Large community · Licensed for 120 · Stanton
Beach Terrace Assisted Living and Memory Care
12282 Beach Blvd, Stanton, CA 90680Licensed since 2025
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 120: a large care communityThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 120 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 20 residents
- Bedriddenup to 120 residents
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 120 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 120 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS ON EXTERIOR EXITS ON 2NDAND 3RD FLOORS. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (20).
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 20 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Beach Terrace Assisted Living and Memory Care: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,450a month to start
Likely $3,450–$5,650
From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a studio and basic help · room, care and fees$4,450likely a month
Starting monthly rate$4,450likely $3,450–$5,650
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,450–$5,800
- $4,450
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,250–$9,000
- $6,950
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes9 nearby homes publish starting rates of $1,700 to $5,783
9 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $1,700–$5,350.
- Rowntree GardensStanton · 0.4 mi · Large community$5,063Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- New Horizon LodgeStanton · 1.9 mi · Large community$1,700Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Brookdale Garden GroveGarden Grove · 2.1 mi · Large community$2,300Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Karlton Residential Care CenterAnaheim · 2.6 mi · Large community$5,500Listed on Seniorly · memory care shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
- Anaheim Crown PlazaAnaheim · 2.7 mi · Large community$2,250Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Brookdale BrookhurstWestminster · 3.8 mi · Large community$2,445Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Katella Senior Living CommunityLos Alamitos · 4.3 mi · Large community$1,832Listed on its own website · studio · seen October 5, 2026
- Walnut VillageAnaheim · 4.3 mi · Large community$5,783Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Ivy Park at Seal BeachSeal Beach · 4.6 mi · Large community$4,495Listed on its own website · private studio & companion suites available floor plans · seen October 27, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
12282 Beach Blvd, Stanton, CA 90680Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Kindred Hospital WestminsterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.4 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #306006746 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 6 of 6 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated”.
20263 state visits · 4 documents
Sep 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Health ChecksReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Tea conducted an unannounced case management visit for the purpose of completing a health and safety check. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Administrator (AD) Minyoung Kim and Operations Director (OD) John Yoon. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA, accompanied by facility staff, toured the facility and inspected the shared room of Resident 1 (R1) and Resident 2 (R2). LPA conducted health and safety checks on the residents and observed them to be doing well. R2 stated that they were happy to be at the facility. No immediate health or safety concerns were observed regarding the residents during the visit. LPA observed the facility to be clean, organized, and free of any apparent health and safety hazards. LPA also requested and reviewed R1 and R2's resident records. Based on observations and information obtained during today's visit, no deficiencies are being cited at this time. An exit interview was conducted with the facility staff, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 8, 2026
Sep 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Tea conducted an unannounced Annual Required inspection of the facility. Upon arrival, LPA Tea was greeted and granted entry by Administrator (AD) Minyoung Kim and Operations Director (OD) John Yoon. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. The facility is licensed to serve 120 non-ambulatory residents, of which 120 may be bedridden, and has a hospice waiver for twenty (20) residents. At the time of the visit, the facility had a census of 73 residents, of which two (2) were receiving hospice services. LPA Tea reviewed seven (7) resident files and five (5) staff files. The residents and staff files reviewed contained the required documentation. AD Kim's Administrator Certificate is current and valid through May 28, 2028. LPA Tea, accompanied by AD Kim and OD Yoon, toured the physical plant, including resident living areas, common areas, food service areas, and outdoor spaces. The facility is a three-story building. The first floor consists of the reception lobby, administrative offices, and kitchen. The second floor serves assisted living residents, and the third floor serves memory care residents. The facility has outdoor terraces located on both sides of the building with adequate shaded seating available for residents. LPA tested the delayed-egress system on the second floor and observed it to be operational. The facility's fire alarm system is monitored and maintained by a third-party company. Fire extinguishers throughout the facility were observed to be fully charged. LPA also observed evacuation chairs located in the stairwells on each floor for emergency use. The facility's most recent disaster drill was conducted on June 19, 2026. (Annual Inspection continued on LIC809-C) Resident bedrooms were observed to have the required furniture, bed linens, and adequate closet and drawer space to accommodate residents. During the room tours, LPA observed bed rails installed on resident beds. LPA reminded facility management that bed rails require appropriate written orders and documentation. Facility staff removed the bed rails for residents who did not have the required documentation and stated that written orders would be obtained, as applicable. Resident bathrooms were inspected and observed to be clean and in good repair. Toilets and faucets were operational, grab bars were secure, and showers were free of visible mold and mildew. Hot water temperatures measured between 105.3 and 105.6 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA activated an emergency call pendant located in a resident bathroom, and facility staff responded within three (3) minutes. LPA also tested a resident push-button pendant, and facility staff responded within one (1) minute. Common areas were observed to be clean and free of apparent hazards. Doorways, hallways, and passageways were observed to be free of obstructions. LPA inspected the kitchen and dining areas. The facility had an adequate supply of perishable and nonperishable food available at the time of the visit. Menus were posted throughout the facility, and residents were provided with a variety of meal options, including Western and Korean food. An emergency supply of drinking water and food was observed in the kitchen storage area. LPA Tea reviewed the facility's medication storage and administration practices. Medications were observed to be stored in locked medication carts in the medication room located on the third floor. During the medication review, medications reviewed were being administered in accordance with physicians' orders. LPA also inspected the first aid kit located in the medication room and observed that it contained the required supplies. LPA interviewed residents regarding the quality of care and services provided by the facility and spoke with staff regarding resident care. During the visit, LPA observed residents participating in leisure activities, including watching Korean programming and other variety shows. Activity schedules were posted throughout the facility. Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed during today's inspection, a deficiency is being cited in accordance with Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Minyoung Kim. The deficiency, Plan of Correction, and appeal rights were reviewed with the facility. A copy of this report, LIC809D, LIC858, LIC859, and Appeal Rights was provided to the facility at the time of exit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 8, 2026
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87609(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 9, 2026
Postural Supports (a)(3) A written order from a physician indicating the need for the postural support shall be maintained in the resident’s record. The licensing agency shall be authorized to require other additional documentation if needed to verify the order. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: During the physical plant tour, LPA observed residents with bed rails without physician orders supporting their use. The unauthorized use of bed rails poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 8, 2026
Plan of correction: LPA advised the facility that appropriate documentation authorizing the use of bed rails must be maintained in each applicable resident's file. During the visit, staff removed the bed rails from residents who did not have the required authorization or documentation on file.
Jun 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
LPA Haley arrived at the facility to deliver findings on complaint control number 22-AS-20250923151212 and conduct a case management visit under the old facility number 306005901. Findings for the complaint were delivered successfully, and the complaint is now closed. No additional action is required. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 16, 2026
Apr 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident's dietary restrictions were not followed Insufficient staff to meet resident's needs Responsible party was not notified of resident's change in condition
An unannounced Complaint Investigation was conducted on this day by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Claudia Gutierrez regarding the allegations mentioned above. LPA met with Operations Director John Yoon and explained the purpose of the inspection. Regarding the allegation, Resident's dietary restrictions were not followed, the following was revealed: It is alleged Resident 1’s (R1’s) dietary restrictions were not followed despite dietary restrictions being given to Administrator (AD) at the time R1 was admitted. During their interview, R1 denied having any dietary restrictions or being on a special diet. Per R1’s Pre-Placement Appraisal (LIC603) dated November 21, 2024, R1 does not eat pork or pork by products and per their Physician Report (LIC602) dated January 20, 2026, R1 is on a special diet consisting of No-Added-Salt (NAS) and regular texture. During their interview, Staff 4 (S4) confirmed allegation and stated R1’s dietary restriction was not followed on at least one occasion. Per S4, on Wednesday, April 1, 2026, R1 was accidentally served pork after staff grabbed the wrong plate and served it to R1. (Cont. LIC9099-C) Substantiated During their interview, Witness 1 (W1) corroborated the allegation and stated they had been present at the time R1 was served with pork and provided LPA with a picture of R1’s plate from that date, consisting of pull pork, mixed vegetables, and mashed potatoes. Regarding the allegation, Insufficient staff to meet resident's needs, the following was revealed: It is alleged that on March 23, 2026, R1 was being changed by Staff 1 (S1), and S1 alone, however, R1 requires a two person assist for diaper changes. During their interview, R1 was unable to confirm or deny allegation. During their interview, S1 corroborated the allegation and stated they were aware R1 required a two person assist, however, assisted R1 with incontinence care alone, as no other care staff was available. Per W1, they had been present at the time and they had to assist S1, as no other care staff was available to assist. Regarding the allegation, Responsible party was not notified of resident's change in condition, the following was revealed: It is alleged R1’s responsible party was not notified of R1’s bed sores. During their interview, R1 was unable to confirm or deny allegation. During their interview, W1 stated that on March 23, 2026, they discovered bed sores on R1, and facility staff had not notified them. During their interview, Staff 2 (S2) corroborated the allegation and stated it had been W1, who informed them of R1’s bed sore. Per Staff 3 (S3) they had notified R1’s responsible party and provided LPA with an email and phone call notification, however, email and phone call were not placed until April 3, 2026. Based on staff and witness interviews and records review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiency are being cited per Title 22, Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report and appeal rights was provided at the end today's inspection. During the course of the investigation, LPA obtained a copy of Internal Occurrence Report and interviewed R1’s family members, Witness (W1) and Witness 2 (W2). Per Internal Occurrence Report (IOR), R1 was found on the floor in their bedroom on March 26, 2026 at 5:30 a.m. IOR does not indicate whether or not the bed rails were in place at the time of the fall. Per Staff 2 (S2), however, the bedrails were in place. During their interview, R1’s family member, W1 stated they did not have a doctor’s order for compression socks and stated one may have been provided to R1 some time ago but was unsure if R1 had a current doctor’s order. Per W1, R1 did have a fall from bed recently and facility staff were unable to confirm if the bedrails had been in place during the night. During their interview, W2 also stated they were unsure if a doctor’s order for compression socks had been obtained and stated W1 had a background in healthcare and may have believed it was best that R1 wear compression socks. W2 denied having any knowledge of whether or not R1’s bedrails were being used. Regarding the allegation, Resident was not accorded sufficient space in their accommodation, the following was revealed: It is alleged R1’s bed is pushed to the side and the room is not shared equally as R1’s roommate has more space for their belongings. During their interview, R1 was unable to confirm or deny whether or not they are accorded sufficient space in their accommodation. During their interview, R1’s roommate, R2 denied the allegation and stated the bedroom space is divided evenly and both they and R1 are able to move about the room comfortably with their wheelchairs. Two of four additional residents interviewed, denied the allegation and stated they are accorded sufficient space in their bedroom accommodation. Two of four residents were unable to confirm or deny the allegation. During their interview, three of three staff denied pushing or moving R1’s furniture aside, and stated that resident bedrooms are divided evenly, and there is no preference for one resident’s space or accommodation over the other. Regarding the allegation, Staff left resident in unhygienic conditions, the following was revealed: It is alleged that during a diaper change, Staff 1 (S1) did not remove their gloves when placing the new diaper and smeared feces onto R1’s clothing. During their interview, R1 was unable to confirm or deny whether or not they had been left in unhygienic conditions. During their interview, S1 stated they only assisted R1 with a diaper change on one occasion, however, denied wearing soiled gloves or smearing feces on R1. Per S1, their gloves were clean, and it is facility protocol to remove their gloves after assisting a resident with incontinence care. Interviews were conducted with five additional facility residents and two staff. One of five residents was unable to confirm or deny allegation and four of five residents denied being left in unhygienic conditions by staff. (Cont. LIC9099-C) Two of two staff denied having any knowledge of R1 or any other resident being provided with incontinence care by a staff member with soil gloves and stated it is facility protocol to wear clean gloves and to remove their gloves after assisting a resident with incontinence care. Due to conflicting information received during interviews conducted, LPA is unable to determine if Resident's needs were not met, if Resident was not accorded sufficient space in their accommodation, or if Staff left resident in unhygienic conditions. Although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore at this time the above allegations are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and copy of this report was provided at the end of the inspection.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 7, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260330160253
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87464(d) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 8, 2026
(d)... the facility shall be responsible for meeting the resident's needs as identified in the pre-admission appraisal... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on staff interview, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above as R1's needs as identifed in their Pre-Placement Appraisal were not met, which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 7, 2026
Plan of correction: S4 immediately updated culinary board to include R1's dietary restictions and OD stated staff training will be conducted and a copy provided to LPA via email by POC date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 8, 2026
(a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on staff interview, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above as one staff assisted R1 alone due to no other care staff being available, despite R1 requiring a two person assist for diaper changes, which poses an immediate safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 7, 2026
Plan of correction: OD stated staff schedule will be updated to ensure two care staff are avaialbe to assist R1 and staff training will be conducted and a copy provided to LPA via email.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 8, 2026
(1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of... (D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident.. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on staff interview and record review, the Licensee did not compy with the section cited above as R1's responsible party was not notified R1 had developed bed sores, which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 7, 2026
Plan of correction: OD stated staff training will be conducted to ensure residents' responsible parties are notified of any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident and a copy provided to LPA via email.
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportPrelicensingReport on file
Type of visit: Prelicensing
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Jerome Haley made a follow up pre-licensing visit to ensure the required correction has been completed. LPA arrived and explained the purpose of the visit to staff. During the follow up inspection, LPA Haley check the hot water temperature in resident bedrooms on all three wings of both floors. During the inspection, hot water temperature was measured between 105.6 – 108.1 degrees F. There are no additional corrections needed. The facility is ready for licensure. Component III: was waived during the follow up visit as Executive Director Christine Chon has extensive experience and has been through the pre-licensing process at previous facilities. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, was provided to Executive Director Christine Chon.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2025
Aug 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportPrelicensingReport on file
Type of visit: Prelicensing
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Jerome Haley made an announced visit for the purpose of conducting a pre-licensing evaluation. LPA Haley was greeted and granted entry by Executive Director Christine Chon. Initial application: To operate a Residential Care Facility Elderly/Dementia (RCFE), with a capacity of 120, of which 120 may be bedridden and waiver granted for Hospice (20) was submitted to the department for licensure. Fire clearance: Orange County Fire Authority granted the Fire Clearance May 13, 2025. Structure: The facility is a three-level structure with a total of 66 bedrooms for residents in care. All resident rooms are on the second and third floor. Assisted Living (AL) residents are located on the second floor and Memory Care (MC) residents are on the third floor. Bedrooms: All bedrooms have the required furnishings: bed, lamp, chair, and storage space. Bathroom(s): Bathrooms are equipped with a working toilet, wash basin, and shower. Non-skid surface and grab bars were observed. Two public bathrooms are located on each floor. Kitchen: The kitchen is clean, well organized and remains locked and inaccessible to residents. Sharps are located in a drawer. LPA observed a large commercial oven that was being used, a commercial refrigerator/freezer. LPA observed an emergency supply of food and water. The main kitchen is on the first floor, and there are two smaller kitchens, one on the second floor and one on the third floor. During meal times the food is brought over from the main kitchen to one of the smaller kitchen areas to be served to the residents on that floor. Food Service: Food deliveries are made twice a week by Cisco. During the inspection LPA observed a perishable and nonperishable food supply that meets regulation requirements. Continued on LIC809C page: 1 of 3 Garage/Parking Area: A covered parking structure is available for staff and authorized visitors when there is no more visitor parking is available. Visitor parking is available in front of the building. Toxins: All toxic chemicals, soaps, detergents, and cleaning solutions were observed in locked rooms (kitchen, laundry room) and inaccessible to residents in care. Client & Staff Files: Staff and resident files are stored on the first floor in the business office. Medications/First-Aid Kit: The med room is located on the third floor. The med room remains locked and inside the locked med room, LPA observed three medication carts, incontinent supplies and resident’s medical files. LPA observed three first aid kits that meet regulation requirements. One first aid kit on each floor. Linens & Hygiene Supplies: Hygiene items were observed in resident bathrooms, and the facility keeps a supply of clean linens to use as back up and in case of emergency. Exterior: Residents have access to two outside areas located on the second floor. Outside walkways are clear and free of obstruction. Table with sunshade and chairs were observed. No bodies of water observed. Laundry: There are two laundry rooms available. One on the second floor and one on the third floor. Residents are on a laundry schedule, but the AL residents can use the laundry room as needed. Smoke/Carbon Monoxide Detectors: Sprinkler and fires systema check are checked by AV Com and are inspected quarterly. Fire Extinguisher: Multiple Fire extinguishers were observed mounted on the walls throughout the facility. Emergency Phone Numbers, House Rules, Exit Plan & Menu: Facility postings were observed in the front lobby on the front desk and on the desk right behind the reception desk. Continued on LIC812C page: 2 of 3 Additional Comments: The facility telephone number is: 714.694.3205, the secondary number is 657.724.9844, and the facility email address is 14730enterprise@gmail.com and was confirmed during the visit. Activities items were observed including arts and crafts items, and musical entertainment for the residents to enjoy. Component III: Component III was not presented as the facility has one correction to make. A follow up visit will be scheduled. Corrections Needed: · Hot water temperature – Hot water needs to be slightly adjusted to meet regulation guidelines. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 26, 2025
64 of 120 beds were occupied at the April 7, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Klmh Enterprises LLC, licensed since 2025.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2025, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 7
- Total complaints
- 1
- Substantiated allegations
- 3
- Type A citations
- 3
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2025, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 3 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 1 |
| Substantiated allegations | 3 | 2 |
| Total complaints | 1 | 6 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
The earlier licenseAn earlier license at this address under the same name: license #306005901.
The state lists license #306005901 as “Closed, Change of Ownership” as of October 26, 2026. Inspections and reports filed under license #306005901 are on the state’s record of that license.
The state’s record for license #306005901 The state’s record for license #306006746
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Beach Terrace Assisted Living and Memory Care
Is Beach Terrace Assisted Living and Memory Care licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Beach Terrace Assisted Living and Memory Care licensed for?
120 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Beach Terrace Assisted Living and Memory Care been cited?
3 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2025, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 7 state visits over the same years.
Is Beach Terrace Assisted Living and Memory Care still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Beach Terrace Assisted Living and Memory Care cost?
$4,450 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,450–$5,650. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 78 other homes of a similar licensed size across Orange County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $5,950 a month, and the middle figure is $4,763 (n = 78 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Beach Terrace Assisted Living and Memory Care take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Klmh Enterprises LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Kindred Hospital Westminster is 1.4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Beach Terrace Assisted Living and Memory Care keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 20 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Beach Terrace Assisted Living and Memory Care license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “BEACH TERRACE ASSISTED LIVING AND MEMORY CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of June 12, 2026.
- License #306006746. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 120 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Klmh Enterprises LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2025, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 7 state inspection visits since 2025, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 3 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2025, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 7 state visits in that period.
- 1 complaint and 3 substantiated allegations on file since 2025, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is October 15, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Orange County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$5,063 a month to start
Listed by the home on A Place for Mom · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$4,200 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,650 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,800–$5,700On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,450 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,800 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,950–$5,900On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,350 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,550–$5,350- Assisted living: Licensed by California as a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly — the assisted-living license category.
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Orange County