Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Alta Vista Simi #2

Small home·Licensed for 6·Simi Valley, California

Licensed since 2022Licence #565850266
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,300 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,350–$6,500
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedMarch 10, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitSeptember 1, 2026CDSS inspection record

Alta Vista Simi #2 is a small care home in Simi Valley — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2022. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Alta Vista Simi #2

Is Alta Vista Simi #2 licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Alta Vista Simi #2 licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Alta Vista Simi #2 been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.

Is Alta Vista Simi #2 still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Alta Vista Simi #2 cost?

$5,300 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,350–$6,500. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 17 other homes of a similar licensed size across Ventura County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $6,202 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 17 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Alta Vista Simi #2 take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Alta Vista Simi #2 LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Adventist Health Simi Valley is 2.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Alta Vista Simi #2 keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Alta Vista Simi #2 license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ALTA VISTA SIMI #2 LLC”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #565850266. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Alta Vista Simi #2 LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 8 state inspection visits since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 1, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 4 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 3 residents

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 3 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.ALL BEDROOMS APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,300a month to start

Likely $4,350–$6,500

From 10 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,300a month

Likely $4,350–$6,650

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$5,300likely $4,350–$6,500

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,350–$6,650
$5,300
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,050–$9,750
$7,300
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

10 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,200–$5,900.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 10 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 2942 Rosette St., Simi Valley, CA 93065Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 8 visits since 2022. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated September 1, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
8
Most recent visit
September 1, 2026
Occupied · March 10, 2026 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated April 24, 2025 to March 10, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2022.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262202025220202411020231102022220

The last 36 months — 5 of 8 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Annual/Random

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Balisi arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. Upon arrival, the LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Emil Siapno arrived shortly after. LPA toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. LPA inspected the kitchen/food service area at approx. 10:00 a.m. Knives and sharp objects are stored in a locked drawer to the right of the stove. No cleaning supplies were observed stored in the kitchen area. Kitchen appliances were observed to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food properly stored at this time. Office area located in the kitchen. At the time of the visit, the common area furniture's were observed to be in good condition. Medications and a sufficient supply of PPE and toiletries were observed stored inaccessible to residents in care in a closet at the entry way. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature of 72 degrees Fahrenheit. Smoke detector(s) and carbon monoxide detector were operational at the time of the visit. LPA observed fire extinguishers to be fully charged and last purchased in 05/01/2025. The LPA observed four (4) resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. The resident restrooms were clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid surfaces. The bathrooms were sufficiently stocked with supplies and paper towels. The hot water temperature was measured in each restroom between 105 - 120 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed hallway cabinets to store various electronic equipment, flashlights and other supplies for emergency use. All exits have functioning auditory devices and were operational at the time of the visit. The LPA observed required postings throughout the common areas. There is an attached garage observed inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed garage to have an additional fridge to store extra perishable food. LPA also observed a laundry area, a sufficient supply of clean linen and towels, laundry supplies securely stored, extra incontinent supplies, PPE , canned goods, emergency food supply as well as additional furniture and medical equipment for facility use. The backyard has a covered outdoor area equipped with furniture including a table and chairs for resident use. The LPA observed two (2) self-latching gate with clear passageways clear of obstruction. There were no bodies of water over 3ft noted at the time of the visit. LPA observed a storage shed behind a locked gate that stored extra furniture and equipment for facility use. LPA also observed a small tool shed behind the locked gate that stored various gardening tools. At 10:51am staff was observed mopping floors. Records review, six (6) resident records were reviewed for, but not limited to: appraisals, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. Five (5) Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to: personnel records, health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All files were observed to be in order at this time. Medication review, medications for all residents were observed. All medications were stored properly and were appropriately documented on their respective centrally stored medication and destruction record sheets. No deficiencies were observed during medication review. Infection control / Emergency Disaster plan: During today’s visit, the LPA reviewed the facility's infection control practices and the facility's emergency disaster plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. Emergency disaster drills are conducted quarterly; the facility’s last emergency disaster drill was conducted on 08/03/2026 The facility’s emergency disaster plan is up to date and is adequate. Both the infection control plan and the emergency disaster plan are reviewed/updated annually by the facility’s administrator. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were tested, all alarms were functional at the time of the visit. During today’s visit LPA updated the facility mailing address, Administrator and telephone number. LPA also obtained a copy of the facility’s LIC 500, resident roster and Limited Liability insurance. Exit interview conducted and copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 1, 2026
Mar 10, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not assist resident with ambulating Facility staff spoke inappropriately to resident Staff did not provide adequate food service for residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Balisi conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to investigation the allegations listed above. Upon arrival LPA met Administrator Emiliano C Siapno and explained the reason for the visit. On 11/07/2025, LPA conducted an initial 10-day complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. At approximately 10:00 a.m. LPA conducted physical plant, interviewed staff, residents, families / responsible parties of residents in care and reviewed and obtained copies of pertinent documentation relevant to the investigation. Today LPA conducted physical plant, interviewed staff, residents, families / responsible parties of residents in care. It was reported that “Facility staff did not assist resident ambulating” as it was alleged that staff are not assisting Resident #1 (R1) with using the restroom. LPA’s interview with six (6) residents during the investigation reflected that none of the (6) residents reported concerns about staff failing to assist them with toileting or incontinence care. All (6) residents stated they have not been left in soiled diapers or clothing for an extended period of time. Unsubstantiated LPA was unable to effectively communicate with one (1) resident. LPA interviewed four (4) staff members. Staff reported that residents are typically asked if they need to use the restroom or have their diapers checked before each shift, before and after meals, before and after snacks, and before going to bed. Staff stated that R1 is encouraged to request assistance with using the restroom; however, at times when R1 requested assistance they already had urinated or had a bowel movement. LPA also interviewed five (5) residents’ family members or responsible parties. None of the (5) individuals did not report any concerns about staff failing to assist residents with toileting or incontinence care in a timely manner. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations "Facility staff did not assist resident with ambulating " has been deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. It was reported that “Facility staff spoke inappropriately to resident” It was alleged that staff told R1 to “shut up.” LPA’s interview six (6) residents during the investigation revealed one (1) resident stated they were not comfortable ringing a bell to request assistance, however when they do request assistance by other means staff attend to them in a timely manner. All (6) residents also reported they have not observed staff speak inappropriately to residents and did not express any concerns about staff speaking inappropriately or discouraging residents from requesting assistance. LPA was unable to effectively communicate with one (1) resident. LPA’s interview with four (4) staff members revealed all (4) Staff reported they have not observed any staff speak inappropriately to residents and have not observed staff deny assistance to residents when requested. LPA also interviewed five (5) residents’ family members or responsible parties. None of the (5) individuals expressed concerns about staff speaking inappropriately to residents in care. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations " Facility staff spoke inappropriately to resident” has been deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. It was reported that “Meals are not provided in a timely manner” as It was alleged that meals are not provided to residents at typical meal times. LPA interviewed six (6) residents during the investigation. One (1) resident stated they receive their meals "long after" typical meal times, but also indicated they can't recall what time the meals were served or when this occurred. Continued from 809-C The other (5) residents reported they have not experienced delays in meal service and did not express concerns about meals being provided at inconsistent times. LPA was unable to effectively communicate with one (1) resident. LPA interviewed four (4) staff members. Staff stated that meals are typically served at approximately 7:30 a.m., 12:00 p.m., and 5:30 p.m., with snacks offered between meals. Staff reported that residents are asked if they would like to eat when meals are offered and that some residents occasionally choose to eat later than the scheduled meal time depending on how much they ate during their previous meal time. LPA also interviewed five (5) residents’ family members or responsible parties. None of the (5) individuals expressed concerns regarding residents not receiving meals in a timely manner. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations " Meals are not provided in a timely manner”” has been deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. During the visit Administrator Emiliano C Siapno stated they had leave to attend to an urgent matter, but stated staff can sign in their place. Exit interview conducted and copy of report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 10, 2026 · control 29-AS-20251106115359
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Balisi arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. Upon arrival, the LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Brenda Siapno arrived shortly after. LPA toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. LPA inspected the kitchen/food service area at approx. 09:40 a.m. Knives and sharp objects are stored in a locked drawer to the right of the stove. No cleaning supplies were observed stored in the kitchen area. Kitchen appliances were observed to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food properly stored at this time. Office area located in the kitchen. At the time of the visit, the common area furniture's were observed to be in good condition. Medications and a sufficient supply of PPE and toiletries were observed stored inaccessible to residents in care in a closet at the entry way. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature of 72 degrees Fahrenheit. Smoke detector(s) and carbon monoxide detector were operational at the time of the visit. LPA observed fire extinguishers to be fully charged and last purchased in 05/01/2025. The LPA observed four (4) resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. The resident restrooms were clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid surfaces. The bathrooms were sufficiently stocked with supplies and paper towels. The hot water temperature was measured in each restroom between 105 - 120 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed hallway cabinets to store various electronic equipment, flashlights and other supplies for emergency use. All exits have functioning auditory devices and were operational at the time of the visit. The LPA observed required postings throughout the common areas. There is an attached garage observed inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed garage to store an additional fridge to store extra perishable food. LPA also observed a laundry area, a sufficient supply of clean linen and towels, laundry supplies securely stored, extra incontinent supplies, PPE , canned goods, emergency food supply as well as additional furniture and medical equipment for facility use. The backyard has a covered outdoor area equipped with furniture including a table and chairs for resident use. The LPA observed two (2) self-latching gate with clear passageways clear of obstruction. There were no bodies of water over 3ft noted at the time of the visit. LPA observed a storage shed behind a locked gate that stored extra furniture and equipment for facility use. LPA also observed a small tool shed behind the locked gate that stored various gardening tools. Records review began: six (6) resident records were reviewed for, but not limited to: appraisals, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. Four (4) Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to: personnel records, health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All files were observed to be in order at this time . Medications review: medications are centrally stored and locked inside an entry way closet. All medications including PRNs were labeled, stored and locked inaccessible to individuals. PRNs have physicians order on file. Medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. No errors observed during medications review at this time. During today's visit, LPA reviewed the facility's infection control policy as well as the emergency disaster plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate at this time. Smoke detectors were tested and all functional at the time of the visit. Carbon monoxide detectors are wired and operational at the time of the visit. Emergency disaster drills conducted quarterly as per regulation; the last one conducted was a fire drill on 08/05/2025. LPA obtained the following documents at the time of visit: LIC500 Personnel Report, LIC9020 Client Roster, and facility’s liability insurance Interview conducted during the visit. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided to the Administratorthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2025
Apr 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff left a resident unattended outside during inclement weather

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Balisi conducted a subsequent complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. During today’s visit, LPA met with House Manager Trish Talastas and explained the reason for the visit. On 03/27/2025, the initial complaint visit was conducted by LPA between approximately 10:00 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. During the visit, LPA’s conducted physical plant, interviewed staff as well as reviewed and obtained copies of pertinent documentation relevant to the investigation. Today LPA interviewed staff. It was reported that " Staff left a resident unattended outside during inclement weather" as it was alleged that staff brought Resident #1 (R1) to sit outside and did not bring R1 back inside the home in a timely manner when it was raining and windy. Interviews and record reviews showed that part of R1’s daily routine was to sit outside under the gazebo from about 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. The only time R1 did not want to go outside during this period was on Sundays during football season. Unsubstantiated Continued from 9099 On February 13, 2025, at around 1:00 p.m., R1 asked staff to take them outside to the gazebo, even though it was observed to be a light rain. R1 kept asking to go outside, and at approx 02:10 p.m. staff eventually agreed to take R1 outside. Staff said R1 was wearing a fleece jacket, UGG slippers, and a blanket. A family member / responsible party of R1 stated that R1 attempted to contact them at approx. 01:30 p.m. but they missed R1’s call. Between approx 03:15 a.m. - 3:30 p.m., a family member of R1 came to the facility and told staff that R1 had contacted them wanting to come inside. The family member saw R1 sitting under the gazebo and asked staff to bring R1 back inside. At that time the rain and wind were observed to be getting worse. In an interview with R1, they confirmed they had asked staff to bring them outside under the gazebo despite the weather. R1 said they felt properly dressed for the weather in their fleece jacket and other warm clothes but didn’t remember having a blanket. R1 also explained that they usually use their bell to ask staff for help, but they didn’t ring it while they were outside. R1 also stated they do not recall if staff checked on them during that time. When interviewed, staff said they checked on R1 at approx 02:15 p.m. and 02:30 p.m. In addition, staff also stated they observed R1 from the living room window and waited for R1 to ring their bell for assistance. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation, “Staff left a resident unattended outside during inclement weather" is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time Exit interview conducted and a copy of report issuedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250320140155
20241 state visit · 1 document
Sep 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Balisi arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. Upon arrival, the LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Emiliano C Siapno arrived shortly after. LPA toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. LPA inspected the kitchen/food service area at approx. 12:05 p.m. Knives and sharp objects are stored in a locked box in a locked drawer to the right of the stove. No cleaning supplies were observed stored in the kitchen area. Kitchen appliances were observed to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food properly stored at this time. Office area located in the kitchen. At the time of the visit, the common area furniture's were observed to be in good condition. Medications and a sufficient supply of PPE and toiletries were observed stored inaccessible to residents in care in a closet at the entry way. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature of 72 degrees Fahrenheit. Smoke detector(s) and carbon monoxide detector were operational at the time of the visit. LPA observed fire extinguishers to be fully charged and last purchased in July of 2024. The LPA observed four (4) resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. The resident restrooms were clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid surfaces. The bathrooms were sufficiently stocked with supplies and paper towels. The hot water temperature was measured in each restroom between 105 - 120 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed hallway cabinets to store various electronic equipment, flashlights and other supplies for emergency use. All exits have functioning auditory devices and were operational at the time of the visit. The LPA observed required postings throughout the common areas. There is an attached garage observed inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed garage to store an additional fridge to store extra perishable food. LPA also observed a laundry area, a sufficient supply of clean linen and towels, laundry supplies securely stored, extra incontinent supplies, PPE , canned goods, emergency food supply as well as additional furniture and medical equipment for facility use. Continued from 809 The backyard has a covered outdoor area equipped with furniture including a table and chairs for resident use. The LPA observed two (2) self-latching gate with clear passageways clear of obstruction. There were no bodies of water over 3ft noted at the time of the visit. LPA observed a storage shed behind a locked gate that stored extra furniture and equipment for facility use. LPA also observed a small tool shed behind the locked gate that stored various gardening tools. Records review began at approx. 12:30 p.m. , six (6) resident records were reviewed for, but not limited to: appraisals, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. Three (3) Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to: personnel records, health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All files were observed to be in order at this time . Last emergency disaster drill was conducted on August 5, 2024 Medications review began at approx. 01:30 p.m. All medications including PRNs were labeled, stored and inaccessible to residents in care. Medications were observed to be administered as prescribed at this time. Infection control: Upon entry, the facility has a central entry point for symptom screening, temperature checks, and sanitation station. At this time, the staff will continue to keep up signs that promotes good hand hygiene and symptoms of a communicable disease. The facility has an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE), and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility’s cleaning protocol is sufficient. If needed, the facility has the capacity to designate a single isolation room if the facility has a confirmed case of an infectious disease. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. The LPA obtained the following documents at the time of visit: LIC500 Personnel Report, LIC9020 Client Roster, a copy of the emergency disaster plan, and a copy of the facility’s liability insurance. Interviews were conducted during the visit. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided to the Administratorthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 11, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Ventura County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Ventura County