Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Abel Care Home

Small home·Licensed for 6·Concord, California

Licensed since 2006Licence #75601216
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,650 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,800–$5,750
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedJanuary 14, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitApril 29, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderAlmat, Inc.Since 2006 · 3 licensed homes

Abel Care Home is a small care home in Concord — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2006. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Abel Care Home

Is Abel Care Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Abel Care Home licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Abel Care Home been cited?

2 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2006, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 15 state visits over the same years.

Is Abel Care Home still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Abel Care Home cost?

$4,650 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,800–$5,750. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 18 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 10 other homes of a similar licensed size in Concord that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,800 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 10 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Abel Care Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Almat, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to Almat, Inc. — at least 3 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

John Muir Medical Center-Walnut Creek Campus is 2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Abel Care Home keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Abel Care Home license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ABEL CARE HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #75601216. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Almat, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2006, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 15 state inspection visits since 2006, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 2 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2006, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 15 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 4 substantiated allegations on file since 2006, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is April 29, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved by the state
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 4 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 2 residents

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. FOUR(4) MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY, TWO(2) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. LICENSE SUBJECT TO TERMS CONDITIONS OF HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FOUR(4) RESIDENTS FOR TOTAL CARE

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,650a month to start

Likely $3,800–$5,750

From 18 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,650a month

Likely $3,800–$5,950

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,650likely $3,800–$5,750

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 18 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,800–$5,950
$4,650
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,450–$9,050
$6,650
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 18 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

18 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,450–$6,800.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 18 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 899 Pla Vada Court, Concord, CA 94518Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 12 documents for this home, and its records count 15 visits since 2006. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 29, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
15
Most recent visit
April 29, 2026
Occupied · January 14, 2026 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated May 15, 2025 to January 14, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations2typical 0
  • Type B citations2typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations4typical 0
  • Total complaints4typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2006.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262212025562202422020231102022110

The last 36 months — 10 of 12 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Apr 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 04/29/26 at 1:00 pm Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) J. Clancy-Czuleger arrived unannounced to do an annual inspection. LPA meet with Administrator Lailo Matias and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA inspected the facility inside out. There is no body of water. Physical plant is consistent with the facility sketch received by Central Application Bureau (CAB) and approved by the fire department. LPA inspected the living room, dining area, kitchen, bedrooms, hallways, bathrooms, side and backyards. Bedrooms were observed appropriately furnished with adequate lighting and drawers. Facility has sufficient towels, extra bed sheets and comforters. Equipment and supplies for residents' personal hygiene are available and on site. Dinner and silver wares were observed sufficient for residents' use. Food supplies checked and observed good for seven days of non-perishables. Facility was observed equipped with refrigerator, microwave, dishwasher, washer and dryer. Cabinet for knives, cleaning supplies, and central storage for medications were observed with locks. Activity supplies were available. Outdoor activity space was observed furnished with tables, chairs and shade. The facility has a mitigation plan. At 1:25 pm LPA reviewed 3 residents records. At 1:45 pm, LPA reviewed 2 staff records and 2 of 2 were fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026
Jan 14, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff interfered with a resident's visitations

On 01/14/2026 at 09:00AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) J. Clancy-Czuleger arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint visit. LPA explained the purpose of the visit with Administrator Lailo Matias. During the initial 10-day complaint visit, LPA interviewed staff, collected the following documents: Resident 1's (R1) Power of Attorney documents, R1's Emergency information, and Physicians report. On the Allegation of: Staff interfered with a resident's visitations Based on interview with Staff, R1's Power of Attorney requested at move in that R1 Continued on 9099C.... Substantiated Continued from 9099 was not to have any visitors. S1 stated that P1 wanted R1 to rest and not be confused or distracted while at the new home. On review of R1's Power of Attorney documents, it does not state that P1 has the authority to restrict visitor to R1. Based on LPA’s interviews and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22 has been cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy appeal rights, and this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2026 · control 15-AS-20260108115418

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(11) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 16, 2026

Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To have their visitors, ... permitted to visit privately during reasonable hours and without prior notice... Based on records review and interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, by not allow a visitor to visit R1the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2026

Plan of correction: The facility agrees to read and review the regulation and PIN 25-07-ASC and submit a letter of self certification showing their understanding. Proof of correction will be sent to CCLD by POC date

20255 state visits · 6 documents
Nov 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not providing adequate food service to residents Staff screams at residents

On 11/07/2025 at 11:00 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA), J. Clancy-Czuleger arrived unannounced to deliver complaint findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Lailo Matias, Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA obtained information, reviewed records, collected documents and interviewed staff and residents. It was alleged staff member physically abused resident by punching R1 in the arms and shoulders. However, based on interview staff denied hitting or pushing R1 nor observed staff hitting or pushing other clients. On the allegation: Staff are not providing adequate food service to residents LPA observed empty fruit basket with two brown bananas, a lime and a single clementine. The cabinets were half empty with cans pushed forward to block the empty shelf behind. There were about a half dozen potatoes that were starting to sprout freezer was bare, with three boxes of frozen popsicles and a tub of ice cream. Continued on 9099C... Substantiated ... Continued from 9099 Fridge had multiple packs of hot-dogs, three bags of bread and some fresh lettuce in the cooler drawer. On the allegation: Staff screams at residents In an interview with W1 they stated that they have heard staff raise their voice at residents and speak to some residents including R2 and R3 in an unkind manor. In an interview it was stated that some of the staff have even pinched R3’s nose. Based on LPAs interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Failure to submit proof of correction by plan of correction due date, and any repeat violations within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, and a copy of this report provided. ... Continued from 9099A R1 was observed one morning to have a broken tooth. Facility staff were interviewed and said that there had been no incident or altercation that had occurred that would have broken R1’s tooth. W1 was interviewed and stated that they were informed about the tooth the same morning that it was noticed by staff and did not believe an injury or altercation occurred, but that staff might not be brushing R1’s teeth well enough. R1 was taken to the dentist, and it was confirmed that the tooth had broken due to rotting away and not from an injury. On the allegation: Staff are handling residents in a rough manner It was observed that R1 had scratches on their arm. W1 said that they also noticed the scratches on R1’s arm but was informed by staff that R2 had grabbed R1 and that was what may have caused the scratches. W1 said that they have not seen any staff handle the residents in a rough manner. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there are not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2025 · control 15-AS-20250717104148

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(26) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 14, 2025

The following food service requirements shall apply: (26) Supplies of nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days shall be maintained on the premises. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having two days of perishable foods or one week of nonperishable foods, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee, agreed to purchase food and submit photo and receipt to CCLD by POC date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 14, 2025

Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To be free from punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature...This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by staff raising their voice at residents and pinching a residents nose, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to train all staff regarding the citations. Copy of training will be send to CCL by POC due date.

Nov 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

While LPA J. Clancy-Czuleger conducted a complaint investigation (15-AS-20250717104148) on 11/07/2025, LPA observed in the staff "break room" in the garage personal toiletries that were still wet from use, an individuals medication, a armoire full of clothes. LPA asked S2 who lived in this "room" and S2 stated a staff member who is working at Abel III. The deficiency was observed (see LIC809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulation, Title 22. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87307(a) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 21, 2025

(a) Living accommodations and grounds shall be related to the facility's function. The facility shall be large enough to provide comfortable living accommodations and privacy for the residents, staff, and others who may reside in the facility. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by allowing staff to live in a make shift room in the garage, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2025

Plan of correction: The licensee agrees to clear the garage room, and review the regulatons. Proof of correction will be sent to CCLD by POC date.

Aug 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not adequately trained

On 08/07/2025 at 1:25 PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) J. Clancy-Czuleger arrived unannounced to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA explained the purpose of the visit with Administrator Lailo Matias. On the allegation: Staff are not adequately trained. Based on interviews, staff never received any training regarding pressure injuries. In an interview it was stated that staff did not have any training regarding pressure injuries and, did not feel comfortable providing care to R1’s pressure injuries without that training. Based on LPA’s interviews and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. The California Code of Regulations, Title 22 has been cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy appeal rights, and this report provided. Substantiated ...Continued from Lic 9099-A Hospital discharge planners, doctors, home health nurses all suggested that R1 should be placed on hospice care due to his condition and requiring a higher level of care; and W1 was told by S1 and JMH home health nurses that the facility would not be able to retain R1 if his pressure injuries went beyond stage two per licensing regulations. On the allegation: Staff did not seek medical attention for residents in a timely manner. Based on interviews, on 3/15/24 R1 started having trouble breathing so W1 asked S3 to call 911. As the phone call was happening the phone was passed over to W1 at their request. On the allegation: Staff are not following residents’ special diet. Based on interviews, R1 was on a special diet of pureed foods and thickened liquids. R1’s physicians report and medical records state that R1 needed pureed foods that were honey thick, and R1 needed to sit up after meals at or above 45 degrees due to high risk for aspiration. Staff interviewed stated that they thought that W1 did not trust staff to feed him properly so W1 brought R1’s food to the facility to prepare it for him and fed him. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there are not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2025 · control 15-AS-20240619090132

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(c) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 21, 2025

87411 (c) All RCFE staff who assist residents with daily activities shall receive initial and annual training as specified in Health and Safety Code sections 1569.625 and 1569.69 Based on records review and interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having staff preform wound care without the associated training which posed an potential health and safety risk to the residentsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2025

Plan of correction: By POC date, the Administrator states that all care staff will get trained on the following topics;pressure sore prevention, wound care, firt aid training and personal rights. Licensee will submit a sign in log for the training or individual certificates of completion to CCLD by POC date.

Jul 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks

On 07/18/2025 at 11:00AM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) J. Clancy-Czuleger conducted an unannounced Health & Safety inspection. LPA met with Licensee Lailo Matias. LPA toured facility including but not limited to the common areas, bathrooms, kitchens, bedrooms and backyard. Resident's medications were kept locked in the medication cabinet. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors are combined and observed throughout the facility and the bedrooms. First-aid kit was complete. No accessible bodies of water were observed. Indoor and outdoor passageways were free of obstruction. The following deficiency was observed: blocked passageway in room 4 The Facility was cited, and citations can be found on the LIC 809-D. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided. interview conducted. A copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87307(d)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 18, 2025

(d) (6)The following space and safety provisions shall apply to all facilities: (6) All outdoor and indoor passageways and stairways shall be kept free of obstruction. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: The facility/staff blocked the emergency exit door in room 4, by putting a bookshelf infront of it.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2025

Plan of correction: The caregiver removed items during inspection. Deficiency cleared

May 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff makes rude comments to resident Staff does not treat resident with dignity and respect

On 05/15/2025 at 10:10 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA), J. Clancy-Czuleger arrived unannounced to deliver complaint findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Lailo Matias, Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of investigation, LPA obtained information, collected documents and interviewed staff and residents. Based on interview with Staff, S1 and S2 both stated that all staff treat R1 with respect and enjoy talking to R1. When asked about joking around or poking fun at residents, both S1 and S2 explained that they like to try and make residents laugh when working with them but not to make fun of or be mean to them. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there are not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2025 · control 15-AS-20250206083206
Mar 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 3/05/25 at 12:25 pm Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) J. Clancy-Czuleger and Y. Brown arrived unannounced to do an annual inspection. LPA meet with Administrator Lailo Matias and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA inspected the facility inside out. There is no body of water. Physical plant is consistent with the facility sketch received by Central Application Bureau (CAB) and approved by the fire department. LPA inspected the living room, dining area, kitchen, bedrooms, hallways, bathrooms, side and backyards. Bedrooms were observed appropriately furnished with adequate lighting and drawers. Facility has sufficient towels, extra bed sheets and comforters. Equipment and supplies for residents' personal hygiene are available and on site. Dinner and silver wares were observed sufficient for residents' use. Food supplies checked and observed good for seven days of non-perishables. Facility was observed equipped with refrigerator, microwave, dishwasher, washer and dryer. Cabinet for knives, cleaning supplies, and central storage for medications were observed with locks. Activity supplies were available. Outdoor activity space was observed furnished with tables, chairs and shade. The facility has a mitigation plan. Fire extinguishers were observed fully charge and tags showed serviced 02/12/2025. At 1:00pm LPA reviewed 5 residents records. At 1:45 pm, LPA reviewed 3 staff records and 3 of 3 were fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. The following TA was observed: R1's Appraisal outdated Continued on 809-C... ...Continued from 809 The following deficiency was observed during the visit: Cleaning wipes in bathroom Plaster falling off wall in room 3 The Facility was cited, and citations can be found on the LIC 809-D. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 5, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Jun 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks

On 06/20/2024 at 09:25 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) J. Clancy-Czuleger conducted an unannounced Health & Safety inspection. LPA met with Administrator Lailo Matias. LPA toured facility including but not limited to the common areas, bathrooms, kitchens, bedrooms and backyard. Hot water temperature in common area temperature was at a comfortable degrees. There are 2-days of non-perishables and 7-days of perishable food supplies. Resident's medications were kept locked in the medication cabinet. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors are combined and observed throughout the facility and the bedrooms. First-aid kit was complete. No accessible bodies of water were observed. Indoor and outdoor passageways were free of obstruction. No deficiencies are cited on this date. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 20, 2024
Apr 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 4/15/2024 at 1:05 pm Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) J. Clancy-Czuleger and A. Gharachorloo arrived unannounced to do an annual inspection. LPA meet with Administrator Lailo Matias and explained the purpose of the visit. LPAs inspected the facility inside out. There is no body of water. Physical plant is consistent with the facility sketch received by Central Application Bureau (CAB) and approved by the fire department. LPAs inspected the living room, dining area, kitchen, bedrooms, hallways, bathrooms, side and backyards. Bedrooms were observed appropriately furnished with adequate lighting and drawers. Facility has sufficient towels, extra bed sheets and comforters. Equipment and supplies for residents' personal hygiene are available and on site. Dinner and silver wares were observed sufficient for residents' use. Food supplies checked and observed good for seven days of non-perishables. Facility was observed equipped with refrigerator, microwave, dishwasher, washer and dryer. Cabinet for knives, cleaning supplies, and central storage for medications were observed with locks. Activity supplies were available. Outdoor activity space was observed furnished with tables, chairs and shade. The facility has a mitigation plan. Fire extinguishers were observed fully charge and tags showed serviced 02/12/2024. At 1:25 pm LPAs reviewed 4 residents records. At 2:10 PM, LPAs reviewed 2 staff records and 2 of 2 were fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Almat, Inc., licensed since 2006, operates 3 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Contra Costa County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Contra Costa County