Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Angelic Mansions

Mid-size home·Licensed for 15·Yucca Valley, California

Licensed since 2017Licence #361800118
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,850 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,850–$6,400
  • Home sizeLicensed for 15Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit8 of 15 beds occupiedAugust 21, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 21, 2026CDSS inspection record

Angelic Mansions is a mid-size care home in Yucca Valley — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 15 residents since 2017.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Angelic Mansions

Is Angelic Mansions licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Angelic Mansions licensed for?

15 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Angelic Mansions been cited?

5 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 14 state visits over the same years.

Is Angelic Mansions still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Angelic Mansions cost?

$4,850 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,850–$6,400. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 25 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 74 other homes of a similar licensed size across San Bernardino County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,700 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,000 (n = 74 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Angelic Mansions take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Angelic Mansions LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Can Angelic Mansions keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 5 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Angelic Mansions license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ANGELIC MANSIONS”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #361800118. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 15 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Angelic Mansions LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 14 state inspection visits since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 5 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 14 state visits in that period.
  • 5 complaints and 7 substantiated allegations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 21, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 15 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 5 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 10 residents

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 15 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 5.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 5 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,850a month to start

Likely $3,850–$6,400

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,850a month

Likely $3,850–$6,550

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,850likely $3,850–$6,400

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 25 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,850–$6,550
$4,850
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,600–$9,500
$6,850
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 25 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

24 homes like this within 25 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,400–$5,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 7585 Warren Vista Ave, Yucca Valley, CA 92284Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 13 documents for this home, and its records count 14 visits since 2017. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on August 21, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”

On file since
2021
State visits
14
Most recent visit
August 21, 2026
Occupied at that visit
8 of 15 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 5 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated August 2, 2021 to August 21, 2026. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 5 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations5typical 0
  • Type B citations2typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations7typical 0
  • Total complaints5typical 1

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 327 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2017.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202624120251102024220202322020222312021111

The last 36 months — 8 of 13 documents

20262 state visits · 4 documents
Aug 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee allows uncleared staff to provide care to residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation on the above allegation. LPA met with Staff Brandy Gorden, and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding allegation mentioned, after reviewing the Guardian website and interviewing staff, it was determined that although Staff #1 has an active background clearance, they are not associated to the facility. Staff #1 (S1) stated they believed the association request had already been submitted. LPA reviewed Staff #1’s personnel file and observed required training documentation as well as a valid CPR certificate, which was verified through the National CPR Foundation website. Based on LPA's interviews and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED An exit interview was conducted where this report LIC9099, LIC9099D, and Appeal Rights were discussed and provided to Staff Brandy Gorden at the conclusion of the visit Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260814164109

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(g)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 28, 2026

87411 Personnel Requirements - General (g) Prior to employment or initial presence in the facility, all employees and volunteers subject to a criminal record review shall: (2) Request a transfer of a criminal record clearance as specified in Section 87355(c)...This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based upon record review and interviews Staff #1 (S1) was no associated to the facility through guardian which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator has agreed to contract guardian to be associated to the facility and provide proof to LPA by the POC due date.

Aug 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Case Management Visit. The purpose of the case management visit was to address deficiencies observed during a required annual inspection conducted on 6/23/26 and in response to death reports submitted to the Community Care Licensing Office on 06/03/26. LPA met with Staff Brandy Gorden and stated the purpose of the visit. On 6/23/26, during the facility’s required annual inspection, deficiencies were cited for the absence of staff training logs in personnel files. LPA has not received proof of corrections for this deficiency. The Administrator stated that the only training documentation currently signed by staff pertains to ensuring chemicals are not accessible to residents. LPA informed staff that additional training logs are required to be maintained in each staff member’s personnel file. LPA discussed the incident/death reports explaining that on 6/3/26, the Department received five (5) resident death reports from the facility. The reports indicated that Resident #1 (R1) passed on 5/2/26, Resident #2 (R2) on 5/7/26, Resident #3 (R3) on 5/10/26, Resident #4 (R4) on 5/16/26, and Resident #5 (R5) on 5/30/26. Four (4) of the five (5) incident/death reports were not reported to the Department within the required time frame. Deficiencies were cited during today’s visit in accordance with Title 22, Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC 809) and correction plans (LIC 809D) and appeal rights were discussed and copies were provided to Staff Brandy Gorden at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(c) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 28, 2026

87411 Personnel Requirements - General (c) All RCFE staff who assist residents with personal activities of daily living shall receive initial and annual training as specified in Health and Safety Code sections 1569.625 and 1569.69 This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interviews, and record review staff did not have training logs in their personnel folders which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator/Licensee has agreed to provide training and obtain logs with signatures for all staff and provide proof to LPA by the POC due date

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC87211(1)(A) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 28, 2026

87211 Reporting Requirements (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency...for the resident within seven days of the occurrence...(A)Death of any resident from any cause... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interviews, and record review staff are not reporting incidents to the department in a timely manner which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2026

Plan of correction: The Licensee/Administrator will review the Reporting Requirements regulation and submit a Statement of Understanding to LPA by Plan of Correction (POC) due date.

Jun 23, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not dispose of non-consumed leftover food after 72 hours Staff does not prevent cross contamination of raw meat Staff does not ensure food is stored, prepared and served in a safe healthful manner Staff are not trained in food handling and safety procedures Staff do not ensure medications are centrally stored in a locked and safe place that are inaccessible to unauthorized persons.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations mentioned. LPA met with Administrator Steve Rajadas and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding Allegation #1: Interviews with three (3) staff members indicated that leftover food is not frozen or reserved for residents. The Administrator informed LPA that leftover food is not served to residents; if food is not discarded after three (3) days, it is stored and frozen for Administrator use only. Interviews with three (3) residents reflected that they have not observed food being recycled and are unaware of whether food is discarded after three (3) days. During the kitchen tour, LPA did not observe any food stored beyond three (3) days. Regarding Allegation #2: LPA interviewed three (3) staff members, all of whom reported that they take precautions to prevent cross-contamination. Staff explained that raw meats are not placed directly on counters and are instead set on foil, and separate cutting boards are used. Unsubstantiated Staff also reported that the Administrator provides thorough in house training. Interviews with three (3) residents indicated they either assume staff prevent cross contamination, have not experienced any issues, or have not observed anything raising concern regarding cross contamination practices. Regarding Allegation #3: Interviews with two (2) staff members revealed that food is stored, prepared, and served in a safe manner. LPA also interviewed three (3) residents, all of whom stated that, to their knowledge, food is stored, prepared, and served in a safe and healthful manner. Regarding Allegation #4: The Administrator reported that all staff receive in-house training on food handling procedures. Two (2) staff informed LPA that they were not required to obtain a food handler’s certificate. Interviews with three (3) residents indicated that two (2) have observed staff being trained in food handling, while one resident stated they were not aware of food handling practices. Regarding Allegation #5: During the facility tour, LPA observed that the medication room door has a digital lock, and cabinets inside the medication room are also secured. Interviews with three (3) staff members confirmed that the medication room remains locked and inaccessible to residents at all times. Two (2) residents also stated that the medication room is consistently kept locked and they have never seen it open. Based on LPA’s observations, staff and resident interviews, and relevant documentation, the allegations are determined to be Unsubstantiated. An Unsubstantiated finding means that although the allegations may be valid or could have occurred, there is insufficient evidence to support that the alleged violations did or did not happen. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Steve Rajadas, and a copy of this report was provided at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 23, 2026 · control 56-AS-20251202152431
Jun 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Steve Rajadas, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with a license capacity of (15), a current census of (7). LPA Ramirez conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant/Environment: Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility has no swimming pool or similar bodies of water. The facility has sufficient lighting and is maintained at a comfortable temperature. The facility has sufficient indoor and outdoor space for resident activities.The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors/carbon monoxide alarms, laundry equipment, and telephone service. Resident’s showers, toilets, and hand washing areas were operating properly. The hot water temperature in residents bathrooms measured between 105.4 and 109.4 degrees F. Six (6) resident’s bedrooms had beds, bed linen, chairs, dresser, storage space and sufficient lighting. The facility has sufficient linens, towels, and personal hygiene items for residents. The facility has posted in a common area, Ombudsman poster, facility license, resident’s rights, CCLD complaint poster, and facility sketch Food Service: Facility kitchen and dining areas are maintained clean. The facility has sufficient non-perishable and perishable food supply for residents in care. Sharps were kept locked, however bottles of bleach were left in the residents bathroom accessible to residents, deficiency issued. Continuation on LIC – 809C: Care & Supervision: Facility has 24-hour/7days a week care staff. Facility staff have current CPR/first aid training. Medical Related Services: Resident’s medications are labeled and centrally stored in a locked room, LPA audited three (3) resident's medication at random, no issued found. Record Review: Five (5) Staff files reviewed were observed to be incomplete, S1,3,4,5 had missing required training,S4 and S5's health screening was not signed by a physician, deficiency will be issued. S3 & S5 were not associated to the facility through guardian, deficiency issued. Six (6) Resident files reviewed were observed, R6 did not have a signed Physician Report, deficiency issued. Last disaster drill was conducted on 6/19/26. Facility does not have an Infection Control Plan, repeated violation issued. Facility does not have an Emergency Disaster Plan, deficiency issued. Based on observations, interview, and record review deficiencies and technical violations were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report along with LIC 809D, LIC 9102, LIC 421IM, and appeal rights was discussed and provided to Administrator Steven Rajadas at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 23, 2026

The state marks this report as 8 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 7. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20251 state visit · 1 document
Dec 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Steve Rajadas, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with a license capacity of (15), a current census of (12). LPA Ramirez conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant/Environment: Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility has no swimming pool or similar bodies of water. The facility has sufficient lighting and is maintained at a comfortable temperature. The facility has sufficient indoor and outdoor space for resident activities The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors/carbon monoxide alarms, laundry equipment, and telephone service. Resident’s showers, toilets, and hand washing areas were operating properly, however one (1) of the resident's shared bathroom has a sink in disrepair; deficiency issued. The hot water temperature in residents bathrooms measured between 109.1 and 113 degrees F. Six (6) resident’s bedrooms had beds, bed linen, chairs, dresser, storage space and sufficient lighting. The facility has sufficient linens, towels, and personal hygiene items for residents. The facility has posted in a common area, Ombudsman poster, facility license, resident’s rights, CCLD complaint poster, and facility sketch Food Service: Facility kitchen and dining areas are maintained clean. The facility has sufficient non-perishable and perishable food supply for residents in care. Sharps and chemicals were kept locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Continuation on LIC – 809C: Care & Supervision: Facility has 24-hour/7days a week care staff. Facility staff have current CPR/first aid training. Medical Related Services: Resident’s medications are labeled and centrally stored in a locked room, LPA audited four (4) resident's medication at random, no issued found. Record Review: Four (4) Staff files reviewed were observed to be incomplete, all staff had missing required training, S3's health screening was not signed by a physician and S4 did not have a health screening or TB result; deficiency will be issued. S1,3,& 4 were not associated to the facility through guardian, deficiency issued. Four (4) Resident files reviewed were observed to be complete. Based on observations, interview, and record review deficiencies and technical violations were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report along with LIC 809D, LIC 9102, and appeal rights was discussed and provided to Administrator Steven Rajadas at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 10, 2025

The state marks this report as 7 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 6. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Steve Rajadas, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with a license capacity of (15), a current census of (14). LPA Ramirez conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant/Environment: Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility has no swimming pool or similar bodies of water. The facility has sufficient lighting and is maintained at a comfortable temperature. The facility has sufficient indoor and outdoor space for resident activities The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors/carbon monoxide alarms, laundry equipment, and telephone service. Resident’s showers, toilets, and hand washing areas were operating properly. The hot water temperature in residents bathrooms measured between 106 and 110 degrees F. Eight (8) resident’s bedrooms had beds, bed linen, chairs, dresser, storage space and sufficient lighting. The facility has sufficient linens, towels, and personal hygiene items for residents. The facility has posted in a common area, Ombudsman poster, facility license, resident’s rights, CCLD complaint poster, facility sketch, and menu Food Service: Facility kitchen and dining areas are maintained clean. The facility has sufficient non-perishable and perishable food supply for residents in care. Sharps and chemicals were kept locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Continuation on LIC – 809C: Care & Supervision: Facility has 24-hour/7days a week care staff. Facility staff have current CPR/first aid training. Medical Related Services: Resident’s medications are labeled and centrally stored in a locked cabinet, LPA found inconsistencies with medication distribution. Deficiency will be issued. Record Review: Four (4) Staff files reviewed were observed to be incomplete, deficiency will be issued. Four (4) Resident files reviewed were observed to be complete. Based on observations and record review deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report along with LIC 809D, and appeal rights was discussed and provided to Administrator Steven Rajadasthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 21, 2024
Sep 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 9/19/2024 Licensing Program Analyst Sarina Ramirez arrived at the facility to amend documents originally delivered on 07/31/24 On 07/31/2024 LPA Ramirez was at the facility to initiate a complaint investigation COMPLAINT CONTROL NUMBER: 56-AS-20240726112144 The amendment was signed by Administrator Rajada and he was provided a copy of the amended report at the conclusion of the visitthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 19, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 4, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection LPA met with Facility Administrator Steven Rajadas and was granted entry to the facility. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for Elderly (RCFE) Licensed capacity is (15) current census (9). LPA was accompanied by Facility Administrator, to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected client bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA measured and observed the water temperatures in the bathrooms to be at 105.8 degrees F The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to clients in care. There was a designated storage space for client/staff files. Medications are kept inside laundry room cabinets inaccessible to clients. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for clients in care. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of clients in care. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. All staff members working in the facility have criminal record clearance through the department. Record Review: LPA reviewed five (5) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA also reviewed four (4) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, trainings, and health screenings. Medications were audited at random and appeared to be dispensed appropriately by staff members. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) was discussed and provided to Facility Administrator Steven Rajadas.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 4, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

  • Common areasIndoor Common Areas

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food

Activities & the rhythm of a day

  • Activity types offeredActivities On-site

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Religious services off site

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Faith, culture & language

  • Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Bernardino County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Bernardino County