Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
A Peace of HomeLicense #567609929 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareA Peace of HomeLicense #567609929 · 1227 Mika Way, Oxnard, CA · (805) 278-9620Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Ventura County/Oxnard/A Peace of Home
Map · 1227 Mika Way

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$5,300/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $4,350–$6,550 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (805) 278-9620

    From the state licensing record · October 27, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

PH

Call A Peace of Home

Oxnard · Licensed for 6

(805) 278-9620

From the state licensing record · October 27, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 6 · Oxnard

A Peace of Home

1227 Mika Way, Oxnard, CA 93030 · Licensed since 2019

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

A Peace of Home

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$5,300 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $4,350–$6,550 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 27, 2026
  • Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 6 residents
  • Dementia
  • Hospiceup to 2 residents
  • Bedriddenup to 2 residents

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 2 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2. BEDRIDDEN APPROVED FOR BEDROOM #4 ONLY.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · October 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    State licensing record · October 27, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for A Peace of Home: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,300a month to start

Likely $4,350–$6,550

From 12 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,300likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,300likely $4,350–$6,550

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,350–$6,700
$5,300
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,100–$9,850
$7,800
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes12 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,210 to $8,000

$3,210$8,000

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

12 homes like this within 9 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,300–$6,600.

  • Mom and Dad Home CareOxnard · 0.2 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Villa Teresa Residential CareOxnard · 0.3 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Absolute Care HomeOxnard · 3.2 mi · Small home
    $3,300Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Sea Breeze ManorOxnard · 3.3 mi · Small home
    $4,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ventura Grand ChateauVentura · 5.5 mi · Mid-size home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · memory care private room · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
  • Rowe ResidenceVentura · 6.0 mi · Small home
    $8,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Cottage InnVentura · 6.3 mi · Small home
    $7,300Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ventura Villa Assisted LivingVentura · 6.5 mi · Mid-size home
    $3,750Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ocean Breeze at BeechwoodCamarillo · 6.5 mi · Small home
    $5,700Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Finest Living at ArcadeVentura · 7.0 mi · Small home
    $3,210Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Brookhaven AlCamarillo · 7.8 mi · Small home
    $6,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Via EsmeraldaCamarillo · 8.2 mi · Small home
    $6,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

1227 Mika Way, Oxnard, CA 93030Address from the public record · October 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1St Johns Regional Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list0.7 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 27, 2026 · License #567609929 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 6 of 11 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated” and 1 “Unsubstantiated”.

20252 state visits · 2 documents

Dec 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the required annual visit at 10:49 AM. LPA met with facility staff who contacted the facility Administrator Herbert Perey. The Co-Administrator Mischelle Perey arrived to the facility at approximately 11:10 AM. LPA and Co-Administrator were later joined by Administrator. Entrance interview was conducted and the reason for the visit was explained. Beginning at approximately 10:50 AM the LPA, along with the facility staff and later the Administrator and Co-Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: COMMON AREAS: This includes the living room, hallway, and dining area. LPA observed the living room to be clean and properly furnished at the time of the visit. The living room contained a television, adequate seating, and locked storage for resident medication and files. Additionally, the living room was observed to contain all required postings, the facility telephone, emergency flashlights, and a complete first aid kit. The hallway was observed to be clean and free from any obstructions. The hallway contained closets that contained storage for linens and care supplies. Additionally, the hallway contained a locked laundry room which contained the facility’s washer and dryer in addition to laundry chemicals and care supplies. The dining area was observed to be equipped with adequate seating for resident use and contained an appropriately screened fireplace. Continued on LIC 809C. COMMON AREAS CONT.: LPA observed the dining area and hallway to contain wall mounted fire extinguishers that were fully charged and last serviced on 05/14/2024 which was more than 12 months from the inspection date. LPA informed the Co-Administrator who purchased new fire extinguishers during the visit and installed them at the facility. The facility’s fire and carbon monoxide alarms were tested at 12:14 PM and were functional at the time of the visit. All exits in the facility were observed to contain functioning auditory alarms. KITCHEN: The LPA observed the kitchen area to be clean. Kitchen appliances appeared to be in operable condition. The facility had a sufficient supply of two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non-perishable food. LPA observed a secured under-sink cabinet to contain cleaning chemicals. LPA observed secured drawers to contain knives and other sharp objects. BEDROOMS: There are four (4) bedrooms in the facility; two (2) are dual occupancy resident rooms, two (2) are single occupancy resident rooms. LPA and the Co- Administrator toured all four (4) bedrooms. All resident rooms were observed to be furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings, and sufficient lighting. BATHROOMS: There are two (2) bathrooms at the facility. One is designated as a shared/common resident bathroom and one (1) is a private resident bathroom. Both resident bathrooms were observed to be clean and were equipped with nonskid surfaces. Grab bars were observed in all resident showers and near all resident toilets, all were properly secured. The water temperature was measured to be between 129.3 and 133.3 degrees Fahrenheit, whish is outside of the range required by regulations. LPA informed the Administrator who adjusted the temperature regulator on the water heater and agreed to submit proof of appropriate water temperature to LPA. The private bathroom contained a secured storage which contained grooming supplies. Continued on LIC 809C. GARAGE: The garage was observed to be locked and inaccessible to clients in care. LPA observed the garage to contain an extra refrigerator/freezer, extra care supplies, and sufficient emergency water supplies. LPA observed the garage to contain two (2) makeshift bedrooms which included supports, wooden walls, and a door. LPA interviewed the Co-Administrator about the rooms. The Co-Administrator stated that the rooms were installed in June of 2025 and facility staff were utilizing the rooms. The Co-Administrator confirmed that they did not obtain building permits for the two (2) rooms, did not inform Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) of the construction, and did not obtain a fire inspection for the rooms. LPA informed the Administrator and Co-Administrator that the constructed rooms are a violation of the facility’s fire clearance which is a zero-tolerance violation and an immediate civil penalty of $500 is being assessed on today’s date (12/18/2025). LPA informed the Administrator and Co-Administrator that failure to remove the structures could result in the assessment of additional civil penalties. OUTDOOR SPACE: The facility has one (1) emergency exit gate located on the side of the facility; LPA observed clear passageways for emergency exit use. The facility had adequate shaded seating outdoors for resident use. LPA observed cameras throughout the outdoors of the facility. RECORD REVIEW: Record review began at 12:19 PM. Staff and resident records were reviewed for documents including, but not limited to: health screening, TB test, staff training records, fingerprint clearance, resident physician's report, needs and service appraisal, consent forms, and personal rights. Five (5) staff files were reviewed. All staff files contained all required documentation and trainings. Four (4) resident files were reviewed. All resident files contained the required documentation. MEDICATION REVIEW: Medication review began at 01:14 PM. Medications for two (2) of four (4) residents were observed. All medications were stored properly and were appropriately documented on their respective centrally stored medication and destruction record sheets. No deficiencies were observed during medication review. Continued on LIC 809C. INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLANNING: During today’s visit, the LPA reviewed the facility's infection control practices and the facility's emergency disaster plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as they pertain to infection control are adequate. Emergency disaster drills are conducted quarterly; the facility’s last logged emergency disaster drill was conducted on 12/01/2025. The facility’s emergency disaster plan is up to date and is adequate. Both the infection control plan and the emergency disaster plan are reviewed/updated annually by the facility’s Administrator. INTERVIEWS: LPA interviewed two (2) residents. The residents interviewed stated that staff treat them well and are attentive to their needs. The residents interviewed had no concerns with the facility. LPA interviewed two (2) staff members. The staff members interviewed were knowledgeable on their roles and responsibilities, the resident’s rights, the forms of abuse, and the appropriate reporting procedures for suspected abuse. During today’s visit LPA obtained a copy of the facility’s LIC 500, resident roster, and current liability insurance. Pursuant to Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited and civil penalty assessed. (refer to LIC 809-D): Exit interview conducted and copy of the report was issued and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 18, 2025

The state marks this report as 7 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 6. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Oct 31, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff neglect resulted in resident sustaining a wound requiring hospitalization

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Esther Cortez, conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings for the above allegation. At 12:25 p.m. the LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. At approximately 1:00 p.m., Co-administrator Michelle Perey arrived and was explained the reason for the visit. On 09/23/2024, the Department received a complaint regarding an allegation of Neglect/Lack of Care and Supervision. Staff neglect resulted in Resident 1 (R1) sustaining a wound requiring hospitalization. On 09/25/2024, beginning at 10:45 a.m., LPA Cortez conducted a physical plant tour with the administrator and then began reviewing facility records. Copies of pertinent records were obtained. On 11/22/2024, starting at 12:22 p.m., LPA Cortez conducted four (4) resident and three (3) staff interviews. Medical and Home Health records were requested and reviewed. Report will continue on LIC9099-C, 2nd page. Substantiated On the allegation " Staff neglect resulted in resident sustaining a wound requiring hospitalization"; it is the concern of the Reporting Party (RP) that on 09/18/24, Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to St. John’s Regional Medical Center, with a gluteal abscess that was so deep, muscle and fat was able to be seen. RP believes R1 was neglected by facility staff due to their condition and R1 was possibly “never turned” by staff. To investigate the allegation the LPA conducted a file review and interviews. According to medical and home health records reviewed, R1 was initially admitted to Camarillo Health Care Center (CHCC) on 07/21/2024 for “encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the genitourinary system”. On 08/19/2024, R1 was discharged and admitted to the A Peace of Home facility. The discharge paperwork from CHCC did not indicate a pressure injury. However, home health records reviewed indicated that on 08/22/2024, R1’s Patient Information Report notated R1 had a left foot unstageable pressure ulcer and a coccyx stage 3 pressure ulcer: measurements at 6.65 CM X 6.5 CM and that all wounds were acquired prior to board and care transfer. Facility staff able to assist with providing wound care 1 time a week or as needed, with home health twice weekly for a total of 3 times a week. On 08/26/2024, a home health nurse cleansed sacral wound with normal saline and there were no signs or symptoms of infection. New wound orders called in for left heel wound. On 08/29/2024, R1 received wound care, pressure relieving measures with skin management for prevention of skin breakdown, no new skin concerns noted at visit. Diet was noted as a concern for board and care as it was reported R1 eats 15% of total daily solids. R1 and care staff were instructed on the importance of appropriate measures to prevent skin injury/breakdown including routine inspection of skin, turning schedule/offloading, keeping skin clean and dry especially over bony prominences, encourage adequate nutrition and hydration and leave blisters intact. On 09/01/2024, a home health nurse noted that R1 was diagnosed with UTI on Friday August 30th, 2024, R1 did not fully engage in conversation due to increased tiredness, and heart rate range between 110 to 113 throughout visit. Nursing interventions were listed as the following: R1 and caregivers educated on repositioning every 2 hours to help heal pressure injuries and prevent further skin breakdown, educated on increasing protein intake as tolerated if not contraindicated to help with the healing process, and educated on signs and symptoms of infection. On 09/04/2024, a case conference note indicated bedbound, wound care, pressure ulcers, cervical spine issues, recently diagnosed with UTI, on antibiotic as skilled reason for home health services, and that R1 is being seen by mobile wound specialist, waiting to have pet scan and recently had MRI. On 09/05/2024, a home health nurse noted that they called the office of Dr. West and gave report that R1 had not been eating or drinking well for 4 days and a feeding tube was being requested. Report will continue on LIC9099-C, 3rd page. Additionally, on 09/06/2025, a home health nurse noted that they were informed by R1’s case manager that R1 was admitted to St. Johns Regional on 09/04/2024 with Dx sepsis, UTI, an abscess, and R1 was on O2. On 09/08/2024, it was noted that R1 was scheduled for drainage procedure later in the day. On 09/13/2024, it was noted R1 was now at USC-Keck Hospital and home health nurse spoke with R1’s nurse at USC. On 09/19/2024, it was noted that R1 was transferred back to St. Johns Regional on 09/18/2024 as R1 was more stable. On 09/25/2024, it was noted a home health nurse spoke with R1’s case manager at St. John’s Regional and it was stated R1 needed a higher level of care as they still had a wound vac in place and wound was not looking good, and it was recommended for R1 to go to SNF instead of Board and care. The Administrator stated that R1 had what appeared to be an "unstageable pressure ulcer” upon admission and that when they did the pre-assessment at CHCC, R1 refused to be seen and went based on photos that were shown to him and the information that was provided. The Administrator revealed that the nurse involved with R1’s care at CHCC let him know he had a diabetic ulcer on their heel, as well as an excoriation on their sacrum, coccyx region, and based on the information that was shared they agreed R1 would be a good fit for the facility. However, upon admission, R1’s wounds were more severe and not as described. The Administrator notified R1’s POA that R1’s wounds were more severe than they thought, they were more of a pressure ulcer and R1 needed a higher level of care, however R1 refused to go the hospital and wanted the home care aspect and nursing visits as opposed to hospitalization. The Administrator further revealed that during R1’s stay at the facility after home health diagnosed the wound as a pressure ulcer, they emphasized to R1’s POA that the facility might not be the appropriate place for R1, and they needed to get treatment at a wound center or the hospital, it did need the clinician care, higher frequency care as it was a pressure injury and the POA eventually was able to convinced R1 to go to the hospital. Staff interviews revealed that staff did not get wound treatment training by a home health nurse. Staff either received training on basic treatment to care for R1’s wound by the Administrator or did not get any training on how to treat the wound, even though R1’s dressing would get changed either by the nurse or sometimes by the staff. Staff further revealed that they would reposition R1 every 2 to 3 hours. Based on record review and interviews conducted, there is sufficient evidence to support the allegation occurred. The Administrator admitted and retained R1 with a prohibitive health condition (who needed a higher level of care) in direct violation of regulations. Report will continue on LIC9099-C, 4th page. R1 had a rapid progression of a pre-existing Stage 3 pressure ulcer to a severe gluteal abscess and sepsis within 2 weeks. Despite HH visits and staff claiming repositioning R1 every 2 hours, R1’s condition deteriorated rapidly between 08/19/2024 and 09/04/2024. A UTI was diagnosed on 08/30/2024, which, coupled with the existing pressure ulcer, required a higher level of care. Additionally, the care staff should not be changing R1’s dressings as they are not skilled professionals. Furthermore, file review did not provide information or documentation to support which caregivers were provided with training on R1’s wound care. Therefore, the allegation “Staff neglect resulted in resident sustaining a wound requiring hospitalization” is deemed Substantiated at this time. Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies are cited (refer to LIC 9099-D). An immediate $500 civil penalty was issued today. Administrator Michelle Perey was informed that additional civil penalties might be assessed based on Health and Safety Code 1569.49(e) and 1569.49(f). Exit interview conducted, copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240923160550

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87615(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 3, 2025

87615(a)(1) Prohibited Health Conditions (a) Persons who require health services for or have a health condition including, but not limited to, those specified below shall not be admitted or retained... (1) Stage 3 and 4 pressure injuries. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the above cited section, as R1 had a left foot unstageable pressure ulcer and a coccyx stage 3 pressure ulcer and R1 was not admitted to hospice care at that time, which posed an immediate health risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2025

Plan of correction: The Administrator agreed to submit a corrective action plan outlining specific steps to ensure future compliance with all admission, retention, care, assessment and relocation regulations.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(d) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 3, 2025

The administrator shall have the qualifications specified in Sections 87405(d)(1) through (7). If the licensee is also the administrator, all requirements for an administrator shall apply. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records review the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as the Administrator did not demonstrarte sufficient knowledge, and qualifications as an Administrator, admitting & retaining R1 with a prohitivive health condition which poses an immideatethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to review reg cited and submit a statement of understanding, along with a written plan on how they will ensure future compliance then send to LPA via email by COB 11/03/2025. health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

20243 state visits · 3 documents

Dec 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kristin Kontilis conducted an unannounced required Annual Inspection at the above-named facility. Upon arrival, LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. At the time of arrival, there were three (3) staff on duty and six (6) residents in care. Administrator Herbert Perey arrived at approximately 12:50 pm. Co-Administrator Mischelle Perey arrived at approximately 2:03 pm. Entrance interview conducted. The facility is a one-story Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE). Currently, there are two (2) residents on hospice and three (3) residents are bedridden. A tour of the physical environment and accommodations were assessed, and the following was noted: LPA observed the required posting of the complaint poster and Resident’s Rights. LPA inspected the one-story facility for fire safety, personal accommodations, and food service. The physical environment was checked for cleanliness and condition. Walls, windows, ceilings, doors, floors and floor coverings were checked. The facility was seen to be in good repair inside and outside. There are three (3) fire extinguishers, inspection was current as of 5/14/2024. There are approximately seven (7) dual carbon monoxide alarm/smoke alarms detectors are hard wired and in good working order. The kitchen area was sufficiently stocked with seven days of non-perishables. LPA observed a minimal amount of fresh vegetables and fresh fruits. Administrator Perey stated the facility recently had a holiday party with approximately 30-35 attendees. Meals served were catered and home-made ethnic dishes. LPA recommended additional fruits and vegetables be on hand, especially after a special event when food has been served. Upon Co-Administrator's arrival at 2:03 pm, Co-Administrator had purchased several fresh vegetables and fresh fruits. Snacks and beverages are readily available for Residents. Frozen foods are properly wrapped and stored appropriately. LPA observed the kitchen cabinets, refrigerator, stove, and counters are clean. Please continue to 809-C, Pg 2. Medications, First Aid kit, and additional first aid supplies are kept in a locked centrally stored cabinet. First aid kit was observed to be complete. Residents participate independently in outside activities such as corn hole, beach ball toss, music, special occasion celebrations, walks in the yard; indoor activities such as reading activities, television watching, Bingo, chess, painting, coloring, and singing. Families visit and take residents out on excursions such as golfing, shopping, and walks in parks. The front yard consists of walkway and well-maintained landscaping. The backyard has walkways, garden sitting areas, and is well-maintained for activities and visits. There are no bodies of water. The recycling bin, green waste bin, and trash bins are standard bins with flip lids. A locked garage is located at the front of the home used for storing supplies. The kitchen, living room, and dining area are neat and clean. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature. There are two private bedrooms and two shared bedrooms. Bedroom #4 is a shared bedroom with a private bath. Each bedroom has a bed, nightstands, and lights and nightstand lamps to provide sufficient lighting. Bathroom #1 is off the hallway near Bedrooms 1, 2, and 3. All residents have access to Bathroom #1. The bathrooms have secure grab bars and no skid flooring. Medication inventory revealed an unexplainable under count of one (1) medication for Resident 1 (R1) and an over count of four (4) medications for R1. Residents’ files were reviewed. LPA noted that on file for each resident was the following: Physician’s Reports, Admission Agreements, Medical Assessments, Identification and Emergency information, Appraisals/Needs Service Plan, and Medication Administration Records (MARs). All persons associated with the facility have criminal record clearance. Administrator certificate is valid. Due to time restraints, the annual inspection will be completed at a later date. The following deficiencies were observed (See LIC 809-D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and/or California Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. Report and Appeal Rights issued at the time of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 17, 2024

The state marks this report as 7 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Jul 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is overmedicating resident Staff is not providing appropriate incontinence care Staff is not allowing resident to have privacy on the phone Resident is not receiving proper nutrition which is causing weight loss Resident has developed wounds for which they are not receiving medical care Facility does not offer activities or exercise to residents Staff pressure resident to go on hospice

LIcensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above noted allegations. LPA met with administrator Herbert Perey and explained the reason for the visit. On 6/13/2023, LPA conducted a facility tour, interviewed witnesses, residents, and staff; and obtained records. During LPA's visit on 7/29/2024, LPA conducted interviews with staff. Based on interviews with staff and review of records, resident 1 (R1) had no medication that would have made them overly sedated. All medications were given as prescribed and R1 readily took the medication. Therefore, the allegation staff overmedicated R1 is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. (continued on LIC9099C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC9099) Based on interviews with staff and witnesses, R1 was provided incontinence care as needed during the day and at night R1 wore a PureWick external catheter. LPA observed R1 on 6/13/2023, R1 was resting comfortably in bed. There were no foul odors in the room. LPA also observed a clean PureWick external catheter machine at the foot of the bed which was used at night. Therefore, the allegation staff was not providing appropriate incontinence care is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Based on interviews with witnesses and staff, R1 took phone calls on the facility cordless phone. Staff would take the phone to R1 in their room. R1 would decide whether to use the speaker phone feature or hold the phone to their ear. R1's roommate stated they would leave R1 in the room alone while R1 was on the phone. Therefore, the allegation staff did not allow for privacy on the phone is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Based on interviews with witnesses and staff, when R1 first moved into the facility R1 would eat meals inconsistently. Staff tried giving R1 their favorite foods and supplements such as protein drinks. During the end, R1 completely lost their appetite and after two days of missing meals R1 was sent to the hospital. Therefore, the allegation resident was not receiving proper nutrition is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Based on interviews with witnesses and staff, R1 needed to see a podiatrist for issues on R1's feet. R1's POA wanted to make the arrangements for transporation themselves. The administrator offered to make transportation arrangements but the POA refused. R1 did not have any wounds but did have some trouble with their nails/toes. Eventually, R1 was taken to the hospital by ambulance. Therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Based on interviews with witnesses, residents, and staff, the facility offers different activities such as short walks, chair exercises, reading comprehension, and puzzles. Witnesses stated R1 did not have energy to participate in activities. R1 did have frequent visitors for personal interaction. Therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. (continued on page 3; LIC9099C) (continued from page 2; LIC9099C) Based on interviews with witnesses and staff, the administrator contacted R1's medical Power of Attorney (POA) as R1 had not eaten in two days. The administrator asked the POA to decide whether they wanted R1 taken to the hospital or placed on hospice as the administrator was aware hospice had been part of the converstaion the POA was having with other family members. The administrator only wanted some sort of care for R1; either medical intervention or comfort care measures from hospice. The administrator did not pressure the family to place R1 on hospice. Therefore, the allegation staff pressured resident to go on hospice is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. No deficiencies observed. Exit interview conducted and report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230605162215
Jan 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual continuation visit. LPA met with Administrator Herbert Perey and explained the reason for the visit. The LPA completed record review and medication review. STAFF RECORDS: LPA reviewed staff records for two staff. Training was complete. All staff have CPR/First Aid certifications. All staff scheduled to work at the facility are fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. RESIDENT RECORDS and MEDICATION: LPA reviewed two residents' records. Resident files included pre-admission appraisals, needs and services plans, physician's reports, and admission agreements. Medications appear to be given as prescribed based on review of medications and the centrally stored medication and destruction records. EMERGENCY DISASTER PLAN: The emergency disaster plan was complete. The facility conducts disaster drills quarterly on each shift. LPA interviewed two staff; there were no concerns. LPA attempted to interview two residents. One resident was unable to answer questions due to their condition and one resident was sleeping. No deficiencies observed during today's visit. Exit interview conducted. Report emailed to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 10, 2024

20231 state visit · 1 document

Dec 8, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 8:17 a.m. LPA met with Administrators Mischelle Perey and Herbert Perey and explained the reason for the visit. The LPA toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The carbon monoxide and smoke alarms were tested and all functioned properly. The fire extinguisher appeared fully charged and was last inspected on 4/24/2023. KITCHEN: LPA observed knives are stored in a locked drawer and chemicals are stored in a locked cabinet under the sink. Kitchen appliances appeared to be in operable condition. The facility had a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food and emergency water. Hot water temperature measured 119.8*F. BEDROOMS: The LPA observed two double-occupancy bedrooms and two single-occupancy bedrooms which were clean and furnished appropriately. RESTROOMS: The two restrooms were clean and sanitary and in operating condition. COMMON SPACES: At the time of the visit, the living room and dining room furniture was observed to be in good condition. The LPA observed the required postings throughout the facility. The backyard patio is equipped with furniture for residents' use. The garage and laundry room were locked. There is additional food stored in the refrigerator in the garage along with refrigerated medication. Medication is also stored in a locked cabinet in the living room. INFECTION CONTROL: The LPA observed an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility has appropriate plans in place in the event of clients and/or staff showing symptoms of COVID or testing positive for COVID. LPA will return at a later date to continue this annual inspection. No deficiencies observed during today's visit. Exit interview conducted. Report emailed to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 8, 2023
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 5 documents

20231 state visit · 2 documents

Mar 23, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff failed to seek timely medical treatment for Resident #1 (R1)

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angel Ascecncio conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver final findings for the above allegation. During today’s visit, LPA Ascencio met with Administrator Herbert Perey and explained the reason for the visit. On 10/25/2022, the Department received a complaint regarding an allegation of Neglect/Lack of Supervision. It was alleged that staff neglected to seek timely medical attention for Resident #1 (R1) after R1 was found with multiple bruises, unable to get out of bed or walk, and later diagnosed with a fractured hip. The complaint was referred to Community Care Licensing Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to Investigator Douglas Real. On 10/26/2022, between 1:52pm and 3:35pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) KaSandra Lopez conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit. Continued on LIC 9099 - C Substantiated LPA Lopez initially met with facility staff who contacted Administrator Herbert Perey and advised him of the visit. The Administrator arrived shortly after the visit began. The LPA conducted an entrance interview explaining the reason for the visit. Beginning at 1:58pm, the LPA conducted a physical plant tour with staff and reviewed facility records. Copies of pertinent records were obtained. The LPA determined further investigation was needed and informed the Administrator that the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Investigations Branch (IB) Investigator Douglas Real was assigned to complete the investigation. Investigator Real conducted interviews on 11/16/2022 with the Licensee/Administrator and staff; on 12/23/2022, with R1’s resident representative; on 12/29/2022, with resident and staff; on 01/06/2023, with residents and staff; on 01/30/2023, with staff; on 01/31/2023, with R1’s resident representative; and on 02/02/2023, with staff. Investigator Real attempted to speak with the complainant on three (3) different occasions, with no response. In addition, the investigator reviewed St. John’s Regional Medical Center medical records and facility file documents related to R1. A review of R1’s hospital medical records, revealed R1 was admitted to St. John’s Regional Medical Center on 10/23/2022 due to left hip pain. R1 was found to have a left femur neck fracture along with a urinary tract infection and dysphagia (trouble swallowing). R1 was noted as having numerous other health conditions including a history of atrial fibrillation, dementia, Parkinson’s disease, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia and R1’s health was declining. R1’s resident representative decided to transition R1 to hospice for comfort care and R1 passed away in the hospital on 11/02/2022. No abuse or neglect concerns were noted in the medical records. The investigation revealed the facility staff discovered a significant change in R1’s condition on the morning of 10/23/2022. R1 was unable to get up and walk on their own which was unusual as R1 ambulated on their own with assistance as their baseline, in addition, staff found bruising on R1’s hip, leg, and forearm which also had a cut. These injuries were discovered around 8:00am. Due to R1’s diagnosis of dementia R1 was unable to express how they sustained the injuries or the extent of their injuries and pain. At 1:00 p.m., R1’s resident representative noticed R1 was in pain and unable to walk which prompted them to take R1 to the hospital were R1 was diagnosed with a fractured left femur. Continued on LIC 9099 - C Multiple factors, including R1’s inability to express how the injuries occurred, the severity of the injuries or lack thereof, of any internal injuries or pain, along with the existence of multiple bruises and R1’s inability to walk, should have prompted the facility to seek timely medical attention, which they did not. The Department’s information and evidence obtained during the investigation sufficiently supports the allegation; therefore, the allegation “Facility staff failed to seek timely medical treatment for Resident #1 (R1)” is deemed Substantiated at this time. A $500 immediate civil penalty is assessed today. The Administrator Herbert Perey was informed that additional civil penalties might be assessed based on Health and Safety Code 1569.49(f). Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations, the following deficiency is cited (refer to LIC 9099-D) Exit interview conducted, civil penalty issued, appeal rights discussed, and a copy of this report issued. The LPA determined further investigation was needed and informed the Administrator that the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Investigations Branch (IB) Investigator Douglas Real was assigned to complete the investigation. A review of R1’s hospital medical records, revealed R1 was admitted to St. John’s Regional Medical Center on 10/23/2022 due to left hip pain. R1 was found to have a left femur neck fracture along with a urinary tract infection and dysphagia (trouble swallowing). R1 was noted as having numerous other health conditions including a history of atrial fibrillation, dementia, Parkinson’s disease, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia and R1’s health was declining. R1’s resident representative decided to transition R1 to hospice for comfort care and R1 passed away in the hospital on 11/02/2022. No abuse or neglect concerns were noted in the medical records. There was no information in the medical records that indicated R1 had a pressure injury. The hospital records noted R1’s skin was warm and dry, no ulcerations. Interviews conducted during the complaint investigation did not indicate R1 suffered from any pressure injuries. Based on the information and documentation obtained and reviewed, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation “Resident sustained pressure injury while in care” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted, copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 23, 2023 · control 29-AS-20221025102303

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 24, 2023

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a)(1) (a) (1) The licensee shall arrange, or assist in arranging, for medical and dental care appropriate to the conditions and needs of residents. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as staff did not obtain timely medical attention for R1 when R1 was discovered with multiple bruises and unable to walk on their own, and was later diagnosed with a fractured left femur, which posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 23, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee will submit plan how you will ensure residents receive timely medical care. Submit to CCL by 03/27/2023.

Mar 23, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

This report was amended on 03/27/2023 due to additional information obtained. During the complaint investigation of complaint #29-AS-20221025102303, the following deficiencies were observed: On 05/17/2022, Resident #1 (R1) was diagnosed with an acute urinary tract infection (UTI). On 10/23/2022, R1 sustained an unwitnessed fall resulting in bruises and left femur fracture. Family Representative stated they were not notified of the incident. Administrator and staff stated they did notify family the day of R1's incident. There was a Special Incident Reports (SIRs) submitted to Community Care Licensing (CCL) that was misfiled. On 10/23/2022, at 8:00am, staff discovered R1 had multiple bruises, was unable to get out bed and walk. At 1:00 p.m., R1’s representative observed that R1 was in pain and took R1 to the hospital where R1 was diagnosed with a left femur fracture. Citations issued, exit interview, appeal rights given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 23, 2023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87466 · Plan of correction due date: Mar 31, 2023

87466 Observation of the Resident: The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental, emotional and social functioning and that appropriate assistance is provided... ensure that such changes are documented and brought to the attention of the resident's physician and the resident's responsible person… This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, R1’s resident representative/physician was not notified when R1 had a change of condition, which posed a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 23, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee will submit a plan on how you will ensure residents' representatives/physicials will be notificed of change in condition. Submit plan to CCL by 03/31/202

20222 state visits · 2 documents

Nov 30, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 9:35 a.m. This annual had a specific emphasis on infection control practices and procedures. The LPA initially met with caregiver Soliman Labrado who assisted with the physical plant tour. Administrator Herbert Perey was at an appointment and arrived at the facility at 10:36 a.m. Co-Administrator Michelle Perey was reachable by phone but out of town. LPA explained the reason for the visit to all parties. The LPA toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The carbon monoxide and smoke alarms were tested and all functioned properly. The fire extinguisher appeared fully charged and was last inspected on 4/20/2022. KITCHEN: Caregivers were preparing breakfast so some locks on cabinets were open. LPA observed knives are stored in a locked drawer and chemicals are stored in a locked cabinet under the sink. Kitchen appliances appeared to be in operable condition. The facility had a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. BEDROOMS: The LPA observed two double-occupancy bedrooms and two single-occupancy bedrooms. RESTROOMS: Restrooms are clean and sanitary and in operating condition. COMMON SPACES: At the time of the visit, the living room and dining room furniture was observed to be in good condition. The LPA observed the required postings throughout the facility. The backyard patio is equipped with furniture for clients' use. The garage and laundry room were locked. There is additional food stored in the refrigerator in the garage along with refrigerated medication. Medication is also stored in a locked cabinet in the living room. INFECTION CONTROL: During today’s visit, the LPA spoke with the Administrator regarding the facility’s infection control practices. Upon entry, the facility has a central entry point for symptom screening and sanitation station. All facility staff were observed wearing masks. The LPA observed an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility has appropriate plans in place in the event of clients and/or staff showing symptoms of COVID or testing positive for COVID. No deficiencies observed. Exit interview conducted. Report emailed to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 30, 2022
Mar 3, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is understaffed

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) JoAnn Rosales conducted a subsequent unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver final investigation findings. LPA met with Administrator Herbert Perey. Concerns were that one staff was unable to assist all 4 residents with activities of daily living at the same time. Interviews with staff and residents conducted on 4/23/21 starting at 1:32 pm, 12/2/21 at 3:58 pm and 3/1/22 at 2:58 pm revealed that from staff are working alone from 3:30 pm to 5 pm and from 7 pm to 7:30 am. A review of resident records on 12/2/21 starting at 12:28 pm revealed that resident #1 (R1) has sundowning behaviors, is non-ambulatory, needs assistance with transferring, toileting, dressing, bathing hair care and personal hygiene, needs special observation/night supervision and is confused/disoriented. R2 has wandering and sundowning behaviors, is non-ambulatory, has bowel and bladder impairment, needs assistance with transferring, toileting, dressing, bathing hair care and personal hygiene, needs special observation/night Continued on 9099C Substantiated supervision and is confused/disoriented. R3 needs assistance with transferring, toileting, dressing, bathing hair care and personal hygiene, needs special observation/night supervision, is non-ambulatory and is confused/disoriented at times. R4 has wandering and sundowning behaviors, is non-ambulatory, has visual and auditory hallucinations, and is confused/disoriented. A review of staff timecards from 3/1/21 to 4/15/21 on 12/28/21 starting at 1:56 pm revealed that from 7:30 pm to 7:30 am there is only one staff working. Based on the information obtained during the course of the investigation the allegation is deemed substantiated at this time. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiency was cited (refer to LIC 9099-D): Exit interview was conducted, today's report was reviewed and emailed to the Administratorthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 3, 2022 · control 29-AS-20210415142327

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 11, 2022

87411 Personnel Requirements – General (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs…The licensing agency may require any facility to provide additional staff whenever it determines through... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as the facility has one caregiver from 7:30 pm to 7:30 am which poses a potential safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 3, 2022

Plan of correction: Administrator stated that they will provide an updated LIC500 which reflects additional staffing to meet the residents needs to CCL by 3/11/22.

20211 state visit · 1 document

Dec 2, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) JoAnn Rosales conducted an unannounced Required - 1 year inspection. LPA met with Administrator Herbert Perey and Assistant Administrator Mischelle Perey. A physical plant tour was conducted to ensure there are no health and safety hazards. The facility is currently fire cleared for 6 non-ambulatory residents of which 2 may be bedridden. The facility was observed to be clean, safe, sanitary, and in good repair. LPA observed one central entry point designated for universal entry screening. Cleaning supplies were observed and infection control practices were discussed. An inspection of the common area, resident rooms and restrooms were conducted. The resident restrooms were observed to be clean and sanitary and in working condition. There is an adequate amount of perishable food. LPA observed fire extinguishers fully charged. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and operable. Grab bars were present in the bathrooms. Hygiene items are being provided. Outdoor area toured- passageways are free of obstruction. During facility tour at 11:19 am with Assistant Administrator Mischelle Perey LPA observed hot water temperature at 141.3 degrees F. in resident bathroom. During facility tour at 11:28 am with Assistant Administrator Mischelle Perey LPA observed resident #1 (R1)'s lactulose and lorazepam in the kitchen refrigerator accessible to residents. Assistant Administrator stated that they were unaware that the medications needed to be kept in a locked location. During facility tour starting at 11:32 am with Assistant Administrator Mischelle Perey LPA did not observe a sufficient supply of non-perishable vegetables and fruit as the facility had 2 small cans of potatoes, 1 large can of corn and 2 small cans of applesauce. Continued on 809C Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D): Exit interview conducted. Today's reports and appeal rights were reviewed and emailed to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2021

5 of 6 beds were occupied at the October 31, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

A Peace of Home LLC, licensed since 2019.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2019, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
12
Total complaints
4
Substantiated allegations
3
Type A citations
3
Type B citations
1

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2019, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations30
Type B citations10
Substantiated allegations30
Total complaints40

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about A Peace of Home

Is A Peace of Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.

How many residents is A Peace of Home licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.

Has A Peace of Home been cited?

3 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026. Those records count 12 state visits over the same years.

Is A Peace of Home still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 12, 2026.

What does A Peace of Home cost?

$5,300 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,350–$6,550. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 21 other homes of a similar licensed size across Ventura County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,688 to $6,500 a month, and the middle figure is $5,700 (n = 21 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does A Peace of Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by A Peace of Home LLC, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

St Johns Regional Medical Center is 0.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can A Peace of Home keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.

A Peace of Home license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “A PEACE OF HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #567609929. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to A Peace of Home LLC, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
  • 12 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
  • 3 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026. The same records count 12 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 3 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 16, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Ventura County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Oxnard · 0.2 mi

    Mom and Dad Home Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Starting rate

    $5,000 a month to start

    Listed by the home on A Place for Mom · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Oxnard · 0.3 mi

    Villa Teresa Residential Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Starting rate

    $3,500 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Oxnard · 0.8 mi

    Grace Living 2

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,300 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,350–$6,550

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Oxnard · 0.1 mi

    Feliz Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,150 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,200–$6,350

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Oxnard · 0.2 mi

    Best of Care Homes II

    Small home · licensed for 4

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,500 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,500–$6,800

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Oxnard · 0.3 mi

    Reesejoy Care Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,300 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,350–$6,550

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Ventura County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
PH

Call A Peace of Home

Oxnard · Licensed for 6

(805) 278-9620

From the state licensing record · October 27, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask A Peace of Home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages