Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Majestic Residential Care

Small home·Licensed for 6·Simi Valley, California

Licensed since 2023Licence #565850366
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,300 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,300–$6,500
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedAugust 21, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitSeptember 3, 2026CDSS inspection record

Majestic Residential Care is a small care home in Simi Valley — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2023. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Majestic Residential Care

Is Majestic Residential Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Majestic Residential Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Majestic Residential Care been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 6 state visits over the same years.

Is Majestic Residential Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Majestic Residential Care cost?

$5,300 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,300–$6,500. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 17 other homes of a similar licensed size across Ventura County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $6,202 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 17 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Majestic Residential Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Majestic Residential Care Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Adventist Health Simi Valley is 2.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Majestic Residential Care keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Majestic Residential Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “MAJESTIC RESIDENTIAL CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #565850366. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Majestic Residential Care Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 6 state inspection visits since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 6 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 3, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenApproved by the state

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 6 MAY_BEBEDRIDDEN; ROOMS 1-4 APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN; HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 6 RESIDENTS

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,300a month to start

Likely $4,300–$6,500

From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,300a month

Likely $4,300–$6,650

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$5,300likely $4,300–$6,500

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,300–$6,650
$5,300
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,050–$9,750
$7,300
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

9 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,950–$5,950.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 2036 Cutler St, Simi Valley, CA 93065Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2023, the state has filed 6 documents for this home, and its records count 6 visits since 2023. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated September 3, 2026.

On file since
2023
State visits
6
Most recent visit
September 3, 2026
Occupied · August 21, 2025 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated August 21, 2025. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2023.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026110202512020241102023220

The last 36 months — 4 of 6 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Sep 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Balisi arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. Upon arrival, the LPA met with Administrator Kemi Osilesi and explained the reason for the visit. At approx 12:35 p.m. LPA toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. LPA inspected the kitchen/food service area. LPA observed Knives and other sharp objects were stored in a locked drawer to the left of the dishwasher. Cleaning supplies were stored underneath the sink and were inaccessible to residents in care. Kitchen appliances were observed to be in operable condition. The facility maintained a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food, which was properly stored. Medications were stored in a cabinet inaccessible to residents in care. Common area furniture was observed to be in good condition. Two (2) residents were observed watching television in the living room while staff served lunch. Multiple board games and activities were stored on a bookshelf in the living room. A sufficient supply of clean linens and towels was stored in the hallway near Room #3. PPE and toiletries were stored in a closet near Room #1 and were inaccessible to residents in care.The facility maintained a comfortable temperature of 72 degrees Fahrenheit. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were operational at the time of the visit. Fire extinguishers were fully charged and had a purchase date of July 2026. Five (5) resident bedrooms were observed and were appropriately furnished with clean linens, adequate furnishings, and sufficient lighting. Resident restrooms were clean, sanitary, and operational. Restrooms were equipped with grab bars and non-skid surfaces and were sufficiently stocked with necessary supplies and paper towels. Hot water temperatures in each restroom measured between 105 and 120 degrees Fahrenheit. A staff room near the entryway was observed to be empty and inaccessible to residents in care at the time of the visit. Office area was located next to the dining area. LPA observed facility files stored inaccessible to residents in care. All exits have functioning auditory devices and were operational at the time of the visit. LPA observed required postings on bulletin board by entry way, on bulletin board by garage as well as throughout the home. An attached garage was observed and was inaccessible to residents in care. The garage contained an additional refrigerator for properly storing perishable food, a laundry area, furniture, medical equipment, PPE, incontinence supplies, and other facility-use items. Several emergency bins were adequately stocked and ready for use during an emergency. Portable power stations and solar panels were also available for emergency use. The backyard included a covered outdoor area with appropriate furniture. Two (2) self-latching gates were observed, and the passageways were clear of obstructions. No bodies of water were observed at the time of the visit. Records review, five (5) resident records were reviewed for, but not limited to: appraisals, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. Six (6) Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to: personnel records, health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All files were observed to be in order at this time . Medication review, medications for all residents were observed. All medications were stored properly and were appropriately documented on their respective centrally stored medication and destruction record sheets. No deficiencies were observed during medication review. Infection control / Emergency Disaster plan: During today’s visit, the LPA reviewed the facility's infection control practices and the facility's emergency disaster plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. Emergency disaster drills are conducted quarterly; the facility’s last emergency disaster drill was conducted in August. The facility’s emergency disaster plan is up to date and is adequate. Both the infection control plan and the emergency disaster plan are reviewed/updated annually by the facility’s administrator. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were tested, all alarms were functional at the time of the visit. During today’s visit LPA obtained a copy of the facility’s LIC 500, resident roster and limited liability insurance. Exit interview conducted and copy of the report issued to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2026
20251 state visit · 2 documents
Aug 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate supervision to resident in care resulting in a fracture Staff mismanaged resident's medication Staff did not provide a proper rate increase notice to resident or resident's authorized representative Staff did not provide resident records to resident's authorized representative

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Balisi conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver final findings for the above allegation. During today’s visit, LPA met with Kemi Osilesi and explained the reason for the visit. On 03/18/2025, the Woodland Hills Adult and Senior Care Regional Office (RO) received a complaint alleging Resident #1 (R1) fell and sustained a fractured femur due to lack of supervision of the facility staff. The case was referred to Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to Investigator Douglas Real. On 03/19/2025, from 03:07pm to 5:00pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Balisi conducted an unannounced complaint visit for the allegation listed above. Upon arrival LPA Balisi met with staff and explained the reason for the visit, Administrator Kemi Osilesi arrived shortly after. Continued on 9099-C Unsubstantiated Continued from 9099 At approximately 03:10pm the LPA conducted a physical plant tour, interviewed staff and reviewed and obtained copies of pertinent documentation relevant to the investigation. The LPA determined further investigation was needed prior to issuing findings. On 04/01/2025, at approximately 10:30am, Investigator Real conducted interviews with R1’s resident representative; on 04/17/2025, from approximately 11:30am to 2:00pm, with R1, staff, and residents; on 06/13/2025, at approximately 12:25pm, with the Administrator; on 06/17/2025, at approximately 12:30pm, with the overnight staff; and on 07/01/2025, at approximately 12:50pm, with R1’s resident representative. In addition, Investigator Real reviewed Los Robles Regional Medical Center medical records and facility file documents related to the investigation. According to the facility file documents reviewed, R1 was admitted to the facility on 06/15/2024. R1 had a history of falls and was considered a fall risk. R1’s Appraisal Needs and Services Plan, updated 12/27/2024, noted confusion and agitation at night, with R1 attempting to walk without supervision. The plan noted safety measures were put in place and staff encouraged R1 to use the call button at night. A review of the Unusual Incident/Injury Report related to R1’s fall on 02/07/2025 revealed the overnight staff checked on R1 at 12:26am and at that time R1 was in bed. At 12:40am the staff heard the safety mat alarm and saw R1 on the floor in R1’s room with leg pain. R1 did not request assistance prior to getting out of bed. The Administrator was notified and 911 was called. Paramedics transported R1 to the hospital. A review of the Los Robles Regional Medical Center medical records revealed R1 was admitted to the hospital on 02/07/2025 with a diagnosis of femur fracture. Surgical procedure was performed to repair the fracture. R1 was discharged from the hospital on 02/14/2025. The Department’s investigation revealed the facility provided a sufficient level of care and supervision for R1. R1, who suffered from dementia, did not have 24/7, one on one supervision. R1 wore a call button alarm that R1 could use to contact facility employees when R1 wanted to get out of bed and was consistently reminded by staff to use the alarm so that staff could assist R1 out of bed. Continued from 9099-C In addition, floor alarm mats were placed on the floor around R1’s bed at night to alert the night staff if R1 got out of bed without contacting them for help. The overnight staff spent the night in a chair outside R1’s room, which allowed them to respond in a prompt manner to incidents or accidents that might occur in the residents’ rooms. The staff working on the night of R1’s fall properly responded as well as assessed R1 after the fall and 911 was called when R1 reported pain. Interviews were conducted with R1’s resident representatives, R1, facility residents and staff. The information obtained during the Department’s investigation did not sufficiently support the allegation. While R1 did sustain a fall which resulted in a fracture, the investigation did not provide sufficient evidence to substantiate neglect/lack of supervision. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. It was reported that “Staff mismanaged resident’s medication” as it was alleged that the Administrator was administering medications that were discontinued. Interviews and record reviews revealed that on 02/07/2025, R1 was admitted to Los Robles Regional Medical Center. The discharge orders directed to stop administering the medication Amlodipine Besylate (NORVASC 5 mg) daily and to consider resuming blood pressure medication only if systolic blood pressure exceeded 160–170 mmHg. On 02/24/2025, R1 was admitted to Kaiser for hypertension and mild chronic kidney disease. The Primary Care Physician (PCP) ordered R1 to start Amlodipine for blood pressure control. On 02/25/2025, during a scheduled visit at the Kaiser Geriatric Clinic, R1 was discharged with instructions to stop taking Amlodipine. Between 02/26 - 03/06/2025, R1’s blood pressure readings were as follows: 149/88, 164/88, 172/80, 167/81, 157/83, 149/89, 164/89, 156/90, and 168/90. On 03/06/2025, the facility administrator notified R1’s PCP of these readings. The PCP recommended restarting Amlodipine. According to the administrator’s interview, the facility requested the POA to order and provide the medication, as has been done in the past. The POA declined to order Amlodipine, citing the 02/07/2025 recommendation from Los Robles advising against its use. As a result, R1 did not receive Amlodipine from March 6 until March 11, 2025, when R1 relocated from the facility. Medication Administration Records (MARs) confirm that R1 was not administered Amlodipine from February 7 through March 11, 2025. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation “Staff mismanaged resident’s medication” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Continued from 9099-C It was reported that "Staff did not provide a proper rate increase notice to resident or resident's authorized representative" as it was alleged that the Administrator informed the POA of R1 of a $500 rent increase without giving at least 30 days’ notice. Interviews and records review revealed that R1 was admitted to the facility on 06/15/2024, with a monthly rent of $4,000. On 12/27/2024, a notice of a $500 rent increase, effective April 2025, was provided to R1’s Power of Attorney (POA) at that time. Following the death of the POA on 01/16/2025, a family member was designated as the new POA. On 02/28/2025, the new POA was informed of the upcoming rent increase. On 03/07/2025, the facility provided the new POA with an updated Admission Agreement reflecting the increased monthly rent of $4,500. However, the updated agreement was never signed, and the rent increase was not implemented. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation “Staff did not provide a proper rate increase notice to resident or resident's authorized representative” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. It was reported that “Staff did not provide resident records to resident’s authorized representative” as it was alleged that Administrator did not provide requested medical records in a timely manner. Interviews conducted and records reviewed revealed on 03/11/2025, upon R1’s discharge from the facility, a family member / responsible party of R1 was provided facility records. LPA’s records review revealed all relevant records were given to the family member / responsible party of R1. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation “Staff did not provide resident records to resident’s authorized representative” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted, copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250318122806
Aug 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Balisi arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. Upon arrival, the LPA met with Administrator Kemi Osilesi and explained the reason for the visit. The LPA toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The LPA inspected the kitchen/food service area at approx. 10:30 a.m. LPA observed (2) resident resting in the living room. Knives and sharp objects are stored in a locked drawer to the left of the dishwasher. Cleaning supplies were observed kept underneath the sink inaccessible to residents in care. Kitchen appliances were observed to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food properly stored at this time. At the time of the visit, the common area furniture's were observed to be in good condition. LPA observed multiple board games and activities stored on a book shelf in the living room. A sufficient supply of clean linen and towels were observed stored in the hallways next to Room #3. A sufficient supply of PPE and toiletries were observed stored inaccessible to residents in care in a closet next to room #1. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature of 72 degrees Fahrenheit. Smoke detector(s) and carbon monoxide detector were operational at the time of the visit. LPA observed fire extinguishers to be fully charged and last purchased in 08/12/2025 LPA observed four (4) resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. The resident restrooms were clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid surfaces. The bathrooms were sufficiently stocked with supplies and paper towels. The hot water temperature was measured in each restroom between 105 - 120 degrees Fahrenheit. At approx. 11:15 am, LPA observed staff conducting exercises with (2) residents. The staff room located to the right of the entry way was observed to be inaccessible to residents in care and empty during the time of the visit. Office area was located to the right of entry way. All exits have functioning auditory devices and were operational at the time of the visit. The LPA observed required postings throughout the common areas. There is an attached garage observed inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed garage to store an additional fridge and extra perishable food. LPA also observed laundry area, along with additional furniture and medical equipment for facility use. Extra PPE supplies were observed stored in this area as well. The backyard has a covered outdoor area equipped with furniture including a table and chairs for resident use. The LPA observed two (2) self-latching gate with clear passageways clear of obstruction. There were no bodies of water noted at the time of the visit. Records review, five (5) resident records were reviewed for, but not limited to: appraisals, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. Five (5) Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to: personnel records, health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All files were observed to be in order at this time. Last emergency disaster drill was conducted on 08/15/2025. Medications review, all medications reviewed including PRNs were labeled, stored and inaccessible to residents in care. Medications were observed to be administered as prescribed at this time. Infection control: Upon entry, the facility has a central entry point for symptom screening, temperature checks, and sanitation station. At this time, the staff will continue to keep up signs that promotes good hand hygiene and symptoms of a communicable disease. The facility has an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE), and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility’s cleaning protocol is sufficient. If needed, the facility has the capacity to designate a single isolation room if the facility has a confirmed case of an infectious disease. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. The LPA obtained the following documents at the time of visit: LIC500 Personnel Report, LIC9020 Client Roster, and a copy of the facility’s liability insurance. Interviews were conducted during the visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Sep 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Balisi arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. Upon arrival, the LPA met with Administrator Kemi Osilesi and explained the reason for the visit. The LPA toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The LPA inspected the kitchen/food service area at approx. 10:05 a.m. The LPA observed resident watching television in the living room. Knives and sharp objects are stored in a locked drawer to the left of the dishwasher. Cleaning supplies were observed kept underneath the sink inaccessible to residents in care. Kitchen appliances were observed to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food properly stored at this time. At the time of the visit, the common area furniture's were observed to be in good condition. LPA observed multiple board games and activities stored on a book shelf in the living room. A sufficient supply of clean linen and towels were observed stored in the hallways next to Room #3. A sufficient supply of PPE and toiletries were observed stored inaccessible to residents in care in a closet next to room #1. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature of 72 degrees Fahrenheit. Smoke detector(s) and carbon monoxide detector were operational at the time of the visit. LPA observed fire extinguishers to be fully charged and last purchased in August 23rd, 2024. LPA observed four (4) resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. The resident restrooms were clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid surfaces. The bathrooms were sufficiently stocked with supplies and paper towels. The hot water temperature was measured in each restroom between 105 - 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Continued from 9099 At approx. 10:35am, LPA observed staff mopping floors. The staff room located to the right of the entry way was observed to be inaccessible to residents in care and empty during the time of the visit. Office was located to the right of entry way. All exits have functioning auditory devices and were operational at the time of the visit. The LPA observed required postings throughout the common areas. There is an attached garage observed inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed garage to store an additional fridge to store extra perishable food. LPA also observed laundry area, along with additional furniture and medical equipment for facility use. The backyard has a covered outdoor area equipped with furniture including a table and chairs for resident use. The LPA observed two (2) self-latching gate with clear passageways clear of obstruction. There were no bodies of water noted at the time of the visit. Records review began at approx. 10:45am, five (5) resident records were reviewed for, but not limited to: appraisals, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. All files were observed to be in order at this time. Three (3) Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to: personnel records, health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. At approx 1:30p.m, LPA observed Staff #1 (S1) to have criminal background clearance, but they were not associated to this facility. Last emergency disaster drill was conducted on August 15, 2024. Medications review began at approx. 1:00 p.m. All medications including PRNs were labeled, stored and inaccessible to residents in care. Medications were observed to be administered as prescribed at this time. Infection control: Upon entry, the facility has a central entry point for symptom screening, temperature checks, and sanitation station. At this time, the staff will continue to keep up signs that promotes good hand hygiene and symptoms of a communicable disease. The facility has an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE), and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility’s cleaning protocol is sufficient. If needed, the facility has the capacity to designate a single isolation room if the facility has a confirmed case of an infectious disease. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. Continued from 809-C The LPA obtained the following documents at the time of visit: LIC500 Personnel Report, LIC9020 Client Roster, a copy of the emergency disaster plan, and a copy of the facility’s liability insurance. Interviews were conducted during the visit. Pursuant to Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations Division 6, Chapter 8, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D). Civil Penalties assessed in the amount of $500. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in additional civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Ventura County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Ventura County