Small home · Licensed for 6 · Paso Robles
Paso Robles Senior Living
380 Scott St, Paso Robles, CA 93446Licensed since 2015
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Hospiceup to 4 residents
Not on file: dementia and bedridden approvals.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Paso Robles Senior Living: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$5,000a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,000likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$5,000this home
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living one bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
Shared room insteadAsknot on file
This home’s listed starting rate is for assisted living one bedroom. A shared room, if one is offered, may cost less — ask.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $5,000–$5,600
- $5,000
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,000–$9,150
- $7,500
Lines marked “Ask” are not in the totals.
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes10 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,500 to $7,000
10 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,950–$6,650.
- Royal Home CarePaso Robles · 1.7 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Irene's Board & CarePaso Robles · 2.2 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- A Heavenly HomePaso Robles · 2.2 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Annette LodgePaso Robles · 2.3 mi · Mid-size home$5,950Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Country Care HomePaso Robles · 5.2 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Mission LodgePaso Robles · 5.3 mi · Mid-size home$6,250Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Monterey LodgePaso Robles · 5.3 mi · Mid-size home$6,250Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Roses Assisted LivingAtascadero · 8.4 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Park Place Assisted LivingAtascadero · 9.6 mi · Mid-size home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Garden View InnAtascadero · 9.7 mi · Mid-size home$4,950Listed on its own website · shared room · seen October 5, 2026
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living one bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
380 Scott St, Paso Robles, CA 93446Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #405801971 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 6 of 10 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 3 “Substantiated”.
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jul 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At 8:50am, on 7/1/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Haner-Tomasko arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the annual facility inspection. LPA met with Licensee/Administrator Eric Bunte, announced who he was and the reason for the visit. Lead Staff Marilyn Del Monte and LPA conducted a full tour of the facility. This facility is a two-story residential home with four resident bedrooms located on the first floor (two are dual occupancy) and one and a half bathrooms for public use. The first floor also has a living room with dining space, a kitchen and office area. Laundry machines are located in the hallway and laundry chemicals are kept in the garage. Access to the garage is through a locked door for resident safety. The second floor is for staff use only and contains a staff bedroom with en-suite full bathroom. LPA noted that the backyard has seating and shade for residents and visitors. LPA noted fresh fruit and snacks in the kitchen for residents to enjoy freely. The facility has battery operated smoke detectors in each resident bedroom and hallway leading to bedrooms that are all working, the carbon monoxide detector is in the hallway and functioning normally. LPA observed a fire extinguisher near the office area that was tagged current and in the green compression range, purchased on 4/8/2026. LPA tested facility hot water at 111.9°F, within regulation temperatures 105-120°F. LPA observed at least 2-days of perishable and at least 7-days of nonperishable foods. LPA noted that the facility has no obstructions in hallways, doorways or exits. Medications, resident and staff records are locked in a cabinet in the office area. LPA conducted a sample medication audit and reviewed the facilities Centrally Stored Medication Records. LPA conducted a staff and resident file review. (Continued on LIC809-C) While reviewing centrally stored medication, at 10:13am, LPA noted two open insulin pens belonging to Resident #1 (R1). Staff removed the cap of the insulin pens revealing both having attached needles. LPA asked staff how many times each needle is used and staff stated they are used multiple times for R1. LPA instructed staff that per regulation needles may only be used once and the used needles need to be discarded. Staff had to ensure R1 had enough supply; LPA observed that the facility did have a box of replacement needles for R1 that had not been used. LPA noted one other resident requires insulin, LPA observed this second residents insulin pen did not have a used needle attached and staff state they do not reuse this residents needles because they have a large supply of replacement needles; LPA observed a supply of unused needles for this resident. LPA and Licensee conducted a review of the annual care tool modules. Exit interview conducted, deficiency cited on LIC809-D page, report signed, report and appeal rights provided to the Licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2026
The state marks this report as 13 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20253 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are video-monitoring residents as a form of supervision
At 9:05am, on 9/22/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Haner-Tomasko arrived at the facility unannounced to investigate the allegation of this complaint. LPA met with Licensee/Administrator Eric Bunte, announced who he was and the reason for the visit. During the visit the LPA conducted interviews with residents, staff, and collected relevant documentation On the allegation, staff are video-monitoring residents as a form of supervision. It was alleged that two of the four resident rooms had video cameras and staff stated they put them in the rooms to watch the residents not record them. (Continued on 9099-C) Substantiated During today's visit LPA toured the facility to find no cameras in the residents rooms. LPA interview with Staff #1 (S1) revealed S1 installed cameras in resident bedrooms #2, 3, and 4 to watch the residents at night so they would not have to go in and disturb the resident to check on them. S1 removed them recently after a visit from the Long Term Care Ombudsman to the facility on 9/15/2025. Interview with the Licensee/Administrator and facility record review reveal the facility does not have and has not applied for a waiver to install surveillance devices in resident rooms. Licensee also stated current residents have not given consent for the camera's in their rooms and residents have not requested the cameras be installed in their bedrooms. Based on all interviews conducted and documents obtained, at this time the above allegation was found to be substantiated, based on the facility installing cameras in the residents bedroom to monitor them violating 4 of 5 resident's right to privacy. Exit interview conducted, deficiencies cited on LIC9099-D page, report signed, and report provided to the Licensee/Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 22, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250918113529
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 6, 2025
Amended. Personal Rights. (a)(1) To have a reasonable level of personal privacy in accommodations, medical treatment, personal care and assistance, visits, communications, telephone conversations, use of the internet, and meetings of resident and family groups. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the licensee placed video cameras in 3 of 4 residents rooms without resident consent which poses a potential Personal Rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 22, 2025
Plan of correction: S1 removed the cameras from the bedrooms after the LTCO visit on 9/15/2025. Licensee will review this regulation with all staff and email LPA documentation and signed training on or before 10/6/2025.
Aug 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not properly safeguard the residents medications Staff allowed the residents access to a harmful material while in care
At 09:10am on 8/7/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Haner-Tomasko arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the initial investigation to the above allegations of this complaint. LPA met with Licensee/Administrator Eric Bunte, LPA announced who he was and the reason for the visit. During LPA visit from 09:10am to 10:00am, LPA interviewed staff and Licensee and obtained copies of documents. On the allegations: Staff did not properly safeguard the residents medications and staff allowed the residents access to a harmful material while in care. It was alleged by a reliable source, Person #1 (P1), that during a visit to the facility on the morning of 8/4/2025 P1 observed the pad lock on the door of the closet containing resident medications left unlocked and there was a gallon of bleach in the hallway on top of the washing machine. These items were accessible to the residents and this facility is licensed for dementia care. (Continued on LIC9099-C) Substantiated LPA toured the facility upon arrival to find no chemicals on the washer and dryer, the garage door, cabinets under the kitchen sink and bathrooms containing hazardous materials all locked. LPA noted the pad lock in an unlocked position hanging from the hasp latch lock on the medication closet. Staff were close by the medication closet and stated they were actively assisting residents with medications. During LPA interview with Staff #1 (S1) and Staff #2 (S2), S1 admitted on the morning when P1 visited they left a half gallon of bleach on top of the washer or dryer and left it unattended within reach of residents in care while they cared for a resident in the bedroom closest to the front door of the facility. S2 stated they were in the kitchen not within sight of the bottle of bleach. S1 showed LPA the bottle of bleach that was left out, LPA photographed the bottle and noted it to be more than half full. Staff interview also revealed the pad lock on the hatch latch of the medication closet was left unlocked and unattended the same morning. Based on all interviews conducted, at this time the above allegations were found to be substantiated, there is a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. During LPA visit on 7/16/2025 to the facility for an annual inspection LPA cited on Title 22 regulation 87309(a). The Licensee/Administrator submitted their plan of correction for this citation on 7/28/2025 which included staff training on keeping medications and disinfectants locked and inaccessible to residents. As this is a repeat violation of the same regulation within 12 months a civil penalty in the amount of $250 for a repeat violation is being assessed on the attached LIC 421FC. Exit interview, deficiencies cited on 9099-D, report signed, report, LIC421FC and appeal rights given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250804132130
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87309(a) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 8, 2025
(a)... the licensee shall ensure that disinfectants, cleaning solutions,... and other similar items which could pose a danger to residents are in locked storage and are not left unattended if outside the locked storage. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above when S1 left a bottle of bleach unattended and S1 and S2 left the medication closet unlocked leaving these items accessible to residents which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee will perform a disciplinary write-up with S1 and S2 and email this to LPA by 8/8/2025. Additionally Licensee will have them individually write a statement of understanding of this regulation, how it can affect the residents in care and ways to prevent it in the future. Licensee will email these statements to the LPA on or before 8/14/2025.
Jul 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At 09:15am, on 07/16/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Haner-Tomasko arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the annual facility inspection. LPA met with Licensee/Administrator Eric Bunte, announced who he was and the reason for the visit. Licensee/Administrator and LPA conducted a full tour of the facility. This facility is a residential home with 2 dual occupancy and 2 single occupancy resident bedrooms, one full shared bathroom and one half shared bathroom. On the second floor is a live-in staff bedroom with full staff bathroom. There is a living room with dining space, a kitchen and office area. While touring the kitchen LPA noted fresh fruit and snacks in the kitchen for residents to enjoy. At 9:42am in the kitchen LPA noted over fifteen prescription and non-prescription medications in four unlocked cabinets and a bottle of liquid lorazepam unlocked in the kitchen refrigerator, all accessible to residents in care. Access to the laundry room is in the hallway. The garage containing cleaning supplies and laundry detergent is through a locked door for resident safety. LPA noted that the backyard has seating and shade for residents and visitors. While touring the backyard at 10:15am LPA noted nine bottles of chemicals (including bleach and Cascade dish washing soap) unlocked and accessible to residents in care. The facility has wired smoke detectors in each bedroom and hallway leading to a bedroom that are all working, the carbon monoxide detector is in the hallway and functioning normally. LPA observed a fire extinguisher near the office area that was tagged current and in the green compression range, purchased on 08/14/2024. LPA tested facility hot water at 110.4*(f), within regulation temperatures 105*-120* (f). LPA observed at least 2-days of perishable and at least 7-days of nonperishable foods. (Continued on LIC809-C) LPA noted that the facility has no obstructions in hallways, doorways or exits. Medications, staff and resident records are locked in a cabinet in the hallway. LPA conducted a sample medication audit and reviewed the facilities Centrally Stored Medication Records, finding no violations. LPA conducted a staff and resident file review. LPA and Licensee/Administrator conducted a review of the annual care tool modules. Deficiencies were cited at this time. Exit interview, report signed, deficiencies cited on LIC809-D, appeal rights, and report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 16, 2025
The state marks this report as 8 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At 12:00 pm on 08/12/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries arrive at the facility and announced who he is and the reason for the visit. LPA met with Licensee/Administrator Eric Bunte and explained the reason for the visit. Licensee and LPA conducted a walking tour of the facility. The facility is a 5 bedroom, 3 bathroom with kitchen, small living room and dining. Two bedroom have double Resident occupancy and the other 2 Resident bedrooms are single Resident occupancy. All three facility bathrooms have hand sanitizer and paper towels. The 5th bedroom and third bathroom are staff live-in quarters and are located on the second floor of the facility. LPA observed the medication closet in hallway past the kitchen and dining room area and staff and resident files are also kept in the same closet. LPA observed all required postings in centralized hallway of the facility. LPA observed more than a two day supply of non perishable foods and more than a seven day supply of perishable foods on hand at the facility for staff and 6 residnets. LPA checked fire detectors and carbon monoxide detectors all in good working condition. LPA observed and ample amount of PPE supplies. LPA noted that all exits, hallways and doors are free from obstructions. LPA did not discover any visible deficiencies or citations at this time during the facility tour. LPA and Licensee conducted a full review of the annual control model portion of the inspection. There were no deficiencies or citations discovered at this time during the annual facility inspection. Exit interview, report signed, and report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 12, 2024
Jan 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Cleaning supplies were accessible to residents in care. Knives were accessible to residents in care.
At 8:01am on 01/09/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries arrived unannounced to conduct the initial investigation to this complaint. LPA met with Licensee Eric Bunte announced who he is and the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a facility tour, conducted interviews, collected documents, made observations, and took photographs. LPA was able to make finial finding determinations based on the initial investigation visit as outlined below: As to the allegation of, “Cleaning supplies were accessible to residents in care.” It was alleged by a reliable source that cleaning supplies, knives, and medications were accessible to residents in care in the first week of January 2024. On 01/09/2024, LPA Jeffries conducted an unannounced investigation visit to the facility where he observed and photographed a plastic bin of approximately 30 ounces of powdered detergent with no lid, and a large (40-60 oz. approximately) fabric softener bottle on top of the dryer. CONTINUED on LIC9099-C Substantiated The facilities washer and dryer are in an open hallway closet with no door and a curtain that was slid open during the investigation visit. The washer and dryer are in direct access of entering and exiting 3 resident rooms in this facility. LPA interviewed Staff 1 (S1), who stated, “that’s where we have been keeping the detergent.” when asked by LPA. LPA instructed S1 to secure the detergent and fabric softener so that it was not accessible to resident in care. LPA noted that there is currently a resident in care that has a diagnosis of dementia which regulations require these items to be inaccessible. Items reported, and observed were accessible to residents in care. At this time there is enough evidence to support the allegation of, “Cleaning supplies were accessible to residents in care.” and is substantiated at this time. As to the allegation of, “Knives were accessible to residents in care.” It was alleged by a reliable source that cleaning supplies, knives, and medications were accessible to residents in care in the first week of January 2024. On 01/09/2024, LPA Jeffries conducted an unannounced investigation visit to the facility where he observed and photographed 3 large kitchen knives, and scissors in an open drawer in the kitchen. LPA interviewed staff 2 (S2) about the knifes, and scissors in the open drawer and S2 stated, we don’t use those knifes.” and “they have been there.” LPA noted that the drawer LPA found the knifes, and scissors was the first drawer as you would enter the kitchen and was not a secured drawer. LPA photographed the knifes and scissors in the unsecured drawer and asked S2 to secure them in the secure lockable knife drawer located adjacent to the unsecured drawer in the kitchen. LPA noted that there is currently a resident in care that has a diagnosis of dementia which regulations require these items to be inaccessible. Items reported, and observed were accessible to residents in care. Based on observations, interviews, and photographic evidence there is enough evidence to substantiate the allegation of, “Knives were accessible to residents in care.” and is substantiated at this time. Exit interview, report read, citations issued, appeal rights and report provided. LPA noted that once S2 secured the medications for the A.M. medication pass, S2 then secured the medication closet by locking the keyed padlock before administering medications. LPA noted that during the investigation visit that the medications were not accessible to residents in care at any time. LPA interviewed 3 of 5 Residents. R1-3 all stated that they had no issues with medications, food, and felt safe in this facility. LPA interviewed Staff 1 and 2. S1 and S2 both stated that the medication closet is locked unless they are working on administering medications. At this time there is not enough evidence to support the allegation of, “Medications were accessible to residents in care.” and is unsubstantiated at this time. As to the allegation of, “Facility did not have an adequate amount of fruit.” It was alleged by a reliable source that there was limited to no fruit and molded fruit on hand for the residents in care in the first week of January 2024. On 01/09/2024. LPA conducted initial investigation visit and was able to observe approximately 2 ripe bananas, 3 pomegranates, 2 ripe kiwis, 12 oranges, and 4 apples, full stock of celery, and 6 cucumbers which is an acceptable amount of perishable foods for 5 residents, for two days. LPA noted that there are more than two dozen canned fruits and vegetables in the garage pantry that have been in stock for at least 3 months according to Licensee and S2. LPA did not observe any molded, spoiled or rotten food on hand in the facility during this investigative visit. LPA interviewed S2, who stated, “we always have more then enough food” and “we always have fresh fruits and vegetables for two days.”. S2 also stated that the facility has planned food shopping every two weeks and as needed. LPA interviewed Licensee who stated that, “we shop every two weeks, but if we need something we go out and buy it as its needed.” LPA interviewed Residents 1-3, R1-3 stated, that they had no issues with medications, food, and felt safe in this facility. Based on interviews, observations, and photographs there is not enough evidence at this time to substantiate the allegation of, “Facility did not have an adequate amount of fruit” and is unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview, report read, and report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 9, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240105150509
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87705(f)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 10, 2024
87705 Care of Persons with Dementia (f) The following shall be stored inaccessible to residents with dementia: (1) Knives, matches, firearms, tools and other items that could constitute a danger to the resident(s) This requirement was not met by evidence of knifes being accessible to residents in care. which poesses and immidate threat to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 9, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to conduct 1 hour of training for all staff on care of residents with dementia, with focus on securing potentially dangerous times. This requirement must be started by 01/10/2024.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87705(f)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 10, 2024
87705 Care of Persons with Dementia (f) The following shall be stored inaccessible to residents with dementia: (2) Over-the-counter medication, nutritional supplements or vitamins, alcohol, cigarettes, and toxic substances such as certain plants, gardening supplies, cleaning supplies and disinfectants. This requirement was not met by detergent and fabric softener being accessible to resident with dementia, which posses in immediate threat to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 9, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to conduct 1 hour of training for all staff on care of residents with dementia, with focus on sun downing behaviors for residents with dementia. This requirement must be started by 01/10/2024.
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 4 documents
20233 state visits · 3 documents
Aug 4, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
At 10:45am on 08/04/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries arrived unannounced to the facility based on a creditable witness report that residents were told by staff that they were not allowed to leave their rooms. LPA met with Care Giver Maryanne Del Monte, announced who he was and the reason for the visit. At 10:30am LPA observed the main common living room area of the facility and did not observe any residents out in the common area of the facility. LPA asked Staff (S1), why there were no residents in the common area of the facility at 10:30am. S1 stated that they are all in their rooms. LPA noted that there are currently 4 residents residing at this facility at this time. LPA asked staff if residents were not permitted to be in the common area of the facility at any time. S1 stated that, "No, they prefer to be in their rooms sleeping or watching TV. (S1 stated): I would like it better if they were out here, so I could watch them while i prepared meals." LPA conducted interviews with all residents: Resident 1 (R1) and R2 were in room 1, both awake and watching TV. R1 stated that they are allowed to use the living room but they "like watching TV right here (Bedroom 1)" R2 was not responsive to LPA's questions and appeared to be sleeping prior to interview. LPA interviewed R3 in room 2.. R3 stated that they are allowed to use the facility at anytime they wanted to and no staff has told them they could not be in the common area at any time. LPA interviewed R4 in room 3, and stated that they are well cared for at this facility and is free to do what she pleases at the facility. R1, R3 and R4 all stated that there were no rules imposed on them as to accesses the common areas, bed room or any area of the facility. LPA did not get any response from R2. At 11:09am LPA called Licensee/Administrator Eric Bunte by phone. LPA informed Licensee that he was at the facility on a Case Management visit based on a personal rights. LPA asked Licensee if they restricted any movement of any resident for any reason at this facility. Licensee denied denying resident movement or use of the common areas of the facility at any time. LPA and Licensee had a conversation about Resident Rights. LPA received permission from Licensee for Care Giver to sing report on his behalf as licensee was out of town. At this time LPA concluded no findings and counseled staff, residents, and administrator/licensee on residents personal rights pertaining to movement in a facility. Exit interview, report read, and report emailed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 4, 2023
Jul 18, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation
At 1:00pm on 07/18/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries returned unannounced to complete the annual inspection started on 07/06/2023. LPA made contact with Licensee Eric Bunte and announced who he was and the reason for the visit. At 1:20pm, Licensee and LPA conducted a constructive physical tour of the facility. LPA noted that the facility is a three bedroom, double client occupancy, one shared bathroom with kitchen, dining/living room area, and outside area with a 14'x16' pergola with ample seating for residents outside with cover for shade. LPA noted that Licensee has applied with the city of Paso Robles for a construction permit, submitted to Licensing for approval to convert the living room on current facility sketch to an additional double occupancy bedroom pending fire clearance approval. That area of the facility is currently not in use until fire clearance approval is met. LPA noted that the facility has at least 2 days of perishable and at least 7 days of non- perishable foods on hand. LPA noted that each room is properly equipped with storage, lighting and linin to meet regulation requirements. LPA noted that the facility is equipped with working smoke detectors throughout the facility and fire extinguisher is primed in the green indicating working status. LPA noted that there is a staff residence on the second floor of the facility and has a gate at the bottom of the stairs for staff entrance only. LPA noted that the staff, resident files, and medication are in a locked cabinet. LPA conducted a sample medication audit and found no errors. LPA did not find any violations during the constructive physical tour. At 2:00pm Licensee and LPA conducted a review of the care tools modules. LPA noted that care tools module had a computer malfunction on module 8 of 12 care tool modules. LPA reviewed the last 4 care tool modules verbally with Licensee. During the review of all 12 care tool modules, LPA found no violations or deficiencies. At this time the annual inspection revealed no violations or citations. Exit interview, report read, report singed and report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2023
Jul 6, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At 11:45am on 07/06/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries arrived to the facility unannounced to conduct the annual inspection visit. LPA met with Licensee Eric Bunte, announced who he was and the reason for the visit. LPA requested documents from administrator, LPA did not have enough time to finish the annual inspection and will return at a later date to conclude the annual inspection. Exit interview, report read, and report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 6, 2023
20221 state visit · 1 document
Jul 29, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
At 10:15am on 07/29/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries arrive at the front door announced the reason for the visit. LPA was screened for COVID-19 protocols at the time of entrance. LPA met the Licensee Eric Bunte and announced the reason for the visit. Licensee and LPA conducted a walking tour of the facility. The facility is a 4 bedroom, 3 bathroom with kitchen, living room and dining room and small living room adjacent to the dining room. Two bedrooms have double occupancy and share one and a half resident bathrooms. One room is a single privet room and licensee only cares for five residents at a time. per licensee. Bathrooms are stocked with liquid soap and paper towels; all three bedrooms have hand sanitizer. The fourth bedroom and third bathroom are staff live-in quarters and are located on the second floor of the facility. LPA observed the medication closet in the hallway past the kitchen and dining room area and staff and resident files are also kept in the same closet. LPA observed all required postings and signs including Provider Information Notices (PINs) on a clipboard in centralized hallway of the facility. LPA observed more than a two day supply of non perishable foods and more than a seven day supply of perishable foods. LPA checked fire detectors and carbon monoxide detectors all in good working condition. LPA observed and ample amount of PPE supplies. LPA did not discover any visible deficiencies or citations at this time during the facility tour. LPA and Licensee conducted the Annual Infection control model portion of the inspection. There were no deficiencies or citations discovered at this time during the annual Infection Control inspection. Exit interview, report signed, and report emailed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2022
5 of 6 beds were occupied at the August 7, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Eric Bunte, licensed since 2015.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2015, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 11
- Total complaints
- 3
- Substantiated allegations
- 5
- Type A citations
- 3
- Type B citations
- 1
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2015, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 3 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 1 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 5 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 3 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Paso Robles Senior Living
Is Paso Robles Senior Living licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Paso Robles Senior Living licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Paso Robles Senior Living been cited?
3 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.
Is Paso Robles Senior Living still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Paso Robles Senior Living cost?
$5,000 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living one bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 7 other homes of a similar licensed size in Paso Robles that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $5,000 to $6,250 a month, and the middle figure is $5,950 (n = 7 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Paso Robles Senior Living take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Eric Bunte, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Can Paso Robles Senior Living keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Paso Robles Senior Living license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “PASO ROBLES SENIOR LIVING”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #405801971. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Eric Bunte, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 11 state inspection visits since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 3 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
- 3 complaints and 5 substantiated allegations on file since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is July 1, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Luis Obispo County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$4,695 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Paso Robles · 0.4 mi
Creston Village Assisted Living and Memory Care
Large community · licensed for 130
Typical starting rate
$4,700 a month to start
Typical in San Luis Obispo County · likely $3,150–$7,000On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,100–$6,150On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,250 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,300–$6,450On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,250 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,300–$6,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,300 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,350–$6,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Luis Obispo County