Brookdale Paulin Creek is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Santa Rosa, Sonoma County, California — state license #496803339, licensed for 100 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 20 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated June 4, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

20 homes in view

Brookdale Paulin Creek

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 100 residents · Santa Rosa, CA · Sonoma County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #496803339, held since 2012 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
2375 Range Ave · Santa Rosa, Sonoma County
Phone
(707) 575-3722
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 100 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 20 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
100 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 18. APPROVED DELAYED EGRESS.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 22 times and filed 20 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on June 4, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”

Most recent state visit
June 4, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
68 of 100 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 10 documents with transcribed findings, dated February 16, 2022 to June 4, 2026. 10 of the 10 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unfounded” (6), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 10 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 10 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 14 of 20 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Jun 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Facility did not centrally store medications.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cuadra arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation and delivered findings regarding the allegation listed above and met with Wendy Trigueros, Financial Services Director. Regarding allegations about facility did not centrally store medications. Per Reporting party, on 3/28/2026 the facility was unable to locate 72 vials of morphine and facility staff (S1) contacted resident’s (R1) responsible party to request a call to be made to hospice and order more morphine, but later S1 called and said to cancel the morphine order, they found the vials at the medication room refrigerator. Also, there were concerns about medication management after they learned that antibiotics prescribed to R1 were lost for three days due to an issue with the pharmacy involving R1’s name resulting in R1 missing their prescribed medication to treat an infected wound leading to R1’s hospitalization. Continued on LIC9099C... Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 4, 2026 · control 21-AS-20260408132257
Jan 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20255 state visits · 6 documents
Oct 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility staff financially abused resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alviso conducted a complaint inspection, on 10/20/25, at approximately 4:15pm, and met with Wendy Trigueros, Financial Services Director. LPA requested records on resident, R1. Wendy Trigueros, notified the LPA that the individual, R1, is not a resident of the facility. R1 is a tenant of the independent living apartment/units, and the licensed facility doesn't provide care services to the independent living tenants/units. The investigation revealed that R1 is not a resident of the residential care for the elderly licensed facility, #496803339; R1 rents an apartment in the independent living area on the property. The Department has no jurisdiction over the independent living units/apartments. Based on interviews, and information obtained during the investigation, the allegation "facility staff financially abused resident in care" is Unfounded. We have found that the complaint allegation was Unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not havethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2025 · control 21-AS-20251014200856
Sep 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair-Elevator doesn't work, and the large dining room has leaks

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alviso conducted a complaint inspection, on 6/17/25 at approximately 1:30pm, and met with Executive Director Associate Viola Kaake. Reporting party alleges that "facility elevator in independent living (IL) doesn't work, and the large dining room in independent living (IL) area has leaks ". LPA conducted interviews with staff, S1 and S2, and other related parties. The investigation revealed that the licensed assisted living area has no leaks in the hallways and/or in the dining room areas. LPA obtained information that the elevator has been repaired in IL, and there is a second elevator on the floorfor use as well. The independent living dining room has no leaks, but is scheduled for roof renovations needed from leaks that occurred during the rainy season. The independent living areas are not part of the licensed assisted living portion of the facility property. The Department has no jurisdiction over the "independent living" portion of the large buildinthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250610100922
Feb 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility ceilings in the dining room are in disrepair

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alviso conducted a complaint inspection, on 2/13/25 at approximately 9:45am, and met with Administrator Robert Alvarado. Reporting party alleges that "facility ceilings in the dining room are in disrepair". LPA toured the assisted living facility, and toured the large dining room area in the independent living portion of the building. LPA conducted interviews with staff, S1, and other related parties. The investigation revealed that the licensed assisted living area has a total of three (3) dining rooms, two of these are in the memory care area. LPA observed that none of these, three (3), dining rooms had leaks and/or openings in the ceilings. LPA observed that the large independent dining room has openings in the ceilings, and has leaks that can't be repaired till the rain stops, per interviews with staff, S1. The independent living dining room is not part of the licensed assisted living portion of the facility. The Department has no jurisdiction over tthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 13, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250205085245
Feb 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 3 documents
Apr 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide adequate activities for residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alviso conducted a complaint inspection, on 4/24/24, at approximately 2:10pm, and met with Robert Alvarado Administrator/Executive Director. LPA reviewed facility records, and interviewed staff and other related parties regarding the allegation. Reporting party alleges that "staff do not provide adequate activities for residents". LPA reviewed the activity calendars for the memory care unit, for December 2023, and January 2024. LPA requested documentation showing which activities were actually held in memory care back in December 2023, and January 2024. Administrator was not able to provide completed records of activities that were actually held, provided daily to residents, in the memory care unit. The Administrator notified the LPA on 1/23/24 that there was not an activity director working at this time, and they have been trying to hire someone for the position. The caregivers in memory care have been helping when able to provide some activities to thethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240119140417
Apr 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20232 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 11, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide resident transportation to medical appointments

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alviso conducted a complaint inspection, on 12/11/2023, at approximately 9:40am, and met with Viola Kaake, Associate Executive Director (ED). Director Viola contacted Executive Director/Administrator Robert Alvarado. Administrator stated they would be arriving to the facility to meet with the LPA. LPA reviewed resident records, R1/R2, and obtained copies of requested documents, including account/financial records, admission agreements, care plan services, resident handbook regarding transportation services (obtained copy), and records on any maintenance repairs to apartment unit. LPA reviewed the facility's bus schedule, operating days and hours (obtained copy. LPA reviewed obtained information from reporting party LPA conducted interviews with staff, S1 & S3, and other related parties. Continued on LIC9099C... Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 11, 2023 · control 21-AS-20231115115708
Dec 11, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 15, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff stole resident’s belongings Resident’s shower is in disrepair Staff did not provide resident with an admissions agreement Staff does not post Ombudsman poster

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alviso conducted a complaint inspection, on 8/15/2023 at approximately 9:15am, and met with the Administrator Robert Alvarado. LPA requested resident (R1) records to review regarding the allegations listed above. The investigation revealed that resident (R1) is not a resident of the assisted living residential care facility for the elderly-license #496803339.The facility is an assisted living community, which includes a dementia unit;There are independent living units on the property that are not part of the licensed assisted living. The independent living units are rented/leased out to independent individuals. Independent living residents do not receive the care services and supervision that is required as part of residing in the assisted living. LPA observed a lease agreement signed by resident (R1), on 10/31/2022, for an independent living unit. The allegations of, Staff stole resident’s belongings, Resident’s shower is in disrepair, Staff did not prothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 15, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230811144525
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints3typical 2
Total complaints10typical 7
State visits on file22typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2012.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262212025560202423120233402022451
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — Sonoma County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (707) 575-3722

Is Brookdale Paulin Creek licensed?

Yes — Brookdale Paulin Creek is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Santa Rosa (Sonoma County): California license #496803339, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 100 residents. State records list 20 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 4, 2026, was marked “Substantiated” by the state.

Can Brookdale Paulin Creek care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Brookdale Paulin Creek with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record100 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 18. APPROVED DELAYED EGRESS.

How much does Brookdale Paulin Creek cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Brookdale Paulin Creek's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sonoma County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Brookdale Paulin Creek accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Brookdale Paulin Creek is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

68 of 100 beds occupied (68%) when the state visited on June 4, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Brookdale Paulin Creek?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 22 state visits and 20 dated documents since 2022 for Brookdale Paulin Creek; 10 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated June 4, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

10 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Facility did not centrally store medications.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cuadra arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation and delivered findings regarding the allegation listed above and met with Wendy Trigueros, Financial Services Director. Regarding allegations about facility did not centrally store medications. Per Reporting party, on 3/28/2026 the facility was unable to locate 72 vials of morphine and facility staff (S1) contacted resident’s (R1) responsible party to request a call to be made to hospice and order more morphine, but later S1 called and said to cancel the morphine order, they found the vials at the medication room refrigerator. Also, there were concerns about medication management after they learned that antibiotics prescribed to R1 were lost for three days due to an issue with the pharmacy involving R1’s name resulting in R1 missing their prescribed medication to treat an infected wound leading to R1’s hospitalization. Continued on LIC9099C... SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 4, 2026 · control 21-AS-20260408132257

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff financially abused resident in care.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alviso conducted a complaint inspection, on 10/20/25, at approximately 4:15pm, and met with Wendy Trigueros, Financial Services Director. LPA requested records on resident, R1. Wendy Trigueros, notified the LPA that the individual, R1, is not a resident of the facility. R1 is a tenant of the independent living apartment/units, and the licensed facility doesn't provide care services to the independent living tenants/units. The investigation revealed that R1 is not a resident of the residential care for the elderly licensed facility, #496803339; R1 rents an apartment in the independent living area on the property. The Department has no jurisdiction over the independent living units/apartments. Based on interviews, and information obtained during the investigation, the allegation "facility staff financially abused resident in care" is Unfounded. We have found that the complaint allegation was Unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not haveCDSS inspection report, October 20, 2025 · control 21-AS-20251014200856
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is in disrepair-Elevator doesn't work, and the large dining room has leaks
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alviso conducted a complaint inspection, on 6/17/25 at approximately 1:30pm, and met with Executive Director Associate Viola Kaake. Reporting party alleges that "facility elevator in independent living (IL) doesn't work, and the large dining room in independent living (IL) area has leaks ". LPA conducted interviews with staff, S1 and S2, and other related parties. The investigation revealed that the licensed assisted living area has no leaks in the hallways and/or in the dining room areas. LPA obtained information that the elevator has been repaired in IL, and there is a second elevator on the floorfor use as well. The independent living dining room has no leaks, but is scheduled for roof renovations needed from leaks that occurred during the rainy season. The independent living areas are not part of the licensed assisted living portion of the facility property. The Department has no jurisdiction over the "independent living" portion of the large buildinCDSS inspection report, June 17, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250610100922
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility ceilings in the dining room are in disrepair
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alviso conducted a complaint inspection, on 2/13/25 at approximately 9:45am, and met with Administrator Robert Alvarado. Reporting party alleges that "facility ceilings in the dining room are in disrepair". LPA toured the assisted living facility, and toured the large dining room area in the independent living portion of the building. LPA conducted interviews with staff, S1, and other related parties. The investigation revealed that the licensed assisted living area has a total of three (3) dining rooms, two of these are in the memory care area. LPA observed that none of these, three (3), dining rooms had leaks and/or openings in the ceilings. LPA observed that the large independent dining room has openings in the ceilings, and has leaks that can't be repaired till the rain stops, per interviews with staff, S1. The independent living dining room is not part of the licensed assisted living portion of the facility. The Department has no jurisdiction over tCDSS inspection report, February 13, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250205085245

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not provide adequate activities for residents
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alviso conducted a complaint inspection, on 4/24/24, at approximately 2:10pm, and met with Robert Alvarado Administrator/Executive Director. LPA reviewed facility records, and interviewed staff and other related parties regarding the allegation. Reporting party alleges that "staff do not provide adequate activities for residents". LPA reviewed the activity calendars for the memory care unit, for December 2023, and January 2024. LPA requested documentation showing which activities were actually held in memory care back in December 2023, and January 2024. Administrator was not able to provide completed records of activities that were actually held, provided daily to residents, in the memory care unit. The Administrator notified the LPA on 1/23/24 that there was not an activity director working at this time, and they have been trying to hire someone for the position. The caregivers in memory care have been helping when able to provide some activities to theCDSS inspection report, April 24, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240119140417

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 22 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
3
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
10
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
22
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(707) 575-3722
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Brookdale Paulin Creek? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.