Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Betty's Place

Small home·Licensed for 6·Murieta, California

Licensed since 2022Licence #331881285Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileDementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,800 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,900–$5,900
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit7 of 6 beds occupiedJune 25, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · August 9, 2026
  • Last state visitMay 11, 2026CDSS inspection record

Betty's Place is a small care home in Murieta — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2022. Wheelchair and non-ambulatory care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Betty's Place

Is Betty's Place licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed/Pending Increase,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Betty's Place licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Betty's Place been cited?

2 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.

Is Betty's Place still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.

What does Betty's Place cost?

$4,800 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,900–$5,900. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 161 other homes of a similar licensed size across Riverside County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,800 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 161 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Betty's Place take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Betty's Place LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Murrieta is 3.8 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Betty's Place keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Betty's Place license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “BETTY'S PLACE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #331881285. The state lists this license as “Licensed/Pending Increase,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Betty's Place LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 8 state inspection visits since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 2 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is May 11, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file · ask the home
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 6 residents

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 BEDRIDDEN. DELAYED EGRESS/ LOCKED PERIMETER NOT PERMITTED. GARAGE OFF LIMITS AS LIVING SPACE. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 6 RESIDENTS.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,800a month to start

Likely $3,900–$5,900

From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,800a month

Likely $3,900–$6,100

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,800likely $3,900–$5,900

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,900–$6,100
$4,800
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,600–$9,200
$6,800
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

9 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,050–$5,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 37182 Sierra Grove Drive, Murieta, CA 92563Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 8 visits since 2022. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 11, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
8
Most recent visit
May 11, 2026
Occupied · June 25, 2025 visit
7 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated June 25, 2025 to May 11, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations2typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2022.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026231202522120242202022110

The last 36 months — 7 of 8 documents

20262 state visits · 3 documents
May 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not adequately supervise resident in care resulting in resident eloping multiple times.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Ivashia Wright, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Ivashia met with Andrew Hardin and explained the purpose of the visit. On March 11, 2026, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint alleging staff did not adequately supervise resident in care resulting in resident eloping multiple times. During the investigation, the LPA inspected the facility, reviewed R1's records, and conducted interviews with staff and residents. LPAs were unable to interview R1 due to R1 not being present or available, on multiple occasions, to be interview. Regarding the allegation that staff did not adequately supervise resident in care resulting in eloping multiple times, it was reported that Resident 1 (R1) has left the facility multiple times unsupervised since October 2025 and attempted to enter neighbor’s home. Continued on LIC 9099-C Substantiated Interview with Licensee, Andrew Hardin, stated R1 has left the facility on multiple occasions, but staff will attempt to deter R1 from leaving the facility and to redirect R1 back to the facility. In addition, Administrator stated that R1 requires increased supervision due to previous behaviors. Administrator reported that the facility is abiding by the increased supervision requirement. Information obtained by additional staff stated the supervision is not enough coverage for R1. Staff stated that the facility is trying to ensure that R1 does not elope. Information obtained from R1’s Responsible Party confirmed that R1 has eloped multiple times, but there are no concerns regarding the facility. An interview with additional witness stated that R1 has been observed in the vicinity of the facility, without supervision. During the inspection on March 13, 2026, LPA Wright and LPA Lankford observed R1 attempting to elope from the facility. Assigned staff member was not present when R1 was attempting to elope. It was advised that staff were not available and or present with R1. This poses a health and safety risk to the clients in care. Based on staff interviews, resident interviews, facility records, and R1's files, the allegations that staff did not adequately supervise resident in care resulting in the resident eloping multiple times is deemed substantiated. A substantiated finding means that the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. The facility will be cited due to the violation pertaining to Title 22. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, 9099C, 9099D, appeal rights were reviewed and provided to Administrator Andrew Hardin.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 11, 2026 · control 18-AS-20260311135916

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 80078(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 15, 2026

80078 Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision:(a)The licensee shall provide care and supervision as necessary to meet the client's needs. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: based on interviews and records review, facility staff failed to... ensure that Resident #1 (R1) was provided required one-on-one staff to resident supervision, resulting in R1 eloping multiple times.This posed an immediate health and safety risk to R1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 11, 2026

Plan of correction: Facility management has implemented new safety measures and an immediate behavioral modification plan for resident when the incident occurred. Administrator will email plan that was implemented to CCLD by 5/15/2026.

May 11, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ivashia Wright conducted an unannounced visit for a required annual inspection. The LPA was greeted by Caregiver Jemimah Williams, notified them of the purpose for the visit and was allowed to enter the facility to conduct the inspection. Administrator Andrew Hardin arrived shortly after. Facility Overview: The facility is a single story building composed of five (5) resident bedrooms, four (4) bathrooms, a office, a dinning room, a living room, a kitchen, an outdoor area, and a garage. There is no gated pool or no firearms on the premises. Infection Control: LPA observed that hygiene and cleaning supplies were available for regular facility maintenance. The facility’s infection control plan was reviewed and found to meet department's requirements. Physical Plant: The physical plant, including floors, windows, and doors, was clean and well maintained. Fixtures and furniture were in good repair. Laundry equipment was in good working condition. Sharp and dangerous objects were securely locked in hallway closet and inaccessible to residents. The smoke detector and carbon monoxide detector were in good working condition. LPA observed fire extinguisher be in compliance with the department's requirements, with expiration date of 6/4/2026. The water temperature was tested within regulations measuring at 112.2 F. Continued 809-C...... Care & Supervision/Administration: Adequate staff were present to supervise residents during the visit. The administrator certificate expires 3/18/2027. Record Review and Resident/Staff Files: LPA reviewed files for three (3) staff members, confirming criminal clearance, updated training, and CPR/First Aid certification. Three (3) clients files were reviewed and contained all required documentation. LPA observed first aid kit to be locked and inaccessible to the clients in care. The clients and staff files were inaccessible to unauthorized individuals. Health-Related Services/Incidental Medical Services: All clients medications were securely locked in a file cabinet in the kitchen area. LPA reviewed medications for two (2) clients, confirming that all medications were listed and accounted for. Disaster Preparedness: LPA reviewed the facility’s emergency and disaster plan, including documentation of the last emergency drill conducted on 4/16/2026, which met department requirements. All facility exits were clear of obstructions. No deficiencies were cited during the visit. An exit interview was conducted, during which this report was reviewed, and a copy was provided to Licensee/Administrator Andrew Hardin.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 11, 2026
Apr 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ivashia Wright conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up regarding a complaint 18-AS-20260311135916. LPA met with Caregiver Charolette Williams explained the purpose of the visit and was granted entry. Administrator Andrew Hardin arrived shortly after. During case management visit LPA toured the facility and interviewed caregiver Charolette Williams and Administrator Andrew Hardin. LPA received updated pertinent documentation during todays visit. No deficiencies observed during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to Administrator Andrew Hardin.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 14, 2026
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Jun 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee is operating beyond the terms and conditions of their license.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Abdoulaye Zerbo and Javina George conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to investigation the allegation listed above. The LPAs met with Caregiver Unique Joshway and informed them of the purpose of the today's visit. LPAs met with Administrator Andrew Hardin at a later time. It was alleged Licensee is operating beyond the terms and conditions of their license. LPAs conducted a tour, reviewed records, and interviewed residents and staff. Interviews conducted revealed that there is a census of seven (7) residents. Additional Information obtained revealed that R1 was admitted to the facility on March 24, 2025. A records review of the resident roster revealed the roster was updated on 06-24-25. The licensee submitted an increase of capacity which is currently pending. On 03/13/25 the department was notified that the fire clearance had been denied, as there was additional changes that needed to be made. Based on observations, interviews and records review the allegation of Licensee is operating beyond the terms and conditions of their license is substantiated. A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegation is Substantiated valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Per Administrator Andrew Hardin R2 is supposed to be leaving the facility today 06/25/25. Due to a zero tolerance for unapproved capacity increase, the facility is being assessed an immediate civil penalty in the amount of $500, as they are operating over capacity. In addition the Licensee is being invited to the office for a meeting, the date is to be determined. An exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report 9099C, 9099D, appeal rights, LIC421IM was reviewed and provided to Administrator Andrew Hardinthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 25, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250619092749

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87204(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 26, 2025

87204 Limitations - Capacity and Ambulatory Status (a) A licensee shall not operate a facility beyond the conditions and limitations specified on the license, including specification of the maximum number of persons who may receive services at any one time... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: the licensee accepted R1 after knowing the fire clearance was denied the facility would operate over capacity. This posed an immediated health, safety and personal right risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 25, 2025

Plan of correction: The licensee agrees to relocate R2, on or before end of day 06/26/25. The adress, and phone number of the new facility is to be submitted to the department by 5pm on the due date indicated.

Jun 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abdoulaye Zerbo conducted an unannounced visit for a required annual inspection. The LPA was greeted by Administrator Andrew Hardin, notified them of the purpose for the visit and was allowed to enter the facility to conduct the inspection. Facility Overview: The facility is a single story building with 6 bedrooms, 4 bathrooms, a dinning room, a living room, a kitchen, an outdoor area, and a garage. There is no gated pool and there are no firearms on the premises. Infection Control: LPA observed that hygiene and cleaning supplies were available for regular facility maintenance. The facility’s infection control plan was reviewed and found to meet department's requirements. Physical Plant: The physical plant, including floors, windows, and doors, was clean and well maintained. Fixtures and furniture were in good repair. Laundry equipment was in good working condition. Sharp and dangerous objects were securely locked in the hallway and inaccessible to clients. The smoke detector and carbon monoxide detector were operable. LPA observed fire extinguishers to be in compliance with the department's requirements and with an expiration date of 06-04-2026. The water temperature was tested within regulations measuring 111.5 F Continued 809-C...... Care & Supervision/Administration: Adequate staff were present to supervise residents during the visit. The Administrator holds a current administrator’s certificate with the expiration date of 03-18-2027 and a CPR certification with the expiration date of 05-2-2026. Record Review and Resident/Staff Files: LPA reviewed files for 3 staff members, confirming criminal clearance, updated training, and health screening. 3 residents' files were reviewed and contained all required documentation. LPA observed first kit to be available for the residents in care. The residents and staff files were kept locked and inaccessible to unauthorized individuals. Health-Related Services/Incidental Medical Services: All residents' medications were securely locked in a cabinet and located in the kitchen area. LPA reviewed medications for 2 residents confirming that all medication were listed and accounted for. Disaster Preparedness: LPA reviewed the facility’s emergency and disaster plan, including documentation of the last emergency drill conducted on 06-01-2025, which met the department's requirements. All facility exits were clear of obstructions. No deficiencies were cited during the visit. An exit interview was conducted, during which this report was reviewed, and a copy was provided to Administrator Andrew Hardin.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 4, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola conducted an unannounced case management visit to the facility. LPA met with Floretta Crenshaw, who identified herself as the House Manager for the facility. The visit is in response to information obtained by the department of a possible transfer of the facility. During the time of the visit there were (3) staff and (4) residents present. LPA conducted a tour of the facility, interviewed staff and residents, and conducted file reviews for residents and staff. LPA verified background clearance for the staff present during the time of the visit on the Guardian system. No immediate health and safety concerns were observed during the visit. LPA observed resident in their rooms and common areas of the facility and staff conducting checks and residents and cleaning of the facility. No deficiencies were cited at the time of the visit. An exit interview was conducted with the House Manager where this report was reviewed and provided to them.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2024
May 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a 1 year required visit. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Caregiver Andrew Hardin, the Administrator Ardie Crenshaw arrived shortly after. At the time of the visit there was (3) staff and (6) residents present. All staff were observed to have obtained criminal record clearance and were associated to the facility. LPA conducted a tour of the interior and exterior of the facility. LPA observed for the facility to be clean, clutter and odor free. The facility was observed to be at a comfortable temperature, the resident bedrooms, had the required furniture, bed, lighting, chest of drawers and chair. The smoke and carbon monoxide detectors are intertwined and were tested and observed to be operable. There is one (1) fire extinguisher hanging on the wall inside the kitchen. The water temperature was tested and was found to be within regulatory limits measuring between 115-120 degrees F. There are no pools or bodies of water observed on the premises, or no known guns or ammunition. The medications are stored in the garage in a locked medication cart and were observed to be inaccessible to residents in care. The medications were observed to be given as they were prescribed. The chemicals and sharp objects (knives) are stored in a locked closet in the hallway next to the laundry room. Records review: Resident files were reviewed and were found to have the required documentation such as medical assessments, appraisal and admissions agreements. 3 of 4 Staff files reviewed were observed to not have the required training such as valid Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR). A deficiency will be issued. The facility food supply was observed to meet the requirements as there was a 2 day supply of perishable and a 7 day supply of nonperishable food items. LPA observed for there to be 3 cans of expired food and were discarded during the visit there no citation will be issued. The facility will submit the following to the regional office for follow up or filing by 5pm, Monday 5/6/24: -LIC808-Mitigation Plan -Addendum to plan of operation if the facility is going to use video surveillance, and an update copy of facility sketch indicating where the cameras are located in the facility -Change of Administrator request -A copy of liability insurance Based on today's visit a citation will be issued in accordance with the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8). An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, 809D, appeal rights, and LIC9098 Proof of Corrections form was provided to Ardie Crenshaw.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Riverside County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Riverside County