Park Visalia Assisted Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Visalia, Tulare County, California — state license #547208809, licensed for 110 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 36 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated November 10, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

10 homes in view

Park Visalia Assisted Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 110 residents · Visalia, CA · Tulare County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #547208809, held since 2017 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
3939 West Walnut Avenue · Visalia, Tulare County
Phone
(559) 625-3388
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 110 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 110 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 15 RESIDENTS. NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY CAREFIELD MANAGEMENT, LLC, EFFECTIVE 11/15/2020.State service designation985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 40 times and filed 36 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated November 10, 2025.

Most recent state visit
May 14, 2026
Occupancy at the April 11, 2025 visit
76 of 110 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 19 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 26, 2021 to April 11, 2025. 19 of the 19 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (14). 19 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 19 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 17 of 36 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20254 state visits · 6 documents
Nov 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do no prevent residents from developing pressure injuries Staff do not assist residents with obtaining medical care Staff are not distributing residents' medications as prescribed Staff do not prevent resident from smoking inside of the facility Staff do not observe resident for change in condition Staff do not provide residents with personal care items Staff do not maintain personal protective equipment at facility

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) K. Kaur and M. Yang arrived at the facility for a subsequent visit to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Executive Director/ Administrator Amanda Kelsey and explained the purpose of the visit and reviewed the elements of the allegations. LPAs delivered the following complaint investigation findings. During the course of the investigation, the department conducted interviews, reviewed records, and toured the facility. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. Based on interviews conducted and observations residents R1, R4 were observed with heal cushion/support pillows to prevent pressure injuries. Residents R1, R3, R4 were observed with no open wounds. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted a wound specialist conducts visits once a week with R2 and resident is under home health care. R2 smokes in the designated smoking area in the back parking lot. Medication is administered as prescribed. Adequate PPE supplies andthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 11, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250320080931
Apr 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained pressure ulcer due to neglect

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Kaur arrived at the facility for a subsequent visit to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Amanda Kelsey and explained the purpose of the visit and reviewed the elements of the allegations. LPA delivered the following complaint investigation findings. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed the facility followed the following plan of care for Resident’s (R1) Care. Resident was bedbound and already getting frequent checks and rotation due to incontinence. Despite frequent rotation the resident developed pressure ulcer sometime around 11/2024 at which point Home Health was initiated by doctor’s orders. Home Health provided wound care while facility continued medication administration for wound and continued checks and rotation. Based on observation and interview of staff, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, therethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250108093803
Mar 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 3 documents
Aug 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not following resident's care plan

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Kaur arrived at the facility for a subsequent visit and reviewed records. LPA met with Administrator Amanda Kelsey and explained the purpose of the visit and reviewed the elements of the allegations. LPA delivered the following complaint investigation findings. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. Based on observations, interviews and record review the Staff did not have sufficient training to provide and follow residents care plan. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. See citations on the attached LIC9099D. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator and appeal rights were provided. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 13, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231103113620
20234 state visits · 8 documents
Oct 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained severe injury due to staff neglect Staff did not administer resident's medication Staff did not assist resident with eating Staff did not provide adequate food service to resident Staff did not meet resident's laundry needs Facility is malodorous

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Kaur arrived at the facility for a subsequent visit to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Amanda Kelsey and explained the purpose of the visit and reviewed the elements of the allegations. LPA delivered the following complaint investigation findings. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. Based on interviews and record review no incidents were documented that resulted in resident abuse or injury. Medication audit was conducted but was inclusive due to resident relocation. Resident weight records were reviewed which indicated although resident weight was at an incline recently at the time of resident admission the resident had put on weight. Facility tour was conducted and did not reveal any facility physical plant issues. . Based on observation and interview of staff and residents, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence tothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 26, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230619145953
Oct 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 26, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 24, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 7, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide a comfortable temperature for the residents in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Kaur arrived at the facility for a subsequent visit to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Mandy Rancour and explained the purpose of the visit and reviewed the elements of the allegations. LPA delivered the following complaint investigation findings. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. Although the facilities kitchen and dining room air conditioning was not working properly; the facility applied alternative methods until necessary repairs were made. Based on observation and interview of staff and residents, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore these allegations are unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 7, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230705120145
Sep 7, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not respond to call signal system in a timely manner

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Kaur arrived at the facility for a subsequent visit and reviewed records. LPA met with Administrator Mandy Rancour and explained the purpose of the visit and reviewed the elements of the allegations. LPA delivered the following complaint investigation findings. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. Based on observations, interviews and record review the Staff did not respond to call signal system in a timely manner. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. See citations on the attached LIC9099D. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator and appeal rights were provided. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 7, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230728084541
Sep 1, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff failed to provide adequate food service Insufficient staffing to meet residents’ needs Facility is in disrepair

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Kaur arrived at the facility for a subsequent visit to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Mandy Rancour and explained the purpose of the visit and reviewed the elements of the allegations. LPA delivered the following complaint investigation findings. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. LPA conducted a kitchen tour and observed sufficient food supplies, review of menu records divulged sufficient food service. LPA observed during Lunch Meal a complete nutritional meal. Based on LPA observations common areas and resident rooms were clean and with adequate furnishings. Based on observations and record review facility has sufficient staff to provide care and supervision. Based on observation and interview of staff and residents, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations did or did not occur,the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 1, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230607155704
Sep 1, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure there is an Administrator or designated substitute present at all times Staff failed to administer resident's medication as prescribed

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Kaur arrived at the facility for a subsequent visit and reviewed records. LPA met with Administrator Mandy Rancour and explained the purpose of the visit and reviewed the elements of the allegations. LPA delivered the following complaint investigation findings. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. Based on observations, interviews and record review a designated substitute was not present at all times while Administrator was on leave. LPA reviewed Residents (R1) medication records and observed medication that was logged in the Centrally stored medication and destruction record (CSMDR) was not sufficient to meet the administration of medication as directed by the physician. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. See citations on the attached LIC9099D. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator and appeal rights were provided. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 1, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230626083044
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations4typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints6typical 2
Total complaints19typical 7
State visits on file40typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2017.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202546020243312023611220227902021771
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Tulare County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2024 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (559) 625-3388

Is Park Visalia Assisted Living licensed?

Yes — Park Visalia Assisted Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Visalia (Tulare County): California license #547208809, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 110 residents. State records list 36 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated November 10, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Park Visalia Assisted Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Park Visalia Assisted Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 110 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 15 RESIDENTS. NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY CAREFIELD MANAGEMENT, LLC, EFFECTIVE 11/15/2020.

How much does Park Visalia Assisted Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Park Visalia Assisted Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Tulare County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Park Visalia Assisted Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Park Visalia Assisted Living is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

76 of 110 beds occupied (69%) when the state visited on April 11, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Park Visalia Assisted Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 40 state visits and 36 dated documents since 2021 for Park Visalia Assisted Living; 19 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 11, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

19 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do no prevent residents from developing pressure injuries Staff do not assist residents with obtaining medical care Staff are not distributing residents' medications as prescribed Staff do not prevent resident from smoking inside of the facility Staff do not observe resident for change in condition Staff do not provide residents with personal care items Staff do not maintain personal protective equipment at facility
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) K. Kaur and M. Yang arrived at the facility for a subsequent visit to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Executive Director/ Administrator Amanda Kelsey and explained the purpose of the visit and reviewed the elements of the allegations. LPAs delivered the following complaint investigation findings. During the course of the investigation, the department conducted interviews, reviewed records, and toured the facility. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. Based on interviews conducted and observations residents R1, R4 were observed with heal cushion/support pillows to prevent pressure injuries. Residents R1, R3, R4 were observed with no open wounds. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted a wound specialist conducts visits once a week with R2 and resident is under home health care. R2 smokes in the designated smoking area in the back parking lot. Medication is administered as prescribed. Adequate PPE supplies andCDSS inspection report, April 11, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250320080931
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained pressure ulcer due to neglect
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Kaur arrived at the facility for a subsequent visit to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Amanda Kelsey and explained the purpose of the visit and reviewed the elements of the allegations. LPA delivered the following complaint investigation findings. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed the facility followed the following plan of care for Resident’s (R1) Care. Resident was bedbound and already getting frequent checks and rotation due to incontinence. Despite frequent rotation the resident developed pressure ulcer sometime around 11/2024 at which point Home Health was initiated by doctor’s orders. Home Health provided wound care while facility continued medication administration for wound and continued checks and rotation. Based on observation and interview of staff, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, thereCDSS inspection report, March 21, 2025 · control 24-AS-20250108093803

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not following resident's care plan
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Kaur arrived at the facility for a subsequent visit and reviewed records. LPA met with Administrator Amanda Kelsey and explained the purpose of the visit and reviewed the elements of the allegations. LPA delivered the following complaint investigation findings. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. Based on observations, interviews and record review the Staff did not have sufficient training to provide and follow residents care plan. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. See citations on the attached LIC9099D. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator and appeal rights were provided. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 13, 2024 · control 24-AS-20231103113620

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained severe injury due to staff neglect Staff did not administer resident's medication Staff did not assist resident with eating Staff did not provide adequate food service to resident Staff did not meet resident's laundry needs Facility is malodorous
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Kaur arrived at the facility for a subsequent visit to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Amanda Kelsey and explained the purpose of the visit and reviewed the elements of the allegations. LPA delivered the following complaint investigation findings. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. Based on interviews and record review no incidents were documented that resulted in resident abuse or injury. Medication audit was conducted but was inclusive due to resident relocation. Resident weight records were reviewed which indicated although resident weight was at an incline recently at the time of resident admission the resident had put on weight. Facility tour was conducted and did not reveal any facility physical plant issues. . Based on observation and interview of staff and residents, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence toCDSS inspection report, October 26, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230619145953
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not provide a comfortable temperature for the residents in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Kaur arrived at the facility for a subsequent visit to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Mandy Rancour and explained the purpose of the visit and reviewed the elements of the allegations. LPA delivered the following complaint investigation findings. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. Although the facilities kitchen and dining room air conditioning was not working properly; the facility applied alternative methods until necessary repairs were made. Based on observation and interview of staff and residents, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore these allegations are unsubstantiated. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 7, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230705120145
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not respond to call signal system in a timely manner
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Kaur arrived at the facility for a subsequent visit and reviewed records. LPA met with Administrator Mandy Rancour and explained the purpose of the visit and reviewed the elements of the allegations. LPA delivered the following complaint investigation findings. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. Based on observations, interviews and record review the Staff did not respond to call signal system in a timely manner. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. See citations on the attached LIC9099D. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator and appeal rights were provided. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 7, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230728084541
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff failed to provide adequate food service Insufficient staffing to meet residents’ needs Facility is in disrepair
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Kaur arrived at the facility for a subsequent visit to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Mandy Rancour and explained the purpose of the visit and reviewed the elements of the allegations. LPA delivered the following complaint investigation findings. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. LPA conducted a kitchen tour and observed sufficient food supplies, review of menu records divulged sufficient food service. LPA observed during Lunch Meal a complete nutritional meal. Based on LPA observations common areas and resident rooms were clean and with adequate furnishings. Based on observations and record review facility has sufficient staff to provide care and supervision. Based on observation and interview of staff and residents, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations did or did not occur,CDSS inspection report, September 1, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230607155704
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee does not ensure there is an Administrator or designated substitute present at all times Staff failed to administer resident's medication as prescribed
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Kaur arrived at the facility for a subsequent visit and reviewed records. LPA met with Administrator Mandy Rancour and explained the purpose of the visit and reviewed the elements of the allegations. LPA delivered the following complaint investigation findings. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. Based on observations, interviews and record review a designated substitute was not present at all times while Administrator was on leave. LPA reviewed Residents (R1) medication records and observed medication that was logged in the Centrally stored medication and destruction record (CSMDR) was not sufficient to meet the administration of medication as directed by the physician. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. See citations on the attached LIC9099D. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator and appeal rights were provided. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 1, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230626083044
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidient sustained multiple injuries due to staff neglect Staff does not ensure that residents are adequately fed
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Kaur arrived at the facility unannounced for a subsequent inspection. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations with administrator. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. Based on interviews conducted and documents reviewed no evidence was found to support staff neglect led to resident sustaining injuries. LPA toured the facility kitchen and found sufficient food and observed mealtime and found sufficient food for a single meal time being served to residents. Based on the interviews conducted, the allegations listed above are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations did or did not occur; therefore, these allegations are unsubstantiated UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 27, 2023 · control 24-AS-20230202110713
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff hit resident while in care Staff failed to treat resident with dignity and respect
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Kaur arrived at the facility unannounced for a subsequent inspection. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations with administrator. The Department investigated the allegations listed above. Based on interviews conducted and documents reviewed no incident was found to indicate resident abuse or disrespect of a resident. Based on the interviews conducted, the allegations listed above are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations did or did not occur; therefore, these allegations are unsubstantiated. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 27, 2023 · control 24-AS-20221228150217
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not following visitor guidelines for COVID-19
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) K. Kaur arrived at the facility unannounced for a subsequent inspection. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations with administrator. LPA delivered the following findings. Based on the interviews conducted, the allegations listed above are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations did or did not occur; therefore, these allegations are unsubstantiated. Exit Interview conducted with Administrator. Report signed on site; printed copy of report was provided UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 28, 2023 · control 24-AS-20221228104529

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 40 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
4
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
6
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
19
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
40
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(559) 625-3388
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Park Visalia Assisted Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.