along with the Administrator toured the physical plant areas to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: The LPA inspected the kitchen area at 10:28 a.m. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. The LPA observed furniture in the common areas to be in good condition. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature. The LPA observed required postings by the main entrance. There is a fireplace in the living room; adequately screened. The LPA observed six (6) resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately and had sufficient lighting. The LPA observed two (2) resident restrooms, which were clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid surfaces. The bathrooms were sufficiently stocked with supplies and paper towels. The LPA observed cameras in the common areas and outside perimeter. All indoor and outdoor passageways were free from obstructions in case of an emergency. No bodies of water noted at the time of the visit. Report Continued on LIC 809C... Report Continued from LIC 809... Records: Records review began at approximately 10:35 a.m. Five (5) resident records were reviewed for, but not limited to: signed admission agreements, current medical assessments with TB results, Consent for Treatment form, and current appraisal. All resident files were in order. Three (3) personnel records including the current Administrator’s file were reviewed for, but not limited to: personnel records, health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. Files were complete. Administrator’s Certificate is active until 01/11/2027. INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLANNING: During today’s visit, the LPA reviewed the facility's infection control practices and the facility's emergency disaster plan. Documents were observed to be reviewed and updated annually as required. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. Fire extinguisher was observed to be fully charged and serviced on 10/08/2024. Emergency disaster drills are conducted quarterly; last drill was conducted on 03/03/2025. Medications: Medications review began at approximately 11:55 a.m. Medications are centrally stored in a locked cabinet adjacent to the kitchen. Medications appeared to be given as prescribed. Exit interview conducted. No citations issued. Report was reviewed and a copy was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 21, 2025
Feb 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Martha Arroyo arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. Upon arrival, the LPA met with staff, Claudette Marasigan and explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview conducted. Starting at 11:20AM, the LPA along with Staff toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: Facility is a single-story residence that consists of six (6) resident bedrooms, three (3) staff rooms, and three (3) restrooms. The LPA observed one (1) fire extinguisher which was fully charged and last serviced 10/08/2024. The smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly at the time of the visit. There is a fire door by the main hallway leading into the resident bedrooms. Facility has an adequate amount of emergency food and water; properly stored. The LPA observed all required postings in the hallway near the entrance area. The auditory alarms on the exit doors were tested and functioned properly at the time of visit. KITCHEN: The LPA inspected the kitchen/food service area at 11:40AM. Knives and sharps were observed locked and inaccessible in a kitchen drawer. Kitchen appliances were in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Refrigerator and food pantry were checked for proper labels and expiration dates. At 11:41AM, the hot water temperature was measured in the kitchen sink, and it measured at 106.5 degrees Fahrenheit. COMMON AREAS: At the time of the visit, furniture in the common areas was observed to be in good condition. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature. The fireplace was adequately screened at the time of the visit. There is a working telephone on premises. Report Continued on LIC 809C... Report Continued from LIC 809... The LPA observed a complete first-aid kit and manual. Cameras observed in the common areas. No obstructions or hazards were observed inside or out. RESTROOMS: The LPA observed all resident bathrooms. Bathrooms were clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid surfaces. The bathrooms were sufficiently stocked with supplies and paper towels. Starting at 11:26AM, the hot water temperature was measured in resident bathrooms, and they measured within the required range at the time of the visit. Proper hand washing signs were observed posted inside bathrooms. BEDROOMS: There are six (6) bedrooms for resident use. All bedrooms are designated as private rooms. All resident rooms were observed to be furnished appropriately with linens, appropriate furnishings, and sufficient lighting. The LPA observed a closet by the hallway with additional clean linens and towels for resident use. LAUNDRY ROOM: The laundry room, which includes a washer and a dryer were observed locked and inaccessible to residents at the time of the visit. Detergents and cleaning solutions were observed in a locked closet inside the laundry room inaccessible to residents in care. BACKYARD: The backyard has a covered patio area with patio furniture for resident use. The LPA observed a shed for storage purposes. All passageways were observed to be clear of any obstructions. There are two (2) side gates with latching mechanisms and auditory alarms. Cameras were observed in the outside perimeter. No bodies of water noted at the time of the visit. INTERVIEWS: The LPA conducted three (3) resident interviews during the inspection. No concerns were noted. MEDICATIONS: Medications are centrally stored in a locked cabinet adjacent to the kitchen. The LPA will review medications at a later date. FILE REVIEW: The LPA will review facility files at a later date. Due to time constraints an LPA will return to complete the annual at a later date. No citations issued. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Jun 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff took inappropriate pictures of resident's body.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings for the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator Anna Lee and explained the reason for the visit. On 05/02/2024, the Department received a complaint regarding staff taking inappropriate pictures of Resident #1’s (R1) body. The complaint was referred to Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to Investigator Heidy Bendana. On 05/03/2024, from 9:55am to 11:45am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an unannounced visit to investigate the allegation listed above. LPA Urena met with administrator Anna Lee and explained the reason for the visit. At 10:05am, the LPA interviewed the administrator, and at 10:30am the LPA requested and reviewed records pertinent to the complaint. The LPA advised the administrator that the case was referred to the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to Investigator Heidy Bendana. Continues on LIC 9099C... Unsubstantiated Pg. 2 On 05/08/2024, from approximately 9:38am to 10:23am, Investigator Bendana conducted interviews with R1, the administrator and facility field supervisor (S1). In addition, the Investigator reviewed photographs and facility file documents related to R1. A review of the Home Health Certification & Plan of Care for R1 listed the start date as 01/21/2023. Diagnosis included zoster (shingles), heart failure and chronic pain. R1 is a fall risk with limited ambulation. R1 is forgetful at times, needs prompting under stressful or unfamiliar conditions. R1’s Physician’s Report, dated 11/06/2023, lists the primary diagnosis as mild cognitive disorder and cerebral infraction with sequelae. R1 is listed to be confused/disoriented at times, depressed but can follow instructions. R1 requires assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and is non-ambulatory. The Resident Appraisal for R1, dated 01/12/2024, documents R1 uses a walker and requires assistance and supervision during ambulation. R1 has periods of forgetfulness and confusion, has no interest in social activities, and is in bed most of the time. A review of the Photo/Video Consent & Release document revealed that the photographs are not made part of the resident record. Photographs are periodically taken for internal or safety purposes, such as to be shared with medical personnel. Text printouts were reviewed, dated 03/12/2024 at 1:21pm, the administrator texted R1’s resident representative regarding photo and video consent forms. The administrator explained skin checks are done weekly and photos are used to document no skin issue. The form was signed 04/03/2024 by R1’s resident representative. During the investigation, the administrator provided a printout of R1’s photographs taken. On 05/06/2024, at approximately 3:34pm hours, S1 conducted a skin check on R1. The skin check consisted of vitals. It is noted R1 had on and off pain in their legs and back. No skin breakdown noticed. Photographs of heel, feet, and bottom of both feet were taken. On 01/18/2024, at approximately 9:38am, S1 conducted a skin check on R1. The photographs are of R1’s torso and chest area affected by shingles. R1 is lifting R1’s top, nipples are not visible, R1’s face is not visible. Photograph is focused on the affected area. Continues on LIC 9099 C...pg. 3 Pg. 3 The investigation further revealed, on 05/02/2024, at 3:11pm, the Los Angeles Police Department, Van Nuys Patrol Division officers responded to the facility due to a phone call from R1. A card was left indicating a report only was taken by law enforcement. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, R1 stated they were not touched inappropriately by facility staff. R1 stated S1 conducts skin checks weekly to check for bed sores. Interviews and documents show skin checks are conducted weekly by S1. S1 asks and informs residents about photographs taken to document bed sores, shingles, or redness. The photographs taken were not sexual in nature. During the interview, R1 showed signs of confusion. Nevertheless, R1 felt safe in the facility. R1 disclosed they had previously refused photographs to be taken and S1 respected R1’s request. Documentation provided by the administrator, included a signed consent for photographs; signed by R1’s resident representative. Based on the information obtained and statements made, the Department did not find sufficient evidence to support the allegation that staff took inappropriate pictures of R1’s body. Therefore, the allegation “staff took inappropriate pictures of resident's body” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted, copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 10, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240502114023
Mar 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Emily Peraldi and Martha Arroyo arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. At 12:30 p.m., the LPAs met with the Administrators, Anna Bernice D Lee and Claudette Marasigan and explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview. At 12:45 p.m., the LPA along with the Administrator, toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The facility is a single-story residential home with nine (9) bedrooms, six (6) for resident use and three (3) for staff use, two (2) of which are inside the ADU and three (3) bathrooms. The LPAs observed the Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) that was previously the garage. The Administrator stated that the ADU will not be for resident use. BEDROOMS: The LPA observed resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Inside temperature was maintained at a comfortable level. LPA observed a two (2) hallway closet with extra towels and linens for resident use. RESTROOMS: Restrooms are relatively clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid mats. Starting at 12:56 p.m., the hot water temperature was measured in bathrooms, and measured between 108.5 and 110.4 degrees Fahrenheit. The sinks had sufficient liquid soap, and paper towels. Signs are posted throughout the facility restrooms to promote handwashing. KITCHEN: The LPAs observed the kitchen and dining area. Knives are stored in a locked kitchen drawer. Kitchen appliances are in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Food labels were observed for expiration dates. At 12:49 p.m., the kitchen water temperature was measured at 111.7 degrees Fahrenheit. Medications are located in a locked cabinet adjacent to the kitchen. A first aid kit is located near the kitchen. Continued on LIC-809-C. OUTDOOR SPACE: At 12:46 p.m., the LPA observed the back patio which has a covered outdoor area with a table and chairs for resident use. There are two gates on each side of the house designated for an emergency exits. The property is gated. Passageways were free and clear from obstruction. There are no bodies of water on the premises. COMMON AREAS: The LPAs observed common areas to be relatively clean and properly furnished. The LPAs observed the fire extinguisher to be fully charged and last serviced on 10/12/2023. At 1:03 p.m., fire alarms/carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly. All exits have functioning auditory devices and were operational at the time of the visit. Facility telephone was observed during the time of the visit. LPAs observed cameras in the common areas, and throughout the exterior perimeter of the facility. Night lights were present in the hallways. Laundry units are located inside the laundry room. Cleaning solutions, chemicals and hazardous items were inaccessible and locked away inside a locked closet near the laundry area. RECORD REVIEWS: Starting at 12:35 p.m., the LPAs conducted a file review for all residents and staff regularly scheduled and observed the following: Staff have current first aid and training documentation showing required training completed. Resident records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. All files were in order. The Administrator’s certificate is active and expires on 01/11/2025. The LPAs requested a copy of valid liability insurance and Facility Emergency Plan and Infection Control Plan. The last emergency disaster drill took place on 03/01/2024. At approximately 1:50 p.m., the LPAs conducted a review of medication and medication documentation with staff for six (6) residents. Three (3) out of three (3) residents with PRN medications did not have the PRN authorization form on file. At 2:05 p.m., the Administrator printed out the PRN authorization forms for the three (3) residents. No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 9, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Colony Care of Sherman Oaks/Valley Glen, LLC, licensed since 2022, operates 3 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County