Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Bluebird Home

Small home·Licensed for 6·Ventura, California

Licensed since 2022Licence #565850292
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,950 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,050–$6,100
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedOctober 29, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitNovember 19, 2025CDSS inspection record

Bluebird Home is a small care home in Ventura — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2022. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Bluebird Home

Is Bluebird Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Bluebird Home licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Bluebird Home been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 7 state visits over the same years.

Is Bluebird Home still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Bluebird Home cost?

$4,950 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,050–$6,100. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size in Ventura that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,428 to $7,475 a month, and the middle figure is $3,750 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Bluebird Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Arlene M. Martinez, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Ventura County Medical Center is 2.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Bluebird Home keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Bluebird Home license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “BLUEBIRD HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #565850292. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Arlene M. Martinez, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 7 state inspection visits since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 7 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is November 19, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,950a month to start

Likely $4,050–$6,100

From 10 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,950a month

Likely $4,050–$6,250

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,950likely $4,050–$6,100

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,050–$6,250
$4,950
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,750–$9,350
$6,950
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

10 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,250–$7,550.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 10 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 1484 Bluebird Ave, Ventura, CA 93003Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 7 documents for this home, and its records count 7 visits since 2022. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated November 19, 2025.

On file since
2022
State visits
7
Most recent visit
November 19, 2025
Occupied · October 29, 2024 visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated December 17, 2022 to October 29, 2024. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2022.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2025110202412020231102022330

The last 36 months — 4 of 7 documents

20251 state visit · 1 document
Nov 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 10:15AM. LPA initially met with facility staff. Licensee was contacted via telephone and arrived at the facility at 10:36AM. Entrance interview conducted. Beginning at 10:37AM, the LPA, along with Licensee toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: Hardwired combination smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were tested at 12:51PM and were functional at the time of the visit. Fire extinguisher was observed to be fully charged and purchased on 10/24/2025. BEDROOMS: The LPA observed the resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. There are 4 (four) total bedrooms for resident use; 2 (two) are shared rooms and two (2) are private rooms. RESTROOMS: The LPA observed two (2) restrooms in the facility. One (1) is for resident use and one (1) is designated for staff use. Resident restroom was observed to be clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and slip-resistant surfaces. Water temperature was measured in the resident restroom at 10:45AM and measured at 137.5 degrees Fahrenheit. KITCHEN: Kitchen appliances appeared to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. All knives and cleaning supplies were observed to be locked and properly stored at the time of the visit. Adjacent to the kitchen is a locked garage. The garage was observed and contained the laundry area, as well as emergency food supply and water, and storage. Report Continued on LIC 809-C COMMON SPACES: In the common areas, walls and flooring were checked for cleanliness and good condition. At the time of the visit, living room and dining room furniture was observed to be in good condition. The LPA observed the required postings in the common area. A fireplace was observed to be adequately screened. OUTDOOR SPACE: The backyard has a covered outdoor area equipped with furniture for resident use. All exits were observed to be clear of hazards. Outdoor gate was observed to be functional, however, not self-closing or latching at the time of the visit. At this time, no residents have documented elopement or unsafe wandering behaviors. LPA advised Licensee to ensure the gate is self-closing and latching in the event any residents' needs change or residents are admitted that may have unsafe wandering or elopement behaviors. RECORD REVIEW: Beginning at 10:54AM, staff and resident records were reviewed for documents including, but not limited to: health screening, TB test, staff training records, fingerprint clearance, resident physician's report, needs and service appraisal, and personal rights. 5 (five) resident records reviewed were complete and contained all required documents. 5 (five) staff files reviewed were complete and contained all required documents. INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLAN: During today’s visit, the LPA reviewed the facility’s infection control plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. LPA also reviewed the facility's emergency disaster plan, which was observed to be complete and updated annually, as required. Emergency drills are conducted quarterly, with the last drill documented on 10/30/2025. MEDICATION REVIEW: Beginning at 12:29PM. medications for 2 (two) residents were observed. Both two (2) of two (2) residents' medications were observed to be maintained and administered in compliance with regulation. INTERVIEWS: Throughout the visit, LPA interviewed two (2) staff and four (4) residents. No concerns were noted during interviews. Pursuant to Title 22, CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiency was cited (refer to LIC 809-D). Licensee was informed that failure to correct deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, report issued, and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 19, 2025

The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20241 state visit · 2 documents
Oct 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Questionable death. Staff gave medication to resident in care without a doctor's order. Staff insert suppositories to residents in care without proper authorization. Staff hit residents in care. Facility does not have adequate staff to meet resident needs. Residents are not provided proper food service.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver findings for the allegations listed above. The LPA met with the Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. On 01/12/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an unannounced initial visit to investigate the allegations listed above. The LPA arrived at 11:15 a.m. and was greeted by Licensee Arelene Martinez. The LPA explained the reason for the visit. At 11:32 a.m. the LPA requested records pertaining to the investigation. From 12:05 p.m. to 12:55 p.m. the LPA interviewed the Administrator Arlene Martinez. On 10/ 23/2024, LPA Urena conducted additional interviews, administrator, staff, residents, and residents’ family members. The LPA requested additional records pertinent to the investigation and conducted medication audit at 1:25 p.m. Continues on LIC 9099C... Unsubstantiated Pg. 2 Questionable deaths On the allegation of questionable death, the concern of the reporting party (RP) is that sometime in November 2023, two residents’ deaths happen suddenly. To investigate the allegation, LPA Urena interviewed the Administrator and staff and requested documents pertinent to the allegation. Staff (S1) interview revealed that the two residents who had passed away at the facility, did not pass away within a week from each other, and both were receiving hospice services by two different agencies. S1 stated that they were not on duty when R1 and R2 passed away. The staff who was present at the time of R1 and R2 deaths, is no longer working for this facility. The administrator stated that the two residents that passed away at the facility were receiving hospice services, and had indeed passed away at the facility, but not within a week of each other. One resident (R1) passed away in September of 2023, and second resident (R2) passed away in November 2023. The Administrator stated that the staff on duty during the death of R1 and R2 is no longer employed at the facility. LPA Urena reviewed the following documents: Physicians’ reports, medication list, hospice, and death certificates. Record review indicates that R1 was receiving hospice while residing at the facility, and the County of Ventura Death Certificate indicates the immediate cause of death as Cardiopulmonary Arrest, and the leading cause of death as Malignant Neoplasm of breast. R2 was receiving hospice care while residing at the facility, and the County of Ventura Death Certificate indicates the immediate cause of death as Cardiopulmonary Arrest, and the leading cause of death as Alzheimer Disease. On both incidents of death, the facility staff followed procedures by informing R1’s representatives, hospice agency, and the Community Care Licensing Department. Administrator’s and staff interviews also revealed that both R1’s and R2’s health was declining prior to death. Residents’ energy was poor and/or were refusing food intake. Based on the information received through interviews and record review, the allegation that residents’ deaths were questionable, is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Pg 3. Staff gave medication to resident in care without a doctor's order. On the allegation that staff gave resident medication without a doctor’s order, it is the concern of the reporting party that staff was giving Lorazepam (Ativan) to calm the resident, and such medication was not prescribed by the primary physician. To investigate the allegation, LPA Urena interviewed the staff, and the administrator and reviewed medication list (LIC 622). The administrator’s and the staff interviews revealed that R1 was prescribed Lorazepam (Ativan) by the primary physician which was documented in the Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record (LIC 622). LPA Urena reviewed the LIC 622 and the list of prescribed medications by the primary physician for R1. Lorazepam (Ativan) 2mg. every two (2) hours or as needed (PRN), was prescribed for anxiety, restlessness, insomnia, and agitation. R2’s primary physician prescribed Lorazepam (Ativan), 2mg. every six (6) hours or as needed. The staff interviews revealed that the nurse would be the person assisting the residents with medication administration. Per the Administrator and staff interviews, when residents pass away, the hospice nurse takes possession of the medications at the facility and takes the medication away to be destroyed. Based on the information obtained through interviews and record review, the allegation that staff gave medication to resident without doctor’s orders, is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff insert suppositories to residents in care without proper authorization. On the allegation that staff insert suppositories to residents without authorization, it is alleged that staff insert the suppositories to residents when residents are having difficulty with bowel movements. To investigate the allegation the LPA interviewed staff (S1) about the suppositories. The staff stated that they are not allowed to insert suppositories and if the residents are experiencing bowl movement issues, they inform the administrator. The administrator stated that staff informs them of any concerns with residents’ bowel movements or being impacted. The administrator then informs the doctor, or hospice nurse. The administrator stated that staff are trained and are aware that they cannot insert suppositories, as they are not skilled professionals. The LPA interviewed a resident’s (R3) representative about suppositories, as it is indicated in the resident’s hospice list of medications. The R3 representative stated that R3 needed the suppositories when R3 was having bowel movement issues, and they understand that the hospice nurse was the person inserting the suppositories; however, the suppositories are no longer needed since R3 is having regular bowel movements now. Continues on Page 4. Pg. 4 Based on the information obtained through interviews, the staff and the administrator stated that they understand that facility staff are not skilled professional to insert suppositories to residents. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff hit residents in care. On the allegation that staff hit resident in care, it is the concern of the RP that staff hit residents in care. To investigate the allegation, LPA Urena interviewed staff and the administrator, residents, and residents’ representatives. The staff denied hitting the residents in care. The administrator stated that they had not received concerns from residents’ representatives or from the residents themselves. The LPA interviewed residents about the care they received from staff, and they stated that they were happy with the care they received and had no concerns. Residents’ representatives and next of kin, stated that they were very happy with the care the staff provided to their residents, and had not received any concern from the residents themselves. During their visit to the facility to visit the residents, the residents’ representatives stated that they had not witness any concerning behavior by staff. Two out of the current Based on the information obtained through interviews, the residents and the residents’ representatives did not have any concerns about the care being provide by staff and stated that they were not aware of any staff hitting residents in care. Therefore, the allegation that staff hit residents in care, is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Continues on LIC 9099C Page 5. Pge 5. Facility does not have adequate staff to meet resident needs. On the allegation that facility does not have adequate staff to meet the residents’ needs, it is the concern of the RP that facility staff have to work six (6) days a week, and do not get enough rest because the daytime staff also cover the night duties. To investigate the allegation, LPA Urena interviewed staff and the administrator about the work schedule and reviewed the Personnel Roster (LIC 500). The staff stated that they are not made to work but choose to work the schedules needed to assist the facility needs. Staff (S1) stated that they work five (5) days a week during the day shift, and sometimes may assist with the night shift, when needed but not typically. Staff (S2) stated they work four (4) days a week during the day shift. The administrator stated that staff get at least two days off. The LPA has always observed two staff working on the days of the unannounced visits to the facility. Review of the LIC 500 revealed that the facility employees work either two (2), four (4) or five (5) day shifts. Schedules vary for staff, and the staff may work up to 10 hours a day. Based on the information obtained through the interviews, observation and record review, the facility has adequate staff to meet the needs of the residents in care. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Residents are not provided proper food service. On the allegation that residents are not provided proper food service, the concern of the RP is that residents are not being provided with vegetables and fruits. To investigate the allegation, the LPA reviewed the menu, interviewed staff, residents, and conducted an inspection of the food available at the facility. The staff interviews revealed that that the menu usually includes a protein, chicken, rice, beans, pasta and fruit and vegetables and drinks, along with dessert for lunch, breakfast usually includes eggs, bacon, pancakes, oatmeal, toast, etc. The residents get three meals a day and snacks. The residents stated that they like the foods the staff cooks, and when asked to describe the type of foods they receive, the residents stated that they eat eggs, pancakes, toast, oatmeal, pasta, sandwiches, fruit, potatoes, chicken, cookies, and drinks. The residents stated that they receive plenty of food and if they request more, they always get more food. The LPA observed milk, juice, meats, eggs, pasta, vegetables and fruits during the food audit. Based on the information obtained through observation, and interviews, the LPA observed that residents received a variety of meals and residents are happy with the meals they receive. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. No citations were issued. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 29, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240110130342
Oct 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. LPA initially met with facility staff. Administrator was contacted via telephone and arrived at the facility shortly thereafter, and LPA explained the reason for the visit. The LPA and the Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: Hardwired combination smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and were functional at the time of the visit. Fire extinguishers were observed to be fully charged and purchased on 06/22/2024. KITCHEN: Kitchen appliances appeared to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. All knives and cleaning supplies were observed to be locked and properly stored at the time of the visit. Adjacent to the kitchen is a locked garage. The garage was observed and contained the laundry area, as well as emergency food supply and water, and storage. BEDROOMS: The LPA observed the resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. There are 4 (four) total bedrooms for resident use; 2 (two) are shared rooms and 2 (two) are private rooms. RESTROOMS: The LPA observed 2 (two) restrooms in the facility. 1 (one) is for resident use and 1 (one) is designated for staff use. Resident restroom was observed to be clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid surfaces. Water temperature was measured within the regulations. COMMON SPACES: In the common areas, walls and flooring were checked for cleanliness and good condition. At the time of the visit, living room and dining room furniture was observed to be in good condition. Continues on LIC 809C... The LPA observed the required postings in the common area. A fireplace was observed to be adequately screened. OUTDOOR SPACE: The backyard has a covered outdoor area equipped with furniture for resident use. All exits were observed to be clear of hazards. RECORDS: Residents’ records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. All records were in order. Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All files were in order. MEDICATION REVIEW: Medications are centrally stored and locked in a cabinet in the kitchen area; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. No errors observed during the medication review. Medications for 2 (two) residents were observed. Both 2 (two) of 2 (two) residents' medications were observed to be maintained and administered in compliance with regulation. During today's visit, LPA gathered the following items: · LIC 500 · A copy of the facility's liability insurance. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 29, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 15, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 09:26AM. LPA initially met with facility staff. Licensee was contacted via telephone and arrived at the facility at 09:38AM. Entrance interview conducted. Beginning at 09:42AM, the LPA, along with Licensee toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: Hardwired combination smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were tested at 10:53AM and were functional at the time of the visit. Fire extinguishers were observed to be fully charged and purchased on 04/22/2023. KITCHEN: Kitchen appliances appeared to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. All knives and cleaning supplies were observed to be locked and properly stored at the time of the visit. Adjacent to the kitchen is a locked garage. The garage was observed and contained the laundry area, as well as emergency food supply and water, and storage. BEDROOMS: The LPA observed the resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. There are 4 (four) total bedrooms for resident use; 2 (two) are shared rooms and 2 (two) are private rooms. RESTROOMS: The LPA observed 2 (two) restrooms in the facility. 1 (one) is for resident use and 1 (one) is designated for staff use. Resident restroom was observed to be clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid surfaces. Water temperature was measured in the resident restroom and initially measured high, but was adjusted and subsequently measured within the required range. COMMON SPACES: In the common areas, walls and flooring were checked for cleanliness and good condition. At the time of the visit, living room and dining room furniture was observed to be in good condition. Report Continued on LIC 809-C The LPA observed the required postings in the common area. A fireplace was observed to be adequately screened. OUTDOOR SPACE: The backyard has a covered outdoor area equipped with furniture for resident use. All exits were observed to be clear of hazards. RECORD REVIEW: Staff and resident records were reviewed for documents including, but not limited to: health screening, TB test, staff training records, fingerprint clearance, resident physician's report, needs and service appraisal, and personal rights. 5 (five) resident records reviewed were complete and contained all required documents. 5 (five) staff files reviewed were complete and contained all required documents. INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLAN: During today’s visit, the LPA reviewed the facility’s infection control plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. LPA also reviewed the facility's emergency disaster plan, which was observed to be complete and updated annually, as required. Emergency drills are conducted quarterly, with the last drill documented on 10/01/2023. MEDICATION REVIEW: Medications for 2 (two) residents were observed. Both 2 (two) of 2 (two) residents' medications were observed to be maintained and administered in compliance with regulation. INTERVIEWS: Throughout the visit, LPA interviewed 2 (two) staff and 1 (one) resident. During today's visit, LPA gathered the following items: LIC 500 A copy of the facility's liability insurance No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 15, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Ventura County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Ventura County