Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Argento Westchester

Large community·Licensed for 88·Los Angeles, California

LicensedLicence #198320629
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,800 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,700–$6,100
  • Home sizeLicensed for 88Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit62 of 88 beds occupiedJuly 10, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 24, 2026CDSS inspection record

Argento Westchester is a large care community in Los Angeles — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 88 residents.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Argento Westchester

Is Argento Westchester licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Argento Westchester licensed for?

88 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Argento Westchester been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is Argento Westchester still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Argento Westchester cost?

$4,800 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,700–$6,100. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 16 other homes of a similar licensed size in Los Angeles that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,000 to $6,148 a month, and the middle figure is $3,547 (n = 16 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Argento Westchester take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by 7501 Osage Management, LLC;Collwood Terrace Et. Al, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kindred Hospital - Los Angeles is 1.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Argento Westchester keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 40 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Argento Westchester license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ARGENTO WESTCHESTER”, per the CDSS roster as of June 12, 2026.
  • License #198320629. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 88 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to 7501 Osage Management, LLC;Collwood Terrace Et. Al, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed: the year is not on file — the roster carries no first-license date for it. Ask: “When did this license start?”
  • 7 state inspection visits on file, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 5 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 24, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 88 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 40 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 8 residents

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR EIGHTY-EIGHT (88) NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH EIGHT (8) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN ON THE FIRST FLOOR. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR FORTY (40).

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA · 985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 40 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,800a month to start

Likely $3,700–$6,100

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,800a month

Likely $3,700–$6,250

With a studio and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,800likely $3,700–$6,100

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,700–$6,250
$4,800
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,500–$9,300
$6,800
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

24 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$8,800.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 7501 Osage Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90045Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2025, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 7 visits. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on July 10, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2025
State visits
7
Most recent visit
August 24, 2026
Occupied · July 10, 2026 visit
62 of 88 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 6 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated January 21, 2026 to July 10, 2026. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (6). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 6 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 2
  • Total complaints5typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20265602025220

The last 36 months — 8 of 8 documents

20265 state visits · 6 documents
Jul 10, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility administrator is unqualified.

On July 10, 2026, the California Department of Social Services/Community Care Licensing (CDSS/CCL) Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Ernand Dabuet, an unannounced complaint visit. Ashley Shire, Executive Director, greeted the LPA. (LPA) explained that the purpose of the visit is to investigate the allegation mentioned above. The investigation included interviews, record reviews, and a tour of the facility. Interviews were conducted with staff members Staff #1 - Staff #6 (S1-S6) and Witness #1 (W1). The Department reviewed several documents, including the Facility Resident Roster (dated 07/02/26), Personnel Report LIC 500 (dated 07/07/26), (S1’s) Resume, Personnel Record LIC 501 (dated 01/01/26), State of California CDSS Community Care Licensing Division RCFE Administrator Certificate Program #607339540, CPR/First Aid #E57578C5, Criminal Record Statement LI 508 (dated 11/20/25), Emergency Disaster Plan for RCFE (dated 01/01/25), RCFE Medical Relias Training, and other pertinent records associated with the complaint. (Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated INVESTIGATION REVEALED THE FOLLOWING: ALLEGATION: Facility administrator is unqualified. It is alleged that the facility Staff #1 (S1) is an unqualified administrator. It is reported that (S1) does not meet the requirements of an administrator for a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE), lacking years of college, work experience, or equivalent education. Reports indicate that (S1) has no higher education credentials and only three years of experience as a salesperson. No further detailed information was provided. On July 10, 2026, between 09:00 AM and 01:15 PM, the Department conducted interviews with staff members identified as Staff #1 through Staff #6 (S1-S6). Six (6) of the six (6) staff members were unable to support this claim. (S2-S6) asserted that (S1) fulfills all the essential duties and qualifications required for the role of Executive Director (administrator). Every staff member emphasized that (S1) possesses a deep understanding of regulatory requirements, is consistently present at the facility, takes responsibility, and provides valuable supervision and direction to the staff. Additionally, (S1) effectively addresses residents' needs while supporting staff in their roles. (S1) claimed that (S1) meets all Administrator Qualifications for large Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly (RCFE). (S1) has not only fulfilled the minimum age criteria but also possesses the necessary educational background. (S1) has completed the 80-hour Initial Certification Training (ICTP) and passed the (RCFE) Administrator Examination. Additionally, (S1) has obtained the required criminal clearance and over three years of management experience in licensed (RCFE) facilities, showing a strong dedication to high-quality care for older adults. (S1) held the positions of Sales and Marketing Director and interim Administrator in Training from 2021 to 2025. Before that, (S1) served as the Resident Engagement Manager from 2017 to 2021. On July 10, 2026, between 10:51 AM and 11:00 AM, the Department interview witness member identified as Witness #1 (W1). (W1) verified that (S1) worked as a Resident Engagement Manager from 2017 through 2021. (Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C) This report serves as an amendment to clarify finding. It does not supersedes the complaint investigation findings reflected on report created on 07/10/26. The Department reviewed (S1's) service records that included: Personnel Record LIC 501 (dated 01/01/26), State of California CDSS Community Care Licensing Division RCFE Administrator Certificate Program (valid through 12/14/26), CPR/First Aid (valid through 04/25/27), Criminal Record Statement LIC 508 (dated 11/20/25), has a current California Department of Social Services Clearance Background (dated 01/20/26), Emergency Disaster Plan for RCFE (dated 01/01/25), Designation of Facility Responsibility LIC 308 (dated 12/26/25), Application for Community Care Facility or (RCFE) License LIC 200 (dated 12/08/25), Argento Westchester Job Description for Administrator/Executive Director (dated 01/04/26). In addition, a review of Relias In-Service Mandatory Training completion of 284 hours. Records show that (S1) meets the qualifications and duties outlined in Title 22 (87405) Administrator - Qualifications and Duties. Based on the information gathered, there is not enough evidence to support the allegation mentioned above. Based on the information collected from the facility inspection, observations, interviews, and records analysis, the Department found no evidence to support the above allegation. The allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. No deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted with ASHLEY SHIRE, and copies of the reports were provided. This report serves as an amendment to clarify finding. It does not supersedes the complaint investigation findings reflected on report created on 07/10/26.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 10, 2026 · control 11-AS-20260706152537
May 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not complete required training. Staff are not conducting fire drills.

On 05/28/26 at 9:40 am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Villegas conducted an initialcomplaint visit regarding the allegation(s) above. LPA met with Executive Director Ashley Shire (staff #1 S1) as the purpose of today’s visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: On 05/28/26 LPA Villegas obtained copies of the staff and resident roster, the emergency disaster plan, facility sign in sheet dated: 05/19/26, copies of the quarterly fire drill reports dated: 01/20/26, disaster drills report dated: 01/20/26, evacuation drills reports dated: 01/20/26, In service sign in sheets dated: 02/26/26, 03/26/26, 04/29/26, 05/20/26, 05/27/26, and reliase training logs for staff #6-11 (S6-S11). On 05/28/26 11am-12pm LPA conducted interviews with staff #1-5 (S1-S5) regarding the allegation above. On 05/28/26 LPA conducted telephone interview with witness #1 (W1), conducted a review of training logs for S6-S11, and conducted a review of quarterly drill reports dated: 01/20/26. The investigation revealed the following: Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff did not complete required training. It is being alleged that not all caregivers have completed the required ongoing training. On 05/28/26 11am-12pm LPA conducted interviews with S1-S5 regarding the allegation above. 5 of the 5 staff interviewed denied the allegation above and reported that upon hire Reliase training is required before "on the floor" training can begin. Additionally, 5 of the 5 staff interviewed reported that all staff have monthly Reliase training's in addition to in-services. On 05/28/26 LPA conducted a review of training logs for S6-S11. Per Reliase transcripts and in- service sign in sheets, S6-S11 have completed required training's for 2026 thus far. Allegation: Staff are not conducting fire drills. It is being alleged that fire drills have only been conducted on the day shift and have not been completed on all shifts as required. On 05/28/26 11 am-12pm LPA conducted interviews with S1-S5 regarding the allegation above. 5 of the 5 staff interviewed denied the allegation above and reported that drills are conducted quarterly and are conducted during every shift. On 05/28/26 LPA conducted telephone interview with W1 regarding the allegation above. W1 denied the allegation above and reported that drills are conducted quarterly and are conducted in the morning, evening, and night shifts. Furthermore, W1 confirmed that the last drill conducted during all 3 shifts was done on 05/19/26. On 05/28/26 LPA conducted a review of quarterly drill reports dated: 01/20/26. Upon review LPA observed that the quarterly fire drills were conducted at 1:00pm, 2:30pm, and 11:30pm, the quarterly disaster drills were conducted at 1:10pm, 2:40pm, and 11:40pm, and the quarterly evacuation drills were conducted at 1:30pm, 2:50pm, and 11:50pm. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2026 · control 11-AS-20260518162103
May 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not complete required training. Staff are not conducting fire drills.

On 05/28/26 at 9:40 am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Villegas conducted an initialcomplaint visit regarding the allegation(s) above. LPA met with Executive Director Ashley Shire (staff #1 S1) as the purpose of today’s visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: On 05/28/26 LPA Villegas obtained copies of the staff and resident roster, the emergency disaster plan, facility sign in sheet dated: 05/19/26, copies of the quarterly fire drill reports dated: 01/20/26, disaster drills report dated: 01/20/26, evacuation drills reports dated: 01/20/26, In service sign in sheets dated: 02/26/26, 03/26/26, 04/29/26, 05/20/26, 05/27/26, and reliase training logs for staff #6-11 (S6-S11). On 05/28/26 11am-12pm LPA conducted interviews with staff #1-5 (S1-S5) regarding the allegation above. On 05/28/26 LPA conducted telephone interview with witness #1 (W1), conducted a review of training logs for S6-S11, and conducted a review of quarterly drill reports dated: 01/20/26. The investigation revealed the following: Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff did not complete required training. It is being alleged that not all caregivers have completed the required ongoing training. On 05/28/26 11am-12pm LPA conducted interviews with S1-S5 regarding the allegation above. 5 of the 5 staff interviewed denied the allegation above and reported that upon hire Reliase training is required before "on the floor" training can begin. Additionally, 5 of the 5 staff interviewed reported that all staff have monthly Reliase training's in addition to in-services. On 05/28/26 LPA conducted a review of training logs for S6-S11. Per Reliase transcripts and in- service sign in sheets, S6-S11 have completed required training's for 2026 thus far. Allegation: Staff are not conducting fire drills. It is being alleged that fire drills have only been conducted on the day shift and have not been completed on all shifts as required. On 05/28/26 11 am-12pm LPA conducted interviews with S1-S5 regarding the allegation above. 5 of the 5 staff interviewed denied the allegation above and reported that drills are conducted quarterly and are conducted during every shift. On 05/28/26 LPA conducted telephone interview with W1 regarding the allegation above. W1 denied the allegation above and reported that drills are conducted quarterly and are conducted in the morning, evening, and night shifts. Furthermore, W1 confirmed that the last drill conducted during all 3 shifts was done on 05/19/26. On 05/28/26 LPA conducted a review of quarterly drill reports dated: 01/20/26. Upon review LPA observed that the quarterly fire drills were conducted at 1:00pm, 2:30pm, and 11:30pm, the quarterly disaster drills were conducted at 1:10pm, 2:40pm, and 11:40pm, and the quarterly evacuation drills were conducted at 1:30pm, 2:50pm, and 11:50pm. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2026 · control 11-AS-20260518162103
May 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure there is sufficient staff to meet the needs of residents who require a two person assist.

On 05/12/2026 at 8:15am the Department conducted a initial visit at this facility to conduct the complaint investigation. During today's visit, the Department met with Ashley Shire (Adminstrator) and explained the purpose of the visit On 05/12/2026, between the hours of 8:00 AM – 10:35 AM, the Department interviewed Administrator (A1), Staff (S1–S7), and Residents (R1–R7). The Department requested and obtained copies of the staff roster (dated 05/05/2026) and resident roster (dated 04/26/2026). The Department also obtained resident records for R1–R7 which include: LIC 601: Identification & Emergency Information, LIC 602A: Physician’s Report for RCFE, LIC 603A: Preplacement Appraisal, Service Plans and Dementia Plan of Care Policies & Procedures Addendum. Investigation Findings continue on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Licensee does not ensure there is sufficient staff to meet the needs of residents who require a two person assist. It was alleged that the licensee has chronic understaffing on both floors, including floors where multiple residents require full two-person assistance. It was further alleged that staffing shortages have persisted despite concerns raised by staff, that agency staffing has not been utilized, and that new residents continue to be admitted without ensuring adequate staffing levels. On 05/12/2025, between the hours of 8:35am – 8:51am, the Department interviewed the Administrator in regards to the allegation. A1 denied the allegation. A1 reported that the facility has 60 residents, with four (4) residents requiring a two-person assist, and stated that current staffing levels which include seven (7) caregivers, one medtech, and administrative support such 1 administrator, 1 assisted living director, 1 activities director, 1 activities assistant, and 1 assistant administrator that are sufficient to meet resident needs. A1 stated that caregivers are assigned as four (4) caregivers upstairs and three (3) caregivers downstairs, with two (2) caregivers provides two person assistance when required. A1 reported that overtime is offered during shortages and that the facility began using outside agency staff as of 05/08/2026. A1 further stated that staffing concerns are taken into consideration and that new resident admissions are evaluated through assessment to ensure the facility can meet care needs. On 05/12/2025, between the hours of 9:40am – 10:41am, the Department interviewed seven (7) staff regarding the allegation. Two (2) out of seven (7) staff confirmed the allegation. Five (5) out of seven (7) staff denied the allegation. Of the staff who confirmed the allegation reported prior shifts where staffing was insufficient to consistently provide two person assistance, resulting in delays and the need to prioritize higher need residents. Of the staff who denied the allegation stated that current staffing levels are sufficient and reported no awareness of residents missing required two person assistance. Investigation findings continues on LIC 9099-C On 05/12/2025, between the hours of 8:54am – 9:27 am, the Department interviewed seven (7) residents regarding the allegation. Three (3) out of seven (7) residents confirmed the allegation. Three (3) out of seven (7) residents denied the allegation. One (1) out of seven (7) resident did not confirm nor deny the allegation and was unable to provide reliable responses due to cognitive impairment. Of the 3 residents who confirmed the allegation stated waiting long periods for assistance, needing two staff but receiving only one or none, or not receiving the care and attention they felt they needed. Of the three (3) residents who denied the allegation reported receiving timely assistance, stated they did not wait long for care, and denied needing two-person assistance. On 05/12/2026, between the hours of 12:00pm – 2:00pm, the Department conducted a records review for Residents R1–R7. The review included LIC 602A Physician’s Reports (dated 09/14/2023, 12/30/2024, 03/19/2025, 02/20/2026, 04/15/2026, 04/21/2026, and 08/27/2024), LIC 603A Preplacement Appraisals (dated 09/13/2024, 12/29/2024, 01/17/2025, 03/19/2025, 02/20/2026, and 04/15/2026), and current Service Plans (dated 01/07/2026, 04/21/2026, and 05/12/2026). Record review showed that the majority of residents (R1, R2, R4, R5, R6, R7) were documented as independent or requiring only one‑person assistance with transfers and mobility. These records consistently reflected needs such as verbal cueing, observation, walker use, or one person hands on assistance, but no documentation indicated a two person assist requirement for any of these residents. One resident (R3) was documented as requiring full assistance with transfers and mobility, including hands on support, fall management, and use of mobility equipment; however, R3’s LIC 602A, LIC 603A, and Service Plan did not identify a two person assist requirement. Across all seven (7) resident files reviewed, none of the LIC 602A forms, LIC 603A appraisals, or Service Plans documented a need for a two person assist for any resident at the time of the investigation. Additionally, according to the facility’s Plan of Operation for Dementia Care (Policies and Procedures Addendum), the facility is required to maintain an adequate number of direct care staff to support each resident’s physical, social, emotional, safety, and health care needs as identified in their current appraisal. The Plan of Operation also states that the facility will have at least one awake night staff if any resident with dementia requires night supervision. Investigation findings continues on LIC 9099-C Also the LIC 500 Personnel Report (dated 05/05/2026) the facility employs 35 direct care staff, consisting of 31 caregivers and 4 MedTech/Caregivers. Staffing schedules show 11 caregivers assigned to the AM shift (6:00 AM – 2:30 PM), 9 caregivers assigned to the PM shift (2:00 PM – 10:30 PM), and 7 caregivers assigned to the NOC shift (10:00 PM – 6:30 AM), with an additional six (6) caregivers listed as variable or TBD. AM schedules include staff working Sunday–Thursday, Wednesday–Sunday, and Tuesday–Saturday. PM schedules include Monday–Wednesday, Thursday–Monday, Wednesday–Thursday, Tuesday–Friday, Friday–Sunday, and Tuesday–Saturday. NOC schedules include Thursday–Saturday, Sunday–Thursday, Monday–Friday, Sunday–Wednesday, and variable overnight assignments. Overall, staffing patterns reflect routine shift coverage supplemented by variable schedule caregivers. Based on information gathered through interviews and record reviews, there is not enough evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted with Ashley Shire (Administrator) and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 12, 2026 · control 11-AS-20260508135653
May 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair.

On 5/11/2026, LPA Alfonso Iniguez conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit. LPA Iniguez met Ashely Shire/Administrator. LPA Iniguez explained the purpose of this visit. Investigation Consisted of: the department conducted the following interviews: Administrator Interview (A#1), Maintenance Director Interview (M#1) and Staff Interviews (S#1-S#3). The department gathered the following documents: copy of client roster and staff roster dated:5/11/26, and a Health and Safety check of the facility. Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated Investigation Revealed the Following: Allegation: Facility is in disrepair. The details of the complaint alleged that the emergency exit door by courtyard is in disrepair. On May 11, 2026, at approximately 1:00 PM, during a Health and Safety check of the facility, the Department observed the emergency exit gate located by the courtyard. The Department requested that the administrator (A#1) operate the gate, and (A#1) entered the access code on the keypad located beside the gate. The gate opened upon entry of the code. The Department did not observe the gate to be in disrepair at the time of the visit. On May 11, 2026, at approximately 2:00 PM, the Department interviewed the facility administrator (A#1) regarding the condition and operation of the emergency exit gate located in the courtyard near the golfing area. When asked to describe the current condition and functionality of the gate, (A#1) stated that the gate is locked and is functioning appropriately, and that it can be opened by entering a code on the keypad located beside the gate. When asked about the facility’s procedures for inspecting and maintaining emergency exit gates and when this specific gate was last checked, (A#1) stated that the maintenance director (M#1) conducts a daily walkthrough to check the doors and ensure they are working properly. When asked whether any reports or concerns had been received regarding the gate not opening properly during routine use or emergency preparedness activities, (A#1) stated that no reports had been brought to their attention. On May 11, 2026, at approximately 2:30 PM, the Department interviewed the maintenance director (M#1) regarding the inspection and operability of the emergency exit gate located in the courtyard near the golfing area. When asked when the gate was last inspected and what the findings were at that time, (M#1) stated that they check all gates, including the courtyard gate, every day. When asked whether any issues with this gate had been identified recently and whether any repairs or maintenance had been required or scheduled, (M#1) stated that no issues had been identified. Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C When asked about the facility’s procedures for ensuring that emergency exit gates remain operable and whether there had been any challenges maintaining this gate, (M#1) stated that daily checks are performed. On May 11, 2026, at approximately 3:00 PM, the Department interviewed facility staff (S#1–S#3), (3) out of (3) stated that they had not observed any difficulties opening or operating the emergency exit gate located in the courtyard near the golfing area during their shifts. In addition, staff stated that if an emergency exit gate is not functioning properly, the expected procedure is to report the issue to the maintenance director and the administrator immediately. Also, staff reported that they had not submitted any reports related to this gate. During this investigation, LPA did not find sufficient evidence to support the above-mentioned allegation(s). Based on the evidence gathered, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above-mentioned allegation(s) are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Complaint Report was given to Ashley Shire /Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 11, 2026 · control 11-AS-20260506115800
Jan 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not keep the emergency exits free of obstruction.

On 01/21/2026 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Troy Watson conducted an initial complaint visit for the allegation listed above. LPA Watson explained to the Administrator Shire Ashely the purpose of the visit. LPA Troy Watson was allowed entry into the facility. Investigation consisted of the following: On 01/21/2026 LPA Watson requested and received the following documents: Staff Roster dated 01/04/2026 and Resident Roster dated 12/02/25, Evacuation Plan, Fire Safety Inspection Request dated 09/04/2025, Fire Drill Report dated 01/20/2026, Emergency Disaster Plan dared 01/01/2026, Daily Safety Checklists Walk Through Logs dated 01/01/2026. On 01/21/2026 LPA Watson interviewed the Administrator (A1) and Staff #1-Staff# 3 (S1–S3). A tour of the facility grounds was conducted with the Administrator and found to be clean and in good repair. CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Staff did not keep the emergency exits free of obstructions. It is being alleged that the emergency exit in the facility’s kitchen office area is always partially blocked, and that kitchen staff do not wear hairnets while working in the kitchen, creating an ongoing safety hazard and restricting clear egress during an emergency. On 01/21/2026, LPA Troy Watson interviewed Administrator Ashley Shire (A1). During the interview conducted on 01/21/2026, Administrator Ashley shire (A1) stated during the interview that hairnets are required by all facility staff to be worn before entering the kitchen. A1 also stated that the emergency exit in the kitchen is never blocked are obstructed with boxes, chairs or anything because It would be considered a fire hazard. A1 denied the allegation that staff did not keep the emergency exits free of obstructions. On 01/21/2026, LPA Troy Watson interviewed Staff #1 -Staff#3 (S1–S3). Out of those interviewed 4 out of 4 staff members denied the above allegation. On 01/21/2026 LPA Troy Watson obtained and reviewed the facilities Evacuation Plan and observed on the Evacuation Plan two exits clearly marked for evacuation of the facility in case of an emergency. LPA Watson also obtained and reviewed the Fire Safety Inspection Request, and it showed a stamped approved clearance for 88 residential occupants. LPA Watson toured the facility with the Administrator and observed that all exits were free of obstructions. Based on the information gathered from the facility inspection, observations, interviews, and records analysis, the Department found no evidence to support the above allegation. The allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with the Administrator Ashley Shire and copies were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 21, 2026 · control 11-AS-20260115093403
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

On 12/17/25 Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Alfonso Iniguez conducted a pre-licensing evaluation for an RCFE facility type. Today’s pre-licensing evaluation was conducted with Linda Cho/License. The licensee has applied for a license to serve (88) elderly residents ages 59 and older. The fire clearance is approved for (88) non-ambulatory and (8) bedridden. Pending hospice waiver for (40). The facility is a two-story commercial building located in a business and residential neighborhood which consisted of the following: There is a hand washing station, reception area, check-in station, lobby, cameras in common areas, 48 resident rooms to accommodate 88 residents, 7 public restrooms, living/family rooms, commercial kitchen; 2 bistro kitchens, dining rooms, staff lounge, mechanical room, maintenance room, nurses’ stations, conference room, offices, medication rooms, sitting areas, activity room, media lounge, physical therapy room, solarium room, salon, locked supply closets, locked laundry rooms, shaded areas, courtyards, indoor/outdoor activity areas, and a parking lot. The evaluation Report continues on the next page, LIC 809-C... The following was observed during this visit: MEDICATIONS There is a locked centralized storage area for Resident medications. PHYSICAL PLANT Facility is clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Protective devices are in place. Indoor and outdoor passageways, stairways, open porches, and other areas of potential hazard are free of obstructions. All window screens are clean and in good repair. Facility temperature is between 68 degrees and 85 degrees. Open porches, and areas of potential hazard are well-lit and equipped with sturdy hand railings. Smoke alarms operate properly. Carbon monoxide detectors operate properly. BEDROOMS No client bedroom is a passageway to another room, bath or toilet. There is a bed for each client with a mattress, mattress pad, bedsprings, and pillow(s) which are clean and in good repair. Mattresses and pillows are flame-retardant. There is dresser and closet space for each client that includes at least two (2) drawers or eight (8) cubic feet of dresser space per client. There is a chair and lamp for each client and at least one (1) nightstand per two (2) clients. The evaluation Report continues on the next page, LIC 809-C... BATHROOMS There is at least one (1) toilet and washbasin per six (6) clients, family, and personnel. There is at least one (1) shower or bathtub per ten (10) clients, family, and personnel. Hot water temperature is between 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit. Bathroom is located near client bedrooms. There are nightlights in the hallways outside non-private bathrooms. SUPPLIES There are client personal hygiene supplies to include soap, toothpaste, toilet paper, and comb. There is a sufficient supply of clean linens to permit weekly changing or more of client top sheets, bottom sheets, bedspreads, blankets, pillowcases, mattress covers, bath towels, hand towels, and washcloths. FOOD SERVICE Dining room is near kitchen. Refrigerator(s) and freezer(s) are clean and large enough for the storage of at least two (2) days of perishable foods. Freezer is 0 degrees Fahrenheit. Refrigerator is a maximum of 45 degrees Fahrenheit. A seven (7) day supply of non-perishable food is present. There are sufficient amounts of tableware, tables, dishes, and utensils. There are sufficient amounts of equipment for the storage, preparation, and service of food. All equipment, dishes, and utensils are clean and well maintained. All kitchen, food storage, and preparation areas are clean. The evaluation Report continues on the next page, LIC 809-C... RECORDS There is confidential storage of personnel records at the facility. There is confidential storage of client records at the facility. ADMINISTRATION The emergency exiting plan and emergency phone numbers are posted. Client Personal Rights are posted. Posting both sides of the Personal Rights form LIC 613 meets this requirement. Facility Visiting Policy is posted. Licensing Complaint Poster is posted. There is space available for resident council meetings and resident council postings. ACTIVITIES There is an outdoor activity space with a shaded area and furnished for outdoor use. There is at least one common room available to clients for visitors. There are activity supplies to include board games and electronic gaming system. MISCELLANEOUS There are first-aid supplies to include sterile first-aid dressings, bandages, adhesive tapes, scissors, tweezers, thermometer, antiseptic solution, and a current first-aid manual. There is space and equipment for laundry. There is a space for clean linen storage and a separate space for soiled linen. There is an operating telephone available to clients. Emergency lighting and supplies to include flashlights with batteries. During this pre-licensing inspection, LPA did not find corrections are needed. LPA conducted the Component III Orientation with the Licensee and copy of this report was provided. A copy of the facility evaluation report will be available to the Central Applications Unit (CAU) for review.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2025
Dec 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

Facility Type: RCFE Application Type: CHOW Capacity: 88 Census (if any clients in care): 55 COMP II Participants: Ashley Shire, Administrator Scott Jang, Corp Mem 7501 Osage Mgt LLC Linda Cho, Corp Mem Collwood Terrace Stellar Care Inc James Kim, 7501 Osage Mgt LLC Brandon Cho, Collwood Terrace Stellar Care Inc Brian Choi, 7501 Osage Mgt LLC Interview Method: Virtual interview (Teams) On 12/10/2025, applicant/administrator participated in COMP II. Identification of the applicant and administrator was verified through interview questions based on photo ID and other identifying personal information. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed that they have read and understand community care facility licensing laws included in the Health and Safety Codes and the California Code of Regulations Title 22. Signed LIC 809 with copy of photo ID have been obtained. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2. Admission Policies 3. Staffing requirements & Training 4. Restrictive/Prohibited Health Conditions 5. General provisions 6. Emergency Preparedness 7. Complaints & Reporting 8.Pre-licensing readinessthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 9, 2025
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County