Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Anastasia

Mid-size home·Licensed for 10·Livermore, California

Licensed since 2022Licence #19201146
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,650 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,450–$7,400
  • Home sizeLicensed for 10Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedSeptember 26, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJuly 29, 2026CDSS inspection record

Anastasia is a mid-size care home in Livermore — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 10 residents since 2022.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Anastasia

Is Anastasia licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Anastasia licensed for?

10 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Anastasia been cited?

2 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 13 state visits over the same years.

Is Anastasia still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Anastasia cost?

$5,650 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,450–$7,400. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 34 other homes of a similar licensed size across Alameda County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,000 to $5,735 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 34 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Anastasia take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Protection of Mother of God, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Can Anastasia keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Anastasia license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ANASTASIA”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #19201146. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 10 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Protection of Mother of God, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 13 state inspection visits since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 2 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 13 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 29, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 2 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 8 residents

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 2 NON-AMBULATORY AND 8 BEDRIDDEN RESIDENTS. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6 RESIDENTS. BEDRIDDEN APPROVEDFOR BEDROOMS 1-7 & 9 ONLY. NON-AMBULATORY ONLY IN BEDROOMS 8 & 10. 2ND FLOOR, GARAGE, AND DETACHED SHEDS ARE OFF LIMITS TO RESIDENTS.

935 - ELDERLY · 983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,650a month to start

Likely $4,450–$7,400

From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,650a month

Likely $4,450–$7,500

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,650likely $4,450–$7,400

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,450–$7,500
$5,650
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,300–$10,400
$7,650
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

8 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,400–$5,850.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 8 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 3646 East Avenue, Livermore, CA 94550Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 13 documents for this home, and its records count 13 visits since 2022. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 29, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
13
Most recent visit
July 29, 2026
Occupied · September 26, 2024 visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated July 16, 2024 to September 26, 2024. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations2typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 1

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 327 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2022.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262202025110202434120231102022450

The last 36 months — 7 of 13 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 7/29/2026 at 4:00 p.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) A Gomez arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit due to a capacity increase. LPA met with Caregiver, Paul Montehermoso and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator was unavailable and approved caregiver to sign todays report over the phone. LPA toured toured the facility and observed it consistent with facility sketch submitted to CCLD. LPA advised facility to utilize a pendant system for residents due to the physical layout. Caregivers and Administrator state that they have a system available that they plan on using. No issues noted. No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2026
Jun 30, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 06/30/26 at 1PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) D Panlilio arrived unannounced to conduct an annual required inspection. LPA met with staff (ADM, S1) and explained the purpose of the visit. ADM has a current administration certificate# 6077591740 which expires 12/19/27. At 1:15PM, LPA toured the facility including but not limited to the front entrance, screening station, kitchen, bathrooms, bedrooms and common areas. There is one central entry point for universal screening for staff, residents and visitors. A sign-in policy, visitor’s logs, no touch thermometer, additional face masks and hand sanitizers were observed at the screening station. Emergency Disaster Plan, Complaint poster, Personal rights, Cough/sneeze etiquette, proper hand-washing signs were observed posted in common areas. Facility has a sufficient 2-day perishable and 7-day non-perishable food supply. Facility has a 30-day supply of PPEs, paper, medications locked in cabinets. Comfortable temperature is maintained at 76 deg F. Hot water temperature was measured at 115 deg F. Facility has a mitigation plan in place and the infection control leader is the administrator. Inside and outside pathways were free of obstruction and fire hazards. Smoke and Carbon monoxide detectors were operational. Fire extinguisher was observed fully charged. LPA reviewed 3 staff and 5 resident files. Updated copies of the following documents were collected for facility file:  LIC500- Personnel Report  LIC9020 - Residents Roster  LIC308- Designation of Facility Responsibility  LIC610E- Emergency/Disaster Plan including infection control plans  Evidence of Liability Insurance No deficiencies observed during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 30, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
May 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 5/28/2025 at 10:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) G. Luk arrived unannounced to conduct a Required - 1 Year inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Christine Sevier and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, dining area, kitchen, garage, and outdoor area. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were observed. Fire extinguisher was observed to be full and purchased on 4/25/2025. One week of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable food supplies were available. Hot water temperature was measured at 115.5 degrees F in the hallway bathroom. LPA observed grab bars and non-skid mat in the bathrooms. There were adequate lights in each room. Resident rooms were observed to be cleaned and fully furnished. First Aid kit is complete. The facility has a written emergency disaster plan. Last disaster drill was conducted on 5/2/2025. LPA reviewed 6 residents and 3 staff files starting at 11:40AM. LPA reviewed a sample of resident's medications during inspection. No deficiencies are being cited on this date. Exit interview conducted with Christine Sevier. A copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2025

The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20243 state visits · 4 documents
Sep 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that resident was adequately fed resulting in weight loss Staff did not assist resident in transferring out of bed.

On 9/26/2024 at 10:40AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) G. Luk arrived unannounced to conduct complaint investigation and to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. LPA met with caregiver, Vanesia Duhaney and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA spoke with administrator, Lacy Vincent who stated caregiver can sign CCLD reports. During the investigation, LPA interviewed 4 residents, 2 staff, witness, and complainant. LPA reviewed and obtained documents including LIC500, physician's report, preplacement appraisal, care plan, facility notes, feeding instructions, home health document, and emergency information. Staff did not ensure that resident was adequately fed resulting in weight loss Interview with staff and witness revealed that staff are feeding R2 three meals daily. Interview with residents indicated that staff is providing meals to residents. R2 stated that staff assist in feeding and R2 had an appetite in the morning. (Continue on LIC9099C...) Unsubstantiated R2's physician's report dated 10/21/2022 shows that R2's weight was168.8 pounds. However, the facility did not have records of R2's weight after admission to the facility. Staff did not assist resident in transferring out of bed. Interview with residents revealed that staff are assisting residents in transferring out of bed. R2 stated that staff would assist R2 in transferring to wheelchair when asked. Interview with staff indicated that R2 doesn't want to be transferred out of bed. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did occur, therefore these allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies are being cited on this date. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2024 · control 15-AS-20230825120429
Sep 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On 9/26/2024 at 12:15PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) G. Luk arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Caregiver, Vanesia Duhaney and explained the purpose for the visit. LPA spoke with administrator, Lacy Vincent who stated caregiver can sign CCLD reports. While LPA G. Luk was at the facility for a complaint investigation (#15-AS-20230825120429), the following deficiency was observed. After reviewing Guardian system, LPA G. Luk observed staff (S1) was not fingerprint cleared or associated to the facility. LPA spoke with Administrator, Lacy Vincent over the phone and informed her that S1 cannot be at the facility or have interactions with residents until fingerprint clearance is completed. LPA observed S1 left the licensed portion of the facility during visit. Civil penalty of $200 is being assessed. The deficiency was observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Failure to correct deficiency may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report, civil penalty, and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(g)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 27, 2024

Personnel Requirements - General. Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by law or Department regulations... This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on record review, licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having staff fingerprint cleared which poses an immediate health and safety risk to the persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2024

Plan of correction: Administrator has agreed to obtain fingerprint clearance for S1 and submit written plan or fingerprint documents to CCLD by POC date. Civil penalty of $200 is being assess.

Jul 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is not fingerprint cleared. Unqualified staff administered medications to residents.

On 07/16/2024 around 05:15 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Holmes arrived unannounced to conduct an initial 10-day complaint visit and deliver the findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Anika Brown, Staff and explained the reason for the visit. S4 was telephoned and stated that her shift had just ended and she could email any documents needed. Allegations: Staff is not fingerprint cleared. Unqualified staff administered medications to residents. SUBSTANTIATED During the course of the investigation and visit, LPA toured the facility, reviewed a sample of three Staff (S1, S2 and S3) files. LPA requested the file for (S4), Medication Log, Current Personnel Report (LIC 500) and Resident Roster. Continued on LIC 9099C... Substantiated ...continued from LIC 9099. -At 5:25 PM, LPA spoke to S4 who stated that she was helping the Licensee and the Licensee was not available at this time. There is not an LIC 308 available. S4 does not have any criminal record clearance on file and is not associated to the facility in Guardian; S4 stated that she/he gave the information to the Licensee but Licensee is unavailable. -At 6:55 PM, S4 stated that he/she had been working at the facility for about two (2) weeks. -At 6:55 PM, LPA reviewed personnel records for (S1, S2, and S3); There was not a file present for S4. -At 7:07 PM, Sample review of C1's Medication Administration Record was not dated or signed by the staff who administered the medication. S2 stated that S4 gives out the medication; S4 is not associated to the facility. -At 7:00 PM, Staff (S1 and S2) New Employee Training records and Certificate of Completion did not include adequate training hours for administration of medication. There was not a file present for S4. Based on information obtained, the allegations are SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegations are valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiencies are cited from Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC 9099D. Failure to submit proof of correction by plan of correction due date, and any repeat violation within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, Appeal Rights, and a copy of this report provided to Anicka Brown, Staff.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 16, 2024 · control 15-AS-20240711153226

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(g)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 19, 2024

87411 Personnel Requirements - General (g)...Prior to employment or initial presence...(1) Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by law or Department regulations... -This requirement is not met as evidenced by: -Based on interviews and observation, the licensee did not comply with the section above by not associating S4 to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 16, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee to submit proof to CCLD by POC date by reading the regulations and self certify. Submit proof that S4 has criminal background clearance and is associated to the facility.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1569.629(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 19, 2024

1569.69 Employees assisting residents with self-administration of medication; training requirements (a)...facility who assists residents...(2)...15 or fewer persons... six hours of initial training...two hours of hands-on shadowing training... -This requirement is not met as evidenced by: -Based on interviews, observation, and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section above by providing medication training to staff that assist residents with self-administration of medication.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 16, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee to submit proof to CCLD by POC of medication training for all staff that assist residents with self-administration of medication.

Jun 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 6/19/2024 at 8:50AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) G. Luk arrived unannounced to conduct a Required - 1 Year inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Octavian Mahler and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility’s fire clearance was approved for 6 non-ambulatory residents, of which 6 residents may be bedridden, and 6 residents may be under hospice care. LPA toured the facility including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, dining area, kitchen, garage, and outdoor area. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were observed. Fire extinguisher was observed to be full and purchased on 6/19/2024. One week of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable food supplies were available. Hot water temperature was measured at 113.2 degrees F in the hallway bathroom. LPA observed grab bars and non-skid mat in the bathrooms. There were adequate lights in each room. Resident rooms were observed to be cleaned and fully furnished. First Aid kit is complete. The facility has a written emergency disaster plan. Last disaster drill was conducted on 5/29/2024. LPA reviewed 5 resident and 4 staff files starting at 10:00AM. LPA interviewed 2 residents and 2 staff. LPA reviewed a sample of resident's medications starting at 12:30PM. At 9:15AM, LPA observed unlocked medication in the refrigerator. Staff locked up the medication in a lockable refrigerator during inspection. LPA also observed unlocked medications in R3's room and staff locked up the medications. At 11:00AM, LPA observed S4's file was incomplete. At 1:00PM, LPA observed facility does not have MAR (Medication Administration Records) for resident's PRN medications. (Continue on LIC809C...) At 1:15PM, LPA observed doctor's order dated 6/8/2024 states that R3 has PRN orders for Chlorhexidine Gluconate and Guaifenesin. However, facility does not have the medications available for R3. At 1:30PM, LPA observed facility does not have hospice training records when R1 was admitted to hospice care. The deficiencies were observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2024

The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Alameda County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Alameda County