Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Aaa Quality Residential Care Facility
Small home·Licensed for 6·Panorama City, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$4,100 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,350–$5,050
- Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedJuly 1, 2025 · not a current opening
- Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · August 9, 2026
- Last state visitMay 27, 2026CDSS inspection record
Aaa Quality Residential Care Facility is a small care home in Panorama City — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2021.
Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Aaa Quality Residential Care Facility
Is Aaa Quality Residential Care Facility licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
How many residents is Aaa Quality Residential Care Facility licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Has Aaa Quality Residential Care Facility been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 13 state visits over the same years.
Is Aaa Quality Residential Care Facility still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Aaa Quality Residential Care Facility cost?
$4,100 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,350–$5,050. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.
Does Aaa Quality Residential Care Facility take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Aaa Quality Residential Corp., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Panorama City is 0.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Aaa Quality Residential Care Facility keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Aaa Quality Residential Care Facility license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “AAA QUALITY RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #195850166. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed to Aaa Quality Residential Corp., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 13 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 13 state visits in that period.
- 4 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is May 27, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
- Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 3 residents
- BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident
State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 3. BEDRIDDEN APPROVED FOR ROOM #1.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,100a month to start
Likely $3,350–$5,050
From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$4,100a month
Likely $3,350–$5,250
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Starting monthly rate$4,100likely $3,350–$5,050
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,350–$5,250
- $4,100
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,950–$8,400
- $6,100
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
8 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$5,700.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 8 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Breath of SunshineNorth Hills · 1.5 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Mom and Dads RetreatVan Nuys · 1.6 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Grant Serenity Homes of Sf ValleyVan Nuys · 2.0 mi · Small home$7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Breath of Sunshine HarmonyArleta · 2.2 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- California State Health GroupNorth Hills · 2.3 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Healthy Life Service FacilityNorth Hills · 2.9 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Blue Horizon EldercareNorth Hollywood · 2.9 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Blue HorizonNorth Hollywood · 2.9 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 7843 Stansbury Ave., Panorama City, CA 91402Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2021, the state has filed 12 documents for this home, and its records count 13 visits since 2021. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 27, 2026.
- On file since
- 2021
- State visits
- 13
- Most recent visit
- May 27, 2026
- Occupied · July 1, 2025 visit
- 5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated December 31, 2024 to July 1, 2025. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (4). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations0typical 0
- Substantiated allegations0typical 0
- Total complaints4typical 0
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2021.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 8 of 12 documents
May 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. The LPA was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit. The Licensee Ovsanna Khayalyan arrived to the facility shortly thereafter. The LPA, along with the staff toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. COMMON AREAS: The common area was observed to be clean and properly furnished. The LPA observed the fire extinguisher to be fully charged and purchased on 03/18/2026; fire alarms/carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly. Night lights were present in the hallways and passages. All exits have functioning auditory devices and were operational at the time of the visit KITCHEN: The kitchen/dining area was observed to be clean and propertly furnished. Knives are stored in a locked kitchen drawer. Kitchen appliances are in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Hot water measured at 107.9-degree Fahrenheit. Medications are located in a locked kitchen cabinet. BEDROOMS: The facility is a single-story residential home with three (3) bedrooms. Bedrooms were observed to be furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Inside temperature was maintained at a comfortable level. Continued on LIC 809-C… RESTROOMS: Restrooms were observed to be clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid mats. Hot water 106.6-degree Fahrenheit. The sinks had sufficient liquid soap, and paper towels. Signs are posted throughout the facility restrooms to promote handwashing. There are a washer and dryer located in the staff's restroom. Cleaning solutions, toxins, chemicals and hazardous items were inaccessible and locked away in the staff restroom. The first aid kit was observed in the staff’s restroom. OUTDOOR SPACE: The patio has patio furniture and patio umbrella to provide shade for residents’ use. There is a gate on the side of the house designated for an emergency exit. Passageways were free and clear from obstruction. There are no bodies of water on the premises. RECORDS: Records review began at 12:15 p.m. Residents’ records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. All records were in order. Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate annual training. All files were in order. MEDICATIONS: Medications review began at 1:30 p.m.; medications are centrally stored and locked in a cabinet in the kitchen area; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. No errors observed during the medication review. The LPA reviewed the following documents: - LIC500 Personnel Report - LIC9020 Client Roster - Certificate Of Liability _ Emergency Disaster Plan No deficiencies were cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 27, 2026
Jul 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident sustained unstageable pressure injury.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver final findings for the above allegation. During today’s visit, LPA Urena met with the Administrator Ovsanna Khayalyan and explained the reason for the visit. On 01/31/2025, the Woodland Hills Adult and Senior Care Regional Office (RO) received a complaint alleging facility employees at the AAA Quality Residential Care Facility failed to provide an appropriate level of care to Resident #1 (R1) resulting in R1 developing numerous pressure injuries with one being identified as unstageable. The complaint was referred to the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to Investigator Douglas Real. Continues on LIC 9099C... Unsubstantiated Page 2. On 02/05/2025, from 10:05am to 12:45pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an unannounced initial visit to investigate the allegation listed above. LPA Urena was greeted by staff and informed of the visit. The staff contacted the Administrator Ovsanna Khayalyan via telephone to inform them of the visit. The Administrator arrived at 10:45am and the LPA explained the reason for the visit. The LPA requested records pertinent to the investigation at 10:55am and interviewed the Administrator from 11:09am to 11:57am. The Administrator was advised that the complaint was referred to the Investigations Branch (IB); however, an IB investigator had not yet been assigned as of the visit date. The LPA determined further investigation was needed prior to issuing findings. On 02/24/2025, at approximately 11:55am, Investigator Real conducted interviews with Kaiser Permanente Hospital Social Worker; on 02/25/2025, from approximately 8:45am to 12:30pm, with County of Los Angeles Deputy Public Guardians; on 03/14/2025, at approximately 11:00am, with facility resident; on 04/15/2025, from approximately 10:00am to 1:00pm, with Staff #1 (S1), Administrator, and facility residents; on 05/22/2025, from approximately 11:45am to 1:15pm, with Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) Detective and Sunshine Care Hospice Administrator; and on 05/29/2025, at approximately 12:00pm, with Sunshine Care Hospice Registered Nurse. In addition, Investigator Real reviewed Kaiser Permanente Hospital medical records, Los Angeles Public Guardian (LAPG) conservator court documents, Sunshine Care Hospice Records, and facility file documents related to the investigation. Due to the complaint was not reported to the LAPD as a crime report, a police report was not generated. Therefore, no investigation or interviews were conducted by the LAPD. According to R1’s Physician’s Report, dated 07/29/2024, the report indicated R1 was diagnosed with Type II diabetes, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and dementia. R1 was noted as having lower leg diabetic wounds. R1 was admitted to the facility on 07/30/2024. Continues on LIC 9099C page 3.... Page 3. A review of the Sunshine Care Hospice records revealed on 11/30/2024, R1 was placed on hospice with the primary diagnosis of Unspecified Protein-Calorie Malnutrition and the Secondary diagnosis as Senile Degeneration of the brain. The hospice certification period was listed as 11/30/2024 to 02/27/2025. Frequency of visits was noted as home aide 2 times per week, LVN 1 time per week, and RN every 2 weeks. The Department’s investigation revealed R1 was under hospice care while residing in the facility and hospice was aware R1’s health was declining. According to R1’s hospice nurse, they saw no evidence to suggest that R1’s decline in health was due to neglect or abuse by the facility and believes R1’s decline was due to advanced dementia and possibly other comorbidities. R1’s hospice nurses instructed the facility caregivers to turn R1 every two hours, and the hospice nurse had no reason to believe the facility staff did not do so. R1 had a very poor appetite and frequently refused to eat or drink. This behavior likely contributed to R1’s skin breakdown leading to the unstageable pressure injury and the beginning of injuries on R1’s feet. Wound care was ordered through hospice to address the skin breakdown issues and an initial wound assessment was done on 01/29/2025, the day prior to R1 being sent to the hospital. The facility staff denied the allegation and reported turning R1 every two hours as instructed by hospice. The information obtained during the Department’s investigation did not sufficiently support the allegation. While R1 did sustain pressure injuries during their stay at the facility, the investigation did not provide sufficient evidence to substantiate neglect/lack of care. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted, copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250131163051
Jul 1, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted a Case Management - Deficiencies visit due to deficiencies discovered during the investigation of complaint control number # 29-AS-20250131163051. The LPA met with the Administrator Ovsanna Khayalyan and explained the reason for the visit. During the Department’s investigation of complaint # 29-AS-20250131163051, the following deficiency was observed: The Department’s investigation revealed that R1 was admitted to the facility on 07/30/2024. The responsible party was listed as “self” and R1 signed the facility admission agreement. R1’s health declined, and on 10/30/2024, R1 was placed on the County of Los Angeles Public Guardian (LAPG) appointed Conservator’s caseload. On 11/14/2024 during a visit to the facility, the LAPG informed the administrator that R1 was under the LAPG and that they were R1’s conservator. On 11/30/2024, R1 was placed on Sunshine Care Hospice. The LAPG was not notified until 01/30/2025. Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations, the following deficiency is cited (refer to LIC 809-D). Exit interview conducted, appeal rights discussed, and a copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87633(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 11, 2025
87633(a)(3) Hospice Care of Terminally Ill Residents (a)The licensee shall be permitted to accept or retain residents who have been diagnosed as terminally ill by his or her physician and surgeon …(3) Hospice agency services are contracted for by each terminally ill resident or prospective resident individually, or the resident’s or prospective resident's Health Care Surrogate Decision Maker if the resident or prospective resident is incapacitated, not by the licensee on behalf of a resident or prospective resident. These hospice agency services must be provided by a hospice agency both licensed by the state and certified by the federal Medicare program. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on records review and interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Licensee did not notify R1’s conservator (LAPG) that R1 was placed on hospice, which posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2025
Plan of correction: The licensee will review regulations and will submit letter of acknowledgment to LPA Urena via email.
May 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. The LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. The Licensee Ovsanna Khayalyan arrived at the facility shortly thereafter. The LPA, along with the Licensee toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. COMMON AREAS: The LPA observed common area to be clean and properly furnished. The LPA observed the fire extinguisher to be fully charged and purchased on 05/; fire alarms/carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly. Night lights were present in the hallways and passages. All exits have functioning auditory devices and were operational at the time of the visit. KITCHEN: The LPA observed the kitchen/dining area. Knives are stored in a locked kitchen drawer. Kitchen appliances are in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Hot water measured at 107.9-degree Fahrenheit. Medications are located in a locked kitchen cabinet. BEDROOMS: The facility is a single-story residential home with three (3) bedrooms. The LPA observed resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Inside temperature was maintained at a comfortable level. Continued on LIC 809-C… RESTROOMS: Restrooms were observed to be clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid mats. Hot water= 105.6-degree Fahrenheit. The sinks had sufficient liquid soap, and paper towels. Signs are posted throughout the facility restrooms to promote handwashing. There is a washer and dryer located in the staff's restroom. Cleaning solutions, toxins, chemicals and hazardous items were inaccessible and locked away in the staff restroom. The first aid kit observed in the staff restroom. OUTDOOR SPACE: The patio has patio furniture and patio umbrella to provide shade for residents’ use. There is a gate on the side of the house designated for an emergency exit. Passageways were free and clear from obstruction. There are no bodies of water on the premises. RECORDS: Records review began at 12:27 p.m. Residents’ records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. All records were in order. Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate annual training. All files were in order. MEDICATIONS: Medications review began at 1:30 p.m.; medications are centrally stored and locked in a cabinet in the kitchen area; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. No errors observed during the medication review. The LPA reviewed the following documents: - LIC500 Personnel Report - LIC9020 Client Roster -Certificate Of Liability No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2025
Apr 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff speak inappropriately towards a resident. Staff mishandle a resident's medication. Resident was physically abused while in care. Staff are denying a resident access to food.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted a subsequent visit to deliver the findings for the allegations listed above. The LPA was greeted by staff, and called the Administrator.The LPA explained the reason for the visit to the Administrator Ovsanna Khayalyan and read the report over on the phone. The Administrator allowed the facility staff to sign on the report. On 04/17/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an initial ten-day visit to investigate the allegations listed above. The LPA met with the Administrator Ovsanna Khayalyan and explained the reason for the visit. LPA Urena and the Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. No concerns were observed at this time. The LPA interviewed the Administrator, residents and staff from 10:05 a.m. to 01:25 p.m. Requested records pertinent to the investigation. Further investigation is needed at this time.Continues LIC 9099C... Unsubstantiated Pg. 2 Staff speak inappropriately towards a resident. On the allegation that staff speak inappropriately towards resident, it is the concern of the reporting party (RP) that staff speak disrespectfully to residents in care. To investigate the allegation, LPA Urena conducted residents’ interviews. The LPA interviewed four (4) out of five (5) residents, one resident was unavailable for the interview. The interviews revealed that staff are never disrespectful, nor do they raise their voices. One resident stated that they thought they heard staff use loud voice but was not sure. Staff denied being disrespectful to residents in care. Based on the information obtained through interviews, the residents stated that staff speaks to them respectfully. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstituted at this time. Staff mishandle a resident's medication. On the allegation that staff mishandle a resident's medication; it is the concern of the reporting party that staff are not dispensing the medications to residents as prescribed (timely). To investigate the allegation, LPA Urena conducted residents’ and staff interviews and conducted a random medication audit of residents’ medications compared to the Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record (LIC622). The interview with residents revealed that they receive their medications on time and according to their doctor’s orders. The medication audit revealed that the medications selected for audit were accurately dispensed, per physician’s orders. Based on the information obtained through interviews, and medication audit, the residents are receiving their medications according to the physician’s orders. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Continues on LIC 9099C pg. 3 Pg. 3 Resident was physically abused while in care. On the allegation that a resident was physically abused while in care; it is the concern of the reporting party that the RP witnessed staff physically abusing an elderly resident. The reporting party did not specify how the physical abuse was being perpetrated, and neither identified the elderly resident. To investigate the allegation, LPA Urena conducted residents’ interviews and residents’ representative’s interviews. The interviews revealed that staff have not abused residents physically nor in any other way. Residents are happy with the care they receive from the staff and the Administrator. The LPA interviewed the RP and the RP denied witnessing any physical abuse. Staff denied being physically abusive towards residents in care. The Administrator stated that no concerns or reports of abuse have been brought up by residents or their representatives. Based on the information obtained through interviews, residents reported that they are happy at the facility and denied any staff was physically abusing them. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff are denying a resident access to food. On the allegation that staff are denying a resident access to food, it is the concern of the reporting party (RP) that staff are not allowing residents access to the kitchen until after 8:00 a.m. To investigate the allegation, LPA Urena conducted residents’ and staff interviews. The residents’ interviews revealed that they receive three meals a day plus they are offered several snacks throughout the day. If they get hungry, they can ask the staff for food. They are never denied food. The staff interviews revealed that they serve breakfast between 8:00 a.m. and 8:30 a.m. lunch between 12:30 p.m. and 1:00 p.m., snacks in between and dinner at around 5:00 p.m. The LPA interviewed the RP, and the RP recognized that the staff are trying to take care of R1’s health, and that they do not actually deny the food, and is more about the food being consumed late at night. Based on the information obtained through interviews, RP denied being hungry or not having access to food or getting enough food during meals. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. No citations were issued. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250414113412
Feb 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident. Facility staff did not arrange transportation for resident in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an unannounced visit to investigate the allegations listed above. The LPA arrived at the facility and was greeted by staff. Staff contacted the Administrator via telephone. The Administrator Ovsanna Khayalyan arrived at 10:45 a.m. LPA Urena toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. LPA Urena requested records pertinent to the investigation at 10:50 a.m. and interviewed the resident, Administrator, and staff between 10:25 a.m. to 12:50 p.m. LPA Urena was unable to reach the reporting party (RP), but was able to speak with R1's case worker (CW) from 1:05 p.m. to 1:46 p.m. CW stated that the RP was a temporary employee and is no longer working for the company. Continues on LIC 9099C... Unsubstantiated Facility staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident. On the allegation that Facility staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident, it is the concern of the reporting party (RP) that the resident (R1) was experiencing chest pains and the facility staff failed to observe the changes in condition and did not seek timely medical attention for R1. The interview with R1 revealed that on 02/18/2025 probably after 2:00 p.m. they were feeling fine when they decided to go on a walk in the community, however after some time during the walk they started to feel weak and knowing that the hospital was nearby, they decided to walk themselves to the hospital. At the hospital they were admitted after being diagnosed with pneumonia. R1 stated that the facility Administrator called them and it was at this time that R1 informed the Administrator that they were admitted to the hospital. Interviews with the Administrator and the staff revealed that they did not notice any changes in R1's condition on 02/18/2025. R1 had lunch that day and decided to go on a walk sometime after lunch. R1 had been admitted in the facility two days prior to the incident, and R1 was in good spirits. Based on the information obtained through interviews, the allegation that facility staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident, is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Facility staff did not arrange transportation for resident in care. On the allegation that the Facility staff did not arrange transportation for resident in care, it is the concern of the RP that R1 was denied transportation to the hospital when they were not feeling well, and consequently R1 had to walk to the hospital. The interview with R1 revealed that on 02/18/2025, at around 2:00 p.m., they told the facility staff, “they were going on a walk”. R1 went stated that during the walk they felt weak. R1 stated that they know the area well and decided to walk to the nearby hospital, which is about 10 minutes of walking distance from the facility. R1 stated that they were confused, and ‘out of it’, when hospital staff interviewed them. R1 denied the statement provided by the RP in the complaint report. The interview with the Administrator revealed that R1 stated that they wanted to go on a walk. The Administrator stated that because R1 had been admitted to the facility only two days before, they were concerned about the walk, however R1 insisted on the walk. Furthermore, the Administrator stated that they told R1 to take the facility’s business card in case they got disoriented or lost and didn’t know how to get back. Per the Administrator R1 has a personal cell phone. The Administrator stated that they called R1 after 15 minutes but R1 did not answer the phone. After an hour passed, the Administrator called R1 again, at this time R1 answered the phone and R1 stated they were admitted to the hospital. The Administrator then informed R1’s emergency contacts that R1 was admitted to the hospital. Continues on pg. 3 Page 3. The LPA spoke with a R1’s case worker (CW) assigned to follow up with R1 for a month after placement at the facility. The CW stated that case notes dated 02/21/2025 indicate that R1 stated that they are happy residing at this facility. Based on the information obtained through record review and interviews, the allegation that facility staff did not arrange transportation for resident in care, is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. No citations were issued at this time. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report was issued. Facility staff yells at resident in care. On the allegation that the facility staff yells at residents, the interview with the resident (R1), revealed that this allegation is based on different facility where they were previously residing, and that it was a mistake, wrong facility. Therefore, the allegation is deemed to be Unfounded, at this time. Facility staff forces to eat. On the allegation that the facility staff forces residents to eat, the interview with the resident (R1), revealed that this allegation is based on different facility where they were previously residing, and that it was a mistake, wrong facility. Therefore, the allegation is deemed to be Unfounded, at this time. Facility staff forces to take medication. On the allegation that the facility staff forces residents to take medication,the interview with the resident (R1), revealed that this allegation is based on different facility where they were previously residing, and that it was a mistake, wrong facility. Therefore, the allegation is deemed to be Unfounded, at this time. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250219161649
Dec 31, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not ensuring resident's hearing aid is replaced. Staff are not providing resident with mail. Staff are not meeting resident's needs.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility to deliver findings. At 11:00 a.m., the LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. At 11:27 a.m., the Licensee, Ovsanna Khayalyan arrived at the facility. During the initial visit conducted on 9/14/2023 between 2:15 p.m. and 3:35 p.m., LPA Sandra Urena conducted a physical plant tour and conducted an interview with the Licensee. During the initial visit, the LPA also obtained copies of pertinent documents. During today’s visit, at 11:30 a.m., LPA Peraldi conducted an interview with the Licensee. Continued on LIC 9099-C. Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation: Staff are not ensuring resident's hearing aid is replaced. It was alleged that Resident #1’s (R1’s) hearing aid was not operable, and the Licensee did not assist with replacing the hearing aid. The Licensee stated that she made an appointment for R1 to a hearing center, and the appointment was set for 08/07/2023, but R1 had left to a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) in July 2023. R1 did not come back to the facility until 09/02/2023. The Licensee provided the LPA with the appointment card for R1. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding the allegation: Staff are not providing resident with mail. It was alleged that the Licensee would not provide R1 with R1’s mail. The Licensee stated that she would give R1’s mail to R1 and that she would keep R1’s mail at the front of the facility for R1. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding the allegation: Staff are not meeting resident's needs. It was alleged that R1 was not taken care of properly as R1 developed wounds while in care. Per record review, R1 was admitted to the facility on 05/06/2023 and left around July 2023 and was readmitted on 09/02/2023. R1’s primary diagnosis upon admission per physician report dated 5/4/2023 is listed as severe sepsis, acute chronic renal failure, acute chronic respiratory failure, atrial fibrillation (afib), bilateral pneumonia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). R1 also had Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). Per physician report dated 5/4/2023, R1 was not on hospice services. R1 did start receiving hospice services on 05/23/2023. Medical records for R1’s hospitalization on 6/27/2023 did not note any pressure ulcers. R1 was at a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) from around July 2023 and returned back to the facility on 09/02/2023. The Licensee stated that from the SNF, R1 developed the pressure ulcers. The Licensee stated that she readmitted R1 since R1 would be getting wound care with hospice. Physician report dated on 9/2/2023, noted R1 had pressure ulcers stage 3 and stage 4 on ankles. R1’s physician report dated 9/2/2023, stated that R1 was receiving hospice services. R1’s medical record dated 8/30/2023 stated that R1 had a pressure ulcer on left ankle, stage 4. The LPA called the SNF to confirm that R1 was admitted between July 2023 and September 2023. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 31, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230907155842
Jun 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. The LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. The Licensee Ovsanna Khayalyan arrived at the facility shortly thereafter. The LPA, along with the Licensee toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. COMMON AREAS: The LPA observed common area to be clean and properly furnished. The LPA observed the fire extinguisher to be fully charged and purchased on 01/19/2024; fire alarms/carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly. Night lights were present in the hallways and passages. All exits have functioning auditory devices and were operational at the time of the visit. KITCHEN: The LPA observed the kitchen/dining area. Knives are stored in a locked kitchen drawer. Kitchen appliances are in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Hot water measured at 107.9-degree Fahrenheit. Medications are located in a locked kitchen cabinet. BEDROOMS: The facility is a single-story residential home with three (3) bedrooms. The LPA observed resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Inside temperature was maintained at a comfortable level. Continued on LIC 809-C… RESTROOMS: Restrooms were observed to be clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid mats. At 12:15 p.m., hot water 105.6-degree Fahrenheit. The sinks had sufficient liquid soap, and paper towels. Signs are posted throughout the facility restrooms to promote handwashing. There is a washer and dryer located in the staff's restroom. Cleaning solutions, toxins, chemicals and hazardous items were inaccessible and locked away in the staff restroom. The first aid kit observed in the staff restroom. OUTDOOR SPACE: The patio has patio furniture and patio umbrella to provide shade for residents’ use. There is a gate on the side of the house designated for an emergency exit. Passageways were free and clear from obstruction. There are no bodies of water on the premises. RECORDS: Records review began at 12:37 p.m. Residents’ records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. All records were in order. Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate annual training. All files were in order. MEDICATIONS: Medications review began at 1:50 p.m.; medications are centrally stored and locked in a cabinet in the kitchen area; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. No errors observed during the medication review. INFECTION CONTROL: The facility has an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility’s cleaning protocol is sufficient. If needed, the facility has the capacity to designate a single isolation room if the facility has a confirmed case of COVID-19. The LPA reviewed the following documents: - LIC500 Personnel Report - LIC9020 Client Roster No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 18, 2024
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Ano Two Facility for the Elderly
Panorama City · Small home · 0.1 mi away
$4,000 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Ano One Facility for the Elderly
Panorama City · Small home · 0.1 mi away
$4,000 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Caring Home Assisted Living
Panorama City · Small home · 0.4 mi away
$4,800 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Emvy Board and Care Facility
Van Nuys · Small home · 0.5 mi away
$4,050 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Valley View Retirement Center
Panorama City · Large community · 0.6 mi away
$2,550 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Maddie's Green Haven Facility
Van Nuys · Small home · 0.6 mi away
$4,450 a month to start · Covelight estimate