Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Hanna House RidleyLicense #496801090 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareHanna House RidleyLicense #496801090 · 1840 Ridley Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA · (707) 591-0980Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Sonoma County/Santa Rosa/Hanna House Ridley
Map · 1840 Ridley Avenue

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Starting rate$6,450/mo

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (707) 591-0980

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

HH

Call Hanna House Ridley

Santa Rosa · Licensed for 28

(707) 591-0980

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Mid-size home · Licensed for 28 · Santa Rosa

Hanna House Ridley

1840 Ridley Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA 95403 · Licensed since 2002

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Hanna House Ridley

Overview

Starting rate

$6,450 a month

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Licensed for 28: a mid-size care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 28 residents
  • Dementia
  • Hospiceup to 8 residents

Not on file: bedridden approval.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
28 NONAMBULATORY RESIDENTS. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR 8.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 8 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Hanna House Ridley: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$6,450a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$6,450likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$6,450this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $6,450–$7,050
$6,450
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $6,450–$10,600
$8,950
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes11 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,200 to $7,500

$2,200$7,500

This homeA nearby home’s published starting rate

11 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,800–$7,500.

  • Marian House for SeniorsSanta Rosa · 0.4 mi · Small home
    $4,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Five Palms Care HomeSanta Rosa · 0.5 mi · Mid-size home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
  • Clover Senior CareSanta Rosa · 0.5 mi · Small home
    $7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Angel's Place in Mosswood PlaceSanta Rosa · 1.3 mi · Small home
    $6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Living Oak Home CareSanta Rosa · 1.4 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Windrose Care HomeSanta Rosa · 1.9 mi · Small home
    $7,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Platinum Residential Care HomeSanta Rosa · 2.0 mi · Small home
    $7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Silver StarSanta Rosa · 2.0 mi · Small home
    $7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Sleepy Hollow Assisted LivingSanta Rosa · 2.9 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • AA Best Care HomesSanta Rosa · 3.0 mi · Mid-size home
    $2,200Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Country Rose Assisted LivingSanta Rosa · 3.0 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

1840 Ridley Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA 95403Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Santa RosaHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.6 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #496801090 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 14 of 20 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Substantiated” and 7 “Unsubstantiated”.

20263 state visits · 5 documents

Aug 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility has a scabies outbreak

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Alviso, conducted a complaint inspection, at approximately 11:25am on 8/11/26, and met with Administrator, David Hanna, and Resident Care Coordinator, Karrie Hanna. Reporting party alleges that "facility has a scabies outbreak". The LPA reviewed resident's (R1) records, including care plan, hospice records, medical assessment, medications list/Dr's Orders, and Kaiser medical records. LPA reviewed resident R2's records. The LPA interviewed staff, and other related parties. The investigation revealed that R1 went out to Kaiser on 4/5/26, and was medically assessed for health concerns, including being very itchy. The Kaiser medical records identify that the resident is diagnosed with diffuse pruritis, a wide spread or generalized, itchy skin affecting the whole body; Per records, R1 diagnosed with Pruritis, a medical term for an itch that creates a strong desire to scratch. Record states there was a concern reported that R1 was very itchy, and it may be scabies. Continued on LIC9099C... Unsubstantiated R1 was not identified as testing positive for scabies, but was provided Ivermectin medication due to a concern of possible scabies. Medical record identifies R1 as receiving methadone medication, which can cause itching as a side effect, per record reviews. R1 is diagnosed with chronic venous stasis edema, which frequently causes persistent itching. Per review of hospice records, hospice Nurses were seeing the resident and were observing that R1 was itchy; R1 was being provided medications for itchy symptoms, but these were not for treatment of scabies and/or provided due to a diagnosis of scabies. LPA obtained copies of records. Per review of R2's records, there was no medical diagnosis of scabies; R2 was seen by a Physician and was found to not have scabies. LPA obtained copies of records. The facility has no scabies outbreak, per Administrator. There was no information and/or documentation obtained to support that a violation had occurred regarding "facility has a scabies outbreak". Based on LPA's investigation, including medical records, medication records, hospice records, interviews with staff, other related parties, the allegation is Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview was conducted with the Administrator David Hanna.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2026 · control 21-AS-20260407105626
Aug 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect/lack of supervision, resulted in resident developing multiple pressure injuries Staff locks resident in their room Staff handles resident roughly Staff leaves resident in soiled incontinence briefs for extended periods of time Licensee does not ensure facility is kept free of incontinent odors

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Alviso, conducted a complaint inspection, at approximately 11:25am on 8/11/26, and met with Administrator, David Hanna, and Resident Care Coordinator, Karrie Hanna. Reporting party alleges that "neglect/lack of supervision, resulted in resident developing multiple pressure injuries, staff locks resident in their room, staff handles resident roughly, staff leaves resident in soiled incontinence briefs for extended periods of time, licensee does not ensure facility is kept free of incontinent odors". The LPA reviewed resident's (R1) records, hospice plan/care plan, hospice records, medications list/Dr's Orders, incidents, and Kaiser medical records. The LPA interviewed staff, and other related parties regarding the allegations. The investigation revealed that resident R1 had moved into the facility with wounds, pressure injuries, and was moved into the facility receiving hospice care. Per record reviews, the resident R1 is susceptible to wounds due to their health and diagnosis. Per review of hospice records, there is no documentation/progress notes from hospice staff/nurses that resident was neglected and/or not being supervised and/or neglect causing pressure injuries/wounds. Hospice was in and out of the facility to see the resident and provide skilled care as needed, per hospice plan. There was no information obtained in the investigation to support that a violation had occurred.....Continued on LIC9099C... Unsubstantiated R1 would transfer into their wheelchair from their bed and would transfer from their wheelchair into bed. R1 was able to roll their wheelchair to their bedroom door and open the door knob; The bedrooms all have door knobs that open from inside by turning the doorknob. The bedroom doors of all residents do not lock from the inside, they may be open by residents at any time. There was no information obtained in the investigation to support that a violation had occurred Per investigation, staff interviewed deny that R1 was handled roughly; Staff interviewed did not observe any staff handle R1 roughly. Per interviews, R1 would not agree to assistance with ADL needs at times, and staff would have to come back and ask to assist R1 as needed. There was no information obtained in the investigation to support that a violation had occurred. R1 was incontinent, and required assistance with changing briefs, and being cleaned as needed. Staff would assist R1 with showering if needed. Per interviews, staff would offer to assist R1 as needed, and sometimes R1 would agree and let the staff care for them; If R1 would say no, not now, staff would return after a few minutes, and ask to assist R1 with incontinent care needs. Staff stated they clean up after changing a resident and if the resident was changed in their room, not in the bathroom, the room may have the smell of a brief change having been done recently. There was no information obtained in the investigation to support that a violation had occurred. Per investigation, the facility has a schedule of cleaning throughout the day at specific times in all restrooms that are used frequently by all residents, and resident's who are changed in their rooms, staff will clean in the room to help rid the room of any lingering incontinent odors. It is unknown how R1's room was at the time of the complaint filing, as R1 had moved out of the facility. LPA observed that the facility has cleaning products, bathroom/resident room maintenance schedules to help ensure incontinent odors are managed appropriately. There was no report of abuse received from the hospice agency regarding the care R1 was receiving from the facility staff; In review of hospice records there was no documentation recorded by hospice staff regarding concerns of neglect in the care of R1 by the facility staff. There was no information and/or documentation obtained to support that violation had occurred regarding "neglect/lack of supervision, resulted in resident developing multiple pressure injuries, staff locks resident in their room, staff handles resident roughly, staff leaves resident in soiled incontinence briefs for extended periods of time, licensee does not ensure facility is kept free of incontinent odors". Based on LPA's investigation, including medical records, medication records, hospice records, interviews with staff, other related parties, the allegations are Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview was conducted with the Administrator David Hanna.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2026 · control 21-AS-20260403110400
Jun 25, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Alviso, conducted a Required - 1 Year Inspection, on 6/25/26 at approximately 1:15pm, and met with Administrator David Hanna,and Resident Care Coordinator (RCC) Karrie Hanna. Currently twenty-five (25) residents in care; There are four (4) residents are on Hospice. Hospice care waiver approved for eight (8) residents. Facility has a required infection control plan. Facility has a required emergency disaster plan. LPA reviewed seven (7) resident files, including medication records and observed storage of medications.. All files were complete. LPA reviewed seven (7) staff files. All staff have required DOJ criminal record clearance. LA reviewed staff training. All care staff have first aid certification and CPR certification. Staff have required training. LPA toured the facility. There was a sufficient supply of cleaners/disinfectants, paper products, linens, and hygiene products. Facility had a sufficient supply of food. LPA observed residents' having their noon/lunch meal during the inspection. The facility bathrooms had grab bars for resident use, including non-slip/textured flooring in showers for residents use as needed. There was sufficient lighting in the facility, in common areas, bathrooms, and resident rooms checked, for residents use. Fire extinguishers were fully charged, serviced, and tagged as required. Medications were locked up and inaccessible to residents in care. Disinfectants/cleaners were locked up and inaccessible to residents in care. There was sufficient supply of hygiene products, paper products, cleaners/soaps, and personal protective equipment (PPE) supplies. Continued on LC809C... LPA is requesting the following documents be updated and submitted by 7/25/26: LIC308 - Designation of Administrator Responsibility LIC500 - Personnel Report LIC610-Emergency Disaster Plan (9 pages)- if any updates submit a copy- If no changes, submit copy of last page (signed/dated) LIC400- Affidavit of Client Cash Resources Copy of Bond if handling cash, per LIC400 Copy of Current Liability Insurance Infection Control Plan- if any updates submit a copy- If no changes, submit copy of last page (signed/dated) Poster of Residents Copy of current Administrator Certificate There were no deficiencies cited during today's inspection. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator David Hanna.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 25, 2026
Jan 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure that skilled staff provides care to resident Staff does not allow residents to possess personal belongings Staff confines residents to chairs Staff did not monitor resident for change in condition Staff do not communicate with responsible party regarding resident's care Staff did not safeguard a resident's medical information Staff handles residents in a rough manner Staff do not assist resident with showering

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Alviso, conducted a complaint investigation,and met with Karrie Hanna, Resident Care Coordinator. Licensee/Administrator David Hanna arrived to meet with the LPA within an hour. Reporting party alleges that "staff does not ensure that skilled staff provides care to resident, staff does not allow residents to possess personal belongings, staff confines residents to chairs, staff did not monitor resident for change in condition, staff do not communicate with responsible party regarding resident's care, staff did not safeguard a resident's medical information, staff handles residents in a rough manner, staff do not assist resident with showering." The LPA reviewed resident's (R1) records, including care plan, medical assessment, medications list/Dr's Orders. The LPA reviewed facility records, including medication assistance records for resident (R1). LPA conducted interviews with staff, and other related parties. Continued on LIC9099C.. Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed that R1 had their blood pressure checks done by resident care coordinator and by some staff. R1 took their blood pressure medication often, and would give the information to the staff, per interviews. Facilities don't have to have medical staff on shift or on all shifts, as it is not a hospital but assisted living for elderly; Facility doesn't have medical staff as part of their program, though RCC is a RN. There was no sufficient information obtained to support that the staff took the resident's blood pressure wrong due to there were no records of blood pressure checks and readings by facility staff, this was not done regularly as needed and required. This was cited as part of the medication deficiency on 11/24/25 of this complaint investigation. There was no information obtained supporting that residents' are not allowed personal belongings, such as cell phones and/or other items. This was investigated recently regarding a separate filed complaint. Per investigation and interviews, there was no information to support that residents are confined to chairs by staff, that staff didn't monitor resident for change in condition. There was no information obtained supporting residents' are handled roughly by staff or that resident's medical information was not safeguarded by staff. There was insufficient information to support violations occurred regarding resident not assisted with showering and/or staff didn't communicate with responsible party regarding resident's care. Based on LPA's review of records, including medical records, medication records, interviews with staff and other related parties, and related information obtained during the investigation, the allegations of "staff does not ensure that skilled staff provides care to resident, staff does not allow residents to possess personal belongings, staff confines residents to chairs, staff did not monitor resident for change in condition, staff do not communicate with responsible party regarding resident's care, staff did not safeguard a resident's medical information, staff handles residents in a rough manner, staff do not assist resident with showering" are Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview was conducted with the Administrator David Hanna. Staff/S2 responded to R1, and provided them a medication pill, but before giving R1 the medication, S2 stated "your family thinks that I am incompetent". R1 is a dependent resident of the facility and this is an inappropriate comment to the resident by facility staff. There is sufficient information obtained to support a personal right's violation occurred. The deficiency will be cited, 87468.2(a)(4) Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities- In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs, see LIC9099D. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), is being cited. Failure to correct deficiencies by due dates, may result in additional deficiency citations and/or civil penalties being assessed. Exit interview conducted with the Administrator David Hanna. Appeal Rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 5, 2026 · control 21-AS-20250904124021

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 19, 2026

87468.2(a)(4) Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities- In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Per LPA's investigation, resident (R1) was not feeling well and requested assistance and help with their needs, including needed medication from staff/S2. Staff/S2 responded to R1, and provided them a medication pill, but before giving R1 the medication, S2 stated "your family thinks that I am incompetent". R1 is a dependent resident of the facility and this is an inappropriate comment to the resident by facility staff. This is a risk to resident's personal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 5, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator to ensure that residents' rights are not violated, per regulations. Administrator to ensure they hold an in-service training with all staff regarding "resident rights". Submit proof of training, and plan of future compliance by 1/19/26.

Jan 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alviso conducted a case management inspection, on 1/5/26 at approximately 1:20pm, and met with Karrie Hanna, Resident Care Coordinator. The case management is being conducted to cite a deficiency that was unrelated to complaint allegations being investigated at the facility, see complaint report of today, 1/5/26. Per investigation of earlier today, LPA conducted interviews, reviewed resident records, reviewed facility records, and reviewed information/documents obtained, it was revealed that the facility had not cleaned resident's bed linen(s) that had been urinated on by R1, on 9/5/25; The bed linens were found to still be on resident's bed with the urine dried on them, the bed and room smelling of urine when moving R1's personal belongings out on 9/6/25. LPA obtained sufficient information to support a violation occurred regarding incontinent care procedures for R1 as needed. The following deficiency will be cited regarding the above on resident (R1) incident and information obtained during today's inspection, 87625(b)(3) Managed Incontinence- In addition to Section 87611, General Requirements for Allowable Health Conditions, the licensee shall be responsible for the following: Ensuring that incontinent residents are kept clean and dry and that the facility remains free of odors from incontinence, see LIC809D. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), is being cited. Exit interview conducted with the Administrator David Hanna. Appeal Rights Provided to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 5, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87625(b)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 9, 2026

87625(b)(3) Managed Incontinence- In addition to Section 87611, General Requirements for Allowable Health Conditions, the licensee shall be responsible for the following: Ensuring that incontinent residents are kept clean and dry and that the facility remains free of odors from incontinence. it was revealed in LPA's investigation that the facility had not cleaned resident's bed linen(s) that had been urinated on, on 9/5/25; The bed linens were found to still be on resident's bed with the urine dried on them, the bed and room smelling of urine, this was on 9/6/25. LPA obtained sufficient information to support a violation occurred regarding incontinent care procedures for R1 as needed. This is a risk to resident rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 5, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator to ensure that the facility is free of urine/feces/ incontinent odors as required by regulations. Ensure residents are clean and dry, including bed linens, and resident rooms are cleaned and free of incontinent odors. Hold an in-service training with all staff. Submit proof of training by 1/19/26. Submit plan of future compliance and plan of completing training with staff by POC 1/9/26.

20255 state visits · 5 documents

Nov 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not following resident's medication Physician order as required

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Alviso, conducted a complaint investigation,and met with Karrie Hanna, Resident Care Coordinator. Reporting party alleges that "staff are not following resident's medication Physician order as required." The LPA reviewed resident (R1) records, including medication records. The LPA reviewed facility records, including medicationr assistance records for resident (R1). LPA conducted interviews with staff, and other related parties. The investigation revealed that R1 has two medications that require blood pressure checks prior to providing the medication to the resident. One medication is provided once a day if able to be provided, and the second medication is provided three times a day if able to be provided; This medication is only provided if in-line with the Physician's order of the resident's blood presure reading, athe time the medication is to be given, per order. Resident's blood pressure checks are to be done while the resident (R1) is standing, per physician instructions. In review of medication records by the facility, there was no specific record information of the actual blood pressure of R1 when medications were said to have been given, and no record showing blood pressure reading, month, days, and time the medications were said to have been provided to the resident (R1). Continued on LIC9099C.. Substantiated Per interviews with staff, S2 stated there was no record of blood pressure readings or every single day and time the medications were provided to the resident. S2 stated they didn't track the blood pressure readings. The resident R1 has the blood pressure readings in their book. R1 didn't return to the facility after going to the hospital on 9/5/25 due to not feeling well. LPA discussed regulation information regarding medications, medication assistance, and maintaining medication records appropriately and accurately to reflect medications are being provided to the resident as required/needed. Ensuring compliance with Dr's Orders, and Dr's instructions, including records to show medication is being provided as required. Per investigation, facility failed to provide R1's medications per Physician orders as required. There was no record of blood pressure (BP) readings, no record of month/days, time, showing the medications were provided, and record of acceptable BP reading of R1. S2 stated they didn't track the blood pressure readings, staff would look at record of blood pressure readings from R1. Sufficient information obtained to support violations occurred regarding "staff are not following resident's medication Physician order as required." Allegation is Substantiated. This deficiency will be cited, 87465(a)(4) Incidental Medical and Dental Care- A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following: The licensee shall assist residents with self administered medications as needed, see LIC9099D. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), is being cited. Failure to correct deficiencies by due dates, may result in additional deficiency citations and/or civil penalties being assessed. Exit interview conducted with the Resident Care Coordinator, Karrie Hanna. Appeal Rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 24, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250904124021

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 25, 2025

87465(a)(4) Incidental Medical and Dental Care- A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility: The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Per investigation, facility failed to provide R1's medications per Physician orders as required. There was no record of blood pressure (BP) readings, no record of month/days, time, showing the medications were provided, and record of acceptable BP reading of R1. S2 stated they didn't track the blood pressure readings, staff would look at record of blood pressure readings from R1. This is a health & safety risk to residents' in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 24, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator to ensure that residents’ medications are provided as needed, per Physician’s orders. Ensure that records are documented and maintained when medications have specific instruction, such as within a blood pressure reading and/or not over or under a specific blood pressure reading. Ensure staff providing blood pressure checks are qualified to be able to provide blood pressure checks to a resident. Submit plan, 12/3/25, on ensuring future compliance with this regulation and submit how the facility will document, and track medications as needed, per instructions by Physicians. Plan of correction should include information documented regarding providing medications, prior to providing and/or after providing them, per order. POC due 11/25/25.

Oct 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident's medication is not being provided as prescribed Resident's personal rights are being violated

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alviso, conducted a complaint inspection, approximately 10:00am on 10/20/25, and met with Resident Care Coordinator(RCC) Karrie Hanna. Administrator David Hanna arrived to to meet with the LPA. Reporting party alleges that "resident's medication is not being provided as prescribed, and resident's personal rights are being violated". The LPA reviewed resident, R1, records, including medication records, medical documentation,medical assessment, facility care plan, and Hospice Care plan; The LPA interviewed staff, and other related parties regarding the allegations. The investigation revealed that per record reviews, medications are being provided to the resident, and they are being povided as prescribed by the Physician. R1's medication list was provided by the hospital upon R1's discharge to the facility, on 10/10/25. R1 had a change in medications by the Physician on 10/11/25. Hospice agency was at the facility, on 10/10/25 and 10/11/25, to see the resident. Hospice is to oversee resident's medication and adjust the medication as needed, with Physician order/approval. Continued on LIC9099C.. Unsubstantiated Hospice agency was at the facility, on 10/10/25 and 10/11/25, to see the resident. Hospice will be overseeing resident's medication (s) and adjust the medication as needed, with Physician approval/order. Per review of hospice records, there was no documentation regarding concerns with how resident's medications were being provided to them, and no concerns on the care being provided to the resident. LPA observed the lunch meal being provided to residents', including R1. Per interviews with staff and other parties, meals are always provided, snacks, and if someone wants seconds of food and/or another item, the facility will provide this to the resident. The resident's personal phone had no charger, and staff would charge the phone for the resident. This would be done in the kitchen and/or in the facility office. R1's responsible party decided to collect the cell phone while at the facility. LPA interviewed staff and other parties regarding staff speaking inappropriately to the residents' and/or staff handling residents in a rough manner. Per investigation and review of records, including medical records, medication records, hospice records, interviews with staff, interviews with other related parties, and staff records, there was no information obtained to support that violations had occurred regarding the allegations reported. Based on LPA's review of records, including medical records, medication records, hospice records, interviews with staff, other related parties,staff records, and related information obtained during the investigation, the allegations of "resident's medication is not being provided as prescribed, and resident's personal rights are being violated" are Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview was conducted with the Administrator David Hanna.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2025 · control 21-AS-20251017145442
Jul 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Alviso, conducted a Required - 1 Year Inspection, on 7/21/25, and met with Administrator David Hanna, and Resident Care Coordinator (RCC) Karrie Hanna. Currently twenty-one (21) residents in care; There are two (2) residents are on Hospice. Hospice care waiver approved for eight (8) residents. Facility has a required infection control plan. Facility has a required emergency disaster plan. LPA reviewed seven (7) resident files. All files were complete. LPA reviewed five (5) staff files. All staff have required criminal record clearance. Per file reviews, staff have first aid certification and CPR certification. Staff have required training. LPA toured the facility. There was a sufficient supply of cleaners/disinfectants, paper products, linens, and hygiene products. Facility had a sufficient supply of food. LPA observed residents' having their noon/lunch meal during the inspection. The facility bathrooms had grab bars for resident use, including non-slip/textured flooring in showers for residents use as needed. There was sufficient lighting in the facility, in common areas, bathrooms, and resident rooms checked, for residents use. Fire extinguishers were fully charged, serviced, and tagged as required. Continued on LIC809C... Facility was observed to be clean and orderly during the inspection. All smoke alarms were in all required rooms, and facility has carbon monoxide detectors. All bathrooms had soap supply for use, and had paper towels available for residents' use. All medications were locked up and inaccessible to residents in care. All cleaners/disinfectants were locked up and inaccessible to residents' in care. Outside facility grounds were clean, pathways free and clear of obstruction, and there was outside furniture for residents' use. LPA is requesting the following documents be updated and submitted by 8/21/25: LIC308 - Designation of Administrator Responsibility LIC500 - Personnel Report LIC610-Emergency Disaster Plan (9 pages)- if any updates submit a copy- If no changes, submit copy of last page (signed/dated) Copy of Current Liability Insurance Infection Control Plan- if any updates submit a copy- If no changes, submit copy of last page (signed/dated) Poster of Residents Copy of current Administrator Certificate There were no deficiencies cited during today's inspection. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator David Hanna.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 21, 2025
Jun 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Alviso, conducted a Required - 1 Year Inspection, on 6/17/25 at approximately and met with Administrator David Hanna, and Resident Care Coordinator (RCC) Karrie Hanna. Currently twenty-four (24) residents in care, and three (3) resident on Hospice. Facility specializes in dementia care. Hospice care waiver approved for eight (8) residents. Facility has a required infection control plan. Facility has a required emergency disaster plan. LPA toured the facility with the Administrator. The LPA will continue the annual inspection at a later date.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2025
Jan 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee/facility staff failed to meet resident's care need

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alviso, conducted a complaint inspection, approximately 11:20am on 1/9/25, and met with Resident Care Coordinator(RCC) Karrie Hanna. Administrator David Hanna arrived to the facility within 30 minutes after the LPA's arrival. The LPA reviewed resident records, medical documentation, and interviewed staff, and other related parties. Reporting party alleges that "Licensee/facility staff failed to meet resident's care needs". The investigation revealed that there are hydration times the facility provides hydration drinks, water/flavored water/tea/coffee, and other hydration fluids to residents in care; Per interviews with staff, S1, S2, S3, and S4, there are in-between mealtimes that staff offer drinks to the residents in care, as well as when the resident requests a drink and/or duriing resident mealtimes. Staff, S2, stated that the residents are encouraged to drink their water because a lot of the residents don't drink water/drink fluids on their own. Staff are to remind residents to drink their water and to offer drinks to the resident to help ensure hydration of the residents in care. Staff deny that they refuse to provide water to residents, and are rushing residents during mealtimes so residents that are taking longer can't eat. Per LPA's interviews with other related parties, 1, 2, and 3, in summary, they have not observed that staff don't provide water to the residents, and have observed staff giving water, tea, and coffee to residents; No staff observed rushing residents so they don't have the time to eat their food. Continued on LIC9099C... Unsubstantiated The Department didn't receive a suspected abuse report filed by a medical professional, Physician/hospital treating R1 that reports and states suspected neglect of the resident by facility staff/licensee that caused resident's dehydration. Per investigation and review of records, including medical records, there was no information obtained to support that violations had occurred regarding the allegation reported. Based on the interviews, record/document reviews, and related information obtained during the investigation, the allegation "Licensee/facility staff failed to meet resident's care needs” is Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview was conducted with the Administrator David Hanna.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 9, 2025 · control 21-AS-20241029100037

20243 state visits · 4 documents

Nov 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is not providing hygiene items/paper towels for residents use Violation of residents personal rights

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alviso, conducted a complaint inspection, approximately 10:00am on 11/5/24, and met with Resident Care Coordinator(RCC) Karrie Hanna. RCC contacted the Administrator, David Hanna, who arrived after LPA's tour of the facility. LPA toured the facility with RCC Karrie Hanna; The facility does have a sufficient supply of hygiene products for all residents in care, including sufficient supply of paper towels, toilet paper, and linens. LPA discussed with RCC regarding linens and that regulation states, "The use of common wash cloths and towels shall be prohibited." RCC stated their understanding of this to the LPA. RCC stated the bathrooms have paper towel dispensers.The LPA observed that there are eight (8) bathrooms in the facility for residents in care.There are four (4) bathrooms that can be used by all residents in care, and the other four (4) are jack and jill bathrooms for the specific residents who reside in the connected rooms. LPA observed that the paper towels were not available in seven out of eight resident bathrooms. Bathrooms had toilet paper available.There is soap and sanitizer dispensers available for resident use. LPA discussed with the RCC Karrie, and Administrator David, that the paper towels for residents use must be available in every resident bathroom at all times. Continued on LIC9099C... Substantiated RCC had the staff filling the paper towel dispensers. Administrator stated that the dispensers that were not operational would be repaired and/or replaced. Administrator stated that all bathrooms would have a supply of paper towels for residents use at all times. Per LPA's observations and interviews with staff, there is sufficient information obtained to support a violation did occur, the allegation of "facility is not providing hygiene items/paper towels for residents use" is Substantiated. This deficiency will be cited, 87307(a)(3) Personal Accommodations and Services- The following provisions shall apply: Equipment and supplies necessary for personal care and maintenance of adequate hygiene practice shall be readily available to each resident, the licensee shall assure provision of: Clean linen, including blankets, bedspreads, top bed sheets, bottom bed sheets, pillow cases, mattress pads, bath towels, hand towels and wash cloths. The use of common wash cloths and towels shall be prohibited, see LIC9099D. LPA observed R1 in the facility, reviewed R1's records, and obtained information from interviewed staff and other related parties. Per investigation, R1 has a seat belt attached to their wheelchair that is used to keep resident in their chair; LPA observed that the seat belt goes straight across as a regular seat belt, which is not providing any postural support for the resident. Per interview with S2, the seat belt helps R1 from standing up and down when agitated, and from possible falls when leaning forward; S2 stated it keeps the resident in their chair. R1 is not able to unbuckle the seat belt on their own. LPA discussed personal rights of the resident/residents per regulation, and ensuring sufficient staff as needed. Administrator and S2 stated their understanding of the regulation. A clip alarm or similar item will be used and R1's care plan will be updated, per Administrator. Per LPA's observations and interviews with staff, there is sufficient information obtained to support a violation did occur, the allegation of "violation of resident's personal rights" is Substantiated. This deficiency will be cited, 87468.2(a)(4)Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities-In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs, see LIC9099D. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), is being cited. Failure to correct deficiencies by due dates, may result in additional deficiency citations and/or civil penalties being assessed. Exit interview conducted with the Resident Care Coordinator, Karrie Hanna. Appeal Rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 5, 2024 · control 21-AS-20241104104137

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 6, 2024

87468.2(a)(4)Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities-In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs.This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Per investigation, R1 has a seat belt attached to their wheelchair that is used to keep resident in their chair; LPA observed that the seat belt goes straight across as a regular seat belt, which is not providing any postural support for the resident. Per interview with S2, the seat belt helps R1 from standing up and down when agitated, and from possible falls when leaning forward; S2 stated it keeps the resident in their chair. R1 is not able to unbuckle the seat belt on their own. This is a risk to resident's personal rights and to health & safety of resident.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 5, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator to ensure the seat belt is removed from R1's wheelchair; Reassess the resident, and update the care plan as needed to meet resident's current care needs. Submit proof of correction, by photo for seat belt removal, and a plan to reassess the resident, and update care plan in a timely manner, no later than 11/13 . POC due 11/06/24.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87307(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 18, 2024

87307(a)(3) Personal Accommodations and Services- The following provisions shall apply:. Equipment and supplies necessary for personal care and maintenance of adequate hygiene practice shall be readily available to each resident, the licensee shall assure provision of: Clean linen, including blankets, bedspreads, top bed sheets, bottom bed sheets, pillow cases, mattress pads, bath towels, hand towels and wash cloths. The use of common wash cloths and towels shall be prohibited. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Per Investigation, LPA observed that there are eight (8) bathrooms in the facility for residents in care. There are four (4) bathrooms that can be used by all residents in care, and the other four (4) are jack and jilll bathrooms for the specific residents who reside in the connected rooms. LPA observed that the paper towels were not available in seven out of eight resident bathrooms. This is a risk to residents personal rights and to the health & safety of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 5, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator to ensure that all bathrooms have paper towels available at all times, ensuring that all paper towel dispensers work. Ensure all bathrooms have a sufficient supply of hygiene items as needed for resident use, and that staff assist residents using bathrooms as needed. POC due 11/18/24.

Oct 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged resident’s medication

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alviso, conducted a complaint inspection, approximately 9:30am on 10/9/24, and met with Resident Care Coordinator(RCC) Karrie Hanna. Administrator David Hanna arrived to meet with the LPA. LPA reviewed resident's (R1) records, including medical documentation, conducted interviews with staff, and other related parties. The investgation revealed that R1 has a care plan in place, and all medications prescribed by the Physician, were on-site, and inaccessible to all others that don't handle the medications. All R1's medications have Dr's Orders, per review of records. There was information and/or provided records that showed a mismanagement of R1's medications. Per interviews with staff, S1 & S2, all of R1's medications are provided as directed by the Physician, per the dosage instructions. There was conflicting information obtained regarding reported allegation of "Staff mismanaged resident’s medication". There was no information obtained that supported a violation had occurred regarding the allegation. Based on the interviews, record reviews, including medical documentation, and Observations, there was no information obtained that supported the above violation had occurred. The allegation is Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Nothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240531164055
Oct 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure that resident is fed a healthy diet

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alviso, conducted a complaint inspection, approximately 9:30am on 10/9/24, and met with Resident Care Coordinator(RCC) Karrie Hanna. Administrator David Hanna arrived to meet with the LPA. LPA reviewed resident's (R1) records, including medical documentation, conducted interviews with staff, and other related parties. The investgation revealed that R1 has a care plan in place, and all medications prescribed by the Physician, were on-site, and inaccessible to all others that don't handle the medications. Per interviews with S1 and S2, there is tons of facility food in large walk-in refrigerator, and freezer.S1 stated they are shopping in bulk all the time during the week as needed, and for all good sales that are available. S1 stated they keep a large food supply of non-perishables, and a very good variety of both perishable and non-perishable food items. LPA observed the food supply, and it was sufficient of a variety of food and drinks. There is also a food overflow storage shed with canned and boxed items that are used. All food items are used for the facility meals, per staff interviews. LPA observed a resident mealtime, and all the residents were eating all their meal,some interacting with one another. There was conflicting information obtained regarding reported allegation of "Staff do not ensure that resident is fed a healthy diet ". There was no information obtained that supported a violation had occurred regarding the allegation. Based on the interviews, record reviews, including medical documentation, and Observations, there was no information obtained that supported the above violation had occurred. The allegation is Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Nothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240604104925
Jun 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Alviso, conducted a Required - 1 Year Inspection, and met with Administrator David Hanna and Resident Care Coordinator (RCC) Karrie Hanna. Currently twenty-four (24) residents in care, and one (1) resident on Hospice. Facility specializes in dementia care. Hospice care waiver approved for eight (8) residents. Facility has a required infection control plan, which is part of the plan of operation. Facility has a required emergency disaster plan. LPA reviewed six (6) resident files. All files were complete. LPA reviewed six (6) staff files. All staff had criminal record clearance as required. All staff had first aid, and cpr certification as required. Staff had required training. Fire clearance approval is for twenty-eight (28) non-ambulatory. All exits were cleared and free of obstruction. Fire extinguishers (5) are currently serviced and tagged as required. Sufficient food supply. Sufficient cleaner/disinfectants, personal protective equipment (PPE), paper products, furnishings, and linens. Sufficient lighting in hallways, bathrooms, resident rooms, and common areas. All postings were up and visible. Medications were locked up and inaccessible to residents in care. All cleaners/disinfectants were locked up and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA is requesting the following documents be updated and submitted by 7/27/24. LIC308 - Designation of Administrator Responsibility LIC500 - Personnel Report LIC610-Emergency Disaster Plan- if any updates submit copy- please ensure to date and sign last page Copy of Current Liability Insurance Infection Control Plan- if any updates submit copy- please ensure to date and sign last page No deficiencies cited today. Exit interview conducted with the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 27, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 6 documents

20234 state visits · 4 documents

Aug 24, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide residents with modified diets as prescribed Staff do not ensure facility plumbing is functioning properly, toilet(s) are not flushing Staff do not safeguard resident's personal belongings Staff yell at residents in care Staff do not ensure the facility is free from bed bugs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alviso, conducted a subsequent complaint visit, approximately 2:00pm on 8/24/23,, and met with Administrator David Hanna, and Resident Care Coordinator(RCC) Karrie Hanna. LPA reviewed four resident files. LPA reviewed four staff files. The LPA conducted interviews with fiver(5) staff, and other interested/related parties, regarding the allegations. The investigation revealed that the facility has a resident(R2) that is on a low sugar special diet. Per LPA interviews,facility is aware of residents low sugar diet, and resident is redirected when needed to healthier food choices; Resident does choose for themselves and it is their personal right but RCC stated they will document it for the record.. RCC stated if needed the information is able to be provided to the Physician. Facility stated they like to prepare food at a low sodium use for all residents. LPA observed regular and almond milk, gluten free mixes for desserts, and a supply of seasonings, other than salt, for preparing meals. The facility had a large supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Per the investigation, there was no information obtained to support that a violation had occurred. Continued on LIC9099C... Unsubstantiated LPA observed the facility toilets to all be working properly during the inspection. The investigation revealed that the Administrator has several facility bathrooms that may be used by residents if a toilet clogs up and/or has plumbing issues. All showers are working properly, including sinks. The facility has staff that handle maintenance, and if a toilet couldn't be unclogged or there were plumbing issues a plumbing service would be contacted. Per the investigation, there was no information obtained to support that a violation had occurred. All resident rooms have locks on the outside of their doors but from the inside the door can be opened at any time by the residing resident. When the resident bedroom door is closed, it automatically locks, which keeps residents belongings safe and secure in their own room. Residents that understand their door lock can get back in, and other residents are able to be let in by staff as needed. If residents ask that they have food/drink items to store in the kitchen refrigerator they are able to, per interviews with staff. The residents name is written on the item(s) and put into the refrigerator in the locked kitchen area. The kitchen doors are kept locked and only accessed by staff. A resident will ask the staff for their food/drink items when they want them, and staff will provide these items to the resident. Per the investigation, there was no information obtained to support that a violation had occurred. LPA conducted interviews with staff and other related parties. Information obtained didn't support that a violation had occurred regarding staff yelling at residents and/or speaking to residents inappropriately. All staff have criminal record clearance as required. Staff have required training. Per investigation, interviews, and observations, the facility does not have an outbreak of bed bugs. The facility has not had a case of bed bugs now and/or prior to the investigation. The facility has had scabies, and all residents were treated as needed and required, per review of records. Per the investigation, there was no information obtained to support that a violation had occurred. Based on the interviews, record/document reviews, and related information obtained during the investigation, of the allegations "Staff do not provide residents with modified diets as prescribed, Staff do not ensure facility plumbing is functioning properly, toilet(s) are not flushing, Staff do not safeguard resident's personal belongings, Staff yell at residents in care, Staff do not ensure the facility is free from bed bugs" are Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview was conducted with the Administrator David Hanna.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 24, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230612151510
Jul 24, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: There is a strong urine odor in the facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alviso, conducted a complaint inspection, approximately 2:00pm on 7/24/23 , and met with Resident Care Coordinator(RCC) Karrie Hanna. RCC contacted the Administrator, David Hanna, who arrived shortly after the LPA. LPA toured the facility with RCC Karrie Hanna; The LPA observed a very strong urine odor when entering the facility and walking in towards the living room. The LPA walked through the living room area and observed the urine odor was very strong throughout the area. The LPA discussed the facility'sstrong urine odor, and discussed regulations regarding ensuring a facility be clean, sanitary, and in good repair, including ensuring meeting needs of incontinent residents. Continued on LIC9099... Substantiated LPA observed residents sitting in the living room watching television when touring the room. LPA observed a large blanket/towel on the floor in front of the couch where a resident was sitting. The facility does provide care to incontinent residents. The RCC stated the area had been cleaned up. RCC stated that the Administrator may be removing the rug. The LPA stepped outside of the facility to continue to speak with the RCC regarding the urine odor in the facility. The Administrator arrived and the LPA discussed the complaint allegation, and LPA's observations of the strong urine odor in the facility. The LPA toured the facility, conducted interviews with staff, and other parties. The investigation revealed that the facility does have a urine odor as you enter, and the living room has a very strong urine odor throughout. This deficiency will be cited, 87303(a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors, see LIC9099D. The conducted interviews, information obtained, and LPA's observations, supported that a violation had occurred, the allegation "there is a strong urine odor in the facility" is substantiated. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), is being cited. Failure to correct deficiencies by due dates, may result in additional deficiency citations and/or civil penalties being assessed. Exit interview conducted with the Administrator David Hanna. Appeal Rights Given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 24, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230720173544

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 7, 2023

87303(a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors.This requirement was not met as evidenced by: The LPA observed a very strong urine odor when entering the facility and walking in towards the living room. The Living room had a very strong urine odor. This a risk to personal rights of the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 24, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator to ensure the facility is free from urine odors. Submit a plan of correction to bring the facility into compliance with the regulation, including using urine odor cleaning and urine odor control products. Submit a maintenance plan on keeping the facility free of urine odors. POC due 8/7/23.

Jun 27, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst(LPA), Alviso conducted a Required - 1 Year Inspection, and met with Resident Care Coordinator(RCC), Karrie Hanna. Currently twenty-seven(27) residents in care, and one(1) resident on Hospice. Facility specializes in dementia care. Hospice care waiver approved for eight (8) residents. Facility has a required infection control plan, which is part of the operation plan. Fire clearance approval is for twenty-eight (28) non-ambulatory. All exits were cleared and free of obstruction. Fire extinguishers(5) are currently serviced and tagged as required- expires 7/14/23. Fire Department inspection completed on facility's fire panel on 3/16/23, passed inspection. There was a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food observed by the LPA. All utilities were observed on and to be working properly. Facility had a supply of food, water, and emergency items, to meet the 72 hour shelter in place requirement. There was a sufficient supply of hygiene products, cleaners, and paper products for use as needed. Facility has a sufficient supply of personal protective equipment(PPE) for use as needed. All bathrooms had grab bars, and non-slip flooring/mats for use as needed. Hot water was checked at 117.1F. which is within regulation of no lower than 105.F , and no higher than 120.F. Toxins are stored inaccessible and in care. Medications are stored locked making them inaccessible to residents, and staff that do not handle medications. Continued on LIC809C.... The LPA reviewed six(6) staff files, including training. All staff have criminal record clearance as required. The LPA reviewed six(6) resident files, including medication records. LPA is requesting the following documents be updated and submitted by 7/27/23: LIC308 - Designation of Administrator Responsibility LIC500 - Personnel Report LIC610-Emergency Disaster Plan Copy of Current Liability Insurance Infection Control Plan- if any updates- please ensure to date and sign last page No deficiencies cited today. Exit interview conducted with the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 27, 2023
Apr 18, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alviso, conducted a complaint visit, approximately 9:00am 4/18/2023 , and met with Administrator David Hanna, and Resident Care Coordinator(RCC) Karrie Hanna. LPA reviewed twelve(12) resident files, and six(6) staff files; The LPA conducted interviews with staff, and other interested/related parties, regarding the allegation(s). The LPA toured the facility on both, 12/15/22, and today 4/18/23. The LPA inspected resident rooms, kitchen, dining area, and food supply. The investigation revealed that resident(R1) has an area up on the ceiling in their bedroom that shows the paint is affected by some moisture in this area; The LPA also observed large patches of mold which were found under some album covers that were hanging on the wall. The Administrator stated that years ago this area had a problem but it was repaired, and Administrator stated to the LPA it is possibly a roof problem. Continued on LIC9099C... Substantiated The Administrator stated to the LPA that they will immediately start addressing the problem of the ceiling and wall having a moisture/water problem. The LPA did not observe any leaking water on the ceiling or the wall but did observe the mold and ceiling paint showing color change, spotting, water damage/moisture issues. The RCC had staff come in and start cleaning the wall in resident's(R1's ) room to disinfect and clean the mold. Based on LPA observations, interviews, and review of records, the investigation has revealed that the allegation of "Facility is in disrepair" has been substantiated. LPA observing a moisture problem/water damage on the ceiling in R1's room, including observation of mold growing on the resident's wall under album covers that were hanging. LPA obtained photos. Due to the substantiation of the allegation, a deficiency will be cited today, Maintenance and Operation 87303(a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary, and in good repair at all times; Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for safety and well-being of residents, and others, see LIC9099D. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), is being cited. Failure to correct deficiencies by due dates, may result in additional deficiency citations and/or civil penalties being assessed. Exit interview conducted with the Administrator David Hanna. Appeal Rights Given. Per investigation, it was revealed that no residents had bed bugs and/or lice in the facility. Per investigation, LPA found that residents' who were assessed to have scabies and/or had symptoms were by staff, by a medical professional, and treatment was provided per Doctor's orders. Per interviews, staff, six (6) out of six(6), deny that they hit and/or yell at the residents in care; Staff stated to the LPA that they have not observed another staff hit and/or yell at residents of the facility. The LPA discussed with facility staff, personal rights of residents in care, and ensuring residents rights are not violated. Per interviews and record reviews, it was revealed that residents have shower schedules, and are also showered as needed due to an emergency and/or if an accident happens. If a resident doesn't take their showers at the scheduled time due to saying no and/or for any other reason, the shower can be provided as soon as possible that day or the next day. Residents may shower as often as needed but if needing assistance with bathing staff will fit the resident in as soon as possible, that day and/or the next day due to the shower schedule. Some residents shower once a week and others a few times a week, and as often as needed. The LPA conducted interviews with staff(5) and other interested parties. Per investigation, it was revealed that the facility had a sufficient supply of food to provide meals to residents. The food supply contains meats, vegetables, fruits, and grains, that need to be cooked for resident meals. There was also eggs, cheese, cereals, fruits, drinks, and milk for resident meals. Per investigation and interviews with staff, S 1 and S2, all resident mail is provided to residents. The LPA discussed resident's personal rights with staff, S1 and S2, and this includes the right to resident's having their personal mail provided to them, unopened. Staff S1 and S2 stated their understanding of the above regarding a resident's personal mail, and resident's right to it. Continued on LIC9099C... Per review of resident records(R1), interviews with staff, and other interested parties, it was revealed that all medications, and over the counter medications and supplements provided to the resident, are prescribed by the Physician. There are no medications allowed to be retained on-site and/or provided to the resident without a Physician's order. The LPA discussed Incidental Medical and Dental Care regulations with all parties, discussing the requirement of having a Physician's Order for all medications, and over the counter medications, including supplements. Without the Physician's order a facility staff can't have the medication and provide it to a resident/residents. Per review of records all medications prescribed are provided per Doctor's Orders to resident(R1). Based on LPA's investigation, record reviews, and interviews with staff, and information obtained during interviews with other related parties, there was no information obtained to support that a violation occurred, the allegations of "Staff refuse to treat resident's scabies condition, Staff hits resident in care, Staff yell at resident in care, Residents in care are not assisted with their showers, Residents are not provided proper food service, Staff withholds resident's mail, Staff do not provide proper medication assistance to resident in care' are unsubstantiated. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews with staff and other parties, there is insufficient information to support that violations occurred. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted with Licensee/Administrator David Hanna.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 18, 2023 · control 21-AS-20221212114408

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 2, 2023

Maintenance and Operation 87303(a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary, and in good repair at all times; Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for safety and well-being of residents, and others. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: LPA observing a moisture problem on the ceiling in R1's room, including observation of mold growing on the resident's wall under album covers that were hanging.This is a risk to the health & safety and/or a risk to personal rights of the resident(s). LPA obtained photos.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 18, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator Davd Hanna to submit plan of correction in repairing the water leak/moisture problem, roof repairs that is causing water damage to the ceiling and wall in resident(R1's )room. Administrator stated to the LPA that they will be contacting a roofing company and having the roof inspected and repaired. Administrator stated they will immediately clean the wall and put a tarp on the roof till repaired. Will submit POC due 5/2/23.

20221 state visit · 1 document

May 10, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst, (LPA), Alviso conducted a Required - 1 Year Inspection, and met with Resident Care Coordinator(RCC), Karrie Hanna. The inspection is focused on the Infection Control procedures and practices of this facility. Currently twenty-three(23) residents in care, and four(4) residents on Hospice. Facility specializes in dementia care. Hospice care waiver approved for eight (8) residents. Mitigation plan submitted and reviewed by the Department. Fire clearance approval is for twenty-eight (28) non-ambulatory. Fire extinguishers are currently serviced and tagged as required- dated 4/29/21. RCC stated that she will be getting the fire extinguishers serviced before they expire (4/29). There was a sufficient supply of food observed by the LPA. All utilities were observed on and to be working properly. Facility was clean and orderly during the LPA's inspection. Mitigation policies are in place. All visitors are screened upon entering the facility grounds/building. All visitors have their temperatures taken and answer screening questions. Residents are screened daily, and observed for any changes.Toxins are stored inaccessible and in care. Medications are stored locked making them inaccessible to residents, and staff that do not handle medications. The facility has a large sufficient supply of personal protective equipment (PPE). LPA observed the Resident Care Coordinator and all staff wearing masks during the LPA's inspection. No deficiencies cited today. Exit interview conducted with RCC Karrie Hanna.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 10, 2022

20211 state visit · 1 document

Dec 28, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility staff do not allow resident to leave the facility

Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on the above captioned complaint allegation. LPA met with Kerrie Hanna and discussed the findings. During the course of this investigation statements were taken, records were obtained and reviewed, and site visits conducted. The following determinations have been made: Physician's Report for Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly, dated 08/30/2021, for Resident #1 states, in part: (Able to Leave Facility Unassisted?) "Only allowed to go out in front of house;" Facility is fully fenced with delayed egress gates and provides spacious areas for residents in side of the fenced area; R1 complains that R1 is not allowed by staff to leave the property unaccompanied; Staff actions regarding R1's ability to leave the facility are in response to, and in compliance with, Physician's orders and, therefore, do not reflect an independent decision made by staff. Based upon the records reviewed, statements obtained, and site inspections made, this complaint is UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation is false and without a reasonable basis. The allegation is DISMISSED. No Citation issued. Report left at facility. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 28, 2021 · control 21-AS-20211206115500

24 of 28 beds were occupied at the August 11, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Dlk Ventures, Inc., licensed since 2002.

Operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

  • Hanna House Scenic · Santa Rosa
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2002, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
26
Total complaints
13
Substantiated allegations
7
Type A citations
2
Type B citations
5

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2002, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations20
Type B citations51
Substantiated allegations72
Total complaints136

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Hanna House Ridley

Is Hanna House Ridley licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Hanna House Ridley licensed for?

28 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Hanna House Ridley been cited?

2 Type A and 5 Type B citations since 2002, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 26 state visits over the same years.

Is Hanna House Ridley still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.

What does Hanna House Ridley cost?

$6,450 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 22 other homes of a similar licensed size in Santa Rosa that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $5,000 to $7,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,525 (n = 22 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Hanna House Ridley take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Dlk Ventures, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to Dlk Ventures, Inc. — at least 2 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Santa Rosa is 1.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Hanna House Ridley keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 8 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Hanna House Ridley license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “HANNA HOUSE RIDLEY”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #496801090. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 28 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Dlk Ventures, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2002, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 26 state inspection visits since 2002, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 2 Type A and 5 Type B citations on file since 2002, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 26 state visits in that period.
  • 13 complaints and 7 substantiated allegations on file since 2002, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 11, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Sonoma County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Santa Rosa · 0.4 mi

    Primrose Alzheimer's Living

    Large community · licensed for 50

    Starting rate

    $8,250 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Santa Rosa · 0.4 mi

    Marian House for Seniors

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Starting rate

    $4,800 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Santa Rosa · 0.5 mi

    Five Palms Care Home

    Mid-size home · licensed for 23

    Starting rate

    $5,000 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Santa Rosa · 0.5 mi

    Clover Senior Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Starting rate

    $7,500 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Santa Rosa · 0.4 mi

    Hershey Senior Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $6,700 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $5,500–$8,250

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Santa Rosa · 0.4 mi

    Sarah's Senior Residential Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,100 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,300

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Sonoma County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
HH

Call Hanna House Ridley

Santa Rosa · Licensed for 28

(707) 591-0980

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Hanna House Ridley

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages