Cottage Inn is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Ventura, Ventura County, California — state license #565850074, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 11 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated April 21, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

7 homes in view

Cottage Inn

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Ventura, CA · Ventura County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #565850074, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
191 Wayview Ct · Ventura, Ventura County
Phone
(805) 650-7497
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 6 residents
Bedridden careVerified in record

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH ALL MAY BE BEDRIDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6 RESIDENTS.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 13 times and filed 11 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated April 21, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 17, 2026
Occupancy at the October 28, 2025 visit
4 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 9, 2022 to October 28, 2025. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 8 of 11 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Apr 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 6, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained a fracture while in care. Resident sustained an unexplained bruise.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne conducted an unannounced follow-up complaint investigation visit at the facility at 10:22 AM. LPA met with facility staff who contacted the Administrator Dania Fayyad via telephone call. The Administrator was unavailable to come to the facility at the time of the visit. LPA explained the reason for the visit to Judith Gonzalez (S1) and entrance interview was conducted. On 01/17/2025 the Woodland Hills North Adult and Senior Care Regional Office (RO) received a complaint alleging that resident #1 (R1) sustained a fracture while in the care of the facility. The case was referred to the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to Investigator Laura Garcia. On 01/22/2025 between 10:30 AM and 01:30 PM LPA Cortez toured the physical plant, interviewed the Administrator, one (1) staff, conducted a file review, and obtained copies of resident records and other pertinent documents relevant to the investigation.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 28, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250117165236
Oct 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident leaving the facility. Staff did not answer resident's call button in a timely manner. Staff did not ensure resident's showering needs were being met.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne conducted an unannounced follow-up complaint investigation visit at the facility at 10:33 AM. LPA met with facility staff who contacted the Administrator Dania Fayyad via telephone call. The Administrator was unavailable to come to the facility at the time of the visit. LPA explained the reason for the visit to Judith Gonzalez (S1) and entrance interview was conducted. During the initial complaint visit on 01/22/2025 between 10:30 AM and 1:30 PM, LPA Cortez toured the physical plant, interviewed the Administrator, one (1) staff, conducted a file review, and obtained copies of resident records and other pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. During today’s visit LPA Byrne conducted a physical plant tour, interviewed two (2) staff, three (3) residents, conducted a medication review for four (4) residents, and collected copies of pertinent documentation between 10:35 AM and 01:45 PM. Continued on LIC-9099C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250117165236
Jan 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Jan 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff left resident in soiled diaper for extended period of time Resident is dehydrated Staff are not responding to residents call button

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Erika Miller (Miller) and Jenny Olson (Olson) conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings on the allegations above. During the investigation, LPA, Angel Ascencio, toured the facility and interviewed Administrator, staff, and residents on May 10, 2022 from 11:45am to 4:30pm. LPAs Miller and Olson also toured the facility on January 23, 2024 and interviewed residents and staff from 10:52 a.m. to 11:10 a.m. LPAs also obtained and reviewed relevant documents. LPAs met with Lead Staff, and explained the purpose of the visit. On the allegation: Staff left resident in soiled diaper for extended period of time. On 5/28/22, a witness visited the facility and observed Resident 1 (R1) had dried feces on them, a rash, a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), and chronic C-diff. R1’s physician’s report dated 4/22/2022 indicated they had bowel and bladder impairment, and needed assistance with toileting. R1’s previous stroke rendered them incthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 23, 2024 · control 29-AS-20220505160911
Jan 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations3typical 0
Substantiated complaints6typical 0
Total complaints4typical 0
State visits on file13typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262202025341202422020231102022330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Ventura County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (805) 650-7497

Is Cottage Inn licensed?

Yes — Cottage Inn is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Ventura (Ventura County): California license #565850074, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 11 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated April 21, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Cottage Inn care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Cottage Inn with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH ALL MAY BE BEDRIDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6 RESIDENTS.

How much does Cottage Inn cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Cottage Inn's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Ventura County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Cottage Inn accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Cottage Inn is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

4 of 6 beds occupied (67%) when the state visited on October 28, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Cottage Inn?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 13 state visits and 11 dated documents since 2022 for Cottage Inn; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 28, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained a fracture while in care. Resident sustained an unexplained bruise.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne conducted an unannounced follow-up complaint investigation visit at the facility at 10:22 AM. LPA met with facility staff who contacted the Administrator Dania Fayyad via telephone call. The Administrator was unavailable to come to the facility at the time of the visit. LPA explained the reason for the visit to Judith Gonzalez (S1) and entrance interview was conducted. On 01/17/2025 the Woodland Hills North Adult and Senior Care Regional Office (RO) received a complaint alleging that resident #1 (R1) sustained a fracture while in the care of the facility. The case was referred to the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to Investigator Laura Garcia. On 01/22/2025 between 10:30 AM and 01:30 PM LPA Cortez toured the physical plant, interviewed the Administrator, one (1) staff, conducted a file review, and obtained copies of resident records and other pertinent documents relevant to the investigation.CDSS inspection report, October 28, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250117165236
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident leaving the facility. Staff did not answer resident's call button in a timely manner. Staff did not ensure resident's showering needs were being met.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne conducted an unannounced follow-up complaint investigation visit at the facility at 10:33 AM. LPA met with facility staff who contacted the Administrator Dania Fayyad via telephone call. The Administrator was unavailable to come to the facility at the time of the visit. LPA explained the reason for the visit to Judith Gonzalez (S1) and entrance interview was conducted. During the initial complaint visit on 01/22/2025 between 10:30 AM and 1:30 PM, LPA Cortez toured the physical plant, interviewed the Administrator, one (1) staff, conducted a file review, and obtained copies of resident records and other pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. During today’s visit LPA Byrne conducted a physical plant tour, interviewed two (2) staff, three (3) residents, conducted a medication review for four (4) residents, and collected copies of pertinent documentation between 10:35 AM and 01:45 PM. Continued on LIC-9099C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 27, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250117165236

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff left resident in soiled diaper for extended period of time Resident is dehydrated Staff are not responding to residents call button
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Erika Miller (Miller) and Jenny Olson (Olson) conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings on the allegations above. During the investigation, LPA, Angel Ascencio, toured the facility and interviewed Administrator, staff, and residents on May 10, 2022 from 11:45am to 4:30pm. LPAs Miller and Olson also toured the facility on January 23, 2024 and interviewed residents and staff from 10:52 a.m. to 11:10 a.m. LPAs also obtained and reviewed relevant documents. LPAs met with Lead Staff, and explained the purpose of the visit. On the allegation: Staff left resident in soiled diaper for extended period of time. On 5/28/22, a witness visited the facility and observed Resident 1 (R1) had dried feces on them, a rash, a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), and chronic C-diff. R1’s physician’s report dated 4/22/2022 indicated they had bowel and bladder impairment, and needed assistance with toileting. R1’s previous stroke rendered them incCDSS inspection report, January 23, 2024 · control 29-AS-20220505160911

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedProvider did not reach out to the resident's reponsible party
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) JoAnn Rosales conducted a subsequent unannounced complaint visit to this facility for the above complaint allegation to deliver final investigation findings. LPA met with Administrator Cinthia Meza. Concerns were that facility staff did not reach out to the resident’s responsible party by not answering phone calls or text messages. Interviews conducted on 4/27/2021 starting at 12:18 pm, 3/2/22 at 4:30 pm, 3/3/22 at 9:08 am and 3/8/22 starting at 11:00 am revealed that resident’s responsible persons phone calls and/or text messages are being answered. Based on the information obtained during the course of the investigation the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Today's reports and appeal rights were reviewed and emailed to the Administrator. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 9, 2022 · control 29-AS-20210426114434

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 13 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
6
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
13
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Cottage Inn?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Ventura County Senior Care Inc., who operates 3 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(805) 650-7497
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Cottage Inn? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.