Garden Court At Villa Santa Barbara is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara County, California — state license #425850241, licensed for 126 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 20 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated May 6, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2022, the state has visited this home 21 times and filed 20 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated May 6, 2026.
The state's published file for this home includes 11 documents with transcribed findings, dated June 2, 2023 to May 5, 2026. 11 of the 11 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unsubstantiated” (6). 11 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 11 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
May 6, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 6, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 5, 2026Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not properly assist with the self-administration of medications. Staff do not refill residents’ medication prescription in a timely manner.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kristin Kontilis conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to deliver final findings for the above-stated allegations. During today’s visit, LPA met with Administrator Robert Glock and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Kontilis conducted the initial visit on 3/11/2025 from approximately 11 am – 6:15 pm at which time LPA conducted interviews and obtained documents pertaining to the investigation. On the allegation, Staff did not properly assist with the self-administration of medications: It has been alleged that Medication Technicians (Med Techs) administered incorrect medication(s) to residents and substituted medications when a resident’s medications were not available. Additionally, reporting party stated when Resident 1 (R1) had voiced to fellow residents that R1 had to correct Med Techs so as R1 would not be administered incorrect medications, the other residents voiced similar experiences with their medications. Record review revealthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 5, 2026 · control 29-AS-20260309111520
May 5, 2026Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff is stealing medication from a resident in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Leon conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility above. LPA met with Robert “Bob” Glock and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA De Leon conducted the initial 10-day visit on 03/24/2026, requested records, conducted interviews with Administrator at 2:40pm, Staff at 5:45pm and audited the Medication cart for R1’s medications. LPA De Leon interviewed additional staff on 04/03/2026 at 4:08pm and 5:29pm, on 04/06/26 at 2:43pm, on 04/29/26 at 3:10pm and on 04/30/26 at 1:50pm, 2:29pm, and 2:41pm. On the allegation: Staff is stealing medication from a resident in care. Based on observation from LPA De Leon auditing the Medication cart for Resident 1’s (R1’s) medications, R1’s cycle medication was audited first. The bubble packs appeared to have the correct count of medication used for March 23, 2026. Continued 9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 5, 2026 · control 29-AS-20260323223249
May 5, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Mar 24, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Mar 10, 2026Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide proper accommodations to residents in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kristin Kontilis conducted a 10-day initial visit to the above-named facility. LPA met with Administrator Robert Glock and explained the purpose of the visit. On the allegation Staff did not provide proper accommodations to residents in care: Reporting Party provided information stating the allegation is based on written notification distributed to residents stating ‘water in the facility will be shut off between 10:00 pm and 5:00 am on Monday through Saturday Nights, March 9-14…’ During today’s visit, LPA obtained notification titled, “From the desk of Executive Director…March 7, 2026…” The notification verifies that residents in care have been informed that "plumbing work will occur between 10:00 pm and 5:00 am on Monday through Saturday Nights, March 9-14. During this time, the water will be shut off in the building, and you will be unable to flush your toilets because the drainage pipes being replaced are sewage and wastewater pipes…” Interview conduthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 10, 2026 · control 29-AS-20260309155422
Feb 18, 2026Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure that the facility is maintained in a sanitary condition.
On February 18, 2026 at 11:00am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Haner-Tomasko arrived unannounced at the facility to investigate the allegation to this complaint. LPA met with Backup Administrator Apple Pelare and explained the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA interviewed staff, residents, the Backup Administrator, Wellness Director TIna Tran, and obtained relevant documents. On allegations, licensee does not ensure that the facility is maintained in a sanitary condition. The Department recieved photos of what appears to be a metal tray with two small round mounds of what is alleged to be mold and what appears to be a yellow leaf. (Continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 18, 2026 · control 29-AS-20260212121521
Feb 18, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 10, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff engages in inappropriate behavior with another staff in the presence of residents. Staff does not provide a healthy and safety environment to residents. Staff withhold food from residents. Staff does not accommodate resident's food needs. Staff does not allow resident visitors.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kristin Kontilis conducted a subsequent visit to the facility to issue final findings. LPA met with Administrator Robert Glock and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, LPA requested relevant documents and conducted interviews with staff on 12/20/2024 from 10:40 am to 12:30 pm. On 12/5/2025, LPA conducted a subsequent visit to the facility and conducted interviews with residents and staff from 11:20 am to 3:40 pm and obtained documents pertaining to the investigation. On 12/9/2025, LPA conducted additional telephone interviews with staff and residents from 12:00 pm to 3:10 pm and 12/10/2025, from 8:03 am to 230 pm. On the allegation: Staff engages in inappropriate behavior with another staff in the presence of residents. It was alleged two staff were in a relationship and were inappropriate, “fraternizing,” and embracing. Administrator stated staff typically create friendships but was unaware of two staff in a relationship and stathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 10, 2025 · control 29-AS-20241218153653
Oct 30, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Apr 14, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not answer resident's call button in a timely manner, resulting in resident sustaining a fracture.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kristin Kontilis conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Robert Glock and explained the purpose of the visit. On 10/01/2024, the Department received a complaint report for alleged neglect/lack of care and supervision by facility staff that resulted in a fracture. The complaint alleged that the facility failed to respond to and seek medical attention in a timely manner for Resident 1 (R1). The complaint was referred to the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to Investigator Johnny Canto. On 10/02/2024, from 9:45 am to 11:15 am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kristin Kontilis conducted an unannounced initial complaint investigation visit based on the above allegation. LPA Kontilis met with Robert Glock, Administrator, and explained the purpose of the visit. Tina Tran, Wellness Director, joined during the visit. During the visit, the LPA obtthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 14, 2025 · control 29-AS-20241001130402
Jan 15, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 6, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not assist resident with incontinence needs. Staff do not keep the facility free of odor. Resident developed a pressure injury while in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kristin Kontilis conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver final findings for the above allegations. During today’s visit, LPA met with Robert Glock, Administrator and Tina Tran, Wellness Director and explained the reason for the visit. The initial visit was conducted on 9/19/2023 from 12:40 pm to 3:45 pm by LPA Kontilis. LPA conducted interviews and obtained relevant documents. LPA conducted a subsequent visit on 9/20/2023 from 2:45 pm to 5:00 pm. LPA toured the facility, interviewed residents and staff, and obtained additional documents. LPA also conducted additional interviews of visitors and hospice personnel by phone. On the allegation: Staff do not assist resident with incontinence needs. It was alleged Resident 1 (R1) was frequently found in soiled, wet briefs due to staff not assisting appropriately. One visitor interviewed stated they believe staff tried to care for the residents, but they did not have enough staff to meet their needs. Athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 6, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230918112215
May 29, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not meet resident's needs.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kristin Kontilis conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility above to issue final findings. LPA met with Robert Glock, Administrator, and Tina Tran, Wellness Director and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, LPA Kontilis conducted an initial visit on 5/22/2024 from 10:14 am to 3:45 pm, toured the facility, obtained documents, and interviewed staff. On the allegation: Facility staff did not meet resident's needs. It was reported Resident 1 (R1) sustained pressure injuries at the facility. The investigation revealed on 4/18/2024, R1 moved into the facility from a Skilled Nursing Facility. On 4/26/2024, R1 fell and went to the hospital. At the hospital, it was discovered R1 had “sores” on their back side and groin that were believed to be consistent with sitting in a soiled brief too log. A witness interviewed confirmed R1 was at the facility for only about one week before they went to the hospital. On 5/8/2024, R1 returnthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 29, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240514113058
Mar 6, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 27, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 11, 2023Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are refusing to allow resident to remove their personal belongings from the facility.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA's) Olson and Miller conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings on the allegation above. LPA obtained documents and interviewed staff on 10/11/23 at 1:30pm and 2pm. LPAs met with Business Director and explained the purpose of the visit. On the allegation: Staff are refusing to allow resident to remove their personal belongings from the facility. It was alleged on 10/2/23 Administrator refused to allow the moving company to pick up R1’s equipment and demanded to speak with the patient before releasing the equipment. LPA interviewed Administrator and Wellness Director who stated they met with R1 on 9/27/23 and 9/29/23 relaying their wishes to return to the facility. Administrator stated they had new equipment ordered such as a hospital bed and Hoyer lift to help R1 come home. On 9/29/23 R1 stated they were ready to come home. On 9/30/23 Administrator went to the SNF to pick up the resident but was denied access and told thethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 11, 2023 · control 29-AS-20231004170559
Sep 20, 2023Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not answer resident’s call button in a timely manner.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kristin Kontilis conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Administrator Mark Cortes and explained the purpose of the visit. On the allegation, Staff do not answer resident’s call button in a timely manner: It was alleged that staff does not respond when R1’s care pendant has been pressed and R1 has had to wait 30-45 minutes before staff responds to the calls. R1 is non-ambulatory and requires assistance with toileting and brief changes. R1’s call pendant history revealed between 9/13/2023 and 9/17/2023, there were eight (8) occurrences when R1’s call pendant was pressed. Out of the eight call pendant requests, four calls were made between 6:00 am and 12:00 pm and two calls were made between 6:00 pm and 12:00 am. The eight call requests were responded to within 10-29 minutes. Staff 1 (S1) stated sometimes the call response button does not clear the resident’s pendant. Administrator stated that on occasion, a caregiver respondsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 20, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230918112215
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Garden Court At Villa Santa Barbara licensed?
Yes — Garden Court At Villa Santa Barbara is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Santa Barbara (Santa Barbara County): California license #425850241, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 126 residents. State records list 20 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 6, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.
Can Garden Court At Villa Santa Barbara care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Garden Court At Villa Santa Barbara with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 126 NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10. NOT SERVING DEMENTIA.
How much does Garden Court At Villa Santa Barbara cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Garden Court At Villa Santa Barbara's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Santa Barbara County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Garden Court At Villa Santa Barbara accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Garden Court At Villa Santa Barbara is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.
Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
92 of 126 beds occupied (73%) when the state visited on May 5, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Garden Court At Villa Santa Barbara?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 21 state visits and 20 dated documents since 2022 for Garden Court At Villa Santa Barbara; 11 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 5, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2026
2025
2024
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 21 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(805) 963-4428Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Garden Court At Villa Santa Barbara? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.