Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Alpine Board and Care

Small home·Licensed for 6·Fair Oaks, California

Licensed since 2023Licence #345002989
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,550 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,750–$5,600
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedMay 20, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJune 29, 2026CDSS inspection record

Alpine Board and Care is a small care home in Fair Oaks — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2023. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Alpine Board and Care

Is Alpine Board and Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Alpine Board and Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Alpine Board and Care been cited?

0 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 13 state visits over the same years.

Is Alpine Board and Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Alpine Board and Care cost?

$4,550 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,750–$5,600. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 51 other homes of a similar licensed size across Sacramento County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,000 (n = 51 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Alpine Board and Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Alpine Board and Care LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Mercy San Juan Medical Center is 0.4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Alpine Board and Care keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Alpine Board and Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ALPINE BOARD AND CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #345002989. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Alpine Board and Care LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 13 state inspection visits since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 13 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is June 29, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED CAPACITY OF 6 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS; HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 6 RESIDENTS

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Medicines

    Level of medication service: reminders only

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

    caring.com · 2026-09-09

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Level of medication serviceReminders only

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,550a month to start

Likely $3,750–$5,600

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,550a month

Likely $3,750–$5,800

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,550likely $3,750–$5,600

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000this home · one time

    The home lists this one-time fee on Caring.com, seen September 9, 2026.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,750–$5,800
$4,550
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,750–$7,800
$6,550
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

24 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$6,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 6725 Lincoln Oaks Drive, Fair Oaks, CA 95628Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2023, the state has filed 12 documents for this home, and its records count 13 visits since 2023. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 29, 2026.

On file since
2023
State visits
13
Most recent visit
June 29, 2026
Occupied · May 20, 2024 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated May 15, 2024 to May 20, 2024. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations2typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2023.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026220202533020244622023110

The last 36 months — 11 of 12 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Jun 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On June 29 2026 at 10:15 a.m. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarah Benson arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year inspection. LPA met with care staff who phoned the administrator China Washington acting for Alex Novell (cert #6065982740 exp: 02-24-27) and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator certificate is current. The administrator arrived at about 11:30a.m. LPA Benson and administrator toured the facility together to ensure the health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to six (6) resident rooms, common areas, six (6) bathrooms, kitchen, storage areas and back yard. Staff and resident files were reviewed. Medications were also reviewed. Medication is locked in a locked file. The common area was clean, odor-free and in good repair. All bedrooms had required furniture, lighting and windows with screens. The bathrooms were clean and in good repair. The kitchen was clean and in good repair. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. Food appears to be stored and prepared properly. Facility has required (7) seven-day non-perishable and (2) day perishable supply of food. The facility was observed to be at a comfortable temperature. First aid kit fully stocked and ready for emergency use. Fire extinguisher fully charged. Smoke detectors are all operational. Hot water temperature measured within required Title 22 regulations of 105 degrees F and 120 degrees F. All employees requiring background checks are cleared. There is a schedule of activities planned for the clients. All required postings are displayed within the facility. No pools/bodies of water are on the premises. No firearms are on premises. The last disaster drill was conducted and documented on 03-03-26, the facility has been conducting drills every 3 months. LPA interviewed four resident and two staff. The following deficiencies were observed (See LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and California Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, a copy of the report, and appeal rights provided to administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 29, 2026
Jan 15, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility and met with Administrator, China Washington, to conduct a case management health and safety check. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. There are six (6) bedrooms and five (5) bathrooms for resident use, along with one (1) bedroom and one (1) bathroom for staff. LPA observed bedrooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food supply on site. Hot water temperature was observed to be 113 degrees F. LPA reviewed three (3) residents' medications and observed medication storage to be locked away and inaccessible to the residents. LPA reviewed six (6) resident records and one (1) staff record. LPA observed staff on the premises to have a criminal background clearance on file. As a result of today's inspection, no deficiencies are being cited. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 15, 2026
20253 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility and met with caregiver, Ruzanna Sargsyan, to conduct a case management health and safety check. LPA spoke with Administrator, China Washington, via telephone call, who gave permission to have caregiver sign report. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. There are six (6) bedrooms and five (5) bathrooms for resident use, along with one (1) bedroom and one (1) bathroom for staff. LPA observed bedrooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food supply on cite. Hot water temperature was observed to be 115 degrees F. LPA reviewed five (5) resident records and two (2) staff records. LPA observed staff on the premises to have a criminal background clearance on file. As a result of today's inspection, no deficiencies are being cited. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2025
Jun 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility unannounced on 6/18/25 to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. There are six (6) bedrooms and five (5) bathrooms for resident use, along with one (1) bedroom and one (1) bathroom for staff. LPA observed bedrooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition and properly maintained. Hot water temperature was observed to be 120 degrees F. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food supply on cite. LPA observed knives, cleaning products, and other toxins to be locked away and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed the backyard and perimeter of the care home to be free of clutter and debris. LPA observed smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors to be operational in the care home. First aid kit is maintained and ready for emergency use. LPA reviewed two (2) residents' medications and observed medication storage to be locked away and inaccessible to the residents. LPA reviewed four (4) resident files and two (2) staff files. Facility has a current copy of certificate of liability insurance and LPA requested a copy. As a result of this visit, no deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit was interview conducted and copy of report given at the conclusion of this visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 18, 2025
Jan 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility and met with caregiver, Shanique Naulty, to conduct a case management health and safety check. LPA spoke with Administrator, China Washington, via telephone call, who gave permission to have caregiver sign report. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. There are six (6) bedrooms and five (5) bathrooms for resident use, along with one (1) bedroom and one (1) bathroom for staff. LPA observed bedrooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food supply on cite. Hot water temperature was observed to be 118.3 degrees F. LPA reviewed four (4) resident records and two (2) staff records. LPA observed staff on the premises to have a criminal background clearance on file. As a result of today's inspection, no deficiencies are being cited. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 21, 2025
20244 state visits · 6 documents
Jun 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

An informal conference was conducted at 7:30am on June 20, 2024, with Sacramento North Regional Office via Microsoft Teams. The purpose of this informal conference meeting is to address citations issued during inspection conducted on 5/20/2024. The Administrators were told that this Informal conference is a part of the Administrative Action process and that further noncompliance may result in an elevation to a formal noncompliance conference, which could lead to a referral to the Department's legal division for possible revocation of license. The following Licensing staff were present: Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Anthony Perez The following facility representatives were present: Administrators Alex Novell and China Washington The following topics were covered during today's meeting: · An overview regarding 3 Type A citations, 2 substantiated complaint allegations, and 1 civil penalty · Care and supervision, including on-call night supervision during NOC shift and Administrator presence at the facility. Administrators are working on pending corrections that will be completed and submitted to LPA by 6/27/2024. Facility was notified that the Department may increase monitoring at the facility. Technical support was offered to facility representatives during meeting. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report will be provided to the facility via email. A copy must be signed and returned to the Department.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 20, 2024
May 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility issued an unlawful eviction

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility and met with Licensee, Alex Novell, to open a complaint into the allegation listed above. During today's visit, LPA interviewed Licensee and Administrator, China Washington, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. LPA reviewed a text authored by Licensee and issued to resident (R1's) responsible party (RP) stating regarding to the text to "consider it as a 30 day notice to take [R1] somewhere else." LPA observed a text authored by Administrator and sent to R1's RP stating to "disregard the 30 day notice." Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standards have been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, a deficiency is being cited on the attached 9099-D page. Exit interview was conducted with Licensee. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240517152244

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.683(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 9, 2024

§1569.683 Eviction notices; reasons for eviction contents; service (a) In addition to complying with other applicable regulations, a licensee of a residential care facility for the elderly who sends a notice of eviction to a resident shall set forth in the notice to quit the reasons relied upon for the eviction, with specific facts to permit determination of the date, place, witnesses, and circumstances concerning those reasons. (...) This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the facility did not issue a lawful 30-day notice to R1's representative regarding eviction, which poses an potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2024

Plan of correction: Facility will complete a statement of understanding regarding regulation 1269.683. Facility will submit statement of understanding to LPA by POC due date of 6/09/2024.

May 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility unannounced on 5/20/24 to conduct an annual continuation visit utilizing the inspection tool following the Required-1 Year Inspection conducted on 5/15/2024. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. There are six (6) bedrooms and five (5) bathrooms for resident use, along with one (1) bedroom and one (1) bathroom for staff. LPA observed bedrooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition and properly maintained. Hot water temperature was observed to be 120 degrees F. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food supply on cite. LPA observed knives to be locked away and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed the backyard and perimeter of the care home to be free of clutter and debris. LPA observed smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors to be operational in the care home. First aid kit is maintained and ready for emergency use. LPA checked medication storage and found medication to be locked away and inaccessible to the residents. LPA reviewed two (2) resident files and five (5) staff files during today's visit. As a result of today's inspection, deficiencies are being cited pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. A civil penalty in the amount of $500 is being assessed today due a one (1) staff member not receiving a criminal background clearance. Deficiencies are listed on 809-D. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Signatures on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2024
May 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not providing adequate food service to residents

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility and met with Administrator, Alex Novell, to deliver findings into the allegation listed above. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, conducted a tour of the facility, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: ** Report continued on 9099-C ** Substantiated During visit conducted on 11/29/2023, LPA conducted an inspection of the facility's required two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food supply on cite. LPA observed multiple open containers, including salad dressing, and multiple expired food items, including yogurt and condiments, in the facility's refrigerator. LPA also observed multiple food containers with prepared food that was not dated or labeled. LPA observed staff member (S1) clean refrigerator and purge expired food items during visit conducted on 11/29/2023. During all subsequent visits to the facility during investigation, LPA observed a sufficient supply of food at the facility. Based on observation, the preponderance of evidence standards have been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, a deficiency is being cited on the attached 9099-D page. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents. Interview with relevant party indicated that resident (R1) sustained a burn while residing at the facility. Interviews conducted with Administrator, China Washington, and staff members (S1 & S2) indicated that they never observed R1 sustain a burn mark while residing at the facility. LPA conducted an interview with R1, who could not recall sustaining a burn while residing at the facility. LPA did no observe a burn mark on R1 during interview. A review of R1's hospice records dated 10/1/2023 to 12/12/2023 did not indicate that R1 sustained a burn mark during the time that they resided at the facility. Interview with relevant party indicated that they could not recall requesting documents for R1. Interview with Administrator Washington indicated that any records requested for R1 were provided to the requester within a timely manner. Interview with relevant party indicated that they were allowed to visit R1 while they resided at the facility. Interviews with Administrator Washington, staff members S1, S2, S3, and S4 stated that they are allowing visitation at the facility. All staff interviews indicated that there is a visitor policy allowing visitation between 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM everyday, but accommodations are made for individuals who cannot visit residents during those hours. Interviews with residents R2, R3, and R4 indicated that they are able to receive visitors at the facility. LPA observed a visitor log for visitors to sign at the conclusion of this investigation. Interview with relevant party indicated that activities were not provided to R1 in accordance with their admission agreement. LPA reviewed R1's Admission Agreement, which indicates the following: "We shall offer individualized program of recreational activities based on cooperative planning by facility staff, family, physician, and rapport and communication with the resident. We offer responsive, creative, and fluid planning of recreational activities. Residents and families are interviewed to gather information on their personal preferences, beliefs, culture, values, attention span and life experiences to determine activities that residents will enjoy and benefit from." LPA observed that admission agreement was signed by R1's representative on 10/11/2023. ** Report continued on 9099-C ** During visit conducted on 11/29/2023, LPA observed board games, crossword puzzles, and toys available to the residents. LPA observed books and a television in the residents' rooms. Interviews conducted with Administrator Washington, S1, S2, S3, and S4 indicated that the residents are provide resources for activities and encouraged to participate in activities. Interviews with residents R2, R3, and R4 indicated that they have resources for activities Based on interviews conducted, observations, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met. Therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report was provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2024 · control 59-AS-20231122112651

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(8) · Plan of correction due date: May 31, 2024

87555 General Food Service Requirements (b) The following food service requirements shall apply: (8) All food shall be of good quality. (...) Food in damaged containers shall not be accepted, used or retained. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, facility did not ensure food items were of good quality and stored in sealed containers, which poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2024

Plan of correction: Facility purged food items during visit conducted on 11/29/2023. LPA observed a sufficient supply of food of good quality during all subsequent visits. LPA cleared deficiency at the conclusion of this investigation.

May 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility unannounced on 5/15/24 to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPA interviewed two (2) residents during inspection. LPA reviewed three (3) resident files and one (1) staff file. Facility has a current copy of certificate of liability insurance and LPA obtained a copy. As a result of today's visit, no deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. LPA will return at a later time to complete annual inspection. Exit interview conducted and copy of report given at the conclusion of this visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2024
Jan 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Post Licensing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the care home unannounced on 1/9/24 to conduct a post licensing visit. A complete tour of the facility was conducted and there are currently two (2) residents in care. There are six (6) bedrooms and five (5) bathrooms for resident use, along with one (1) bedroom and one (1) bathroom for staff. LPA observed bedrooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition and properly maintained. LPA observed that there are locked cabinets for knives and medications. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has the required (2) two-day perishable and (7) seven-day non-perishable food supply on hand. LPA observed the backyard and perimeter of the care home to be free of clutter and debris and there appeared to be no potential safety hazards to the residents in care. First aid kit to be maintained and ready for emergency use. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors are hard wired and functioning. No deficiencies were cited at today's visit. Exit interview conducted and copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 9, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

  • Room typesAll Private Rooms

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Pets, routines & independence

  • Residents may bring a petReported no

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Sacramento County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Sacramento County