Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Aaa Residential Elderly Retreat

Small home·Licensed for 6·Bakersfield, California

Licensed since 2020Licence #157209103Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$3,950 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,200–$4,850
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedAugust 14, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · August 9, 2026
  • Last state visitAugust 14, 2026CDSS inspection record

Aaa Residential Elderly Retreat is a small care home in Bakersfield — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2020.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Aaa Residential Elderly Retreat

Is Aaa Residential Elderly Retreat licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Aaa Residential Elderly Retreat licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Aaa Residential Elderly Retreat been cited?

0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 18 state visits over the same years.

Is Aaa Residential Elderly Retreat still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Aaa Residential Elderly Retreat cost?

$3,950 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,200–$4,850. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 17 other homes of a similar licensed size in Bakersfield that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,000 to $4,050 a month, and the middle figure is $3,500 (n = 17 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Aaa Residential Elderly Retreat take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Tru Vision LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Tru-Vision LLC — at least 4 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Mercy Hospital is 4.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Aaa Residential Elderly Retreat keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Aaa Residential Elderly Retreat license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “AAA RESIDENTIAL ELDERLY RETREAT”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #157209103. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Tru Vision LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 18 state inspection visits since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 18 state visits in that period.
  • 10 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 14, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
ALL MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. RM #3 FIRE CLEARED FOR ONE (1) BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR TWO (2). CLEARED FOR LOCKED PERIMETER.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$3,950a month to start

Likely $3,200–$4,850

From 10 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$3,950a month

Likely $3,200–$5,050

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$3,950likely $3,200–$4,850

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,200–$5,050
$3,950
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,800–$8,250
$5,950
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

10 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,950–$4,050.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 10 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 4313 Monitor Street, Bakersfield, CA 93307Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 17 documents for this home, and its records count 18 visits since 2020. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on August 14, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2021
State visits
18
Most recent visit
August 14, 2026
Occupied at that visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 10 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated January 13, 2022 to August 14, 2026. 10 of the 10 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (5). 10 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 10 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints10typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2020.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202624020255512024330202311020223302021110

The last 36 months — 12 of 17 documents

20262 state visits · 4 documents
Aug 14, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff speaks inappropriately to residents in care.

On 08/14/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) J. Duarte arrived unannounced to conduct interviews and deliver findings. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and met with Lead Caregiver Gwendolyn Bonner. The Department investigated the above allegation. LPA interviewed residents in care and staff. Based on interviews conducted, staff communicate with residents appropriately. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Lead Caregiver Gwendolyn Bonner and a copy of this report was provided. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2026 · control 24-AS-20260504163930
Aug 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On 08/14/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) J. Duarte, arrived unannounced to conduct a case management. LPA met with Lead Caregiver Gwendolyn Bonner. During the investigation of complaint #24-AS-20260504163930, LPA observed that there was a latch at the top of the front door of the facility. LPA conducted a file review for the facility and the facility has a waiver for locked perimeter gates; however, LPA observed the interior front door of the facility had a latch to secure the door closed. On today's vist, LPA observed the latch was removed from the front door. Staff stated that on 05/11/2026, the same day LPA went to the facility, the front door and back door latches were removed. During today's visit, LPA observed a resident with a restricted health condition. LPA requested to review the restricted health care plan for the resident. Licensee stated that the resident has a restricted health care plan, home health goes comes to the facility, and staff have been trained. However, licensee stated that documentation is locked and licensee is not available to come to the facility. LPA was not provided with a health care plan for review. Deficiencies are being issued in accordance to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, chapter 8 on the attached 809D reports. A plan of correction was implemented and an immediate civil penalty in the amount of $500 was assessed for fire clearance, see LIC421IM. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights were discussed and provided to Lead Caregiver Gwendolyn Bonner, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of this document.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87202(a) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 15, 2026

87202 Fire Clearance (a) All facilities shall maintain a fire clearance approved by the city, county, or city and county fire department, or district providing fire protection services, or the State Fire Marshal. Prior to accepting or retaining any of the following types of persons, the applicant or licensee shall notify the licensing agency and obtain an appropriate fire clearance approved by the city, county, or city and county fire department, or district providing fire protection services, or the State Fire Marshal. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: During the investigation of complaint #24-AS-20260504163930, LPA observed that there was a latch at the top of the front door of the facility. LPA conducted a file review for the facility and the facility has a waiver for locked perimeter gates; however, LPA observed the interior front door of the facility had a latch to secure the door closed, which poses an Immediate Health and Safety Risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2026

Plan of correction: On today's vist, LPA observed the latch was removed from the front door. Staff stated that on 05/11/2026, the same day LPA went to the facility, the front door and back door latches were removed. POC CLEARED

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(a) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 17, 2026

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following: This requirement was not met as evidenced by: LPA observed a resident with a restricted health condition. LPA requested to review the restricted health care plan. Licensee stated that the resident has a restricted health care plan, home health goes to facility, and staff have been trained. However, licensee stated that documentation is locked and licensee is not available to come to the facility. LPA was not provided with a health care plan for review, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee will provide restricted health care plan and documentation of staff that have been trained on the resident's restricted health condition by POC due date of 08/17/2026.

Mar 26, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility does not provide necessary supplies for staff to do their job Facility does not properly clean laundry Administrator License is expired Facility does not offer a variety of activities for residents in care Facility is not kept at a comfortable temperature for residents in care Facility serves food that is not of good quality to meet residents needs Facility does not serve food in a quantity to meet residents needs Facility does not address residents medical needs in a timely manner

On May 26, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega conducted an unannounced inspection at the facility and met with Administrator - Alexis Bell. The purpose of the visit was to resume complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegation. Based on interviews, record review, Health and satety walthough visual inspection, it has been determined that the facility Facility does not provide necessary supplies for staff to do their job, Facility does not properly clean laundry, Administrator License is expired, Facility does not offer a variety of activities for residents in care, Facility is not kept at a comfortable temperature for residents in care, facility serves food that is not of good quality to meet residents needs Facility does not serve food in a quantity to meet residents needs, Facility does not address residents medical needs in a timely mannerand determined the allegation is UNFOUNDED. Continuation on LIC 9099C Unfounded This agency has investigated the complaint alleging “Facility does not provide necessary supplies for staff to do their job, Facility does not properly clean laundry, Administrator License is expired, Facility does not offer a variety of activities for residents in care, Facility is not kept at a comfortable temperature for residents in care, Facility serves food that is not of good quality to meet residents needs, Facility does not serve food in a quantity to meet residents needs, Facility does not address residents medical needs in a timely manner” We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened or is without a reasonable basis. We have found that the complaint was UNFOUNDED, therefore we have dismissed the complaint.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2026 · control 24-AS-20250411104340
Mar 26, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide activities or outings for residents in care Staff did not provide adequate care to residents Staff are serving contaminated tea to residents in care Staff spoke inappropriately to residents in care Staff do not ensure that residents are cleaned properly

On May 26, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M Vega conducted an unannounced inspection at the facility and met with Administrator - Alexis Bell. The purpose of the visit was to close an open complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegation. It was alleged that, “Staff did not provide activities or outings for residents in care, Staff did not provide adequate care to residents, Staff are serving contaminated tea to residents in care, Staff spoke inappropriately to residents in care, Staff do not ensure that residents are cleaned properly.” Based on interviews, record review, Health and safety walkthrough visual inspection. it has been determined that the facility does ensure Staff did not provide activities or outings for residents in care, Staff did not provide adequate care to residents, Staff are serving contaminated tea to residents in care Staff spoke inappropriately to residents in care Staff do not ensure that residents are cleaned properly determined the allegation is UNFOUNDED. Continuation on LIC 9099 Unfounded This agency has investigated the complaint alleging “Staff did not provide activities or outings for residents in care, Staff did not provide adequate care to residents, Staff are serving contaminated tea to residents in care, Staff spoke inappropriately to residents in care, Staff do not ensure that residents are cleaned properly” We have found that the complaint was UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened or is without a reasonable basis. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, therefore we have dismissed the complaint.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2026 · control 24-AS-20250319161325
20255 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 12/4/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) B. Miranda arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct an unannounced annual inspection. LPA was greeted by staff and was informed Administrator would not be available until after 1:30. Staff also informed LPA a resident had active Covid. As a precaution LPA did not conduct annual inspection and will return to conduct at a later time. Staff was informed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 4, 2025
May 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility neglected to seek medical treatment for resident.

On May 28, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rachel Bruce conducted an unannounced inspection at the facility and met with Caregiver (CG) Latecha Thompson. The purpose of the visit was to open a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegation. It was alleged that the facility was not seeking medical care for a resident. (R1- see attached confidential names list). Based on interviews and record review it has been determined that the facility does ensure R1 receives medical care and determined the allegation is unfounded. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging “Facility neglected to seek medical treatment for resident.” We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened or is without a reasonable basis. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, therefore we have dismissed the complaint. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250521114432
May 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not ensure facility plumbing was in good repair.

On 5/21/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted unannounced inspection and met with Latecha Thompson, Caregiver. The purpose of the visit is to deliver findings on the above allegations. During the course of this complaint investigation LPA conducted an inspecation, spoke with staff and residents, and obtained and/or reviewed facility records. Based on the investigation it was found that the facility did encounter a plumbing issue that was impactful to both staff and residents as the water was backed up and only one restroom was functional. Based on LPAs observations and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Title 22 regulations are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. An exit interview was conducted and a copy will be provided to the Administrator by email. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250221090844

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 21, 2025

87303 Maintenance and Operation a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. This requirement was not met as evidenced by plumbing issue which caused one toilet and kitchen sink to backup. This poses a potential risk to the health and safety of the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2025

Plan of correction: Facility has already remedied the issue and had the plumbing fixed. Plan of correction to be cleared as of today's visit.

Mar 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff violate client's personal rights Medication mishandled by staff Neglect / lack of supervision resulting in an injury

On 3/4/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rachel Bruce conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to the facility. During this visit LPA delivered the investigative findings regarding the allegations listed above and described below. Allegation 1- Personal Rights violation - not enough clothing or proper toiletries- LPA conducted tour and found that at the time of the visit, clients had sufficient clothing and there were appropriate toiletry items for staff and clients. Interviews conducted provided conflicting information regarding supplies. Allegation 2- Medical violation- not enough medication- clients share and medication is physically mishandled. LPA conducted tour and conducted interviews. At the time of the visit, medication appeared to be in order. Interviews conducted provided conflicting information regarding how medication is handled in the facility and the way that is stored and distributed. Allegation 3- Neglect / lack of supervision resulting in an injury- This was concerning a resident who had a broken finger due to mistreatment. No records of that being reported to staff were found. The other issue referenced that the same client was mistreated verbally and was left in their room in the wheelchair. LPA conducted tour and interviews which revealed conflicting information and no record of the above found in documentation. Unsubstantiated The Department has concluded the investigation regarding the complaint and the allegations noted above. LPA conducted tours and interviews and received conflicting information. Based on the information received the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or may be valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are found to be unsubstantiated. No citations were issued regarding the allegations at today's visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report and appeal rights was provided to the Licensee whose signature acknowledges receipt.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2025 · control 24-AS-20241205100619
Mar 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff interacted with resident in an inappropriate manner.

On 3/4/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rachel Bruce conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to the facility. During this visit LPA delivered the investigation finding regarding the above allegation. The Department has investigated the complaint alleging that a staff member interacted with a resident inappropriately by the way the resident was physically handled; specifically the manner which client was moved in his wheelchair. Staff involved indicated it was not rough just a matter of directing traffic. LPA conducted interviews and received conflicting information. Based on the interviews conducted and/or records review the above allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or may be valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is found to be unsubstantiated. No citation issued regarding the allegation. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report and appeal rights was provided to the Licensee whose signature acknowledges receipt. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 3, 2025 · control 24-AS-20241219100153
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On December 26, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rachel Bruce conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose of discussing incident reporting. On December 21, 2024, Community Care Licensing received an incident report from AAA Residential Elderly Retreat. The report was regarding an incident with a resident (R1) who had an episode at the day program and was sent to the ER on 12/10/2024. The report indicates that it was called into the CCL phone line on 12/11/2024 providing an initial notification to be followed up with a submitted physical report. LPA discussed with Administrator, Alexis Bell (AB) , the need to submit reports within seven day per regulation. AB indicated that she faxed the report in as usual and on time however she did not notice until four days later that she did not get a confirmation notice and the report was now late. AB indicated that she will pay closer attention to the confirmation notice and ensure that reports are sent in timely. No citation issued at today's visit. Below is the regulation regarding reporting requirements: 80061 Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee or applicant shall furnish to the licensing agency reports as required by the Department, including, but not limited to, those specified in this section. (b) Upon the occurrence, during the operation of the facility, of any of the events specified in (1) below, a report shall be made to the licensing agency within the agency's next working day during its normal business hours. In addition, a written report containing the information specified in (2) below shall be submitted to the licensing agency within seven days following the occurrence of such event. (1) Events reported shall include the following (D) Any injury to any client which requires medical treatment.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 26, 2024
Nov 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff handled resident in a rough manner Facility is not meeting food service requirements resulting in weight loss Staff violate resident's personal rights

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA)'s Shawna Doucette conducted an unannounced complaint visit and was granted entry by Administrator Alexis Bell. LPA's explained the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted interviews and reviewed records. Based on record review and interviews Staff documentation indicates R1 refused meals regularly. Based on interviews, staff did not violate resident's personal rights or handle resident in a rough manner Based on record reviews and interviews, Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 8, 2024 · control 24-AS-20240722153956
Oct 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 10/15/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) R. Bruce arrived unannounced to conduct an Annual Required Inspection. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit and was allowed entry by Direct Care Staff Gwen Bonner. Staff contacted Administrator, Alexis Bell who arrived shortly thereafter. Facility has one entrance/exit point. Facility appeared clean with no obvious obstruction or fire clearance issues. Tour of facility was provided by Gwen Bonner. Bedrooms were clean and furnished per regulation. Sharp items were locked in kitchen cabinet. LPA observed a 7-day supply of non-perishable foods and a 2-day supply of perishable foods. There is a locked shed in the backyard which holds a large supply of non-perishable food. Two additional locked sheds are located in the backyard which store office supplies and various equipment. There are three freezers located on the back patio. Two are not completely functioning and will be repaired or removed. Currently the facility dryer is located in the den and clothes are being dried by hanging outside. Dryer has been serviced and when part comes in will be moved back to wash room. Medications observed locked in hallway closet. LPA reviewed all 4 resident's Centrally Stored Medication list, MARS and medication. No regulation violations were noted. Fire extinguisher purchased today and is located in the kitchen. LPA toured bathrooms. Water registered at 105 degrees. Personal hygiene items are locked in hall closet. Bathroom trash bins were observed lids. Securely fastened grab bars observed in bathroom along with no slip bath mats. Resident rooms toured and observed to be adequately furnished and lit. A tour of the exterior was conducted. No issues noted. Four staff records were reviewed as well as three resident files and all were found to contain required documentation. LPA is requesting the following documents be submitted to the Fresno CCL office by 11/01/2024: Current copy of Administrator Certificate, Designation of Facility Responsibility (LIC308), Administrator Organization (LIC 309), Affidavit regarding Client/Resident Cash Resources (LIC 400), Emergency and Disaster Plan (LIC 610E), Personnel Report (LIC500), Register of Facility Clients/Residents for LIC9020. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator. Report signed on-site and copy will be provided by email as printer is not working.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 15, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Kern County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Kern County