Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Chateau of Oaks

Small home·Licensed for 6·Sherman Oaks, California

Licensed since 2006Licence #197606758
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,300 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,300
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 5, 2026CDSS inspection record

Chateau of Oaks is a small care home in Sherman Oaks — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2006. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Chateau of Oaks

Is Chateau of Oaks licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Chateau of Oaks licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Chateau of Oaks been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2006, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 6 state visits over the same years.

Is Chateau of Oaks still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Chateau of Oaks cost?

$4,300 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,500–$5,300. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Chateau of Oaks take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Chateau of Oaks, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Sherman Oaks Hospital is 0.9 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Chateau of Oaks keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Chateau of Oaks license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “CHATEAU OF OAKS”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197606758. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Chateau of Oaks, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2006, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 6 state inspection visits since 2006, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2006, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 6 state visits in that period.
  • 0 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2006, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 5, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
APPROVED FOR SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH ONE (1) CAN BE BEDRIDDEN IN BEDROOM #5. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR ONE (1).

985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,300a month to start

Likely $3,500–$5,300

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,300a month

Likely $3,500–$5,500

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,300likely $3,500–$5,300

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,500–$5,500
$4,300
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,100–$8,650
$6,300
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

24 homes like this within 9 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,150–$7,550.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 15239 Camarillo Street, Sherman Oaks, CA 91403Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 6 documents for this home, and its records count 6 visits since 2006. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated August 5, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
6
Most recent visit
August 5, 2026

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints0typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2006.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262202025110202411020231102022110

The last 36 months — 4 of 6 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Quoc Huynh arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 9:37AM. The LPA met with the Licensee Rolando Lazatin. Entrance interview conducted. Beginning at 9:43AM, the LPA and Licensee toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards, and the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: COMMON AREAS: At the time of the visit, living room and dining room furniture was observed to be in good condition. A fireplace was observed to be properly screened and inoperable. Required postings were located above the fireplace. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature throughout the visit. Night lights and exit signs were observed throughout the facility. GARAGE: The facility’s garage contained general storage, extra facility supplies, a refrigerator with extra food, emergency water, and laundry machines. The laundry machines were observed to be in good condition and had locked cabinets above that contained detergent and cleaning supplies. The garage remained inaccessible to residents. Report Continued on LIC 809-C BEDROOMS/RESTROOMS: There were five (5) total bedrooms: four (4) private resident bedrooms and one (1) shared resident bedroom. Bedroom #5 had a direct exit to the outside. Bedrooms were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Extra linens were stored in a dresser located in the hallway. There were three (3) total restrooms in the facility, each shared. Restrooms were clean, sanitary, and in operating condition with grab bars and non-slip surfaces. All restrooms were sufficiently stocked with soap and paper products. Sink cabinets were locked and contained hygiene products. Hot water was tested and measured between 109 degrees F and 112.8 degrees F. OUTDOOR AREA: The surrounding grounds had one (1) shaded patio area equipped with furniture in good condition for resident and visitor use. The LPA observed three (3) locked sheds in the backyard that contained general storage. There were (2) emergency side exits with a self-latching mechanism that led to the front yard. The front yard had a driveway with a manual gate and a regular gate door for everyday use. All exits and passageways were free of obstruction. KITCHEN: The LPA observed knives stored inaccessible in a locked drawer. Cleaning supplies were stored inaccessible and locked under the sink. Kitchen appliances were clean and in operable condition. The facility had a supply of perishable and non-perishable food, as well as emergency food. Food in the refrigerator and freezer were observed to be properly stored with labels and dates. Medications and files were stored in a locked cabinet near the refrigerator. Two (2) fire extinguishers were observed and purchased on 06/26/2026. RECORDS: Record review began at 10:06AM. Resident records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, physician's report, admissions agreement, and consent forms. Resident #1 (R1)’s physician’s report dated 04/03/2026 did not document their diagnoses and was noted as “see attached,” with no attachment. The Licensee confirmed there were no attachments. The Licensee contacted R1’s physician and was unsuccessful in obtaining the complete record. Resident #2 (R2) did not have consent forms on file. Report Continued on LIC 809-C Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. Review of staff’s annual training revealed that they were not given the required twenty (20) hours of annual training, as they lacked the eight (8) hours of general training topics. INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLAN: During today's visit, LPA reviewed the facility's infection control plan and emergency disaster plan. The emergency disaster plan has not been updated since 09/04/2020 as answers to the plan pertained to COVID-19 and did not accurately address the emergency preparedness. Emergency disaster drills are conducted monthly, with the last documented drill on 08/03/2026. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were tested at 11:08AM and were operational. MEDICATIONS: Medication review began at 11:16AM. Medications were centrally stored and kept inaccessible in the kitchen. Medications were observed for two (2) residents. Medications were labeled and checked for expiration dates and were properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. Medications for Resident #3 (R3) were observed to have differing counts. The Licensee and staff reported that R3 is often hospitalized or refuses their medications, but do not document the occurrences. Pursuant to Title 22 CA Code of Regulations and/or Health and Safety Code, the following deficiencies were cited (Refer to LIC 809-D). Exit interview conducted. A copy of the appeal rights and report was reviewed and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2026

The state marks this report as 8 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 6. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Apr 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Quoc Huynh conducted an unannounced Case Management visit at 1:43PM. The LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. The Licensee Rolando Lazatin arrived at 2:31PM. Entrance interview conducted. Beginning at 1:50PM, the LPA conducted a physical plant tour with staff. On 07/27/2006, the facility was granted a fire clearance for a total of five (5) non-ambulatory residents. The floor plan indicated Bedroom #1 was a staff room and Bedrooms #2, #3, and #4 were resident bedrooms. Currently, the facility has a total of six (6) bedrooms. Bedroom #1 is utilized as a resident bedroom and Bedroom #4 was split into two (2) bedrooms with a built-in wall. The Licensee stated a building permit was not needed and did not have documentation. Staff confirmed that the new staff room was a previous hallway walk-in closet. Further record review revealed that on 06/28/2019, the facility had six (6) residents, however, it was only cleared for a capacity of five (5). On 08/07/2024, LPA Sandra Urena and Erica Mosley conducted an annual visit and observed the facility’s floor plan did not reflect what was on file with the Department. The facility was cited with a plan of correction to provide the Department with an updated floor plan and obtain a new fire clearance. The plan of correction was not met as a new fire clearance was not obtained. Report Continued on LIC 809-C On 08/05/2025, LPA Huynh conducted an annual visit and inquired about the fire clearance to which the Licensee stated they contacted the city for clearance the prior year and an inspection was conducted. The facility had corrections and provided them to the Inspector who allegedly provided verbal confirmation that the inspection was passed. However, no documentation of the inspection was provided. The LPA advised the Licensee to contact the city and obtain a new fire clearance. On 08/11/2025, the Department provided the city with a Fire Safety Inspection Request. On 02/27/2026, LPA Huynh contacted the city Inspector who stated that the last inspection was conducted on 08/30/2024 and was closed due to inactivity. On 03/09/2026, LPA Huynh contacted the Licensee via email requesting an update on the fire clearance and did not receive a response. During today’s visit, the Licensee stated that after the visit on 08/05/2025, they contacted the city and did no further follow up. The Licensee provided confirmation of a Pre-Inspection/Consultation Request dated 04/01/2026, however an inspection date has not been scheduled. The LPA also discussed reporting requirements and provided the Regional Office’s email to ensure all Incident Reports were received. An immediate civil penalty in the amount of $500 was assessed for a violation of the facility’s fire clearance. The Licensee was advised that failure to correct may result in additional civil penalties and the Licensee understood. Pursuant to Title 22 CA Code of Regulations and/or the Health and Safety Code, the following deficiency was cited (Refer to LIC 809-D). Exit interview conducted. A copy of the appeal rights and report was reviewed and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 8, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87202(a) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 9, 2026

(a) All facilities shall maintain a fire clearance approved by the city, county, or city and county fire department or district providing fire protection services, or the State Fire Marshal... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Licensee did not comply with the above cited section in the facility's fire clearance was not maintained which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 8, 2026

Plan of correction: The Licensee will provide an updated LIC 200, facility sketch, and confirmation of the scheduled pre-inspection to CCLD by the POC due date.

20251 state visit · 1 document
Aug 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Quoc Huynh arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 9:07AM. The LPA met with the Licensee Rolando Lazatin, who arrived at 10:00AM. Entrance interview conducted. Beginning at 10:07AM, the LPA and Licensee toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards, and the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The facility is a single-story residential home. The following was observed: KITCHEN: The LPA observed knives stored inaccessible in a locked drawer. Cleaning supplies were stored inaccessible and locked under the sink. Kitchen appliances were clean and in operable condition. The facility had a supply of perishable and non-perishable food, as well as emergency food. Food in the refrigerator and freezer were observed to be properly stored with labels and dates. Medications and files were stored in a locked cabinet near the refrigerator. One (1) fire extinguisher was observed and purchased on 07/29/2025. COMMON AREAS: At the time of the visit, living room and dining room furniture was observed to be in good condition. A fireplace was observed to be properly screened and inoperable. Required postings were located above the fireplace. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature throughout the visit. Night lights and exit signs were observed throughout the facility. Report Continued on LIC 809-C GARAGE: The facility’s garage contained general storage, extra facility supplies, a refrigerator with extra food, emergency water, and laundry machines. The laundry machines were observed to be in good condition and had locked cabinets above that contained detergent and cleaning supplies. The garage remained inaccessible to residents. BEDROOMS/RESTROOMS: There were five (5) total bedrooms: three (3) private resident bedrooms, one (1) shared resident bedroom, and one (1) staff room. Bedroom #5 had a direct exit to the outside. Bedrooms were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Extra linens were stored in a dresser located in the hallway and in resident bedrooms. There were three (3) total restrooms in the facility: two (2) shared common restrooms located in the hallways and one (1) private restroom attached to Bedroom #3. Restrooms were clean, sanitary, and in operating condition with grab bars and non-slip surfaces. All restrooms were sufficiently stocked with soap and paper products. Sink cabinets were locked and contained hygiene products. Hot water was tested and measured between 105.8 degrees F and 108.5 degrees F, which is within the required range per regulation. OUTDOOR AREA: The surrounding grounds had one (1) shaded patio area equipped with furniture in good condition for resident and visitor use. The LPA observed three (3) locked sheds in the backyard that contained general storage. There was one (1) emergency exit located on one side of the facility with a self-latching mechanism that led to the front yard. The front yard had a driveway with a manual gate and a regular gate door for everyday use. All exits and passageways were free of obstruction. RECORDS: Record review began at 10:34AM. Resident records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, physician's report, admissions agreement, and consent forms. All records were in order. Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All records were in order. Report Continued on LIC 809-C INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLAN: During today's visit, LPA reviewed the facility's infection control plan and emergency disaster plan. The emergency disaster plan was observed to be complete and reviewed annually as required. The Licensee was unable to locate the infection control plan at this time. Emergency disaster drills are conducted monthly, with the last documented drill on 07/23/2025. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were tested at 10:31AM and were operational. MEDICATIONS: Medication review began at 1:03PM. Medications were centrally stored and kept inaccessible in the kitchen. Medications were observed for three (3) residents. Medications were labeled and checked for expiration dates and were properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. Three (3) out of three (3) residents were prescribed PRN (as needed) medications. The facility staff administered PRN medications to residents everyday with no documentation of the administration. Resident #1 (R1) was prescribed one (1) PRN medication: Docusate Sodium. Resident #2 (R2) was prescribed three (3) PRN medications: Amlodipine Besylate, AllerClear, and Tylenol. Resident #3 (R3) was prescribed two (2) PRN medications: Midodrine HCL and Acetaminophen. R1 had a PRN Authorization Letter dated 08/21/2017 for Magnesium Hydroxide, which R1 was no longer prescribed. The Licensee did not obtain PRN Authorization Letters for R2 and R3. The Licensee plans to contact Physicians and the Pharmacy to clarify the PRN medications and obtain Authorization Letters. Pursuant to Title 22 CA Code of Regulations and/or Health and Safety Code, the following deficiencies were cited (Refer to LIC 809-D). Exit interview conducted. A copy of the Appeal Rights and report was reviewed and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Aug 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Sandra Urena and Erica Mosley arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual inspection at 10:00 a.m. LPAs were greeted by staff. The Administrator Rolando Lazatin arrived shortly thereafter, and the LPAs explained the reason for the visit. At 10:20 a.m., LPAs, staff and the administrator conducted a tour inside, and outside the facility to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. KITCHEN: Knives are stored in a locked cabinet drawer. Kitchen appliances were in operable condition. The facility has enough supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Freezer and refrigerator are stocked with a variety of foods. Emergency food supply is adequate for six residents and two staff. Toxic materials are locked, and out of reach of residents. Upon inspection, at 10:28 a.m., LPAs noticed a box with medications sitting in an area between the living room and kitchen area, and accessible to residents in care. Additionally, LPAs observed three small lighters in a kitchen drawer accessible to residents in care. Water temperature was withing regulation limits. BEDROOMS: Five bedrooms were observed to be furnished appropriately with appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Linens are clean and in good condition. Extra linens were observed in the hallway cabinet. COMMON AREAS: The common seating area, and dining room furniture was observed to be clean and in good condition. Fire extinguisher was observed to be purchased on 07/23/2024. The walls and flooring were observed to be clean and in good condition. Continues on LIC 809C… BATHROOM: Bathrooms were observed to be clean; shower area was in clean condition with grab bars, and a non-skid mat available. Hand washing signs were displayed, and enough soap, and paper products in each restroom. Water temperature was withing regulation limits. OUTDOOR: Backyard has a patio area and has patio shade umbrella and patio furniture for residents’ use. No open bodies of water were noted. RECORDS: Records review began at 11:22 a.m. Residents’ records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, medical records, admissions agreement, and consent forms. Two out of three residents’ records were missing an updated appraisal assessment. Two residents’ files were not available for review, licensee stated that the files were damaged by water and licensee was in the process of creating new files. Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate annual training. Four out of four files were missing the annual mandated 20-hour training. MEDICATIONS: Medications review began at 1:06 p.m.; medications are centrally stored and locked in a cabinet in the kitchen area; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented in the centrally stored medications and destruction record. No errors were observed during the medication review. INFECTION CONTROL: The facility has an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility’s cleaning protocol is sufficient. If needed, the facility has the capacity to designate a single isolation room if the facility has a confirmed case of COVID-19. The LPA obtained the following documents: - LIC500 Personnel Report Deficiencies were cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County