Oak Cottage Of Santa Barbara Memory Care is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara County, California — state license #425802118, licensed for 50 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 17 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated April 21, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

10 homes in view

Oak Cottage Of Santa Barbara Memory Care

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 50 residents · Santa Barbara, CA · Santa Barbara County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #425802118, held since 2018 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1820 De La Vina Street · Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara County
Phone
(805) 456-7270
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
oakcottagesb.com
listed by the county Area Agency on Aging, April 7, 2025
Listing details can lag reality — confirm anything important by phone.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 39 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 11 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 39 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 11 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 21 times and filed 17 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 21, 2026.

Most recent state visit
April 21, 2026
Occupancy at the November 19, 2025 visit
32 of 50 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 6 documents with transcribed findings, dated April 21, 2022 to November 19, 2025. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (6). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 6 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 11 of 17 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Apr 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20254 state visits · 5 documents
Nov 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff violated resident's personal rights.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kristin Kontilis conducted a subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings on this investigation. LPA met with Administrator Tyler Barnes and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, LPA conducted an initial visit on 9/10/2024 from 1:45 pm to 5:00 pm, where LPA interviewed staff and residents and requested documents. Additional interviews were conducted on 9/5/2024 and 5/27/2025. LPA conducted additional staff interviews on 11/18/2025 from 11:40 am to 4:00 pm and 11/19/2025 from 1:45 pm to 2:00 pm. On the allegation: Staff violated resident's personal rights. It was alleged Resident 2 (R2), who verbally expresses themselves with limited and few words and is wheelchair-bound, is placed in a corner away from other residents with their brakes locked so they cannot leave. It was alleged that this is a form of restraint, and R2’s wheelchair has caused damage to the surrounding walls, suggesting this is a common practice. Please contithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 19, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240904153809
Nov 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20244 state visits · 4 documents
Sep 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not provide adequate supervision to residents in care. Illegal eviction. Facility staff did not properly report abuse.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kristin Kontilis conducted an initial complaint visit for this investigation. During today’s visit, LPA met with Tyler Barnes, Administrator, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff, and obtained relevant documents. On the allegation: Facility staff did not provide adequate supervision to residents in care. R1 was admitted into the facility for respite care on 8/20/2024. Based on R1’s aggressive behaviors, the need for a one-on-one private caregiver for R1 was implemented at the time of admission on 8/20/2024. CCL received incident reports from the facility reporting aggression from R1 on 8/26/2024, 8/27/2024, and 8/29/2024. Based on the incident report and interviews conducted, on 8/29/2024 at approximately 4:45 pm, R1 and R2, both of whom had private one-on-one caregivers, were in the elevator. When the elevator door opened, R1 grabbed R2’s hair, and walked R2 out of the elevator into the activity room while kthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240917144445
Sep 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate supervision to a resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kristin Kontilis conducted an initial 10-Day complaint visit on the above-stated allegation. LPA met with Jovany Guerra, Senior Resident Care Director (SRCD) and announced the purpose of the visit. At the time of arrival Administrator Andrea Katz was not available. During today’s visit, from 12:00 pm to 4:00 pm, LPA conducted interviews and obtained documents pertinent to the investigation. On the allegation, Staff did not provide adequate care and supervision to a resident: It was alleged that lack of supervision resulted in R1 eloping from the facility on 2/10/2023. Information gathered reflected that R1 has a diagnosis of Dementia and was admitted into the facility on 9/22/2021. Interviews conducted and records reviewed revealed that R1 eloped from the facility at approximately 1:01 am on 2/10/2023. Interviews further reflected that 9-1-1 was called by facility staff to alert emergency responders to assist in a perimeter search for R1. Jovany Guerra,the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 12, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240108210433
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 20, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not meet resident's diapering needs Staff did not adequately manage resident's medication

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kontilis conducted a subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings for the complaint allegations above. LPA met with Jovany Guerra, Senior Resident Care Director and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, LPA reviewed relevant documents, and conducted interviews with responsible parties on 9/16/2021 and 10/4/2021, and staff on 12/18/2023. On the allegation: Staff did not meet resident's diapering needs. It was alleged that R1 was wearing two briefs, with the first brief soiled. R1’s responsible party confirmed on one occasion, they observed R1 wearing two briefs. Staff interviewed stated they were aware of other staff double diapering residents in the past. Facility nurse confirmed double diapering is against the facility’s policy, and around the time of this complaint they became aware that a caregiver double diapered residents at the facility. Facility nurse stated they held an in-service training with all staff to address tthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2023 · control 29-AS-20211013143424
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations8typical 1
Type B citations5typical 1
Substantiated complaints15typical 2
Total complaints6typical 7
State visits on file21typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2018.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025451202444220233422022131
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — Santa Barbara County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (805) 456-7270

Is Oak Cottage Of Santa Barbara Memory Care licensed?

Yes — Oak Cottage Of Santa Barbara Memory Care is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Santa Barbara (Santa Barbara County): California license #425802118, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 50 residents. State records list 17 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated April 21, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Oak Cottage Of Santa Barbara Memory Care care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Oak Cottage Of Santa Barbara Memory Care with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 39 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 11 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.

How much does Oak Cottage Of Santa Barbara Memory Care cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Oak Cottage Of Santa Barbara Memory Care's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Santa Barbara County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Oak Cottage Of Santa Barbara Memory Care accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Oak Cottage Of Santa Barbara Memory Care is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

32 of 50 beds occupied (64%) when the state visited on November 19, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Oak Cottage Of Santa Barbara Memory Care?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 21 state visits and 17 dated documents since 2022 for Oak Cottage Of Santa Barbara Memory Care; 6 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated November 19, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

6 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff violated resident's personal rights.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kristin Kontilis conducted a subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings on this investigation. LPA met with Administrator Tyler Barnes and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, LPA conducted an initial visit on 9/10/2024 from 1:45 pm to 5:00 pm, where LPA interviewed staff and residents and requested documents. Additional interviews were conducted on 9/5/2024 and 5/27/2025. LPA conducted additional staff interviews on 11/18/2025 from 11:40 am to 4:00 pm and 11/19/2025 from 1:45 pm to 2:00 pm. On the allegation: Staff violated resident's personal rights. It was alleged Resident 2 (R2), who verbally expresses themselves with limited and few words and is wheelchair-bound, is placed in a corner away from other residents with their brakes locked so they cannot leave. It was alleged that this is a form of restraint, and R2’s wheelchair has caused damage to the surrounding walls, suggesting this is a common practice. Please contiCDSS inspection report, November 19, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240904153809

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not provide adequate supervision to residents in care. Illegal eviction. Facility staff did not properly report abuse.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kristin Kontilis conducted an initial complaint visit for this investigation. During today’s visit, LPA met with Tyler Barnes, Administrator, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff, and obtained relevant documents. On the allegation: Facility staff did not provide adequate supervision to residents in care. R1 was admitted into the facility for respite care on 8/20/2024. Based on R1’s aggressive behaviors, the need for a one-on-one private caregiver for R1 was implemented at the time of admission on 8/20/2024. CCL received incident reports from the facility reporting aggression from R1 on 8/26/2024, 8/27/2024, and 8/29/2024. Based on the incident report and interviews conducted, on 8/29/2024 at approximately 4:45 pm, R1 and R2, both of whom had private one-on-one caregivers, were in the elevator. When the elevator door opened, R1 grabbed R2’s hair, and walked R2 out of the elevator into the activity room while kCDSS inspection report, September 24, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240917144445
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide adequate supervision to a resident.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kristin Kontilis conducted an initial 10-Day complaint visit on the above-stated allegation. LPA met with Jovany Guerra, Senior Resident Care Director (SRCD) and announced the purpose of the visit. At the time of arrival Administrator Andrea Katz was not available. During today’s visit, from 12:00 pm to 4:00 pm, LPA conducted interviews and obtained documents pertinent to the investigation. On the allegation, Staff did not provide adequate care and supervision to a resident: It was alleged that lack of supervision resulted in R1 eloping from the facility on 2/10/2023. Information gathered reflected that R1 has a diagnosis of Dementia and was admitted into the facility on 9/22/2021. Interviews conducted and records reviewed revealed that R1 eloped from the facility at approximately 1:01 am on 2/10/2023. Interviews further reflected that 9-1-1 was called by facility staff to alert emergency responders to assist in a perimeter search for R1. Jovany Guerra,CDSS inspection report, January 12, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240108210433

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not meet resident's diapering needs Staff did not adequately manage resident's medication
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kontilis conducted a subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings for the complaint allegations above. LPA met with Jovany Guerra, Senior Resident Care Director and explained the purpose of the visit. During the investigation, LPA reviewed relevant documents, and conducted interviews with responsible parties on 9/16/2021 and 10/4/2021, and staff on 12/18/2023. On the allegation: Staff did not meet resident's diapering needs. It was alleged that R1 was wearing two briefs, with the first brief soiled. R1’s responsible party confirmed on one occasion, they observed R1 wearing two briefs. Staff interviewed stated they were aware of other staff double diapering residents in the past. Facility nurse confirmed double diapering is against the facility’s policy, and around the time of this complaint they became aware that a caregiver double diapered residents at the facility. Facility nurse stated they held an in-service training with all staff to address tCDSS inspection report, December 20, 2023 · control 29-AS-20211013143424
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents left in soiled diapers for a long period of time. Facility staff did not keep the facility premises in clean and sanitary condition at all times. Facility staff did not keep centrally stored medication locked.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kontilis conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility to issue final findings on this complaint. LPA met with Andrea Katz, Administrator and Jovany Guerra, Senior Generations Program Director. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews with staff on 4/21/2021 at 3:50 pm, 4/28/2021 at 4:45 pm, 4/29/2021 at 12:50 pm, 3/13/2023 at 1:47 pm, 3/29/2023 10:14 am and 2:55 pm, and 3/30/2023 at 1:15 pm. LPA conducted interviews with a witness on 3/21/2023 at 2:19 pm, and interviews with responsible parties on 4/14/2022 at 4:55 pm. LPA also reviewed relevant documentation. On the allegation: Residents left in soiled diapers for a long period of time. LPA interviewed a staff, who stated they would arrive on their shift and would find “at least 90%” of the residents in wet/soiled diapers. Staff stated they found one resident “digging” in their diaper and had feces on their hand. Staff stated caregivers on the previous shift would not change the resiCDSS inspection report, April 12, 2023 · control 29-AS-20210420120111

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 21 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
8
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
5
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
15
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
6
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
21
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(805) 456-7270
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Oak Cottage Of Santa Barbara Memory Care? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.