Familycare Cottage One is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Thousand Oaks, Ventura County, California — state license #565801505, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 9 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated March 4, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

47 homes in view

Familycare Cottage One

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Thousand Oaks, CA · Ventura County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #565801505, held since 2007 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
820 Calle Cedro · Thousand Oaks, Ventura County
Phone
(805) 492-1200
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 1 resident

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
6 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN BEDROOM #2 OR #4. HOSPICE WAIVER INCREASE FROM 1 TO 5 RESIDENTS.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 9 times and filed 9 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on March 4, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”

Most recent state visit
March 4, 2026
Occupancy at the January 29, 2026 visit
3 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated January 18, 2024 to March 4, 2026. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 8 of 9 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Mar 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not provide responsible party with a refund as required

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erica Mosley conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to investigate the above-listed allegation. Upon arrival at approx. 10:12a.m. LPA was greeted by staff who called the Administrator and the reason for the visit was explained. The LPA met with Debra Bryant, Licensee Representative, Marisol Flamenco, Administrator and Magdalena "Maggy" Garcia, Assistant Administrator, and reason for the visit was explained. Entrance interview conducted. On 02/12/2026, the Department received a complaint regarding the following allegation, Licensee did not provide responsible party with a refund as required. On 02/12/2026 LPA Esther Cortez conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit, conducted a physical plant tour, conducted three (3) in-person, staff interviews, a file review for Resident #1 (R1), and obtained copies of pertinent documentation relevant to the investigation. Report continued on LIC 9099-C PAGE 2... Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2026 · control 29-AS-20260212110309
Jan 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff refused to return resident's personal items upon move out Facility staff did not allow resident's authorized person to make decisions regarding resident's care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erica Mosley conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to investigate the above-listed allegations. The purpose of this visit is to deliver findings for the above listed allegations. Upon arrival at approx. 1:15 p.m. LPA was greeted by staff who called the Administrator and the reason for the visit was explained. The LPA met with Magdalena "Maggy" Garcia, Assistant Administrator (AA) and reason for the visit was explained. Entrance interview conducted. On 12/17/2025, the Department received a complaint regarding the following allegations, Facility staff refused to return resident's personal items upon move out and Facility staff did not allow resident's authorized person to make decisions regarding resident's care. On 12/19/2025 starting at 1:13 p.m. LPA and staff briefly toured the physical plant areas inside and outside, starting at 1:30 p.m. and throughout the visit LPA conducted three (3) in-person, staff interviews, conducted a file and rethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 29, 2026 · control 29-AS-20251217145251
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident developed maggot infested wound while in care of staff.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit is to deliver investigation finding. Upon arrival LPA met with Marisol Flamenco and explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview conducted. On 07/23/2024, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint with the above allegation. Investigation was initiated on 08/02/2024; at approximately 9:45a.m., a physical plant tour was conducted with administrator. Resident and staff records were reviewed at approximately 10a.m. and interviews were conducted with staff at 11:30a.m. Pertinent documents were requested and received on 08/06/2024. Following is a summary of the investigation finding: Regarding allegation, “Resident developed maggot infested wound while in care of staff.” – It was alleged that due to improper wound care by staff, resident #1’s (R1) wound on the left side of the face was infested with maggots. (Continue to LIC9099c) Unsubthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 29, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240723124722
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff falsify training records Staff do not ensure facility is free from pests Dishwasher is in disrepair

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted an initial complaint investigation for the allegations listed above. LPA arrived at the facility at 11:15AM and was greeted by facility staff. LPA met with Facility Designee Marisol Flamenco. Entrance interview conducted. During today’s visit, LPA interviewed staff and Facility Designee from 11:17AM to 11:55AM, toured the facility with Facility Designee at 11:57AM and LPA reviewed and obtained copies of pertinent documents. The following was then determined: Allegation "Staff falsify training records:" The complaint alleges that staff are not trained annually as required. LPA interviewed facility staff, who indicated they are trained as required. Staff indicated they have completed trainings and that hospice nurses Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 26, 2024 · control 29-AS-20241121091701
Oct 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Medication is not being administered as prescribed.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted an initial complaint investigation visit. LPA met with licensee/administrator Debra Bryant and explained the reason for the visit. LPA interviewed the licensee at 9:10 a.m. LPA interviewed staff 1 (S1) at 10:10 a.m. while also reviewing the medications for all residents. LPA interviewed staff 2 (S2) at 10:52 a.m. There was a suspicion of former staff mishandling medication for residents in one of the other homes owned by the licensee. However, all medications at this facility appear to be given as prescribed. The staff LPA interviewed had not witnessed or suspected any medication mishandling at this facility. Based on the medication review and interviews, the allegation medication is not being administered as prescribed is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No defiiciencies cited. Exit interview conducted and report issued. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 18, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240110170429
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 13, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations1typical 0
Substantiated complaints1typical 0
Total complaints5typical 0
State visits on file9typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2007.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262212025220202433020231102022110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Ventura County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2026 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (805) 492-1200

Is Familycare Cottage One licensed?

Yes — Familycare Cottage One is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Thousand Oaks (Ventura County): California license #565801505, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 9 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated March 4, 2026, was marked “Substantiated” by the state.

Can Familycare Cottage One care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Familycare Cottage One with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record6 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN BEDROOM #2 OR #4. HOSPICE WAIVER INCREASE FROM 1 TO 5 RESIDENTS.

How much does Familycare Cottage One cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Familycare Cottage One's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Ventura County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Familycare Cottage One accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Familycare Cottage One is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

3 of 6 beds occupied (50%) when the state visited on January 29, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Familycare Cottage One?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 9 state visits and 9 dated documents since 2022 for Familycare Cottage One; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 4, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

5 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not provide responsible party with a refund as required
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erica Mosley conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to investigate the above-listed allegation. Upon arrival at approx. 10:12a.m. LPA was greeted by staff who called the Administrator and the reason for the visit was explained. The LPA met with Debra Bryant, Licensee Representative, Marisol Flamenco, Administrator and Magdalena "Maggy" Garcia, Assistant Administrator, and reason for the visit was explained. Entrance interview conducted. On 02/12/2026, the Department received a complaint regarding the following allegation, Licensee did not provide responsible party with a refund as required. On 02/12/2026 LPA Esther Cortez conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit, conducted a physical plant tour, conducted three (3) in-person, staff interviews, a file review for Resident #1 (R1), and obtained copies of pertinent documentation relevant to the investigation. Report continued on LIC 9099-C PAGE 2... SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 4, 2026 · control 29-AS-20260212110309
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff refused to return resident's personal items upon move out Facility staff did not allow resident's authorized person to make decisions regarding resident's care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erica Mosley conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to investigate the above-listed allegations. The purpose of this visit is to deliver findings for the above listed allegations. Upon arrival at approx. 1:15 p.m. LPA was greeted by staff who called the Administrator and the reason for the visit was explained. The LPA met with Magdalena "Maggy" Garcia, Assistant Administrator (AA) and reason for the visit was explained. Entrance interview conducted. On 12/17/2025, the Department received a complaint regarding the following allegations, Facility staff refused to return resident's personal items upon move out and Facility staff did not allow resident's authorized person to make decisions regarding resident's care. On 12/19/2025 starting at 1:13 p.m. LPA and staff briefly toured the physical plant areas inside and outside, starting at 1:30 p.m. and throughout the visit LPA conducted three (3) in-person, staff interviews, conducted a file and reCDSS inspection report, January 29, 2026 · control 29-AS-20251217145251

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident developed maggot infested wound while in care of staff.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit is to deliver investigation finding. Upon arrival LPA met with Marisol Flamenco and explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview conducted. On 07/23/2024, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint with the above allegation. Investigation was initiated on 08/02/2024; at approximately 9:45a.m., a physical plant tour was conducted with administrator. Resident and staff records were reviewed at approximately 10a.m. and interviews were conducted with staff at 11:30a.m. Pertinent documents were requested and received on 08/06/2024. Following is a summary of the investigation finding: Regarding allegation, “Resident developed maggot infested wound while in care of staff.” – It was alleged that due to improper wound care by staff, resident #1’s (R1) wound on the left side of the face was infested with maggots. (Continue to LIC9099c) UnsubCDSS inspection report, January 29, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240723124722

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff falsify training records Staff do not ensure facility is free from pests Dishwasher is in disrepair
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted an initial complaint investigation for the allegations listed above. LPA arrived at the facility at 11:15AM and was greeted by facility staff. LPA met with Facility Designee Marisol Flamenco. Entrance interview conducted. During today’s visit, LPA interviewed staff and Facility Designee from 11:17AM to 11:55AM, toured the facility with Facility Designee at 11:57AM and LPA reviewed and obtained copies of pertinent documents. The following was then determined: Allegation "Staff falsify training records:" The complaint alleges that staff are not trained annually as required. LPA interviewed facility staff, who indicated they are trained as required. Staff indicated they have completed trainings and that hospice nurses Report Continued on LIC 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 26, 2024 · control 29-AS-20241121091701
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedMedication is not being administered as prescribed.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted an initial complaint investigation visit. LPA met with licensee/administrator Debra Bryant and explained the reason for the visit. LPA interviewed the licensee at 9:10 a.m. LPA interviewed staff 1 (S1) at 10:10 a.m. while also reviewing the medications for all residents. LPA interviewed staff 2 (S2) at 10:52 a.m. There was a suspicion of former staff mishandling medication for residents in one of the other homes owned by the licensee. However, all medications at this facility appear to be given as prescribed. The staff LPA interviewed had not witnessed or suspected any medication mishandling at this facility. Based on the medication review and interviews, the allegation medication is not being administered as prescribed is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No defiiciencies cited. Exit interview conducted and report issued. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 18, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240110170429

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 9 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
5
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
9
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Familycare Cottage One?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Familycare Cottage One, Inc., who operates 3 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(805) 492-1200
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Familycare Cottage One? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.