Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Bay Care Assisted Living

Small home·Licensed for 6·San Pablo, California

Licensed since 2018Licence #79200734
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,650 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,650–$6,950
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedSeptember 17, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitNovember 13, 2025CDSS inspection record

Bay Care Assisted Living is a small care home in San Pablo — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2018.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Bay Care Assisted Living

Is Bay Care Assisted Living licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Bay Care Assisted Living licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Bay Care Assisted Living been cited?

0 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 14 state visits over the same years.

Is Bay Care Assisted Living still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Bay Care Assisted Living cost?

$5,650 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,650–$6,950. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 21 small homes and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 33 other homes of a similar licensed size across Contra Costa County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $5,825 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 33 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Bay Care Assisted Living take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Bay Care Assisted Living LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Richmond Campus is 4.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Bay Care Assisted Living keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Bay Care Assisted Living license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “BAY CARE ASSISTED LIVING LLC”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #79200734. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Bay Care Assisted Living LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 14 state inspection visits since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 14 state visits in that period.
  • 5 complaints and 4 substantiated allegations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is November 13, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 3 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 3.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,650a month to start

Likely $4,650–$6,950

From 21 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,650a month

Likely $4,650–$7,100

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,650likely $4,650–$6,950

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 21 small homes and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,650–$7,100
$5,650
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,400–$10,150
$7,650
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 21 small homes and similar homes within 15 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

21 homes like this within 15 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,900–$7,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 21 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 2352 Shannon Ave, San Pablo, CA 94806Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 14 visits since 2018. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated November 13, 2025.

On file since
2022
State visits
14
Most recent visit
November 13, 2025
Occupied · September 17, 2025 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 5 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated January 26, 2023 to September 17, 2025. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 5 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations2typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations4typical 0
  • Total complaints5typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2018.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2025221202422020234422022220

The last 36 months — 6 of 10 documents

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 11/13/2025 at 1:20pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carol Fowler conducted an unannounced 1-Year Required inspection. LPA met with Rose Onyeagocha and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility’s fire clearance was approved for five (5) non-ambulatory and one (1) bedridden residents. LPA toured the facility with Caregiver including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common area, garage and back yard. The facility consists of six (6) and three (3) bathrooms. No bodies of water observed. A comfortable temperature is maintained at 71 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. The hot water temperature in the residents’ shared bathroom was measured at 109.1 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 10/22/2025. Emergency Disaster Plan was not posted. LPA reviewed two (2) staff files and were all complete. LPA reviewed all two (2) resident files and all were complete. Continued on LIC809C. CONTINUE FROM LIC80 LPA requested updated copies of the following documents from ADM to be submitted to LPA by 11/21/25: · LIC500- Personnel Report · LIC308- Designation of Facility Responsibility · LIC610E- Emergency/Disaster Plan Liability Insurance The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Failure to correct these deficiencies and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties. LPA observed the following deficiencies: No proof of staff CPR/FIRST-AID No proof of disaster drills conducted. Emergency/Disaster Plan not posted. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights and copy of this report provided to ADM.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 13, 2025
Sep 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure facility has adequate food supply.

On 9/18/2025 at 12:15PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Carol Fowler and David Doidge arrived unannounced to deliver complaint findings for the allegation above. Upon arrival, LPA met with Caregiver, Evelyn Pinon and explained to her the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews with staff and witnesses. The Department obtained and reviewed the following documents: Personnel report, Residents' Roster, and menu. CONTINUE ON LIC9099C Substantiated CONTINUE LIC9099 Allegation: Staff does not ensure facility has adequate food supply. Investigation Finding: Substantiated W1 reported that the facility does not have an adequate food supply for the amount of residents. LPA conducted a tour of the kitchen and observed that the facility dose not meet the minimum of one week nonperishable food supply and two day of perishable food supply which should be maintained at the facility. Therefore, this allegation is Substantiated. Based on the Department’s investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, are being cited on the attached LIC9099D. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights provided. CONTINUE FROM LIC 9099 Allegation: Resident sustained unexplained bruises while in care. Investigation Finding: unsubstantiated W1 reported that R1 had unexplained bruises, interview with S1 revealed that R1 has a habit of hitting the walls in R1s room when R1 is read to get out of bed which has caused the bruises on R1s arms. Interview with W2 revealed that due to R1 being on the heavier side the bruises could have come from R1 mobility such as getting up from bed or a fall. S2 was unsure of where the bruises came from. Therefore, this allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff yell at residents. Investigation Finding: unsubstantiated W1 reported that facility staff have been yelling at residents in care. Interview with W2 revealed that W2 has never witnessed staff yelling at residents. Interview with R2 revealed that staff have not yelled at R2 and R2 has never witnessed staff yelling at other residents in care. Interview with R3 revealed that R3 and the Administrator had a misunderstanding which caused R3 to raise R3’s voice and Administrator raised her voice at R3, R3 also stated that once R3 understood the situation that everything was fine and the facility takes good care of R3. R3 stated that R3 has not heard any staff yelling at any residents. Interview with R4 revealed that R4 has never been yelled at by staff and has not witnessed staff yelling at the residents. Interview with S1 revealed that S1 has not yelled at any of the residents but has spoken loud due to hearing issues of residents. Interview with S2 revealed that S2 has not yelled at residents, Therefore, this allegation is unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove it; therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2025 · control 15-AS-20250905154629

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 85076(d)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 1, 2025

(d) The licensee shall meet the following food supply and...requirements: (1) Supplies of staple nonperishable foods for a minimum... and fresh perishable foods for a ... premises. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in having an insufficient amount of perishables and non- perishable foods which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator to purchase a minimum of one week nonperishable foods and a minimum of Administrator shall also provide in- service training to all staff using an approved CCLD vendor on food service in compliance with Title 22 Section regulations, and submit a copy of all staff that attended training. two days fresh perishable foods for facility and submit a copy of food and the receipt to CCL by POC due date. Administrator shall also provide in- service training to all staff using an approved CCLD vendor on food service in compliance with Title 22 Section regulations, and submit a copy of all staff that attended training.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 11/6/2024 at 9:35am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carol Fowler conducted an unannounced 1-Year Required inspection. LPA met with Rose Onyeagocha and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility’s fire clearance was approved for five (5) non-ambulatory and one (1) bedridden residents. LPA toured the facility with Administrator including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common area, garage and back yard. The facility consists of six (6) and three (3) bathrooms. No bodies of water observed. A comfortable temperature is maintained at 71 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. The hot water temperature in the residents’ shared bathroom was measured at 115.7 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 10/21/2024. Emergency Disaster Plan was last posted on 10/10/2024. LPA reviewed three (3) staff files and were all complete. LPA reviewed all three (3) resident files and all were complete. Continued on LIC809C. continue from LIC 809 LPA requested the following documents to be submitted to CCLD by 11/15/2024. Resident Roster LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC 309 Administrative Organization LIC 500 Personnel Report Liability Insurance No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2024

The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Jan 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not meeting resident's toileting needs Staff do not keep the home clean or sanitary Staff do not meet resident hygiene needs Staff do not keep the facility free from odor Staff are not providing residents adequate food service

On 01/04/24 at 10AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) D Panlilio conducted a subsequent visit and met with administrator (ADM) to deliver findings of above allegations. LPA explained the purpose of the visit with ADM. Allegation: Staff are not meeting residents’ toileting needs Finding: Unsubstantiated During investigation, LPA observed staff assisting a resident with toileting and changing another resident inside her bedroom on 11/30/23. During visit, resident ‘s (R2) responsible party (F2) confirmed with LPA that he visits R2 every other day and has observed staff assist residents with their daily toileting needs, giving them showers, changing diapers, providing sufficient variety of meals and giving them prescribed medications. LPA observed staff take resident (R3) to the toilet on 01/04/24 at 11:45AM. Continued on next page, LIC-9099C Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff do not keep the home clean or sanitary Finding: Unsubstantiated During investigation, LPA toured the facility with administrator (ADM) including but not limited to common living room, dining room, kitchen, bathrooms, residents' bedrooms, laundry closet and storage shed. LPA observed cleaning supplies (Clorox, Lysol, wipes) and detergent stored locked in the backyard storage shed. LPA also observed residents to be well-groomed, no urine or feces smells on them or inside their bedrooms. ADM stated staff clean and disinfect commonly touched surfaces with Clorox and Lysol every day. LPA observed the facility to be clean, odor free, sanitary and in good repair Allegation: do not meet resident hygiene needs Finding: Unsubstantiated During investigation, R4 confirmed with LPA that staff change her diapers 3 or 4 times a day or as needed. She stated that staff assist her with her hygiene needs (toileting, showering, grooming, dressing) each day. During visit on 11/30/23, LPA observed residents (R1, R2, R3, R4) to be clean, odor free and well groomed. free. ADM stated that staff checks on residents every 2 hours and changes their diapers as needed. LPA observed staff assisting resident (R3) in the toilet during visit while another staff was changing another resident (R4) inside her bedroom. Allegation: Staff do not keep facility free from odor Finding: Unsubstantiated During investigation, LPA toured the facility with administrator (ADM) including but not limited to common living room, dining room, kitchen, bathrooms, residents' bedrooms, laundry closet and outside storage shed. LPA did not smell any foul odors inside or outside the facility. LPA did not observe any garbage or dirty laundry that may cause an odor. LPA observed the facility to be clean, odor free and in good repair. Continued on next page, LIC-9099C1 Allegation: Staff are not providing residents adequate food service Finding: Unsubstantiated During investigation, LPA observed the facility has a minimum of 2-day perishable and 7-day non-perishable food supply including fresh fruits and vegetables, cereals, bread, juice, milk, water, coffee and meats stored in the kitchen refrigerator, freezer, pantry and garage refrigerator/freezer. On 11/30/23 at 12PM, LPA observed residents eating chicken stew, bread, fresh fruit with water & juice. LPA observed weekly menu showed a variety of meals scheduled from Monday to Sunday. Residents (R1, R4) and responsible party (F2) confirmed with LPA that staff provide a variety of food for breakfast, lunch, snacks and dinner with drinks every day. ADM stated residents are provided extra helpings of food and drinks upon request. Based on records review, interviews conducted, and observations made, the department has investigated the above allegations and found them to be unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. Therefore, the above allegations are unsubstantiated. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 4, 2024 · control 15-AS-20231121122835
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not adequately trained. Staff are not adequately maintaining residents' records.

On 10/13/2023 at 1:30pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), L. Hall arrived unannounced to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. LPA met with Rose Onyeagocha, Administrator, and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews with staff, Reporting Party (RP), and reviewed records. On the allegation staff are not adequately trained. RP reported none of the staff have had the required training in direct care or first aid training when working with residents. Two staff were present during the visit and neither one was able to provide LPA with the staff or resident files. During interviews Continued on LIC9099C. Substantiated Continued from LIC9099. with staff S1 stated she has first aid training and had trained the new staff but did not record the training. During record review LPA did not observe any training records and that only one staff S3 had first aid training. On the allegation Staff are not adequately maintaining residents’ records. RP reported that the residents’ records are not current, which poses a potential problem if the staff is not aware of the residents’ conditions. LPA reviewed all the resident records and observed none of the residents have a current appraisal needs and services plan, two of four were missing the consent form, a current physician’s report, and the ID and emergency information. None of the resident records contained personal rights or safeguards for property/valuables. Based on LPAs observations, interviews conducted, and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Both substantiated allegations were cited on the required annual inspection on 10/04/2023. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided. Continued from LIC9099. also changed residents while LPA was visiting. The caregiver stated she checks the resident every hour or so or changes them when at the resident’s request. S1 stated that residents should be checked at least every two hours. On the allegation facility is odiferous. RP reported the facility smells bad. Upon arrival LPA did not smell any foul odors on the outside or inside of the facility. LPA did not observe any garbage or dirty laundry that may cause an odor. On the allegation the facility is dirty. RP reported the bathroom, floors, and kitchen are filthy. LPA conducted an annual inspection on the same day as opening this complaint. LPA observed the facility being clean and sanitary. LPA did observe some items were blocking the passageways in the back yard. LPA cited the facility under the annual inspection for the items. Based upon the information obtained and the observation during the investigation. The above allegations are unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. Exit interview conducted and a copy of report was given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 13, 2023 · control 15-AS-20230928111639
Oct 4, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 10/4/2023 at 10:15am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Hall conducted an unannounced 1-Year Required inspection. LPA met with Mary Burgess-Shaw, Caregiver, and explained the purpose of the visit. Rose Onyeagocha, Administrator, arrived at 11:08am. The facility’s fire clearance was approved for five (5) non-ambulatory and one (1) bedridden residents. LPA toured the facility with Caregiver including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common area, garage and back yard. The facility consists of six (6) and three (3) bathrooms. No bodies of water observed. A comfortable temperature is maintained at 72 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. The hot water temperature in the residents’ shared bathroom was measured at 116.4 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 10/20/2022. Emergency Disaster Plan was last posted on 10/10/2019. LPA reviewed four (4) staff files and three (3) of four were incomplete. LPA reviewed all four (4) resident files and all were incomplete. Continued on LIC809C. Continued from LIC809. LPA observed the following deficiencies: At 10:25am, LPA observed S2 was fingerprinted or associated to the facility. At 10:35am, LPA observed facility does not have a 7-days of non-perishables and 2-days perishables available for residents. At 10:40am, LPA observed during record review there is not a doctor's order for a hospital bed for R1. At 10:50am, LPA observed a chest of drawers, 2 wheelchairs, a walker, a step ladder, and a bedframe in back yard.. At 11:15am, LPA observed during record review that resident records were incomplete. At 11:30am, LPA observed during record review that staff records were incomplete. At 11:30am, LPA observed during record review three (3) of the four (4) staff records does not contain a first aid certification. At 11:30am, LPA observed during record review that staff does not have any training records. LPA requested the following documents to be submitted to CCLD by 10/11/2023. Resident Roster LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC 309 Administrative Organization LIC 500 Personnel Report LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan (9 pages) Liability Insurance Continued on LIC809C. Continued from LIC809C. The deficiencies were observed (see LIC809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulation, Failure to submit proof of corrections (POC) by plan of correction due date and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. *An immediate $500.00 civil penalty will be assessed on today's date for association.* Exit interview conducted. A copy of the LIC421BG, this report and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 4, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Contra Costa County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Contra Costa County