Magnolia Court is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Vacaville, Solano County, California — state license #486803822, licensed for 146 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 45 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 30, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

11 homes in view

Magnolia Court

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 146 residents · Vacaville, CA · Solano County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #486803822, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1111 Ulatis Dr · Vacaville, Solano County
Phone
(707) 447-7100
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 146 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 15 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 146 NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 57 times and filed 45 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated June 30, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 2, 2026
Occupancy at the October 24, 2025 visit
79 of 146 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 22 documents with transcribed findings, dated December 2, 2021 to October 24, 2025. 22 of the 22 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (7), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (13). 22 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 22 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 36 of 45 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20267 state visits · 8 documents
Jun 30, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 2, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 2, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 30, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 30, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 6, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20258 state visits · 9 documents
Dec 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are billing for services not rendered.

On 10/24/2025,Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)Nakagawa arrived unannounced to complete an investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Jennifer Roldan, Business Office Manager for Kristine Soriano, Administrator to discuss. The complaint alleges that staff are billing for services not rendered. The reporting party RP stated that Resident R1 received a billing increase for an increase in services in mid-July, 2025. The reporting party stated that R1 is not receiving the services being billed and paid for which includes: showers twice a week, incontinence care as required, and regular housekeeping to keep the room sanitary. (Continued on 9099-C) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250804125148
Oct 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure adequate supervision is provided to residents in care Staff do not ensure care needs of residents are being met Staff do not ensure medications are dispensed as prescribed Licensee allows unqualified staff to dispense medication

On 7/22/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nakagawa arrived unannounced to continue an investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Candice Moses and Memory Care Director Gina Lapid. The complaint alleges Staff do not ensure adequate supervision is provided to residents in care. LPA observed that during visits on 3/11/2025 (11AM - 4PM), 4/1/2025 (10AM - 4PM), 4/7/2025 (3:20-4:50 PM), 5/29/2025 (10:25AM - 4:55PM), 7/17/2025 (10AM - 2:45PM) and 7/22/2025 (12:55 - 2:00PM) there appeared to be adequate supervision during the time of visit, with a majority of residents out of their rooms socializing in the common rooms; typically 20-22 of 28 residents on the days observed with one caregiver circulating in the common areas and two caregivers and a med tech providing care and medications to residents in their rooms. Based on LPA's observations and staff schedules the allegation that Staff do not ensure adequate supervision is provided to resthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 22, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250407085527
Jul 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility has insufficient food service. Residents are not accorded dignity in their relationship with staff. Staff do not provide activities for all residents.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jill Nakagawa arrived unannounced to conduct an investigation regarding the above allegations on 3/11/2025 and 04/01/2025. LPA Nakagawa met with the Administrator Candice Moses and the Memory Care Coordinator Gina Lapid to discuss. Regarding the allegation Facility has insufficient food service: LPA toured the facility kitchen on 04/01/2025 and found an ample supply of fresh and frozen foods to supply the menu choices. The chef stated that all residents in Assisted Living and Memory Care communities are given the same multiple choices at each meal. A copy of the menus for 03/02/2025 through 04/05/2025 was provided to LPA. LPA was told by staff Memory Care Director Gina Lapid that meal service in Memory Care is brought over from the central kitchen pre-plated and served by care staff. Continued on 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 1, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250306150522
Jan 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Residents not provided proper nutritional needs Staff does not ensure residents grooming needs are met Lack of supervision resulting in falls

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jill Nakagawa arrived unannounced to continue an investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Nakagawa met with the Administrator Candice Moses and the Memory Care Coordinator Gina Lapid to discuss. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted unannounced inspections on 01/09/2025 and 01/30/2025, made observations, reviewed records, and interviewed staff and others. Due to no contact information, LPA was unable to obtain further information from the reporting party. It is alleged that Residents are not provided proper nutritional needs. LPA toured the facility kitchen on 01/09/2025 and found an ample supply of fresh and frozen foods to supply the menu choices which are provided to all residents: Assisted Living and Memory Care communities. Continued on 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250109092615
20248 state visits · 16 documents
Nov 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff not meeting residents care needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nakagawa arrived unannounced and conducted a complaint investigation regarding the allegation listed above. LPA met with Candice Moses, Administrator. The complaint alleges that staff are not meeting resident’s care needs. During the investigation LPA reviewed records, made observations and conducted interviews. LPA's record review found that resident R1 was hospitalized from 7/21/24 – 7/27/24. A review of records during this time did not reveal any concerns regarding R1’s care. On 8/13/2024 R1 was sent to ER and at that time there were concerns raised regarding hygiene care. Continued on 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 12, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240813153600
Nov 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Due to a lack of staff, residents are not assisted with feeding

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jill Nakagawa arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegation and met with Administrator Candice Moses. The complaint alleges that due to a lack of staff, residents are not assisted with feeding. LPA reviewed documents and conducted interviews which revealed that 2 of 28 residents in memory care, residents R1 and R2, require assistance with feeding. There are additional residents, R3 and R4 who require constant re-direction to eat and/or assistance in cutting their food and receiving proper utensils. Continued on 9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 12, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240826150840
Nov 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff inappropriately posted residents on personal social media

Licensing Program Analyst Jill Nakagawa arrived unannounced to conduct an investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Candice Moses . The allegation states that the Staff inappropriately posted residents on personal social media. Based on LPA interviews, review of records, and photos LPA obtained, the investigation has revealed that the Staff S1 violated residents’ personal rights by posting resident photos on Facebook without consent. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation that Staff inappropriately posted residents on personal social media is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), is being cited on the attached 9099-D). Continued on 9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 12, 2024 · control 21-AS-20241106125840
Sep 27, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not allowing resident to have visitor(s)

LPA Nakagawa arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation and met with the new Administrator, Candice Moses. Facility staff are not allowing resident to have visitor(s) – Complaint alleges that facility staff are not allowing resident to receive visitors. Per interviews, it was confirmed that the facility stopped visitation for individuals as directed by a resident’s responsible party. No documentation was provided to allow for this action. Based on interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Continued on 9099-D Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 27, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240523083545
Sep 27, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not follow protocols to prevent the spread of illness.

LPA Nakagawa arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation and met with Candice Moses, the newly appointed Administrator. Staff did not follow protocols to prevent the spread of illness – Complaint alleges that covid positive cases were not being reported and positive residents were walking around. Per interview, facility reported a Covid outbreak on 7/7//2024 to the local public health department and created a Special Incident Report for CCL on 7/8/2024. CCL received the report on 7/9/2024. Per the Special Incident Report, a third resident tested positive on 7/7/2024, which prompted the facility to report the Covid outbreak, per local public health requirements. Per interview, Covid positive residents isolated well, except one Memory Care resident who had to be redirected frequently. When the resident refused to isolate, facility staff asked them to mask and attempted to provide distance between resident and Covid negative residents who were not requthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 27, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240708160837
Sep 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate supervision to resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nakagawa arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation and met with Mike Carpenter, Interim Administrator. Staff did not provide adequate supervision to resident in care – Complaint alleges that a staff brought their family member to the facility allowing them to go into resident rooms without permission and “rummage” through the rooms. CCL staff conducted multiple interviews but were unable to corroborate that this event happened. Although the allegation that Staff did not provide adequate supervision to resident in care may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Nothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 6, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240610105634
Aug 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not provide adequate supervision resulting in residents leaving facility

On 7/9/2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA’s) Tobola and Mutialu arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and were greeted by Acting Administrator, Mike Chatman. LPA’s toured the facility, interviewed staff and outside parties, reviewed resident and facility records and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges staff does not provide adequate supervision resuliting in residents leaving facility. Based upon review of facility incdient reports it was found that on the evening of 5/22/2024, resident (R1) had been found out in the community unassisted. Based upon a review of R1's Physicain's Report it is indicated that R1 is diagnosed with dementia and resides in the memory care unit. In addition, review of the Preplacement Appraisal indicates that R1 required special observation/night supervision due to confusion, forgetfullness and wandering. Lastly, review indicated contracdicting information on R1's physicianthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 9, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240528094749
Jul 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged residents' medication

On 7/9/2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA’s) Tobola & Mutialu arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and were greeted by Acting Administrator, Mike Chatman. LPA’s toured the facility, reviewed resident medication supply and records, reviewed staff and resident records, interviewed staff and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges, staff mismanaged resident's medication additionally indicating staff (S1) taking narcotics from the facility. Based on LPA spot review of medication supply and medication records, medications, narcotics and records for 3 out of 3 residents in memory care and 3 out of 3 residents in assisted living were found to be in order. During LPA observations during medication record keeping, administering and medication security protocols, LPA found that medtech staff (S2 & S3) appropriately handled medications and records. During a tour of the facility, LPA also found all medication storthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 9, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240611092503
Jul 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff speak inappropriately to residents Facility staff restrain resident's in a rough manner Facility staff do not administer resident's medication as prescribed

On 7/9/2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA’s) Tobola & Mutialu arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and were greeted by Acting Administrator, Mike Chatman. LPA’s toured the facility, reviewed resident medication supply and records, reviewed staff and resident records, interviewed staff and residents and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges facility staff speak inappropriately to residents. Based upon interviews with multiple staff (S1-S8) there were inconsistent statements and a lack of corroborating information gathered to support the allegation. Complaint alleges facility staff restrain resident's in a rough manner. Based upon interviews with multiple staff (S1, S2, S3 & S4) there were inconsistent statements and a lack of corroborating information gathered to support the allegation. Continued onto LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 9, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240626090026
Jul 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff hit resident Staff screams at residents

On 7/9/2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA’s) Tobola & Mutialu arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and were greeted by Acting Administrator, Mike Chatman. LPA’s toured the facility, interviewed staff and outside parties and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges facility staff hit resident. Based upon interviews with multiple staff (S1, S2, S3 & S4) there were inconsistent statements and a lack of corroborating information gathered to support the allegation. Complaint alleges staff screams at residents. Based upon interviews with multiple staff (S1-S8) there were inconsistent statements and a lack of corroborating information gathered to support the allegation. Continued onto LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 9, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240617155026
Jul 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff block facility exit doors Staff does not ensure resident's hygiene needs are being met

On 7/9/2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA’s) Tobola and Mutialu arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and were greeted by Acting Administrator, Mike Chatman. LPA’s toured the facility, interviewed staff, reviewed resident and staff records and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges staff block facility exit doors. Based upon interview with multiple memory care staff, (S1, S2, S3 & S4) there is confirmation of incidents in which staff observed furnishing items being used to block the exits of residents in the memory care unit during evening shifts. Complaint alleges staff does not ensure resident's hygiene needs are being met. Based upon, facility tour, LPA Mutialu observed resident (R1) on their wheelchair in their bedroom with soiled clothing (photos taken). In addition, based upon interviews with staff (S3 & S4) it was stated that residents have been left in soiled clothing/continence products withouthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 9, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240610105634
Jun 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not properly trained Staff are not attending to resident care needs in a timely manner

On 6/20/2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA’s) Tobola & Mutialu arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and were greeted by Acting Administrator, Mike Chatman and Resident Service Director, Grace Montemayor. LPA’s toured the facility, reviewed resident medication supply and records, reviewed staff and resident records, interviewed staff and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges, staff are not properly trained. Upon review of resident records and information provided by staff, it was found that resident (R1) requires a two-person assist along with the use of a hoyer lift. The review of training records revealed that 12 total caregiver staff received hoyer lift training as of 6/13/2024. However, training was not implemented prior to staff providing postural support and hoyer lift services to resident R1. Continued onto LIC9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 20, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240516084802
Jun 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20232 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 5, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect/Lack of Supervision resulting in resident falls with injury(ies)

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jill Nakagawa arrived unannounced at Magnolia Court for the purpose of conducting a complaint investigation inspection and delivering complaint findings. LPA was greeted at the door by Administrator, Yolanda Harrell, and was granted access into the facility. During the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and outside parties, reviewed documents and made observations. Complaint alleges Neglect/Lack of Supervision resulting in resident falls with injury(ies). (Continued on 9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2023 · control 21-AS-20231204144402
Nov 16, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident leaving facility.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Farhaan Sarangi arrived unannounced at Magnolia Court for the purpose of conducting a subsequent complaint investigation inspection and delivering complaint findings. LPA was greeted at the door by Administrator, Yolanda Harrell, and was granted access into the facility. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff, residents and outside parties. LPA reviewed documents during the investigation. Complaint alleges that Staff does not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident leaving facility. Based on the interviews, LPA could not prove or disprove the allegation. LPA received inconsistent information regarding what actually transpired. LPA reviewed documents and found three Responsible Parties identified on the Emergency Contact form. During the incident in question, the resident left the facility with Responsible Party #3 who is allowed to take the resident on outings and outside of the facility. Facility was made aware that Rethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 16, 2023 · control 21-AS-20231003122141
Nov 16, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations11typical 1
Type B citations5typical 1
Substantiated complaints16typical 2
Total complaints26typical 7
State visits on file57typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026780202589120248166202356020225502021220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Solano County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (707) 447-7100

Is Magnolia Court licensed?

Yes — Magnolia Court is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Vacaville (Solano County): California license #486803822, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 146 residents. State records list 45 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 30, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Magnolia Court care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Magnolia Court with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 146 NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15.

How much does Magnolia Court cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Magnolia Court's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Solano County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Magnolia Court accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Magnolia Court is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

79 of 146 beds occupied (54%) when the state visited on October 24, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Magnolia Court?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 57 state visits and 45 dated documents since 2021 for Magnolia Court; 22 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 24, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

22 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are billing for services not rendered.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 10/24/2025,Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)Nakagawa arrived unannounced to complete an investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Jennifer Roldan, Business Office Manager for Kristine Soriano, Administrator to discuss. The complaint alleges that staff are billing for services not rendered. The reporting party RP stated that Resident R1 received a billing increase for an increase in services in mid-July, 2025. The reporting party stated that R1 is not receiving the services being billed and paid for which includes: showers twice a week, incontinence care as required, and regular housekeeping to keep the room sanitary. (Continued on 9099-C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 24, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250804125148
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure adequate supervision is provided to residents in care Staff do not ensure care needs of residents are being met Staff do not ensure medications are dispensed as prescribed Licensee allows unqualified staff to dispense medication
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 7/22/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nakagawa arrived unannounced to continue an investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Candice Moses and Memory Care Director Gina Lapid. The complaint alleges Staff do not ensure adequate supervision is provided to residents in care. LPA observed that during visits on 3/11/2025 (11AM - 4PM), 4/1/2025 (10AM - 4PM), 4/7/2025 (3:20-4:50 PM), 5/29/2025 (10:25AM - 4:55PM), 7/17/2025 (10AM - 2:45PM) and 7/22/2025 (12:55 - 2:00PM) there appeared to be adequate supervision during the time of visit, with a majority of residents out of their rooms socializing in the common rooms; typically 20-22 of 28 residents on the days observed with one caregiver circulating in the common areas and two caregivers and a med tech providing care and medications to residents in their rooms. Based on LPA's observations and staff schedules the allegation that Staff do not ensure adequate supervision is provided to resCDSS inspection report, July 22, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250407085527
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has insufficient food service. Residents are not accorded dignity in their relationship with staff. Staff do not provide activities for all residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jill Nakagawa arrived unannounced to conduct an investigation regarding the above allegations on 3/11/2025 and 04/01/2025. LPA Nakagawa met with the Administrator Candice Moses and the Memory Care Coordinator Gina Lapid to discuss. Regarding the allegation Facility has insufficient food service: LPA toured the facility kitchen on 04/01/2025 and found an ample supply of fresh and frozen foods to supply the menu choices. The chef stated that all residents in Assisted Living and Memory Care communities are given the same multiple choices at each meal. A copy of the menus for 03/02/2025 through 04/05/2025 was provided to LPA. LPA was told by staff Memory Care Director Gina Lapid that meal service in Memory Care is brought over from the central kitchen pre-plated and served by care staff. Continued on 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 1, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250306150522
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents not provided proper nutritional needs Staff does not ensure residents grooming needs are met Lack of supervision resulting in falls
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jill Nakagawa arrived unannounced to continue an investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Nakagawa met with the Administrator Candice Moses and the Memory Care Coordinator Gina Lapid to discuss. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted unannounced inspections on 01/09/2025 and 01/30/2025, made observations, reviewed records, and interviewed staff and others. Due to no contact information, LPA was unable to obtain further information from the reporting party. It is alleged that Residents are not provided proper nutritional needs. LPA toured the facility kitchen on 01/09/2025 and found an ample supply of fresh and frozen foods to supply the menu choices which are provided to all residents: Assisted Living and Memory Care communities. Continued on 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 30, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250109092615

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff not meeting residents care needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nakagawa arrived unannounced and conducted a complaint investigation regarding the allegation listed above. LPA met with Candice Moses, Administrator. The complaint alleges that staff are not meeting resident’s care needs. During the investigation LPA reviewed records, made observations and conducted interviews. LPA's record review found that resident R1 was hospitalized from 7/21/24 – 7/27/24. A review of records during this time did not reveal any concerns regarding R1’s care. On 8/13/2024 R1 was sent to ER and at that time there were concerns raised regarding hygiene care. Continued on 9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 12, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240813153600
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedDue to a lack of staff, residents are not assisted with feeding
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jill Nakagawa arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegation and met with Administrator Candice Moses. The complaint alleges that due to a lack of staff, residents are not assisted with feeding. LPA reviewed documents and conducted interviews which revealed that 2 of 28 residents in memory care, residents R1 and R2, require assistance with feeding. There are additional residents, R3 and R4 who require constant re-direction to eat and/or assistance in cutting their food and receiving proper utensils. Continued on 9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 12, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240826150840
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff inappropriately posted residents on personal social media
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst Jill Nakagawa arrived unannounced to conduct an investigation and deliver findings regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Candice Moses . The allegation states that the Staff inappropriately posted residents on personal social media. Based on LPA interviews, review of records, and photos LPA obtained, the investigation has revealed that the Staff S1 violated residents’ personal rights by posting resident photos on Facebook without consent. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation that Staff inappropriately posted residents on personal social media is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), is being cited on the attached 9099-D). Continued on 9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 12, 2024 · control 21-AS-20241106125840
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not allowing resident to have visitor(s)
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
LPA Nakagawa arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation and met with the new Administrator, Candice Moses. Facility staff are not allowing resident to have visitor(s) – Complaint alleges that facility staff are not allowing resident to receive visitors. Per interviews, it was confirmed that the facility stopped visitation for individuals as directed by a resident’s responsible party. No documentation was provided to allow for this action. Based on interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Continued on 9099-D SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 27, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240523083545
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not follow protocols to prevent the spread of illness.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
LPA Nakagawa arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation and met with Candice Moses, the newly appointed Administrator. Staff did not follow protocols to prevent the spread of illness – Complaint alleges that covid positive cases were not being reported and positive residents were walking around. Per interview, facility reported a Covid outbreak on 7/7//2024 to the local public health department and created a Special Incident Report for CCL on 7/8/2024. CCL received the report on 7/9/2024. Per the Special Incident Report, a third resident tested positive on 7/7/2024, which prompted the facility to report the Covid outbreak, per local public health requirements. Per interview, Covid positive residents isolated well, except one Memory Care resident who had to be redirected frequently. When the resident refused to isolate, facility staff asked them to mask and attempted to provide distance between resident and Covid negative residents who were not requCDSS inspection report, September 27, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240708160837
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide adequate supervision to resident in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nakagawa arrived unannounced to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation and met with Mike Carpenter, Interim Administrator. Staff did not provide adequate supervision to resident in care – Complaint alleges that a staff brought their family member to the facility allowing them to go into resident rooms without permission and “rummage” through the rooms. CCL staff conducted multiple interviews but were unable to corroborate that this event happened. Although the allegation that Staff did not provide adequate supervision to resident in care may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. NoCDSS inspection report, September 6, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240610105634
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not provide adequate supervision resulting in residents leaving facility
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 7/9/2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA’s) Tobola and Mutialu arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and were greeted by Acting Administrator, Mike Chatman. LPA’s toured the facility, interviewed staff and outside parties, reviewed resident and facility records and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges staff does not provide adequate supervision resuliting in residents leaving facility. Based upon review of facility incdient reports it was found that on the evening of 5/22/2024, resident (R1) had been found out in the community unassisted. Based upon a review of R1's Physicain's Report it is indicated that R1 is diagnosed with dementia and resides in the memory care unit. In addition, review of the Preplacement Appraisal indicates that R1 required special observation/night supervision due to confusion, forgetfullness and wandering. Lastly, review indicated contracdicting information on R1's physicianCDSS inspection report, July 9, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240528094749
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff mismanaged residents' medication
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 7/9/2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA’s) Tobola & Mutialu arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and were greeted by Acting Administrator, Mike Chatman. LPA’s toured the facility, reviewed resident medication supply and records, reviewed staff and resident records, interviewed staff and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges, staff mismanaged resident's medication additionally indicating staff (S1) taking narcotics from the facility. Based on LPA spot review of medication supply and medication records, medications, narcotics and records for 3 out of 3 residents in memory care and 3 out of 3 residents in assisted living were found to be in order. During LPA observations during medication record keeping, administering and medication security protocols, LPA found that medtech staff (S2 & S3) appropriately handled medications and records. During a tour of the facility, LPA also found all medication storCDSS inspection report, July 9, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240611092503
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff speak inappropriately to residents Facility staff restrain resident's in a rough manner Facility staff do not administer resident's medication as prescribed
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 7/9/2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA’s) Tobola & Mutialu arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and were greeted by Acting Administrator, Mike Chatman. LPA’s toured the facility, reviewed resident medication supply and records, reviewed staff and resident records, interviewed staff and residents and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges facility staff speak inappropriately to residents. Based upon interviews with multiple staff (S1-S8) there were inconsistent statements and a lack of corroborating information gathered to support the allegation. Complaint alleges facility staff restrain resident's in a rough manner. Based upon interviews with multiple staff (S1, S2, S3 & S4) there were inconsistent statements and a lack of corroborating information gathered to support the allegation. Continued onto LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 9, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240626090026
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff hit resident Staff screams at residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 7/9/2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA’s) Tobola & Mutialu arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and were greeted by Acting Administrator, Mike Chatman. LPA’s toured the facility, interviewed staff and outside parties and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges facility staff hit resident. Based upon interviews with multiple staff (S1, S2, S3 & S4) there were inconsistent statements and a lack of corroborating information gathered to support the allegation. Complaint alleges staff screams at residents. Based upon interviews with multiple staff (S1-S8) there were inconsistent statements and a lack of corroborating information gathered to support the allegation. Continued onto LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 9, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240617155026
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff block facility exit doors Staff does not ensure resident's hygiene needs are being met
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 7/9/2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA’s) Tobola and Mutialu arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and were greeted by Acting Administrator, Mike Chatman. LPA’s toured the facility, interviewed staff, reviewed resident and staff records and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges staff block facility exit doors. Based upon interview with multiple memory care staff, (S1, S2, S3 & S4) there is confirmation of incidents in which staff observed furnishing items being used to block the exits of residents in the memory care unit during evening shifts. Complaint alleges staff does not ensure resident's hygiene needs are being met. Based upon, facility tour, LPA Mutialu observed resident (R1) on their wheelchair in their bedroom with soiled clothing (photos taken). In addition, based upon interviews with staff (S3 & S4) it was stated that residents have been left in soiled clothing/continence products withouCDSS inspection report, July 9, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240610105634
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not properly trained Staff are not attending to resident care needs in a timely manner
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 6/20/2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA’s) Tobola & Mutialu arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and were greeted by Acting Administrator, Mike Chatman and Resident Service Director, Grace Montemayor. LPA’s toured the facility, reviewed resident medication supply and records, reviewed staff and resident records, interviewed staff and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges, staff are not properly trained. Upon review of resident records and information provided by staff, it was found that resident (R1) requires a two-person assist along with the use of a hoyer lift. The review of training records revealed that 12 total caregiver staff received hoyer lift training as of 6/13/2024. However, training was not implemented prior to staff providing postural support and hoyer lift services to resident R1. Continued onto LIC9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 20, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240516084802

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect/Lack of Supervision resulting in resident falls with injury(ies)
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jill Nakagawa arrived unannounced at Magnolia Court for the purpose of conducting a complaint investigation inspection and delivering complaint findings. LPA was greeted at the door by Administrator, Yolanda Harrell, and was granted access into the facility. During the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and outside parties, reviewed documents and made observations. Complaint alleges Neglect/Lack of Supervision resulting in resident falls with injury(ies). (Continued on 9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 5, 2023 · control 21-AS-20231204144402
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident leaving facility.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Farhaan Sarangi arrived unannounced at Magnolia Court for the purpose of conducting a subsequent complaint investigation inspection and delivering complaint findings. LPA was greeted at the door by Administrator, Yolanda Harrell, and was granted access into the facility. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed staff, residents and outside parties. LPA reviewed documents during the investigation. Complaint alleges that Staff does not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident leaving facility. Based on the interviews, LPA could not prove or disprove the allegation. LPA received inconsistent information regarding what actually transpired. LPA reviewed documents and found three Responsible Parties identified on the Emergency Contact form. During the incident in question, the resident left the facility with Responsible Party #3 who is allowed to take the resident on outings and outside of the facility. Facility was made aware that ReCDSS inspection report, November 16, 2023 · control 21-AS-20231003122141
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to meet resident's care needs
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Karina Canela arrived unannounced to open a complaint at Magnolia Court on 06/05/2023. LPA met with Yolanda Harrell, Executive Director. LPA reviewed facility documents and obtained copies. Interviews were conducted and observations were made. Review of Resident (R1)'s records revealed R1 was admitted on 03/23/2023 to Magnolia Court, R1 was then admitted to Kaiser Permanente Emergency Department on 03/24/2023 and discharged back to Magnolia Court on 05/26/2023. Interviews conducted indicated concerns with the care plan not being followed and neglect of R1 was a complaint made against Kaiser Permanente Hospital, not Magnolia Court. Based on records reviewed and statements received, evidence obtained did not corroborate the allegation against Magnolia Court. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging "Facility failed to meet resident's care needs". We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not havCDSS inspection report, June 5, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230531105101

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 57 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
11
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
5
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
16
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
26
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
57
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(707) 447-7100
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Magnolia Court? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.