Small home · Licensed for 6 · San Jose
Villa Antonio
1494 Koch Lane, San Jose, CA 95125Licensed since 1994
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 5 residents
- Hospiceup to 3 residents
- Bedriddenup to 1 resident
Not on file: dementia approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
LICENSED TO SERVE RESIDENTS AGE 60 AND ABOVE. A BEDRIDDEN FIRE CLEARANCE FOR ONE HAS BEEN GRANTED. FIVE RESIDENTS MAY BE NONAMBULATORY. THE LICENSE IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE HOSPICE WAIVERFOR THREE (3).
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Villa Antonio: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$5,000a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,000likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$5,000this home
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.
Shared room insteadAsknot on file
This home’s listed starting rate is for assisted living private room. A shared room, if one is offered, may cost less — ask.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $5,000–$5,600
- $5,000
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,000–$9,150
- $7,500
Lines marked “Ask” are not in the totals.
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes22 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,000 to $6,400
22 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,100–$5,000.
- A Home at ShawSan Jose · 0.6 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Bonhomie IV - WillowmontSan Jose · 0.9 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Bonhomie III - Lena DriveSan Jose · 0.9 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Juliette's Gardens (Rose)San Jose · 1.2 mi · Small home$4,100Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Laurel Crest ManorSan Jose · 1.3 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Princess Care Home #4San Jose · 1.3 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Villa VerdeSan Jose · 1.4 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Lincoln & Pine, Willow GlenSan Jose · 1.4 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Cherish Senior Care HomeSan Jose · 1.5 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Dry Creek Guest HomeSan Jose · 1.5 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Esther's Residential Care HomeCampbell · 1.8 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Ambrosia Senior CareSan Jose · 2.0 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Mina's Elderly Care Home 3Campbell · 2.1 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Jessie Court Care HomeSan Jose · 2.2 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Camden Senior LivingSan Jose · 2.4 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Friendship HouseSan Jose · 2.4 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Silicon Valley Senior Care HomeSan Jose · 2.6 mi · Small home$3,600Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Juliet Stephen Rest HomeSan Jose · 2.6 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Shamrock Residential Care HomeCampbell · 2.7 mi · Small home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Palm Villas, CampbellCampbell · 2.8 mi · Mid-size home$6,400Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- College ManorSan Jose · 2.9 mi · Small home$3,700Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Sakura Gardens VillaCampbell · 2.9 mi · Mid-size home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.
Rooms & the spaces they will use (1)Room types
Room typesPrivate Rooms
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Pets, routines & independence (1)Residents may bring a pet
Residents may bring a pet
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Where it is
1494 Koch Lane, San Jose, CA 95125Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Children's Healthcare Organization of Northern California - Pediatric HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list3.1 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #435200085 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 8 of 12 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated”.
20263 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit, and met with Administrator Joseph Anthony Oliva. During the visit, LPA observed 5 residents and 2 staff. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility inside out with ADM which included the Living room, kitchen, dining room, 3 restrooms and 6 residents bedrooms. There was no obstruction to block the walkways. The staff area of the facility was also inspected. The front yard and backyard were inspected. Two-day perishable food supplies and seven day nonperishable food supplies were observed. LPA observed the medication storage area, knives storage area, and cleaning product storage area as locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Room temperature was at 72 degrees F, and hot water temperature was measured at 116 degrees F in resident bathrooms. Fire extinguisher was serviced in May 18, 2026. The facility was equipped with smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. Smoke detectors was tested by ADM, and were functional. LPA observed facility first aid kit and facility fire/earthquake drill log. The facility's last drill was on July 7, 2026. LPA reviewed facility disaster plan, which was last reviewed/updated on September 3, 2026. LPA reviewed facility records for 3 staff and 3 residents. LPA reviewed 3 resident medications and centrally stored medication records. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. This report was reviewed with Administrator Joseph Anthony Oliva and a copy of the signed report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2026
May 11, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced case management- other regarding the facility’s bedridden increase request. LPA met with Administrator Joseph Anthony Oliva and explained the purpose of the meeting. On December 29, 2025, the Department received a hospice increase request from 3 to 4 hospice residents. On January 5, 2026, ADM requested an increase to his bedridden capacity . On January 18, 2026 ADM stated he was no longer interested in adding additional bedridden. ADM stated the fire Marshall informed him, there would need to be a sprinkler system needed and fire doors. ADM stated its beyond his budget to make those changes. During todays visit, LPA discussed with ADM the number of bedridden residents and residents under hospice. ADM stated he currently has 2 residents under hospice, who are able to reposition. ADM stated going froward he will ensure when he accepts residents into the facility, to keep in mind his 1 bedridden fire clearance. LPA requested a copy of the resident roster. ADM agreed and understood that he must be complaint with his fire clearance and must only retain 1 bedridden resident at a time. No deficiency was cited during todays visit. This report was reviewed with Administrator Joseph Anthony Oliva. A copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 11, 2026
Feb 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced case management- other regarding the facility’s bedridden increase request. LPA met with Administrator Joseph Anthony Oliva and explained the purpose of the meeting. During todays visit, LPA discussed with ADM the number of bedridden residents and residents under hospice. LPA also discussed with ADM the results of the fire clearance request. ADM stated he is no longer interested in adding additional bedridden. ADM stated the fire Marshall informed him, there would need to be a sprinkler system needed and fire doors. ADM stated its beyond his budget to make those changes. ADM stated he currently has two residents under hospice, who are able to reposition. ADM stated going froward he will ensure when he accepts residents into the facility, to keep in mind his 1 bedridden fire clearance. LPA requested a copy of the resident roster. No deficiency was cited during todays visit. This report was reviewed with Administrator Joseph Anthony Oliva. A copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 18, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Sep 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit, and met with Administrator (ADM) Joseph Anthony Oliva. During the visit, LPA observed 6 residents and 2 staff. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility inside out with ADM which included the Living room, kitchen, dining room, 3 restrooms and 6 residents bedrooms. The staff area of the facility was also inspected. The front yard and backyard were inspected. There was no obstruction to block the walkways. During the tour of the backyard, LPA noted some clutter alongside the backyard of the facility. LPA also noted some clutter in the inside of the facility as well. LPA advised ADM to de-clutter both the inside and outside of the facility. Two-day perishable food supplies and seven day nonperishable food supplies were observed. LPA observed the medication storage area, knives storage area, and cleaning product storage area as locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Room temperature was at 75 degrees F, and hot water temperature was measured at 114 degrees F in resident bathrooms. Fire extinguisher was serviced in May 9, 2025. The facility was equipped with smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. Smoke detectors was tested by ADM, and were functional. LPA observed facility first aid kit and facility fire/earthquake drill log. The facility's last drill was on July 9, 2025. The facility's emergency and disaster plan was last reviewed on October 22, 2024. Page 1 Out of 2. LPA reviewed facility records for 3 staff and 3 residents. LPA reviewed 3 resident medications and centrally stored medication records. LPA reviewed resident records. Based on a review, R1-R3's Needs and services plans are not updated and are over 12 months old. ADM stated he has not updated R1-R3's Needs and services plans. A deficiency is cited during today's visit. A technical violation was cited. This report was reviewed with Administrator Joseph Anthony Oliva and a copy of the signed report was provided. Page 2 Out of 2.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Manuel Monter and Marcela Yanez conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit, and met with Administrator (ADM) Joseph Oliva. During the visit, LPA observed 3 residents and 3 staff. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility inside out with ADM which included the Living room, kitchen, dining room, 3 restrooms and 6 residents bedrooms. The staff area of the facility was also inspected. The front yard and backyard were inspected. There was no obstruction to block the walkways. Two-day perishable food supplies and seven day nonperishable food supplies were observed. LPA observed the medication storage area, knives storage area, and cleaning product storage area as locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Room temperature was at 72 degrees F, and hot water temperature was measured at 108 degrees F in both resident bathrooms. Fire extinguisher was serviced in 04/29/24. The facility was equipped with smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. Smoke detectors was tested by ADM, and were functional. LPA observed facility first aid kit and facility fire/earthquake drill log. The facility's last drill was on 08/06/2024. LPA conducted interviews with 1 staff and 1 residents. LPA reviewed facility records for 3 staff and 3 residents. LPA reviewed 3 resident medications and centrally stored medication records. While reviewing resident R2's medications, LPA's observed medication #1's bottle did not contain the prescription label. R2's medication bottle 1 did not have the prescribing physician, dosage, or name of resident. ADM stated the box was discarded. a Deficiency are being cited during today's visit. This report was reviewed with Administrator Joseph Anthony Oliva and a copy of the signed report was provided. Appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 15, 2024
Jan 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On January 4, 2024, Licensing Program analysts (LPA's) Manuel Monter, and Steve Chang conducted an unannounced case management visit to check if the facility is complying with their plan of action, after being cited on December 19, 2023. LPA's observed 4 residents in the facility with 2 staff members. During today's visit, LPA's toured the facility inside and out with ADM. LPA's did not observe S1 working at the facility, the staff member who was excluded on December 19, 2023. LPA's observed the locked storage units the backyard. ADM opened the locked storage units and the storage units are being used as storage units. ADM stated the excluded staff member no longer works at the facility since December 19, 2023 and has not entered the facility since then. ADM stated the facility's plan of action regarding the covid is to test the residents again in 5 days because only 1 resident tested positive. If a resident tests positive, then we quarantine them. ADM stated he already sent an incident report regarding the covid positive case. ADM stated there is no change in visitors policy, but he encourages them to wear masks. ADM stated he also informed the family's of the coivd positive case in the facility. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. This report was reviewed with ADM Joseph Anthony Oliva and a copy of the signed report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 4, 2024
20231 state visit · 2 documents
Dec 19, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff verbally abusive to a resident. Staff did not report physical and verbal abuse to licensing.
On December 19, 2023, Licensing Program analysts (LPA's) Manuel Monter, Mita Partoza and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Romeo Manzano conducted an unannounced complaint investigation. LPA's and LPM with Administrator (ADM) Joseph Anthony Oliva, and explained the purpose of the visit. On December 18, 2023, the department received a complaint alleging facility staff verbally abused a resident. Staff verbally abusive to a resident. On December 19, 2023, LPA's and LPM interviewed 3 out of 3 staff. 2 Out of 3 staff interviewed stated that staff S1 verbally abused R1 sometime in October 2023. 2 out of 3 staff alleged S1 would also verbally abuse resident R2 who no longer lives at the facility, by screaming at him/her. Page 1 out of 2. Substantiated LPA's interviewed 6 out of 6 residents. 4 Out of 6 residents denied the allegation. 2 residents were not able to respond to interview due to neurocognitve disorder. Based on the interviews conducted with residents and staff & records review, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the above allegations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies cited, Exit interview conducted with Administrator, Joseph Anthony Oliva and a copy of the report was provided. Staff did not report physical and verbal abuse to licensing. On December 19, 2023, LPA's and LPM interviewed 3 out of 3 staff. 2 Out of 3 staff interviewed stated that staff S1 verbally abused R1 sometime in October 2023. Staff S2 and S3 stated they did not report because they were afraid to report it. Based on staff facility file, 3 out of 3 staff did not have training on mandated reporting. Based on a review of the evidenced provided, S1 was verbal berating R1 (“why do you have to know everything”, “you’re so crazy”, “you’re making me mad now”, and “see, it’s broken now [as if the breaking was R1’s fault]”). S1 clapping his/her hands loudly in the face of R1; slamming the cord forcefully into the lamp and breaking the cord connection and slamming of the cord was jolting. Based on interviews and evidenced reviewed the preponderance of evidence standard has been met therefore the above allegations is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies were cited from California Code of Regulations, Title 22 during today’s visit, see LIC 9099-D. This report was reviewed with Administrator Joseph Anthony Oliva and a copy of the report was provided. Appeal Rights was provided. Page 2 out of 2.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2023 · control 26-AS-20231218120700
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 20, 2023
87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilites (a)(1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This requirement was not met as evidenced by; Based on evidence reviewed and interviews with conducted, 2 Out of 3 staff admitted that S1 verbally abused resident R1. The facility staff did not acccord dignity to residents in care. This poses an immideate threat to health, saftey and personal rights risk to person in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2023
Plan of correction: ADM stated he will send a plan of action on how the facility will ensure staff accord residents with dignity. ADM will send the plan of action by POC date, 12/20/2023.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 20, 2023
87211 Reporting Requirements (a)(1)(D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident, such as psychological abuse of a resident by staff or other residents, or unexplained absence of any resident. This requirement was not met as evidenced by Based on evidence reviewed & interviews with conducted, 2 Out of 3 staff admitted that S1 verbally abused resident R1. 2 Out of 3 staff acknowledge the verbal abuse occured a month ago & they did not report it. This poses an immideate threat to health, saftey & personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2023
Plan of correction: ADM stated he will send a plan of action on how facility staff will meet reporting requirments. ADM will send plan of action to LPA by POC date, 12/20/2023.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1569.50(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 20, 2023
1569.50 Denial, suspension or revocation of license; ...exclusion from licensee without right to petition for reinstatement (a)(3) Conduct that is inimical to the health, morals, welfare, or safety ... from the facility or the people of the State of California. This requirement was not met as evidenced by; Based on interviews conducted, and evidenced reviewed, the facility staff verbally abused a resident in care. 2 Out of 3 staff admitted a staff member verbally abused a resident. This poses an immediate threat to residents health, safety and personal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2023
Plan of correction: ADM stated that S1 will be terminated and removed effective today. ADM stated S1 will move from the facility and will be relocated at Licensee's home.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.625(b)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 26, 2023
1569.625 Staff training; legislative findings; contents (b)(1)The department shall adopt regulations to require staff members of residential care facilities for the elderly ...This training shall consist of 40 hours of training.... This requirement was not met as evidenced by; Based on staff training records review & interviews, Staff did not receive training on mandated reporting/elder abuse & filling out SOC341. ADM also acknowledged he/she did not provide training on mandated reporting of elder abuse. This poses an immediate threat to residents health, safety & personal rightsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2023
Plan of correction: ADM stated he/she will provide training for staff. ADM stated he will send documentation to LPA by POC date, 12/26/2023.
Dec 19, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency pages: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On December 19, 2023, Licensing Program analysts (LPA's) Manuel Monter, Mita Partoza and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Romeo Manzano conducted a case management visit/inspection during a complaint investigation. LPA's observed 6 residents in the facility with 3 staff members. As a result of the complaint investigation, the Department issued an immediate exclusion letter to exclude a staff (S1) who is currently works and resides at the facility. The letter was given to and reviewed to S1 and Administrator/Licensee. This report is reviewed and discussed, and a copy is provided. During a complaint investigation interview with the staff, LPA's and LPM observed staff S2 and his/her spouse exit from the backyard storage area. S2 and his/her spouse was observed folding blankets and storing them at adjacent storage unit. S2 stated he/she was staying in the storage area with his/her spouse while waiting for S2 to leave work and stays until 2PM when his/her child goes out of school daily (Monday to Friday) since the school year began, sometime in August 2023. Staff S1 and S3 confirmed that S2's spouse comes to the facility, and waits for S2 to finish his/her night shift. S1 and S3 confirmed S2's spouse other also enters the facility to use the restroom as well. LPA's reviewed Guardian, and S2's spouse is not fingerprinted. S2's spouse went to obtain his/her livescan, and was informed to refrain from being present in the facility. On October 24, 2023, the facility was cited under code 87202(a) by having staff members use the storage area in the backyard as a rest area/living quarter. LPA also inspected the storage area, which contained electric wires. Based on interviews and LPA's observations, facility staff continue to use the backyard storage space as a rest area. A civil penalty is being assessed for the amount of $1,000 for a repeat violation within the same year. Page 1 out of 2. Deficiencies were cited from California Code of Regulations, Title 22 during today’s visit, see LIC 9099-D. A civil penalty is being assessed for the amount of $100 ($100 per day x 5 day = $500) for S1's spouse staying at the facility without fingerprints. During todays visit, LPA's and LPM explained the exclusion letter to S1. LPA's and LPM observed S1 leave the facility effective immediately. This report was reviewed with Administrator Joseph Anthony Oliva and a copy of the report was provided. Appeal Rights was provided. Page 2 out of 2.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87202(a) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 20, 2023
87202(a) All facilities shall maintain a fire clearance approved by the city, county, or city and county fire department or district providing fire protection services, or the State Fire Marshal. ... This requirement was not met as evidenced by Based on observation & interview, the ADM did not comply with the section cited above. LPA observed S2 leaving the storage unit with his/her spouse. S2 admitted that he/she was resting in the storage area. This poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2023
Plan of correction: ADM stated he will send plan of action on how he/she will ensure the facility is adhering to their fire clearence and ensure the facility storage units are not being used as a sleeping/rest area. This is a repeat citation, issued on 10/24/2023.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87355(e)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 20, 2023
(e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (1) Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption ... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, record review and observation the ADM did not ensure S2's spouse received a fingerprint clearance from the Department pior to S2 residing at the facility, which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2023
Plan of correction: ADM will review section 87355 and submit a statement of understanding to LPA by POC due date, December 12, 2023.
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 4 documents
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 24, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit, and met with Administrator (ADM) Joseph Anthony Oliva. During visit, LPA observed 5 residents and 2 staff on duty(not including ADM). LPA toured the facility inside out with ADM which included; the Living room, kitchen, dinning room, 2 restrooms and 6 residents bedrooms. The staff area of the facility was also inspected. Front yard and backyard were inspected. There was no obstruction to block the walkways. Two day perishable food supplies and seven day nonperishable food supplies were observed. LPA observed the medication closet, knives storage area, and cleaning product storage area as locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Room temperature was at 77 degrees F, and hot water temperature was measured to range between 112-115 degrees F in both resident bathrooms. While touring the backyard, LPA observed a tool bag (with included scissors) and a block of knives near the storage units, across bedroom # 4's outside exit (Photographs were taken). LPA asked ADM if the residents have access to the back yard. ADM stated the residents can come to the backyard. LPA also observed can of paint and can of WD-40 accessible to residents in care. (Photographs were taken.) While touring the backyard, LPA observed a two storage units. LPA asked ADM to open the one door storage unit and LPA observed it being used as storage. LPA requested ADM open the other storage unit with two doors. ADM opened the door and there was a mattress on the ground with blankets. ADM stated the storage unit is used as a "rest area" but don't sleep there. ADM stated the storage unit is a "rest area" and no one lives there. Page 1 out of 2. LPA interviewed Staff S1 and S2. LPA consulted with LPM Manzano if LPM can assist with staff interview in Filipino language (Tagalog). LPM conducted interviews with Staff S1 and S2 on the phone. S1 stated as of August 2023, he/she and his/her child stay in the storage room while waiting for his/her spouse from work who get off from work between 12am to 1am. S1 admitted he/she is resting/sleeping in storage room with his/her 6-year-old child until his/her spouse picks them up. S1 works from 7am to 3pm and often gets off late from work wherein he/she does not have a childcare, so he/she was allowed to occupy storage room. Staff (S2) was interviewed who stated that the storage room was built for their previous male staff in the facility. S2 stated that male staff gets off work early mornings wherein they opted to sleep in the living room instead of going home at dawn wherein licensee/administrator has decided to convert the storage room as a designated staff resting area until present. S2 confirmed that S1 utilizes the storage room along with his/her 6-year-old child while waiting for his/her spouse gets off from work at 12am. LPM informed S1 and S2 agreed and understood that no staff or any individual is allowed to sleep in the following areas without building permit and fire clearance such as but not limited storage room, living room, and garage. Fire extinguisher was serviced in May 03, 2023. The facility was equipped with smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. Smoke detectors was tested by ADM, and were functional. LPA observed facility first aid kit and facility fire/earthquake drill log. The facility's last drill was on December 2021. ADM stated "we haven't done one in the past year." LPA reviewed facility records for 3 staff and 3 residents. LPA reviewed 3 resident medications and centrally stored medication records. LPA conducted interviews with 3 staff (S1 to S3) and 3 residents (R1-R3). LPA and ADM discussed the storage unit. ADM agreed and understood that no staff or any individual is allowed to sleep in the following areas without building permit and fire clearance such as but not limited storage room, living room, and garage. Deficiencies are being cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. See LIC809-D. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator Joseph Anthony Oliva. Appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2023
20222 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 27, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit, and met with Administrator (ADM) Joseph Anthony Oliva. Upon arrival, ADM took LPA body temperature, and checked LPA in the visitor log book. LPA toured the facility inside and out with ADM. Screening station with masks, hand sanitizer, thermometer and visitor log book was observed. Kitchen, office, dinning room, living room and three restrooms were inspected. One trash can was observed without cover. ADM stated the facility will replace with thrash can with cover in 3 days. Some paper towels were observed without holders. ADM stated the facility will put all the paper towels with holders in 3 days. Posters of washing hands were observed, but there were no posters of washing hands for 20 seconds by the sinks in restrooms and kitchen. ADM stated the facility will put the posters of washing hands for 20 seconds in the kitchen and restrooms in 3 days. 6 resident bedrooms, and laundry room were inspected. One staff live-in room was observed in facility. Two day perishable food supplies and seven day nonperishable food supplies were observed sufficient. Medication closet, knives closet, and cleaning product closet were observed locked. Room temperature was at 76 degree F, and hot water temperature was at 107 degree F in facility. 5 residents and 3 staff were observed in facility. Fire extinguisher was serviced on 5/20/2022. The facility was equipped with fire alarm system, smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. Smoke detectors was tested by ADM, and were working fine. Front yard and backyard were inspected. There was no obstruction to block the walkways. ADM stated all the residents and staff are fully vaccinated and done with boosters. ADM stated the facility already submitted the Infection Control Plan to CCL office. No citation were noted today. Exit interview was conducted with ADM. This report was provided to ADMthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 27, 2022
Aug 24, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - COVID-19Report on file
Type of visit: Case Management - COVID-19
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christine Dolores conducted a scheduled technical assistance visit and met with Administrator, Tony Oliva and Dominica Oliva. LPA conducted a Facetime tour of the facility with Program Clinical Consultant (PCC), Roxane Fangon and Licensing Program Manager (LPM), Sarah Yip. The purpose of the visit was to provide technical assistance to prevent and mitigate the spread of COVID-19 at the facility. During today's tele-visit, the following recommendations were made to the facility: 1. Monitor the staff symptoms prior to starting their shift and throughout the day 2. Provide staff an in-service training to infection control to include donning and doffing PPE 3. Clean and disinfect the facility at least 3 times a day and as often as needed 4. Staff should don and doff PPE supplies when entering and exiting an isolation room 5. Provide a PPE cart and trash bin with lid next to the isolation room 6. The COVID positive resident's laundry should be done last and in the hottest setting. Have staff wear their PPE supplies when completing the COVID positive laundry. Clean and disinfect laundry area once done. 7. Complete the 10 day isolation period and monitor for symptoms on the 10th day 8. Thoroughly clean, disinfect, and aerate the facility after the isolation period No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed via telephone with Administrator, Tony Oliva and a copy of the report was emailed for signature.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 24, 2022
20211 state visit · 1 document
Oct 7, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst, Steve Nguyen, conducted an unannounced annual inspection with Administrator (AD), Joseph Oliva. LPA toured facility inside and out. LPA observed: Covid signs are present and in conspicuous vantage points, are exits are free of obstructions, emergency contact for residents were up to date, facility screening protocols will be enforce and staff will be retrained by AD, hand sanitizing station were available throughout facility, medicine cabinet were observed to be locked, paper towers are in use, all rooms in facility are single occupancy and physical distancing was observed to be in practice. No citation was issued at this time. LPA went over report findings with Administrator, Joseph, for review and a copy was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2021
License holder
Joseph Anthony Oliva, licensed since 1994.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 1994, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 12
- Total complaints
- 1
- Substantiated allegations
- 2
- Type A citations
- 3
- Type B citations
- 1
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 1994, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 3 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 1 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 2 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 1 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Villa Antonio
Is Villa Antonio licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Villa Antonio licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Villa Antonio been cited?
3 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 1994, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 12 state visits over the same years.
Is Villa Antonio still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Villa Antonio cost?
$5,000 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 49 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Jose that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,575 to $4,625 a month, and the middle figure is $4,200 (n = 49 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Villa Antonio take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Joseph Anthony Oliva, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Children's Healthcare Organization of Northern California - Pediatric Hospital is 3.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Villa Antonio keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Villa Antonio license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “VILLA ANTONIO”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #435200085. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Joseph Anthony Oliva, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 1994, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 12 state inspection visits since 1994, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 3 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 1994, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 12 state visits in that period.
- 1 complaint and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 1994, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is September 3, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Santa Clara County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$4,250 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,900 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,050On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,950 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,050–$6,100On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,800 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,950–$5,950On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,950 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,050–$6,050On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Santa Clara County