Abemu Residence Care

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 12/19/2025 at 12:30 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) James Sampair arrived unannounced to conduct this Required Annual Inspection. Upon entry, the LPA stated the purpose of the visit to Caregivers Jocelyn Valencia and Felicitas Dizon. At approximately 1:45 PM, Licensee Joy Manalang-Enriquez arrived at the facility. The LPA toured the facility including but not limited to residents’ rooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common areas and the backyard. The LPA observed adequate lighting for the comfort and safety of residents in all rooms. Inside and outside areas are free of obstruction and no bodies of water. The temperature in the living room was measured at 74.8 degrees Fahrenheit. The hot water temperature was measured at 111.7 degrees Fahrenheit, which was within the safe range of 105 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and slip-resistant mats. There is more than the minimum of a one-week supply of nonperishable food and 2 days of perishable food. Centrally stored medications, sharps, and toxic cleaners are inaccessible to residents in care. The LPA observed the required postings in the facility, including the Residential Care Facility for the Elderly Complaint Poster, Ombudsman and Personal Rights posters, and the Theft and Loss Policy. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and found to be in operating condition. The fire extinguisher was fully charged and replaced within one year on 12/15/2025. The Emergency Disaster Plan was last reviewed on 12/19/2025. Emergency, disaster, and fire drills are conducted quarterly; the most recent drill was conducted on 10/7/2025. First aid kit was observed to be complete. Liability insurance expires on 1/18/2027. The LPA reviewed 4 resident records and 5 staff records. No citations were issued during the inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2025

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained pressure injuries while in care. Resident in care was diagnosed with severe dehydration. Staff did not seek timely medical care for resident care. Staff did not report resident's incident to resident's authorized representative. Staff did not provide adequate meals to resident in care. Staff did not prevent the spread of illness at the facility.

On March 12, 2025, at 9:30 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) James Sampair and Yasamin Brown arrived unannounced to continue the investigation of the allegations above. Upon entry into the facility, the LPAs identified themselves and stated the purpose of the visit to Licensee Joy Manalang-Enriquez and Administrator Jhon Marie Wolffenden. The complaint alleges that resident sustained pressure injuries while in care. The LPAs interviewed Witness W1, Staff Members S1 and S2 and reviewed caregiver notes, resident records, facility records, and hospital records. Based on the data gathered, the resident did not sustain any pressure injuries while in care. The data collected does not confirm the allegation. Continued on LIC 9099-C1. . . . Unsubstantiated . . .Continued from LIC 9099 The complaint alleges that resident in care was diagnosed with severe dehydration. The LPAs interviewed Staff Members S1 and S2 and reviewed caregiver notes, resident records, facility records, and hospital records. Based on the data gathered, the resident was provided adequate water while living at the facility. The data collected does not confirm the allegation. The complaint alleges that staff did not seek timely medical care for resident care. The LPAs interviewed Witness W1, Staff Members S1 and S2 and reviewed caregiver notes, resident records, facility records, and hospital records. Based on the data gathered, the staff did seek timely medical care for the resident. The data collected does not confirm the allegation. The complaint alleges that staff did not report resident's incident to resident's authorized representative. The LPAs interviewed Witness W1, Staff Members S1 and S2 and reviewed caregiver notes, resident records, facility records, and hospital records. Based on the data gathered, the resident's authorized representative was notified in a timely manner. The data collected does not confirm the allegation. The complaint alleges that staff did not provide adequate meals to resident in care. The LPAs interviewed Witness W1, Staff Members S1 and S2 and reviewed caregiver notes, resident records, facility records, and hospital records. Based on the data gathered, the resident was provided adequate meals while living at the facility. The data collected does not confirm the allegation. The complaint alleges that staff did not prevent the spread of illness at the facility. The LPAs interviewed Witness W1, Staff Members S1 and S2 and reviewed the caregiver notes and the hospital records. Based on the data gathered, the staff did prevent the spread of illness at the facility. The data collected does not confirm the allegation. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove them; therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2025 · control 15-AS-20250226153346

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 1/14/2024 at 1:00 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) James Sampair arrived unannounced to conduct an annual required inspection. The LPA informed Staff Members Jocelyn Valencia and Felicitas Dizon of the reason for visit. At approximately 1:45 PM, Licensee Joy Manalang-Enriquez arrived at the facility. The LPA inspected the facility inside and outside with the staff and licensee. The inspection included the kitchen, dining area, living room, bedrooms, bathrooms, and yards. An adequate amount of food supplies were observed, more than the required minimum of 2 days of perishable and 7 days of non-perishable food. The central storage for medications and cleaning supplies were stored in locked cabinets. Facility has a 2-in-1 smoke and carbon monoxide detector that was tested, which functioned correctly. Facility conducts disaster/emergency and fire drills on a quarterly basis; records showed that the most recent drill was conducted on 1/7/2025. Fire extinguisher was fully charged and last replaced on 3/13/2024. The indoor temperature and the maximum hot water temperatures were in the acceptable range. The LPA reviewed 5 resident and 5 staff records. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2025

Type of visit: Post Licensing

On 7/23/2024 at 12:45 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) James Sampair arrived unannounced to conduct the Post Licensing Inspection. Upon entry, LPA stated the purpose of the visit to Licensee Joy Manalang-Enriquez. The LPA inspected the interior and exterior of the facility. The inspection of the physical plant included the kitchen, dining area, restrooms, community living spaces, resident rooms, storage areas, and the grounds of the facility. More than the required minimum of 7 days of nonperishable and 2 days of perishable foods were appropriately stored. Temperature in the dining room was measured at 75.4 degrees Fahrenheit at 3:23 PM. The fire extinguisher was fully charged and last replaced 3/13/2024. The carbon monoxide and smoke detectors were fully operational. The LPA observed required postings in the facility, including the Residential Care Facility for the Elderly Complaint Poster, Ombudsman and Personal Rights posters, and the Theft and Loss Policy. An administrator is on site more than the minimum of 20 hours a week to oversee the proper business operations. The LPA reviewed facility records, records of 5 residents, and records of 5 staff members. The LPA interviewed 2 staff members and 2 residents. No citations were issued during the inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 23, 2024

Type of visit: Prelicensing

On 12/15/2023 at 9:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) J. Sampair arrived unannounced to conduct a prelicensing inspection of the facility with Applicant Joy Manalang-Enriquez. Upon arrival, the LPA identified himself and verified the purpose of the meeting. The LPA and Applicant completed the prelicensing inspection of the facility inside and outside. COMP III training completed with Administrator at 11:40 AM. There are no deficiencies. Pre-Licensing is complete. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided via email to Applicant Joy Manalang-Enriquez.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 15, 2023

Type of visit: Office

Component II completion: Successful Facility Type: RCFE Application Type: CHOW Capacity: 6 Census (if any clients in care): 5 COMP II Participants: Name - Joy Manalang-Enriquez CEO/Administrator Interview Method: Telephone interview On November 6, 2023, Applicant/Administrator participated in COMP II. Identification of the applicant and administrator was verified through interview questions based on photo ID and other identifying personal information. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed that they have read and understand community care facility licensing laws included in the Health and Safety Codes and the California Code of Regulations Title 22. Signed LIC 809 with copy of photo ID have been obtained. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of the following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2. Admission Policies 3. Staffing requirements & Training 4. Restrictive/Prohibited Health Conditions 5. General provisions 6. Emergency Preparedness 7. Complaints & Reporting 8. Pre-Licensing Readinessthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2023