Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Aaspen Villagecare

Mid-size home·Licensed for 15·Yucca Valley, California

Licensed since 2009Licence #366423788
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,600 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,650–$6,050
  • Home sizeLicensed for 15Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit13 of 15 beds occupiedMay 9, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 25, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderMnk Group LLCSince 2009 · 2 licensed homes

Aaspen Villagecare is a mid-size care home in Yucca Valley — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 15 residents since 2009. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Aaspen Villagecare

Is Aaspen Villagecare licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Aaspen Villagecare licensed for?

15 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Aaspen Villagecare been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2009, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.

Is Aaspen Villagecare still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Aaspen Villagecare cost?

$4,600 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,650–$6,050. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 21 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 24 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 74 other homes of a similar licensed size across San Bernardino County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,700 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,000 (n = 74 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Aaspen Villagecare take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Mnk Group LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to Mnk Group LLC — at least 2 on the state roster.

Can Aaspen Villagecare keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Aaspen Villagecare license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “AASPEN VILLAGECARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #366423788. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 15 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Mnk Group LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2009, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 8 state inspection visits since 2009, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2009, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2009, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 25, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 15 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 3 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
15 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 3.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,600a month to start

Likely $3,650–$6,050

From 21 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,600a month

Likely $3,650–$6,200

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,600likely $3,650–$6,050

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 21 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 24 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,650–$6,200
$4,600
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,350–$9,150
$6,600
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 21 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 24 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

21 homes like this within 24 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,350–$5,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 21 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 7633 Kickapoo Trail, Yucca Valley, CA 92284Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 11 documents for this home, and its records count 8 visits since 2009. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated January 26, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
8
Most recent visit
August 25, 2026
Occupied · May 9, 2025 visit
13 of 15 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 5 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated July 2, 2021 to May 9, 2025. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 5 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 1

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 327 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2009.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025440202322020221102021132

The last 36 months — 6 of 11 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Jan 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Sarina Ramirez and Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPAs met with House Manager Amanda Roberts, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with a license capacity of (15), a current census of (7). LPAs conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant/Environment: Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility does not have a swimming pool or similar bodies of water. The facility has sufficient lighting and is maintained at a comfortable temperature. The facility has sufficient indoor and outdoor space for resident activities, however an activities schedule is not created/posted; deficiency issued. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors/carbon monoxide alarms, working laundry equipment, and telephone service. Four (4) Resident’s showers, toilets, and hand washing areas were operating properly. The hot water temperature in one (1) resident bathrooms measured between 113.1 degrees F. Five (5) resident’s bedrooms had beds, bed linen, chairs, dresser, storage space and sufficient lighting. The facility has sufficient linens, towels, and personal hygiene items for residents. The facility has posted in a common area, Labor laws, facility sketch, CCLD complaint poster, and Ombudsman poster. Continuation on LIC – 809C: Food Service: Facility kitchen is under construction, dining area is maintained clean . The facility has sufficient perishable food supply, but not non perishable food supply for residents in care, deficiency issued. Sharps and chemicals were kept locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Care & Supervision: Facility has 24-hour/7days a week care staff. Medical Related Services: Resident’s medications are labeled and centrally stored in a locked room. Four (4) residents medications were audited at random, R3's medication is not being administered per physician's orders, deficiency issued. Record Review: Four (4) Staff files reviewed were observed to be incomplete, Staff #1 (S1) had a missing health screening, technical violation issued. Staff #3 (S3) was not associated to the facility through guardian deficiency issued. Personnel files did not have in service training, deficiency issued. Three (3) Resident files reviewed were observed to be complete. Based on observations and record review technical violations and deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report along with LIC 809C, LIC 809D, LIC 9102, and Appeal Rights were discussed and provided to House Manager Amanda Roberts at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 26, 2026

The state marks this report as 9 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 8. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20254 state visits · 4 documents
Jun 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

On June 27, 2025, the Department held an informal office meeting to discuss the status of all Aaspen Village Care facilities. In attendance was Regional Manager (RM) Leslie Mendiveles, Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Karen Clemons, Licensing Program Analyst, (LPA) Sarina Ramirez and Licensee Khan Mushtaq. During today's meeting the following was discussed: 1. The status of the facility operation. 2. Eviction Procedures/Plan of Closure 3. Notification in Compliance with Title 22 4. Licensee/Administrator Responsibilities/ Staffing 5. Accountability of Licensee Governing Body 6. Residents in care. The Licensee informed the Department the facility will not be closing. The following was requested: LIC 500, LIC 9020, copies of letters to residents rescinding eviction, list of residents who relocated and where they moved to. All documents requested are due by Monday June 30,2025. The following documents were provided to Licensee: Accountability of Licensee Governing Body, Administrator Qualifications and duties, Eviction Procedures, Transfer of Resident upon forfeiture of License or Change in use of facility. On 4/29/25 House Manager Amanda Roberts and Administrator Chris Tanabe emailed LPA copies of eviction letters to residents regarding renovations. The letters were not approved and the licensee agreed to resend the letters and provide licensing with corrected copies of a temporary relocation notice. In the future the Licensee has agreed to follow Title 22 procedures regarding facility closure. An exit interview was conducted with the Licensee and a copy was provided at the conclusion of the meetingthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 27, 2025
Jun 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a Health and Safety check. LPA met with House Manager Amanda Roberts, and discussed the purpose of the visit. House Manager Roberts stated there was five (5) residents residing at the facility, LPA interviewed three (3) residents, 2 of the 3 residents interviewed explained to LPA they received eviction letters, 1 of the 3 stated they did not receive an eviction letter. House Manager Roberts explained to LPA as of yesterday the residents were no longer being evicted. One (1) resident was sleeping and was unable to be interviewed, One (1) resident was out in the community and was also unable to be interviewed. LPA toured the facility, LPA observed four (4) empty rooms. Rooms #1,2,6&7 remained empty with no residents or beds, however room #6 was unsanitary with feces on floor; deficiency issued. LPA explained to House Manager Roberts the Licensee has yet to contact CCLD regarding the status of Aaspen Village Care facilities, LPA advised Roberts to notify Licensee about an office meeting that has been scheduled and provided a copy of the correspondence. Based on observation deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6 of The California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted where the Licensing reports were discussed and copies of the reports with Appeal Rights was provided to House Manager Amanda Roberts.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.682 · Plan of correction due date: Jun 28, 2025

1569.682 Transfer of resident upon forfeiture of license or change in use of facility; duties of licensee; closure plan; duty of department upon licensee’s failure to comply; civil penalties(a) A licensee of a licensed residential care facility for the elderly shall, prior to transferring a resident of the facility to another facility or to an independent living arrangement as a result of the forfeiture of a license...or a change of use of the facility pursuant to the department’s regulations, take all reasonable steps to transfer affected residents safely and to minimize possible transfer trauma……..(b) If seven or more residents of a residential care facility for the elderly will be transferred...the licensee shall submit a proposed closure plan to the department for approval. The department shall approve or disapprove the closure plan, and monitor its implementation...(6) Until the department has approved a licensee’s closure plan, the facility shall not issue a notice of transfer or require any resident to transfer. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based upon record review and interviews, Administrator/Licensee did not submit closure plan to CCLD for approval. This violation posed a potential health and safety risk to residents in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2025

Plan of correction: House Manager Roberts was advised to notify Licensee about office meeting to discuss the status of facilities.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 20, 2025

87303 Maintenance and Operation (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. Based on observation the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by leaving room #6 unsanitary with feces on floor and cabinets loose off their hinges in the kitchen which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2025

Plan of correction: House Manager has agreed to clean empty rooms and repair broken cabinets in kitchen by POC due date and submit proof to LPA

May 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that facility has an adequate amount of food in refrigerator and freezer for the residents. Staff did not ensure that there is substance or variety in the food served to the residents. Staff did not ensure that food served to the residents matches what is on the menu. Staff is not following the residents' special diets.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced complaint investigation on the above allegations. LPA met with House Manager, Amanda Roberts, to discuss the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegations, staff did not ensure that facility has an adequate amount of food in refrigerator and freezer for the residents, staff did not ensure that there is substance or variety in the food served to the residents, staff did not ensure that food served to the residents matches what is on the menu, staff is not following the residents' special diets, the investigation reveals the complaint was filed under a similar name but incorrect facility number. Based on investigation findings, the allegations above are Unfounded. A finding that the complaint is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted where this report was reviewed and a copy provided to the House Manager at the conclusion of the visit. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 9, 2025 · control 56-AS-20230627113631
Jan 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with House Manager Amanda Roberts, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with a license capacity of (15), a current census of (13). LPA conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant/Environment: Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility does not have a swimming pool or similar bodies of water. The facility has sufficient lighting and is maintained at a comfortable temperature. The facility has sufficient indoor and outdoor space for resident activities. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors/carbon monoxide alarms, working laundry equipment, and telephone service. Resident’s showers, toilets, and hand washing areas were operating properly. The hot water temperature in two (2) resident bathrooms measured between 124 and 137 degrees F, technical violation issued. Eight (8) resident’s bedrooms had beds, bed linen, chairs, dresser, storage space and sufficient lighting. The facility has sufficient linens, towels, and personal hygiene items for residents. The facility has posted in a common area, facility license, facility sketch, and Ombudsman poster. Food Service: Facility kitchen and dining area are maintained clean. The facility has sufficient non-perishable and perishable food supply for residents in care. Sharps and chemicals were kept locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Continuation on LIC – 809C: Care & Supervision: Facility has 24-hour/7days a week care staff. Facility staff have current CPR/first aid training. Medical Related Services: Resident’s medications are labeled and centrally stored in a locked cabinet. Record Review: Four (4) Staff files reviewed were observed to be complete. Four (4) Resident files reviewed were observed to be complete. Based on observations and record review technical assistance and violations were issued, but no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report along with LIC 902 was discussed and provided to House Manager Amanda Roberts.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 21, 2025

The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 11, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with Lora Statler, Facility Representative as was granted access to the facility. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with a license capacity of (15) and a current census of (0) residents in care. Facility Representative Statler stated that the facility has not had residents for at least two years. LPA spoke with Administrator, Chris Tanabe, who stated that he wants to keep the facility in operating status although there are no residents in care. LPA conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: LPA observed outdoor frontyard and backyard had overgrown dry shrubs which presents a safety hazards for visitors. LPA spoke with the Administrator who stated that yard maintenance will be conducted at the facility tomorrow. The facility has no pools or other bodies of water. Indoor passageways were free of obstruction. The facility has sufficient indoor and outdoor space for the capacity of residents. Bathroom equipment were in operating condition; however, the facility did not ensure the bathrooms hot water temperature attained at a minimum 105 degrees F. The hot water temperature in (6) bathrooms measured between 54 to 55 degrees F. LPA spoke with the Administrator who stated that he would have the utility company check the water heater. LPA observed all bedrooms had no beds and no functioning lights. Although, there are no residents in care, the facility should have at a minimum one completely furnished bedroom for visitor and/or licensing inspection. Care & Supervision: The facility has no staff or residents in care. Record Review: The facility has no staff or residents in care for record review. Medical Related Services: The LPA observed a locked room where medications will be kept. Based on LPA observations, deficiencies are being cited per Title 22, Division 6 of The California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted where reports LIC809/LIC809-D/LIC9102 were discussed and copies provided to the facility representative with Appeal Rights at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 11, 2023

The state marks this report as 8 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Mnk Group LLC, licensed since 2009, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Bernardino County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Bernardino County