Valle Verde · License #421700411 · 900 Calle De Los Amigos, Santa Barbara, CA · (805) 883-4193 Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Valle Verde is a continuing-care retirement community in Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara County, California — state license #421700411, licensed for 547 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 15 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated March 25, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
listed by the county Area Agency on Aging, April 7, 2025
Listing details can lag reality — confirm anything important by phone.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
✓Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 29 residents
–Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
✓Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
–Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home
“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.
Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →
29 NON-AMBULATORY IN QUAIL LODGE AND 18 NON-AMBULATORY IN THE GROVE DEMENTIA UNIT. 82 NON-AMBULATORY IN INDEPENDENT LIVING UNIT. SEE ATTACHMENT WITH LIST OF ALL ADDRESSES UNDER LICENSE #421700411. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.State service designation938 - CONTINUE CARE CONTRACT (CCC)the CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026
Since 2022, the state has visited this home 16 times and filed 15 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated March 25, 2026.
Most recent state visit
March 25, 2026
Occupancy at the August 10, 2023 visit
369 of 547 beds
The state's published file for this home includes 9 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 9, 2021 to August 10, 2023. 9 of the 9 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (6). 9 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 9 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
Mar 25, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Sep 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
20241 state visit · 2 documents
Aug 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Aug 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
20231 state visit · 1 document
Sep 26, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints2typical 2
Total complaints7typical 7
State visits on file16typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 1993.
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →
our estimate — Santa Barbara County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo(2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2022 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?
The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.
Yes — Valle Verde is a licensed continuing-care retirement community in Santa Barbara (Santa Barbara County): California license #421700411, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 547 residents. State records list 15 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated March 25, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.
Can Valle Verde care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Valle Verde with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record29 NON-AMBULATORY IN QUAIL LODGE AND 18 NON-AMBULATORY IN THE GROVE DEMENTIA UNIT. 82 NON-AMBULATORY IN INDEPENDENT LIVING UNIT. SEE ATTACHMENT WITH LIST OF ALL ADDRESSES UNDER LICENSE #421700411. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.
How much does Valle Verde cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Valle Verde's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Santa Barbara County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Valle Verde accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Valle Verde is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.
369 of 547 beds occupied (67%) when the state visited on August 10, 2023. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Valle Verde?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 16 state visits and 15 dated documents since 2022 for Valle Verde; 9 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated August 10, 2023, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not provide proper medication assistance to residents in care Staff do not attend to residents in a timely manner Staff do not properly maintain resident's prescription medication records
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Phillips conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings on the allegations above. LPA met with Christina Burton, Infection Preventionist, as well as Jeremiah Hovsepian Bearce, Director of Health Services, and explained the purpose of the visit. On the allegation: Staff do not provide medication assistance to residents in care. It is alleged that Staff members have given wrong medications to residents in care. The allegation states four incidents have occurred between 9/6/22 through 9/22/22 in which multiple residents in different rooms were given incorrect medications. On 09/27/2022, LPA interviewed staff members and residents in the facility. No staff member nor resident confirmed the allegation. Staff interviewed stated they had not observed any resident being given incorrect medications. LPA did not observe any evidence of the allegation while at the facility. Continued on 9099-C Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, August 10, 2023 · control 29-AS-20220922112716
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not serve food of good quality
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Phillips conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint visit and met with Andy Sheen-Turner, Director of Dining Services. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested documents pertaining to the investigation and conducted observations of the pertinant areas of the facility. On the allegation: Facility does not serve food of good quality. It was alleged that the meat is dry, burnt, and vegetables are sometimes of poor quality. The reporting party indicated that the quality of food is too salty. Reporting party also indicated an unwillingness to receive custom food orders accommodated by the facility. LPA observed the dining room areas in separate sections of the facility and found the food items on the menu to be of good quality while served to residents. LPA toured the kitchen and observed the food supply. All foods observed were of good quality. There was no indication of any expired/stale food items and all food items were stored properly a— CDSS inspection report, May 12, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230509113301
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not serve food of good quality.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Olson and Phillips conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings on the allegation above. LPAs met with Adam Kopras, Assisted Living Manager, Jeremiah Hovsepian Bearce, Director of Health Services, and Andy Sheen-Turner, Director of Dining Services and explained the purpose of the visit. On the allegation: Facility does not serve food of good quality. It was alleged that the meat was tough and “low quality”, custom orders (such as holding sauce) are not available, and vegetables are sometimes of poor quality and salty. The reporting party indicated that the quality of food has decreased from how it used to be. LPA Olson interviewed residents and staff on 1/10/2023 from 4:45pm to 7:10pm and observed the dinner meal service. During the dinner service, LPA took photographs of the food served to the residents and interviewed 27 residents about the food. Continued on 9099-C Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, March 7, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230105144728
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not provide adequate food service
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Olson and Kontilis conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings on the allegation above. LPAs met with Suzie Ponce, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. On the allegation: Staff do not provide adequate food service. It was alleged that the vegetables are old and that food was not cooked properly. It was also alleged that some of the meat and vegetables were “tough” and difficult to chew, and that the food was too salty for residents’ tastes and for residents on a low-salt diet. On 3/22/2022, LPA Kontilis interviewed Executive Director and Director of Dining Services. LPA toured the kitchen and observed the kitchen was clean and sanitary. LPA observed an adequate amount of food and the food appeared to be of good quality. Continued on 9099-C Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, September 27, 2022 · control 29-AS-20220315115521
Allegation the state reviewedFood is too high in sodium.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Olson and Kontilis conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings on the allegation above. LPAs met with Suzie Ponce, Administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. It was alleged the facility serves food that is high in sodium, such as Reuben sandwiches, BBQ shrimp, grits and soup. On 3/22/2022, LPA Kontilis interviewed Executive Director and Director of Dining Services. LPA toured the kitchen and observed the kitchen was clean and sanitary. LPA observed an adequate amount of food and the food appeared to be of good quality. Director of Dining Services stated they have changed their food ordering system and vendors. On 6/24/2022, LPA Olson interviewed Dining Room Manager, who stated they offer a low sodium soup every day, and any items on the menu can be made with lower salt. Continued on 9099-C Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, September 27, 2022 · control 29-AS-20220617165147
Allegation the state reviewedLack of supervision resulting in resident wandering away from facility.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Olson, Cortez, and Kontilis conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to issue final findings on the above allegation. LPAs met with Administrator Susie Ponce and explained the purpose of the visit. LPAs arrived at the facility at 11:15 am. During the investigation, LPA Kontilis reviewed an incident report and other facility documents, and interviewed resident’s responsible party and staff. Resident 1 (R1) lived at the facility since 2009, originally in Independent Living, then in Assisted Living, and then in Memory Care since January 2019. LPA Kontilis reviewed an incident report submitted on 6/25/2021 for an incident that occurred on 6/20/2021. The incident report states on 6/20/2021 at approximately 1:00 pm, R1 exited the memory care unit. R1’s WanderGuard bracelet activated the emergency system at 1:03 pm. The resident continued walking through the campus and fell. Please continue to 9099-C, Pg 2. Substantiated— CDSS inspection report, September 20, 2022 · control 29-AS-20210623155841
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is without a first aid kits in designated areas
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Olson conducted an unannounced initial 10-Day complaint visit to the facility above at 12:20 PM. LPA met with Jeremiah Hovsepian Bearce, Director of Health Services and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Susie Ponce and Melissa Honig, Executive Director were not available at the time of the visit. LPA conducted a tour of the facility from 1:20 pm to 2:20 pm with Jeremiah Hovsepian Bearce, Director of Health Services and Stephen Freine, Building and Gounds Director. On the allegation that the facility is without First Aid kits in designated areas of the facility, at 1:35 pm, 1:39 pm, and 1:45 pm, LPA observed First Aid kit signage indicating First Aid kits were available in the cabinets in East Laundry Room, #33 (1:35 pm), Rose-Garden Clubhouse #35 (1:39 pm), and The North Gazebo Clubhouse, #36 (1:45 pm) yet no first Aid kids were present. LPA informed Building and Grounds Director and Director of Health Services that there were no First Ai— CDSS inspection report, June 24, 2022 · control 29-AS-20220617165147
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not safeguard residents personal belongings Staff denied resident their personal belongings
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Olson conducted subsequent visit to deliver final findings. LPA met with Jeremiah Hovsepian Bearce, Director of Health Services and explained the purpose of the visit. Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Toan Luong and Darlene Chavez conducted initial visit on 4/19/2021 and met with Administrator Susan Ponce. Due to the situation surrounding the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and to implement mitigation measures, the complaint investigation was conducted virtually. LPAs conducted interviews with the administrator and requested documents pertinent to the investigation. LPA Luong conducted interviews with staff, residents, and witnesses on 5/7/21, 5/11/21, 5/13/21, 8/23/21, 8/27/21, 8/31/21, and on 11/05/21. LPA Luong reviewed facility documents. R1 was scheduled to move to assisted living from independent living on 3/23/2020. The resident and resident’s responsible parties would be responsible for the relocation of the resident. Continued on 9099-C Unsu— CDSS inspection report, June 10, 2022 · control 29-AS-20210416110128
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to safeguard resident's belongings Facility did not report missing items.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Toan Luong made an unannounced initial 10-Day complaint visit. LPA arrived at the facility at 9:01 am and announced the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA conducted a Safety and Welfare tour of the facility. From 9:55 AM – 12:45 PM, LPA Luong conducted in-person interviews and obtained copies of documents pertaining to the investigation. LPA Kristin Kontilis conducted telephone interviews and participated in the investigation. On 6/20/2021, Resident 1’s (R1’s) eyeglasses and wristwatch went missing after R1 sustained a fall in the Independent Living area of the facility. 9-1-1 was called, R1 was transported to the hospital and subsequently admitted into the skilled nursing unit of the facility. Documents reviewed revealed that R1 has limited vision and requires eyeglasses. On 6/30/2021, R1’s Responsible Party was informed that a replacement wristwatch was available after a change of battery. On 7/2/2021, facility staff assisted R1 to a local ven— CDSS inspection report, July 9, 2021 · control 29-AS-20210629102735
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 16 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.
Licensed to Humangood & Humangood Norcal, who operates 6 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →