Farmstead At Dixon, The is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Dixon, Solano County, California — state license #486804191, licensed for 96 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 14 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2024, the most recent dated November 25, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

1 home in view

Farmstead At Dixon, The

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 96 residents · Dixon, CA · Solano County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #486804191, held since 2024 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
350 Gateway Drive · Dixon, Solano County
Phone
(707) 676-5060
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 96 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 10 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER 96 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. WAIVER GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR 20State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2024, the state has visited this home 14 times and filed 14 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on November 25, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
June 16, 2026
Occupancy at the November 25, 2025 visit
93 of 96 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 27, 2024 to November 25, 2025. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 14 of 14 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20258 state visits · 8 documents
Nov 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff fraudulently placed residents in hospice care.

On November 25, 2025,Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nakagawa arrived unannounced to complete the investigation regarding the above allegation and to deliver findings. LPA met with Alana Reyes to discuss findings. The complaint alleges that Staff fraudulently placed residents in hospice care. The complainant states that they believe this facility is committing abuse and fraud by forcing patients onto Hospice for a commission check. LPA interviewed 3 independent hospice agencies; 3 of 3 agencies all confirmed that a facility may not demand someone goes on hospice. Residents of a facility may be referred by the family, their primary care physician or the facility, but they must meet the requirements to go on hospice such as failure to thrive, weight loss, decline in health with an expected end of life within 6 months. (Continued on 9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 25, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250918142622
Nov 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is not following resident's special diet

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nakagawa arrived unannounced on 10/20/2025 to conclude an investigation and deliver findings regarding the allegation listed above and met with Mark Reyes, Administrator and Maribel Samayoa to discuss. The complaint alleges that Staff is not following resident's special diet. The complainant stated that the resident’s (R1) responsible party checked R1’s camera and saw that someone had brought R1 a plate of shrimp for dinner and told complainant. Complainant stated that R1 is allergic to shrimp and it is listed in more than one place on Farmstead’s records. (Continued on 9099-C) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250902171844
Sep 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff violated residents personal rights Staff did not properly assist a resident during transfers

On 9/23/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jill Nakagawa arrived unannounced to continue an investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA conducted interviews, made observations and reviewed documents. LPA met with Administrator Mark Reyes to discuss the findings. The complaint alleges that Staff violated resident’s personal rights. The complainant stated that a staff member (S1) pulls a resident’s (R1) arm and tells R1 if they don’t do what S1 says they will get R1 kicked out. LPA interviewed complainant, who stated that there are staff that are not well-trained and should not be working there. LPA reviewed the training and personnel files of S1 and found that S1 is a long-term employe; S1 received all the required training as per regulation. (Continued on LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 23, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250624103730
Aug 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 1, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20246 state visits · 6 documents
Sep 27, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged residents’ medications. Staff did not maintain accurate medication records for residents. Staff did not report incidents involving residents as required. Staff did not appropriately evaluate residents’ service needs. Staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in a resident wandering away from the facility.

The complaint alleges that staff mismanaged residents’ medications and staff did not maintain accurate medication records for residents. Through interviews LPA learned that staff had been informed by management to document inaccurate information on the MAR. LPA reviewed documents and conducted interviews with staff and found no irregularities in the MARs. A random check of medications found no discrepancies and all medications appeared to have been given as prescribed. LPA could find no evidence to corroborate the allegations therefore they allegations are unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated Continued on 9099-C...... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 27, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240528151013
Aug 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints2typical 2
Total complaints4typical 7
State visits on file14typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2024.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20258812024660
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Solano County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (707) 676-5060

Is Farmstead At Dixon, The licensed?

Yes — Farmstead At Dixon, The is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Dixon (Solano County): California license #486804191, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 96 residents. State records list 14 inspection and complaint documents since 2024; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated November 25, 2025, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Farmstead At Dixon, The care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Farmstead At Dixon, The with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER 96 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. WAIVER GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR 20

How much does Farmstead At Dixon, The cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Farmstead At Dixon, The's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Solano County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Farmstead At Dixon, The accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Farmstead At Dixon, The is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

93 of 96 beds occupied (97%) when the state visited on November 25, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Farmstead At Dixon, The?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 14 state visits and 14 dated documents since 2024 for Farmstead At Dixon, The; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated November 25, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff fraudulently placed residents in hospice care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On November 25, 2025,Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nakagawa arrived unannounced to complete the investigation regarding the above allegation and to deliver findings. LPA met with Alana Reyes to discuss findings. The complaint alleges that Staff fraudulently placed residents in hospice care. The complainant states that they believe this facility is committing abuse and fraud by forcing patients onto Hospice for a commission check. LPA interviewed 3 independent hospice agencies; 3 of 3 agencies all confirmed that a facility may not demand someone goes on hospice. Residents of a facility may be referred by the family, their primary care physician or the facility, but they must meet the requirements to go on hospice such as failure to thrive, weight loss, decline in health with an expected end of life within 6 months. (Continued on 9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 25, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250918142622
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is not following resident's special diet
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nakagawa arrived unannounced on 10/20/2025 to conclude an investigation and deliver findings regarding the allegation listed above and met with Mark Reyes, Administrator and Maribel Samayoa to discuss. The complaint alleges that Staff is not following resident's special diet. The complainant stated that the resident’s (R1) responsible party checked R1’s camera and saw that someone had brought R1 a plate of shrimp for dinner and told complainant. Complainant stated that R1 is allergic to shrimp and it is listed in more than one place on Farmstead’s records. (Continued on 9099-C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 20, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250902171844
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff violated residents personal rights Staff did not properly assist a resident during transfers
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 9/23/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jill Nakagawa arrived unannounced to continue an investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA conducted interviews, made observations and reviewed documents. LPA met with Administrator Mark Reyes to discuss the findings. The complaint alleges that Staff violated resident’s personal rights. The complainant stated that a staff member (S1) pulls a resident’s (R1) arm and tells R1 if they don’t do what S1 says they will get R1 kicked out. LPA interviewed complainant, who stated that there are staff that are not well-trained and should not be working there. LPA reviewed the training and personnel files of S1 and found that S1 is a long-term employe; S1 received all the required training as per regulation. (Continued on LIC9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 23, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250624103730

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff mismanaged residents’ medications. Staff did not maintain accurate medication records for residents. Staff did not report incidents involving residents as required. Staff did not appropriately evaluate residents’ service needs. Staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in a resident wandering away from the facility.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
The complaint alleges that staff mismanaged residents’ medications and staff did not maintain accurate medication records for residents. Through interviews LPA learned that staff had been informed by management to document inaccurate information on the MAR. LPA reviewed documents and conducted interviews with staff and found no irregularities in the MARs. A random check of medications found no discrepancies and all medications appeared to have been given as prescribed. LPA could find no evidence to corroborate the allegations therefore they allegations are unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated Continued on 9099-C...... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 27, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240528151013

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 14 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
4
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
14
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(707) 676-5060
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Farmstead At Dixon, The? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.