Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Affordable Board and Care

Small home·Licensed for 6·Lakeview Terrace, California

Licensed since 2021Licence #197610098
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,300 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,300
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedJuly 8, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitApril 5, 2026CDSS inspection record

Affordable Board and Care is a small care home in Lakeview Terrace — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2021. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Affordable Board and Care

Is Affordable Board and Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Affordable Board and Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Affordable Board and Care been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.

Is Affordable Board and Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Affordable Board and Care cost?

$4,300 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,500–$5,300. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Affordable Board and Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Affordable Board and Care Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Pacifica Hospital of the Valley is 2.9 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Affordable Board and Care keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Affordable Board and Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “AFFORDABLE BOARD AND CARE INC.”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197610098. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Affordable Board and Care Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 10 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is April 5, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH ONE MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE CARE WAIVER FOR 6 RESIDENTS.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,300a month to start

Likely $3,500–$5,300

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,300a month

Likely $3,500–$5,500

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,300likely $3,500–$5,300

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,500–$5,500
$4,300
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,100–$8,650
$6,300
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

24 homes like this within 9 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$6,300.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 11382 Kamloops St, Lakeview Terrace, CA 91342Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 10 visits since 2021. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 5, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
10
Most recent visit
April 5, 2026
Occupied · July 8, 2024 visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated November 16, 2023 to July 8, 2024. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (4). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints4typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2021.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020251102024440202322020221102021110

The last 36 months — 7 of 10 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Apr 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced One (1) year Required visit at this facility. LPA met with the administrator Vilbert Keshishi and explained the purpose of this visit. A tour of the physical plant was conducted at 9:18 AM and the following was observed: The facility has one main entrance being used, screening station is located immediately upon entrance and had a table equipped with hand sanitizer, gloves, mask and sign in sheet. The facility has an approved mitigation and Infection plan on file. The facility is a single storey building and has four (4) bedrooms and two (2) bathrooms. An additional bedroom and one (1) bathroom is designated for staff use. Fire cleared for six (6) non-ambulatory residents, one (1) of which maybe bedridden on Room #1. Hospice waiver for six (6) residents. Living and dining room furniture were checked. The living room is neat and clean along with the dining room. Furniture were observed to be in good repair and excellent condition. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 74°F. The dual smoke/carbon monoxide alarm are hardwired and interconnected and observed to be operational. There is a Fire extinguisher located in the kitchen and observed to be last bought on 02/08/26. (continued on LIC 809-C) (continued from LIC 809) The Clients' rooms are adequately furnished with appropriate furniture and lighting system. Hall ways/passage ways are lit. Clients have sufficient amounts of personal hygiene product which is provided by the licensee. Food Service/Kitchen area was sufficiently stocked with two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non-perishable food. Frozen foods are properly wrapped and stored appropriately. Food storage and preparation areas are clean and inaccessible to pests. Knives and sharps are observed to be locked in the kitchen drawer and inaccessible to residents. Laundry area is located in the garage. Laundry detergent, cleaning solutions and other toxins are observed to be locked inside the garage. The Bathroom was checked for cleanliness and proper operation. LPA observed the appropriate grab bars in the toilet and shower. The hot water temperature was checked and measured at 115.7°F. Towels and washcloths are not shared. There were enough clean linen available in stock at the cabinet. Medications: LPA observed that the medication are kept in the cabinet in the kitchen are a and was observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. There was a complete first aid kit located on top of the medication cabinet. Garage: The garage has access from inside the facility and also being used as frozen and emergency food and other supplies storage. The Backyard had a covered shaded area for clients with outdoor furniture. There is no body of water at the facility. Client records. All six (6) clients records were reviewed. Clients record appeared to be complete and current. Staff records were also reviewed. Three (3) staff records were reviewed, they all have criminal record clearances and associated to this facility. Current training and first aid observed for staff on duty. Administrator's certificate was observed to be current. Disaster drill was last conducted on 04/01/26. Required posting observed in facility (complaint hot line poster, personal rights, etc). Exit interview conducted. Copy of the report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 5, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Mar 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced One (1) year Required visit at this facility. LPA met with the administrator Vilbert Keshishi and explained the purpose of this visit. A tour of the physical plant was conducted at 9:46 AM and the following was observed: The facility has one main entrance being used, the main door has required Covid-19 prevention signage (hand washing, coughing etiquette and physical distancing) are posted on the door. The PPE screening station is located immediately upon entrance and had a table equipped with sufficient PPE readily accessible, a thermometer, hand sanitizer, gloves, mask and sign in sheet at the time of visit. Visitors are required to wear mask. The facility has an approved mitigation plan on file. The facility is a single storey building and has four (4) bedrooms and two (2) bathrooms. An additional bedroom and one (1) bathroom is designated for staff use. Fire cleared for six (6) non-ambulatory residents, one (1) of which maybe bedridden on Room #1. Hospice waiver for six (6) residents. Living and dining room furniture were checked. The living room is neat and clean along with the dining room. Furniture were observed to be in good repair and excellent condition. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 73°F. The dual smoke/carbon monoxide alarm are hardwired and interconnected and observed to be operational. There is a Fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen and observed to be last bought on 02/05/25. (continued on LIC 809-C) (continued from LIC 809) The Clients' rooms are adequately furnished with appropriate furniture and lighting system. Hall ways/passage ways are lit. Clients have sufficient amounts of personal hygiene product which is provided by the licensee. Food Service/Kitchen area was sufficiently stocked with two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non-perishable food. Frozen foods are properly wrapped and stored appropriately. Food storage and preparation areas are clean and inaccessible to pests. Knives and sharps are observed to be locked in the kitchen drawer and inaccessible to residents. Laundry area is located in the garage. Laundry detergent, cleaning solutions and other toxins are observed to be locked inside the garage. The Bathroom was checked for cleanliness and proper operation. LPA observed the appropriate grab bars in the toilet and shower. The hot water temperature was checked and measured at 111.4°F. Towels and washcloths are not shared. There were enough clean linen available in stock at the cabinet. Medications: LPA observed that the medication are kept in the cabinet in the kitchen are a and was observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. There was a complete first aid kit located on top of the medication cabinet. Garage: The garage has access from inside the facility and also being used as frozen and emergency food and other supplies storage. The Backyard had a covered shaded area for clients with outdoor furniture. There is no body of water at the facility. Client records. All six (6) clients records were reviewed. Clients record appeared to be complete and current. Staff records were also reviewed. Three (3) staff records were reviewed, they all have criminal record clearances and associated to this facility. Current training and first aid observed for staff on duty. Administrator's certificate was observed to be current. Disaster drill was last conducted on 01/03/25. Required posting observed in facility (complaint hot line poster, personal rights, etc). Exit interview conducted. Copy of the report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2025
20244 state visits · 4 documents
Jul 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: . Staff does not ensure that resident receive adequate wound care 2. Staff left resident soiled in feces 3. Staff are severely restricting residents’ visitation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tuesday Cabiness met with Administrator Vilbert Keshishi, and informed him the purpose of the visit, which is to finalize the above complaint allegations. On October 13, 2022, the Woodland Hills Regional South Adult and Senior Care Office, received a complaint, for the allegations mentioned above. On August 31, 2021, the complaint was referred to the Community Care Licensing Division’s (CCLD’s) Investigations Branch (IB), and assigned to Investigator Jose Santana, to investigate and determine the finding for allegation # 1. LPA Tuesday Cabiness, conducted a subsequent visit, interviewed staff and residents, pertaining to allegation # 2 and 3. The following was determined: Allegation # 1: “Staff does not ensure that resident receive adequate wound care”. On October 14, 2022, from 930am to 12pm, former LPA Wendell Smith, conducted the initial complaint visit, as well as conducted a physical plant inspection, reviewed, and obtained resident medical records, and interviewed staff. Investigator Santana conducted interviews, obtained, and reviewed facility documents and medical records, pertaining to allegation #1 on various dates, from approximately October 2022 through November 2022. The following is a Unsubstantiated summary of the IB investigation and it’s finding of the allegation. Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on 09/26/2022 and already being regularly treated by hospice nurses and wound care physicians prior to being admitted. Once the facility retained R1, the wound care services continued for R1’s wound, and the Administrator, including staff, treated the wound in between skilled nurses’ visits and per hospice care instructions. Investigator Santana reported that the complainant was under the impression (R1) developed the wound while in the care of the facility, and that the facility was not allowed to retain or admit (R1) with the wound. Further information by Investigator Santana revealed, the facility met the necessary requirements to retain and treat R1, therefore, based on the investigation conducted by IB investigator Santana, and all information obtained, through interviews and documentation, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Allegation # 2: “Staff left resident soiled in feces”. On October 14, 2022, from 930am to 12pm, former LPA Wendell Smith, conducted the initial complaint visit, as well as conducted a physical plant inspection, reviewed, and obtained resident medical records, and interviewed staff. LPA T. Cabiness reviewed facility documents, resident and medical records, and other documentation pertaining to allegation # 2 on various dates and times, in October 2022, December 2022, July 2023, and December 2023, and May 2024. On 05/24/2024, LPA T. Cabiness conducted a subsequent visit and interviewed staff, as well as obtained additional documentation. From the information obtained, resident # 1 (R1) was diagnosed a severe medical condition that caused diarrhea. It was reported to LPA that staff had to change R1’s diarrhea several times throughout the day. On the day in question, pertaining to the allegation, although it was reported, R1’s diaper was soiled with feces, it was due to R1’s medical condition, and not by the negligence of staff. Therefore, based on interviews, and documentation, there is insufficient evidence to prove the allegation, and it’s Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation # 3: “Staff are severely restricting residents’ visitation”. On October 14, 2022, from 930am to 12pm, former LPA Wendell Smith, conducted the initial complaint visit, as well as conducted a physical plant inspection, reviewed, and obtained resident medical records, and interviewed staff. LPA T. Cabiness reviewed facility documents, resident and medical records, and other documentation pertaining to allegation # 3, on various dates and times, in October 2022, December 2022, July 2023, and December 2023, and May 2024. On 05/24/2024, LPA T. Cabiness conducted a subsequent visit and interviewed staff, as well as obtained additional documentation. From the information obtained, R1 was scheduled for a home health nurse to visit and provide services. On the day in question, (2) home health nurses showed up to the facility at the same time. There was a schedule conflict and the Administrator requested (1) nurse to provide the services for R1. Therefore, based on interviews, the allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview and copy of report provided to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 8, 2024 · control 31-AS-20221013141941
May 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: . Resident sustained pressure injuries while in care 2.Staff did not change resident timely

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tuesday Cabiness met with Administrator Vilbert Keshishi to deliver the final findings of the allegations mentioned above. The following was determined: Allegation # 1: It was alleged that resident sustained pressure injuries while in care. On 08/26/2022 from 930am to 11am, and during today's visit, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed resident records. From the information obtained, it was revealed to LPA, that resident #1 (R1) had developed an eye infection and prescribed antibiotics. R1 developed a severe case of diarrhea that lasted over a series of months, which eventually resulted in R1 being admitted to the hospital several times and diagnosed with a bacterial infection. R1 was admitted to the facility with the infection, and staff had to continuously change R1’s diaper. Interviews revealed that the infection, caused R1’s skin to become sensitive and frail. Although it was reported R1 sustained pressure injures while in care, LPA does not have enough evidence to corroborate the allegation, therefore based on interviews, it’s Unsubstantiated at this time. Unsubstantiated Allegation # 2: It was alleged that staff did not change resident timely. On 08/26/2022 from 930am to 11am, and during today's visit, LPA conducted interviews and resident records. From the information obtained, it was revealed to LPA, that R1 had developed a severe bacterial infection that caused severe diarrhea. Prior to being admitted to the facility, R1 was retained with the infection. Interviews also revealed that the infection, caused R1 to be hospitalized several times and caused R1 to have diaper changed hourly. Although it was reported, staff did not change resident timely, LPA does not have enough evidence to corroborate the allegation, therefore based on interviews, it’s Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview and copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2024 · control 31-AS-20220822130646
Apr 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced One (1) year Required visit at this facility. LPA met with the administrator Vilbert Keshishi and explained the purpose of this visit. A tour of the physical plant was conducted at 12:46 PM and the following was observed: The facility has one main entrance being used, the main door has required Covid-19 prevention signage (hand washing, coughing etiquette and physical distancing) are posted on the door. The PPE screening station is located immediately upon entrance and had a table equipped with sufficient PPE readily accessible, a thermometer, hand sanitizer, gloves, mask and sign in sheet at the time of visit. Visitors are required to wear mask. The facility has an approved mitigation plan on file. The facility is a single storey building and has four (4) bedrooms and two (2) bathrooms. An additional bedroom and one (1) bathroom is designated for staff use. Fire cleared for six (6) non-ambulatory residents, one (1) of which maybe bedridden on Room #1. Hospice waiver for six (6) residents. Living and dining room furniture were checked. The living room is neat and clean along with the dining room. Furniture were observed to be in good repair and excellent condition. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 73°F. The dual smoke/carbon monoxide alarm are hardwired and interconnected and observed to be operational. There is a Fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen and observed to be last bought on 04/27/24. The Clients' rooms are adequately furnished with appropriate furniture and lighting system. Hall ways/passage ways are lit. Clients have sufficient amounts of personal hygiene product which is provided by the licensee. (continued on LIC 809-C) (continued from LIC 809) Food Service/Kitchen area was sufficiently stocked with two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non-perishable food. Frozen foods are properly wrapped and stored appropriately. Food storage and preparation areas are clean and inaccessible to pests. Knives and sharps are observed to be locked in the kitchen drawer and inaccessible to residents. Laundry area is located in the garage. Laundry detergent, cleaning solutions and other toxins are observed to be locked inside the garage. The Bathroom was checked for cleanliness and proper operation. LPA observed the appropriate grab bars in the toilet and shower. The hot water temperature was checked and measured at 115.3°F. Towels and washcloths are not shared. There were enough clean linen available in stock at the cabinet. Medications: LPA observed that the medication are kept in the cabinet in the kitchen are a and was observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. There was a complete first aid kit located on top of the medication cabinet. Garage: The garage has access from inside the facility and also being used as frozen and emergency food and other supplies storage. The Backyard had a covered shaded area for clients with outdoor furniture. There is no body of water at the facility. Client records. All five (5) client records were reviewed. Clients record appeared to be complete and current. Staff records were also reviewed. Three (3) staff records were reviewed, they all have criminal record clearances and associated to this facility. Current training and first aid observed for staff on duty. Administrator's certificate was observed to be current. Disaster drill was last conducted on 04/01/24. Required posting observed in facility (complaint hot line poster, personal rights, etc). Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issuedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 28, 2024
Feb 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: . Licensee did not meet resident's needs resulting in hospitalized for UTI and dehydration 2. Licensee did not observe change in condition of resident 3. Licensee did not obtain medical care for resident in care 4. Resident lost significant amount of weight 5. Licensee was unable to meet resident's care needs 6. Licensee did not assist with resident's hygiene needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tuesday Cabiness met with Administrator Vilbert to deliver the final findings of the allegations mentioned above. The following was determined: Allegation # 1: Licensee did not meet resident’s needs resulting in hospitalized for UTI and dehydration. On 10/21/2021, 08/26/2022, and during today’s visit, from various times, ranging from 10am to 4pm, LPA conducted interviews, and reviewed documents pertaining to the complaint. It was reported to LPA, that resident # 1 (R1) was to be admitted to the facility for only (2) weeks, until R1’s husband returned from out of town. R1’s medical condition and diagnosis was dementia, with a fully contracted body. R1’s total care was depended on staff provided all ADL’s, including feeding R1. It was reported to LPA that R1 was admitted to the facility with a foul odor from R1’s urine. Staff attempted to contact R1’s husband to inform him of the smell but was not successful. Although it was reported R1 had an UTI, it was reported R1’s UTI was due to R1’s progression with R1’s diagnosed medical condition. Through all the information obtained, LPA does not have enough evidence to prove R1 was dehydrated and had an UTI Unsubstantiated during the temporary stay at the facility. Therefore, based on interviews and documentation, the allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation # 2: Licensee did not observe change in condition of resident. On 10/21/2021, 08/26/2022, and during today’s visit, from various times, ranging from 10am to 4pm, LPA conducted interviews, and reviewed documents pertaining to the complaint. It was reported to LPA through interviews, R1 was admitted to the facility with a fully contracted body and had a foul odor. R1 stayed at the facility for (2) weeks, and staff took care of R1 to the best of their ability and LPA does not have enough evidence to prove otherwise, therefore based on interviews and documentation received, the allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation # 3: Licensee did not obtain medical care for resident in care. On 10/21/2021, 08/26/2022, and during today’s visit, from various times, ranging from 10am to 4pm, LPA conducted interviews, and reviewed documents pertaining to the complaint. Prior to R1 being admitted to the facility, the Administrator requested R1 to be taken to urgent care. R1 was taken to urgent care before being admitted. Due to R1’s medical condition, staff reported R1 had a foul odor from R1’s urine. The Administrator stated, that because R1’s was admitted for a temporary stay, there was no change in R1’s medical condition when picked up from husband. The Administrator and wife are in the medical field, and have medical knowledge and training, and both did not observe that R1 needed medication attention. Therefore, LPA does not have enough evidence to prove facility did not obtain medical care for R1. Based on interviews, the allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation # 4: Resident lost significant amount of weight. On 10/21/2021, 08/26/2022, and during today’s visit, from various times, ranging from 10am to 4pm, LPA conducted interviews, and reviewed documents pertaining to the complaint. It was reported to LPA R1 lost a significant amount of weight during the (2) week stay at the facility. It was also reported, that when R1 was admitted, R1 was frail and had very thin skin. There was no documentation provided to the Administrator of R1’s weight when R1 was admitted. Although it was reported and alleged that R1 lost an enormous amount of weight, LPA does not have enough evidence to prove the allegation, therefore, based on interviews and documentation, it is Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation # 5: Licensee was unable to meet resident's care needs. On 10/21/2021, 08/26/2022, and during today’s visit, from various times, ranging from 10am to 4pm, LPA conducted interviews, and reviewed documents pertaining to the complaint. Although it was reported that the facility did not provide adequate care for R1, and R1 had to be hospitalized, through interviews, and observations, LPA does not have enough evidence to prove the facility is unable to meet resident’s needs. LPA has observed during various times and visits, residents and facility was clean. LPA has also observed residents eating and staff cooking meals. Therefore based on interviews and observations, the allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation # 6: Licensee did not assist with resident's hygiene needs. Licensee was unable to meet resident's care needs. On 10/21/2021, 08/26/2022, and during today’s visit, from various times, ranging from 10am to 4pm, LPA conducted interviews, and reviewed documents pertaining to the complaint. It was alleged that R1 was dirty and filthy when picked up by R1’s husband. R1 was taken to the hospital and was admitted for (2) days. There was no documentation provided for R1 from the hospital, alleging R1’s appearance when admitted to the hospital. Interviews reveal, residents are sponge bathed once or twice a week, including R1, during R1’s temporary stay. LPA has observed during many visits, residents were clean and staff providing appropriate care for residents. Therefore, LPA does not have enough evidence to prove facility did not assist with R1’s hygiene needs, and based on interviews and observations, the allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview and copy of report provided to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 13, 2024 · control 31-AS-20211012105006
20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 16, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff hit resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with administrator Vilbert Keshishi and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:44 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 10:05 AM and interviewed staff, resident and resident family between 10:30 AM to 1:30 PM. It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was hit by a staff in the face. LPA's record review today at 11:30 AM revealed that R1 has a diagnosis of Dementia. LPA's interview with R1 today at 12:02 PM revealed that R1 was incoherent and seemed confused and was not able to answer simple questions. LPA's interview with Resident #2 (R2) who is the room mate of R1 for over a year, however, revealed that no one hit R1 nor R2 at anytime during their stay at the facility. LPA's interview with two (2) staff and administrator revealed that all of the staff interviewed denied hitting any resident at the facility at any time. (continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC 9099) LPA's interview with R1's family member (FM) today at 12:45 PM revealed that FM visit R1 almost everyday, sometimes multiple times a day. FM stated that it may or could have happened but did not witness any staff hitting R1 or any resident during FM's visit. Based on the information gathered during this visit, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 16, 2023 · control 31-AS-20231114122645
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County