Mission Villa is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara County, California — state license #425850204, licensed for 15 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 16 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated February 4, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

10 homes in view

Mission Villa

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 15 residents · Santa Barbara, CA · Santa Barbara County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #425850204, held since 2022 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
321 W Mission Street · Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara County
Phone
(805) 898-2709
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 15 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 15 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 6 RESIDENTS. APPROVED WITH 2 DELAYED EGRESS DOORS AND 2 KEYPAD ENTRANCE/EXITS.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 19 times and filed 16 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on February 4, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
February 4, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
12 of 15 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 6 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 22, 2023 to February 4, 2026. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 6 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 11 of 16 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20264 state visits · 4 documents
Feb 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee financially abused a resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kristin Kontilis conducted a subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings on the above-stated allegation. LPA met with Administrator Emily Gerr and explained the purpose of the visit. On 10/28/2025 from 10:23 am to 3:40 pm, LPA Kontilis conducted an initial complaint visit to obtain documents and conduct interviews. On the allegation: Licensee financially abused a resident in care: It was alleged the licensee financially abused Resident 1 (R1), by removing money from their account and safety deposit box. LPA interviewed the reporting party, who stated the licensee had a preexisting friendship with R1 and the licensee became R1’s Power of Attorney (POA) in August 2023. During today’s visit, Administrator confirmed the Licensee had a preexisting friendship with R1 and became their POA for medical and financial. Administrator confirmed Licensee helped care for R1 for approximately Please continue to 9099-C, Pg 2. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 4, 2026 · control 29-AS-20251021125447
Jan 28, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 22, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide privacy to resident when changing resident. Due to lack of supervision, resident pushed another resident. Staff did not treat resident with respect. Staff had resident sleeping in living room. Staff charged resident for toilet paper. Staff did not notify the authorized representative of move. Improper eviction. Staff did not refund resident.

At 1:00pm on 01/22/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries conducted a subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings on the allegations above. LPA met with Administrator Emily Gerr and explained the purpose of the visit. On 5/2/2025 from 11:40am to 3:00pm, LPA Kontilis conducted an initial complaint visit to obtain documents and interview staff and administrator. LPA conducted interviews with R1 on 5/28/2025 at 11:05am and 5/30/2025 at 11:13am. LPA Jeffries interviewed administrator on 01/15/2026 at 1:00pm. On the allegation: Staff did not provide privacy to resident when changing resident. It was alleged Resident 2 (R2) was not provided privacy when staff changed R2, and other residents watched. On 01/22/2026, LPA Jeffries conducted interviews with Staff 1 (S1), Staff 2 (S2), Staff 3 (S3), and Staff 4 (S4). S1-4 all stated that residents are not changed in common areas. CONTINUED on LIC-9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 22, 2026 · control 29-AS-20250501111925
Jan 15, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20254 state visits · 5 documents
Oct 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not assisting residents with personal care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kontilis conducted a subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings on this investigation. LPA met with Emily Gerr, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, LPA conducted an initial visit on 9/30/2024 from 1:00 pm to 2:30 pm, where LPA conducted interviews and obtained relevant documents. LPA conducted additional interviews on 9/30/2024, 10/1/2024, 10/22/2024, 10/23/2024, and 11/19/2024. On the allegation: Staff are not assisting residents with personal care. It was alleged that residents are not receiving assistance with dental care. One visitor interviewed stated plaque on the bottom teeth of residents was visible and some residents stated their teeth were not being brushed. Please continue to 9099-C, Pg 2. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 16, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240927093414
Apr 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility increased resident’s rate without proper notice.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kristin Kontilis conducted a subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings on this investigation. LPA met with Emily Gerr, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, LPA conducted an initial visit on 1/17/2024 from 10:00 am to 4:00 pm, where LPA interviewed staff and residents and requested documents; LPA also conducted additional interviews by phone with relevant parties including responsible parties and witnesses. On the allegation: Facility increased resident’s rate without proper notice. It was alleged the administrator increased Resident 1's (R1’s) rent by $1,000 without proper notice. R1’s responsible party indicated when R1 moved in, they did not receive a copy of the admission agreement they signed despite asking for a copy for months. Per the verbal agreement when R1 moved in, R1’s total rent was $7,000, and incontinence supplies would be provided through hospice. After providing the initial $7,000, thethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 21, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240111092634
Apr 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Feb 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 31, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations5typical 0
Substantiated complaints9typical 0
Total complaints6typical 1
State visits on file19typical 8
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 307 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2022.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20264402025452202422020232322021220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — Santa Barbara County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (805) 898-2709

Is Mission Villa licensed?

Yes — Mission Villa is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Santa Barbara (Santa Barbara County): California license #425850204, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 15 residents. State records list 16 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated February 4, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Mission Villa care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Mission Villa with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 15 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 6 RESIDENTS. APPROVED WITH 2 DELAYED EGRESS DOORS AND 2 KEYPAD ENTRANCE/EXITS.

How much does Mission Villa cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Mission Villa's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Santa Barbara County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Mission Villa accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Mission Villa is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

12 of 15 beds occupied (80%) when the state visited on February 4, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Mission Villa?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 19 state visits and 16 dated documents since 2021 for Mission Villa; 6 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated February 4, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

6 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee financially abused a resident in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kristin Kontilis conducted a subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings on the above-stated allegation. LPA met with Administrator Emily Gerr and explained the purpose of the visit. On 10/28/2025 from 10:23 am to 3:40 pm, LPA Kontilis conducted an initial complaint visit to obtain documents and conduct interviews. On the allegation: Licensee financially abused a resident in care: It was alleged the licensee financially abused Resident 1 (R1), by removing money from their account and safety deposit box. LPA interviewed the reporting party, who stated the licensee had a preexisting friendship with R1 and the licensee became R1’s Power of Attorney (POA) in August 2023. During today’s visit, Administrator confirmed the Licensee had a preexisting friendship with R1 and became their POA for medical and financial. Administrator confirmed Licensee helped care for R1 for approximately Please continue to 9099-C, Pg 2. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 4, 2026 · control 29-AS-20251021125447
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide privacy to resident when changing resident. Due to lack of supervision, resident pushed another resident. Staff did not treat resident with respect. Staff had resident sleeping in living room. Staff charged resident for toilet paper. Staff did not notify the authorized representative of move. Improper eviction. Staff did not refund resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At 1:00pm on 01/22/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries conducted a subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings on the allegations above. LPA met with Administrator Emily Gerr and explained the purpose of the visit. On 5/2/2025 from 11:40am to 3:00pm, LPA Kontilis conducted an initial complaint visit to obtain documents and interview staff and administrator. LPA conducted interviews with R1 on 5/28/2025 at 11:05am and 5/30/2025 at 11:13am. LPA Jeffries interviewed administrator on 01/15/2026 at 1:00pm. On the allegation: Staff did not provide privacy to resident when changing resident. It was alleged Resident 2 (R2) was not provided privacy when staff changed R2, and other residents watched. On 01/22/2026, LPA Jeffries conducted interviews with Staff 1 (S1), Staff 2 (S2), Staff 3 (S3), and Staff 4 (S4). S1-4 all stated that residents are not changed in common areas. CONTINUED on LIC-9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 22, 2026 · control 29-AS-20250501111925

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not assisting residents with personal care.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kontilis conducted a subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings on this investigation. LPA met with Emily Gerr, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, LPA conducted an initial visit on 9/30/2024 from 1:00 pm to 2:30 pm, where LPA conducted interviews and obtained relevant documents. LPA conducted additional interviews on 9/30/2024, 10/1/2024, 10/22/2024, 10/23/2024, and 11/19/2024. On the allegation: Staff are not assisting residents with personal care. It was alleged that residents are not receiving assistance with dental care. One visitor interviewed stated plaque on the bottom teeth of residents was visible and some residents stated their teeth were not being brushed. Please continue to 9099-C, Pg 2. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 16, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240927093414
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility increased resident’s rate without proper notice.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kristin Kontilis conducted a subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings on this investigation. LPA met with Emily Gerr, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, LPA conducted an initial visit on 1/17/2024 from 10:00 am to 4:00 pm, where LPA interviewed staff and residents and requested documents; LPA also conducted additional interviews by phone with relevant parties including responsible parties and witnesses. On the allegation: Facility increased resident’s rate without proper notice. It was alleged the administrator increased Resident 1's (R1’s) rent by $1,000 without proper notice. R1’s responsible party indicated when R1 moved in, they did not receive a copy of the admission agreement they signed despite asking for a copy for months. Per the verbal agreement when R1 moved in, R1’s total rent was $7,000, and incontinence supplies would be provided through hospice. After providing the initial $7,000, theCDSS inspection report, April 21, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240111092634

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is not properly trained. Facility has insufficient staffing.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kristin Kontilis conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Emily Gerr in-person and Lisa Gerr, telephonically and explained the reason for the visit. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews with staff on 9/2/2022, 11/2/2022, 11/4/2022, and 11/7/2022; interviewed responsible parties on 11/2/22, and reviewed relevant documentation obtained. On the allegation: Staff is not properly trained. Health and Safety Code sections 1569.69(a)(2) and 1569.69(b) state training requirements for medication assistance in Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly are 10 hours of initial training for new staff, and 8 hours additional training in each succeeding 12-month period for continuing staff. Licensee provided medication training records for S1, S2, S3, S4, and the Licensee via email. LPA confirmed with Licensee that the documents provided for S1, S2, S3, S4 and the Licensee were the complete medicaCDSS inspection report, March 22, 2023 · control 29-AS-20220914113148
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not meet resident’s needs. Facility did not arrange timely medical attention for resident. Facility failed to notify resident’s authorized representative of bruising. Facility Administrator is not present at the facility. Administrator is not responding timely to responsible party’s communications.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kontilis conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Emily Gerr in person and Lisa Gerr telephonically and explained the reason for the visit. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews with staff on 9/2/2022, 11/2/2022, 11/4/2022, 11/7/2022; interviewed responsible parties on 11/2/22, and reviewed relevant documentation obtained. On the allegation: Facility did not meet resident’s needs. It was alleged that R1 was dressed inappropriately during a heat wave. Based on interviews, RP1 visited R1 on 9/4/2022 at approximately 5:45 pm and observed R1 was wearing a long sleeve shirt. The location of the facility experienced a heatwave on this day. The National Weather Service indicates the high temperature outside on 9/4/2022 was 99 degrees Fahrenheit (F). RP1 stated the temperature inside the facility was approximately 85 degrees F. R1’s physician’s report dated 4/10/2022 indicates R1 has dementiaCDSS inspection report, March 22, 2023 · control 29-AS-20220912144619

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 19 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for mid-size homes (7–15 beds), computed across all 307 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
5
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
9
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
6
typical for this size: 1
State visits on file
19
typical for this size: 8
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(805) 898-2709
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Mission Villa? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.