Atria Sunnyvale is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sunnyvale, Santa Clara County, California — state license #435200731, licensed for 160 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 13 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 16, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

16 homes in view

Atria Sunnyvale

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 160 residents · Sunnyvale, CA · Santa Clara County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #435200731, held since 1999 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
175 E Remington Dr · Sunnyvale, Santa Clara County
Phone
(408) 738-3410
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 160 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 15 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 20 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND ABOVE. A FIRE CLEARANCE FOR 160 NONAMBULATORY, 20 BEDRIDDEN, AND DELAYED EGRESS ON DEMENTIA UNIT HAS BEEN GRANTED. THE LICENSE IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FIFTEEN (15).State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 13 times and filed 13 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 16, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 16, 2026
Occupancy at the April 21, 2026 visit
110 of 160 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 12, 2021 to April 21, 2026. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 9 of 13 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Staff billed resident for services not rendered

On 04/21/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit in order to deliver findings regarding allegation received. LPA met with Chad Jones and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the course of the investigation, documentation was reviewed and interviews are conducted. Per interviews, the responsible party was billed for services that were not rendered in error as the resident was not at the facility from January 15, 2026 through February 10, 2026. The resident was admitted to the hospital on January 15, 2026 and never returned to the facility. The responsible party provided the facility with a 30 day notice to the facility on January 10, 2026. The responsible party received a notice of still owing the facility $2157 for extra services that were not part of the basic care plan, but the resident was not present to receive those services. It was discovered that there was a clerical error due to the previous administratorthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 21, 2026 · control 26-AS-20260326120029
Jan 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Staff are not returning authorized representative's calls -Staff did not seek timely medical care for resident

On December 10, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings of the complaint investigation. LPA met with Executive Director, Flavio Silva and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding to the allegation of- staff are not returning authorized representative's call, the reporting party stated that the responsible party called the facility to ask questions and the facility was not returning calls. Based on interviews, facility staff stated that they have contacted and left messages for the reporting party after an incident that happened to resident #1 (R1). Based on documentation provided by the facility, it indicated that the facility called, texted and emailed R1's responsible party. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated. (continue 9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 10, 2024 · control 26-AS-20230911114451
Jun 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff caused an injury to a resident while in care due to abuse

On 2/29/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Resident Services Director Cathy Platon.. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation of staff caused an injury to a resident while in care due to abuse, the Reporting Party (RP) stated that the suspected abuser (SA) moved the resident (R1) from the wheelchair to the bed. In doing so, the SA grabbed the resident with enough pressure that it left a bruise on the client. During the course of the investigation, LPA Ng was able to interview R1 and mentioned that they don’t remember who the caregiver was who helped with the transfer. R1 also felt that was not doing it on purpose. R1 still felt safe in the facility. A staff member (S1) who was on duty at this time, mentioned that they did not believe there was an abuse by staff. Three other staff members who were interviewed has denied seeing any resident being abused in the fthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 29, 2024 · control 26-AS-20210817170716
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints0typical 2
Total complaints5typical 7
State visits on file13typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 1999.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202633020253302024330202311020221202021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — Santa Clara County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (408) 738-3410

Is Atria Sunnyvale licensed?

Yes — Atria Sunnyvale is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sunnyvale (Santa Clara County): California license #435200731, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 160 residents. State records list 13 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 16, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Atria Sunnyvale care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Atria Sunnyvale with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND ABOVE. A FIRE CLEARANCE FOR 160 NONAMBULATORY, 20 BEDRIDDEN, AND DELAYED EGRESS ON DEMENTIA UNIT HAS BEEN GRANTED. THE LICENSE IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FIFTEEN (15).

How much does Atria Sunnyvale cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Atria Sunnyvale's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Santa Clara County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Atria Sunnyvale accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Atria Sunnyvale is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

110 of 160 beds occupied (69%) when the state visited on April 21, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Atria Sunnyvale?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 13 state visits and 13 dated documents since 2021 for Atria Sunnyvale; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 21, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

5 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Staff billed resident for services not rendered
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 04/21/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit in order to deliver findings regarding allegation received. LPA met with Chad Jones and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the course of the investigation, documentation was reviewed and interviews are conducted. Per interviews, the responsible party was billed for services that were not rendered in error as the resident was not at the facility from January 15, 2026 through February 10, 2026. The resident was admitted to the hospital on January 15, 2026 and never returned to the facility. The responsible party provided the facility with a 30 day notice to the facility on January 10, 2026. The responsible party received a notice of still owing the facility $2157 for extra services that were not part of the basic care plan, but the resident was not present to receive those services. It was discovered that there was a clerical error due to the previous administratorCDSS inspection report, April 21, 2026 · control 26-AS-20260326120029

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Staff are not returning authorized representative's calls -Staff did not seek timely medical care for resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On December 10, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings of the complaint investigation. LPA met with Executive Director, Flavio Silva and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding to the allegation of- staff are not returning authorized representative's call, the reporting party stated that the responsible party called the facility to ask questions and the facility was not returning calls. Based on interviews, facility staff stated that they have contacted and left messages for the reporting party after an incident that happened to resident #1 (R1). Based on documentation provided by the facility, it indicated that the facility called, texted and emailed R1's responsible party. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated. (continue 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 10, 2024 · control 26-AS-20230911114451
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff caused an injury to a resident while in care due to abuse
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 2/29/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Resident Services Director Cathy Platon.. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation of staff caused an injury to a resident while in care due to abuse, the Reporting Party (RP) stated that the suspected abuser (SA) moved the resident (R1) from the wheelchair to the bed. In doing so, the SA grabbed the resident with enough pressure that it left a bruise on the client. During the course of the investigation, LPA Ng was able to interview R1 and mentioned that they don’t remember who the caregiver was who helped with the transfer. R1 also felt that was not doing it on purpose. R1 still felt safe in the facility. A staff member (S1) who was on duty at this time, mentioned that they did not believe there was an abuse by staff. Three other staff members who were interviewed has denied seeing any resident being abused in the fCDSS inspection report, February 29, 2024 · control 26-AS-20210817170716

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResident is being financially abused
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Marrufo conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit and met with Kris Waluszko, Regional Vice President.. During visit, LPA Marrufo interviewed residents R1-R6, Staff S1-S9, and R1's Family Member, FM1. During interviews, Residents R2-R6 stated to have not had any recent incidents of bank fraud, to have not had their personal banking information stolen, nor to have suspected any staff of stealing any of their personal belongings from their living units. Staff S1-S9 stated to have not observed any staff or residents report any incidents of bank fraud, theft of personal banking information, or theft of personal belongings from their living units. See LIC9099-C for more information. Page 1 of 2. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, April 4, 2023 · control 26-AS-20230327165532

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 13 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
5
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
13
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(408) 738-3410
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Atria Sunnyvale? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.