Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Angels of the Valley Board & Care

Small home·Licensed for 6·Northridge, California

Licensed since 2007Licence #197606826Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,100 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,350–$5,100
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedSeptember 24, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · August 9, 2026
  • Last state visitMarch 16, 2026CDSS inspection record

Angels of the Valley Board & Care is a small care home in Northridge — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2007. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Angels of the Valley Board & Care

Is Angels of the Valley Board & Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Angels of the Valley Board & Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Angels of the Valley Board & Care been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 5 state visits over the same years.

Is Angels of the Valley Board & Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Angels of the Valley Board & Care cost?

$4,100 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,350–$5,100. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Angels of the Valley Board & Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Diaz, Yana D., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Northridge Hospital Medical Center is 3.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Angels of the Valley Board & Care keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 1 resident, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Angels of the Valley Board & Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ANGELS OF THE VALLEY BOARD & CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197606826. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Diaz, Yana D., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 5 state inspection visits since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 5 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2007, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is March 16, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 1 resident
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 1.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 1 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,100a month to start

Likely $3,350–$5,100

From 12 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,100a month

Likely $3,350–$5,300

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,100likely $3,350–$5,100

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,350–$5,300
$4,100
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,950–$8,450
$6,100
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

12 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,350–$5,950.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 12 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 10700 Reseda Blvd., Northridge, CA 91326Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 5 documents for this home, and its records count 5 visits since 2007. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated March 16, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
5
Most recent visit
March 16, 2026
Occupied · September 24, 2024 visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated September 24, 2024. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2007.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026110202511020242202022110

The last 36 months — 4 of 5 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Mar 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mariana Agban conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. LPA met with Administrator Yana Diaz and explained the reason for the visit. At approximately 09:30 am, with the assistance of the Administrator, LPA took a tour of the physical plant. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The smoke alarms were tested, and they function properly. The carbon monoxide detector was tested, and it functions properly. The fire extinguisher is located in the main hallway. The charge date February,2026 . Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. LPA found a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility, properly stored. Knives were stored in a locked drawer in the kitchen. Properly labeled medications were locked in one of the kitchen cabinets. Bedrooms: There were four (4) bedrooms designated for residents' use. All four bedrooms in use by residents were properly furnished with appropriate bedding and linens and with sufficient lighting. Bathrooms: There are two (2) bathrooms designated for residents' use. Both bathrooms were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. The hot water temperature was measured from the bathroom sink at 108.9 degrees Fahrenheit. No cleaning supplies or hazardous items were present in each bathroom during the inspection. Common Areas: These included the living room and dining area. The common areas were properly furnished. The auditory alarms on all exit doors were on and functional at the time of the visit. Surrounding Grounds: LPA observed that the facility is still under construction in the backyard. There were no visible immediate hazards. (Continue on 809C) The gate at the side of the home was checked to ensure no locks were installed, and that exits and passageways were clear for emergency evacuation. The laundry area is located in the garage, which is inaccessible to residents. Resident Files: LPA conducted a file review of resident records to ensure compliance with licensing forms. Staff Files: LPA also conducted a file review of staff records to ensure forms and training are up to date and in compliance with licensing forms. Medications: Medication and Medication Records were reviewed for proper documentation. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, there were no deficiencies observed during the visit. Exit Interview Conducted and a Copy of the Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 16, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Mar 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mariana Agban conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. LPA met with Administrator Yana Diaz and explained the reason for the visit. At approximately 09:30 am, with the assistance of staff#2 (S2), LPA took a tour of the physical plant. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The smoke alarms were tested, and they function properly. The carbon monoxide detector was tested, and it functions properly. The fire extinguisher is located in the hallway. The purchase date is Feb 5, 2025. Temperature: Facility maintains a comfortable temperature of 77 degrees Fahrenheit. Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. LPA found a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility, properly stored. Knives were stored in a locked drawer in the kitchen. Properly labeled medications were locked in one of the kitchen cabinets. Bedrooms: There were four (4) bedrooms designated for residents' use. All four bedrooms in use by residents were properly furnished with appropriate bedding and linens and with sufficient lighting. Bathrooms: There are two (2) bathrooms designated for residents' use. Both bathrooms were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. The hot water temperature was measured from the bathroom sink at 108.9 degrees Fahrenheit. No cleaning supplies or hazardous items were present in each bathroom during the inspection. Common Areas: These included the living room and dining area. The common areas were properly furnished. The auditory alarms on all exit doors were on and functional at the time of the visit. Surrounding Grounds: Entry/exits were free of obstruction. There was furniture appropriate for outdoor use. The outdoor area was free of hazards. The laundry area is located in the garage, which is inaccessible to residents. Resident Files: LPA conducted a file review of resident records to ensure compliance with licensing forms. Staff Files: LPA also conducted a file review of staff records to ensure forms and training are up to date and in compliance with licensing forms. Medications: Medication and Medication Records were reviewed for proper documentation. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, there were no deficiencies observed during the visit. Exit Interview Conducted and a Copy of the Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility retains resident(s) with prohibited health condition(s) Over-occupancy in Resident bedroom(s) Facility not kept in a safe condition

On 09/24/2024 at 10:00 am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Lorena Casillas conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to this facility to investigate the above stated allegations. LPA was greeted by staff and was granted access to the facility. LPA spoke to the Administrator Yana Diaz and explained the reason for the visit. On 06/12/2023, the Woodland Hills South Adult and Senior Care Regional Office received a complaint regarding the allegations mentioned above. On 06/20/2023, LPA Mariana Agban and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Eva Miller initiated the complaint visit. LPA Agban and LPM Miller conducted a tour of the facility and obtained copies of pertinent information. LPA Agban also conducted an interview with the Administrator. LPA Casillas reviewed documents collected by LPA Agban. LPA Casillas also reviewed interviews conducted by LPA Agban. Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated At 10:00 AM LPA Casillas conducted a physical plant tour. During the investigation, interviews and record reviews were conducted from 10:00 am to 12:30 pm. LPA requested and obtained copies of updated resident roster, updated LIC 500, Administrator Certificate and Liability Insurance. LPA requested copies of Physician Reports for all residents, and any other information pertaining to the investigation. LPA Casillas conducted interviews with Administrator, two (2) staff and six (6) residents out of six (6) that were present at the facility at the time of the visit. Allegation #1 Facility retains resident(s) with prohibited health condition(s). It is alleged that facility retains resident(s) with prohibited health condition(s). Regarding this allegation, it is reported that on an undisclosed date, a medical emergency call was made, and emergency personnel were dispatched to the facility where it was observed that a person with bedside suctioning equipment, a dislodged nasogastric tube, and a gastrostomy tube, was residing and receiving care in the facility. Interview with the Administrator revealed that the person in question was in fact an adult relative of the Administrator’s that resided in the home, who was fingerprint cleared, and not a Resident. The Administrator states that the relative has since passed and is no longer at the facility. The Administrator stated that the facility is their primary home, however there is a separate area where the Residents have their own living quarters. LPA interviewed staff that confirmed that Administrator lives in the facility with their relative and that living quarters are kept separate for both staff and residents. Furthermore, it was confirmed by staff that the person in question was not a facility Resident, but a relative that lived in the home. LPA interviewed Residents present in the facility and they also confirm that the persons living in the staff room are staff and relatives of the Administrator. LPA reviewed documentation and the person in question is/was listed as a cleared adult allowed to be in the home. LPA also reviewed all Resident files and none of the Residents currently residing in the facility have a prohibited health condition, therefore based on observations, record review, and interviews, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Continued on LIC9099-C Allegation #2 Over-occupancy in Resident bedroom(s). It is alleged that there is over-occupancy in Resident bedroom(s). Regarding this allegation, it is reported that there are three (3) beds being used in the primary room. Interview with the Administrator revealed that the room in question is the staff room, and no Residents have access to that room. Administrator stated that the three beds are for personal use and are not all used at the same time. Interviews with staff confirmed that the room with three (3) beds is the staff room and that the beds are for personal use. Interview with Residents revealed that Residents do not have access to the staff room therefore they do not know what is contained in that room. During LPA tour it was noted that staff room is labeled “Staff Room Only”, it was locked and inaccessible to Residents. LPA also observed that all Resident rooms are adequately being used for the number of beds/residents allowed per the fire clearance. Based on observations, file reviews and interviews this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Allegation #3 Facility not kept in a safe condition. It is alleged that the facility is not kept in a safe condition. Regarding this allegation, it is reported that there was an excessive amount of storage in the primary bedroom and that there was an excessive amount of extension cords that were running up the wall causing a fire hazard. Interview with the Administrator revealed that the room in question is the staff bedroom where all the belongings are for personal staff use. Administrator states that the extension cords that were in use at the time of the complaint were used for medical equipment that was for the relative that was being cared for by the Administrator, and that all the equipment has since been removed. Interviews with staff confirmed that the staff bedroom is used for staff personal use only and that Residents do not have access to that room as it always remains inaccessible. During LPA’s tour of the facility, it was observed that all Resident rooms as well as areas throughout the facility were clean and clear of clutter. LPA was granted access to the staff room where it was observed that the room was clean and free of clutter as well as free of excessive extension cords. LPA did not observe any extension cords being used in Resident rooms nor was there an excessive amount of storage throughout the facility to cause a hazard. Therefore, based on observations and interviews this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. No citations issued. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report given to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230612155207
Feb 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Mariana Agban and Perchui Khurshudyan conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. LPAs met with staff and explained the reason of the visit. At approximately 10:45 am, with the assistance of staff, LPAs took a tour of the physical plant. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The smoke alarms were tested and function properly. The carbon monoxide detector was tested and functions properly.The fire extinguisher is located in the hallway. The purchase date Jan 3,2023. Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. LPAs found a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; properly stored. Knives were stored in a locked drawer in the kitchen. Properly labeled medications were locked in one of the kitchen cabinets. Bedrooms: There were four (4) bedrooms designated for residents' use. Three (3) designated for residents' use and one (1) for staff. All three bedrooms, in use by residents, were properly furnished with appropriate beddings and linens with sufficient lighting. Bathrooms: There are one (1) bathroom designated for residents' use. The bathroom was properly supplied and had functional fixtures. Hot water temperature was measured from the bathroom sink at 105.3 degrees Fahrenheit. No cleaning supplies or hazardous items were present in each bathroom during the inspection. Common Areas: These included the living room and dining area. The common areas were properly furnished. The auditory alarms on all exit doors were on and functional at the time of the visit. Surrounding Grounds: Entry/exits were free of obstruction. There was furniture appropriate for outdoor use. The outdoor area was free of hazards. The laundry area is located in the garage, which is inaccessible to residents. Resident Files: LPAs conducted a file review of resident records to insure compliance of licensing forms. Staff Files: LPAs also conducted a file review of staff records to insure forms and training are up to date and compliance with licensing forms. Medications: Medication and Medication Records were reviewed. LPAs observed LEVOTHYROXINE medication is short by 1 bill for 2 out 2 residents. Assistant administrator couldn't explain the reason for the shortage. They were advised to use Medication Administration Record (MAR) to prevent any future issues with medications. Exit Interview conducted, citation issued and a Copy of the Report deliveredthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 23, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County