Southbay Maxi Care is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Los Osos, San Luis Obispo County, California — state license #405800923, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 8 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated January 12, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

12 homes in view

Southbay Maxi Care

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Los Osos, CA · San Luis Obispo County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #405800923, held since 2004 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1410 13th Street · Los Osos, San Luis Obispo County
Phone
(805) 528-1725
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 3 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 1 resident

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM #7. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 3.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 8 times and filed 8 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated January 12, 2026.

Most recent state visit
January 12, 2026
Occupancy at the April 11, 2025 visit
4 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 3 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 25, 2022 to April 11, 2025. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 3 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 5 of 8 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jan 12, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20251 state visit · 1 document
Apr 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not ensure residents were provided food of good quality.

At 7:30am on 04/11/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct the initial investigation visit to the allegation to this complaint. LPA met with Administrator, Lita Lazo announce who he is and the reason for the visit. LPA conducted interviews, conducted a physical tour of the facility focusing on the kitchen and food supply. LPA made observations and took photographs. LPA requested documentation to support the final finding of the allegation to this complaint that were issued on this visit. As to the allegation of, “Licensee did not ensure residents were provided food of good quality.” It was alleged that in the late morning of 04/08/2025, a reliable witness (a person with license or credentials indicating expertise training and/or experience) observed, “a handful of rotting, shriveled carrots with brown spots and one rotting squash.” a photograph of said vegetables was provided. It was discovered on 04/11/2025 that Licensing Program Athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 11, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250410114231
20242 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not provide a refund to resident's responsible person

On 12/17/24 at 9:45 am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rankin conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility above to review allegations of complaint. LPA met with Administrator Lita Lazo and explained the purpose of the visit. On the allegations: Licensee did not provide a refund to resident's responsible person It was alleged by the reporting party that the licensee failed to refund the pro-rated amount of the monthly payment after the passing of Resident #1 (R1). Investigation consists of facility admission agreement with resident, interview with administrator and responsible person. LPA learned that R1 moved in in June of 2021 and passed away on 05/08/24. Interviews revealed that resident’s belongings were removed the same day on 05/08/24 by responsible party and 2 witnesses. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 17, 2024 · control 29-AS-20241210132533
Dec 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 0
Type B citations2typical 0
Substantiated complaints3typical 0
Total complaints3typical 0
State visits on file8typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2004.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025111202423120231102022221
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$4,000$6,500 /mo
our estimate — San Luis Obispo County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (805) 528-1725

Is Southbay Maxi Care licensed?

Yes — Southbay Maxi Care is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Los Osos (San Luis Obispo County): California license #405800923, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 8 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated January 12, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Southbay Maxi Care care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Southbay Maxi Care with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM #7. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 3.

How much does Southbay Maxi Care cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Southbay Maxi Care's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Luis Obispo County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Southbay Maxi Care accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Southbay Maxi Care is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

4 of 6 beds occupied (67%) when the state visited on April 11, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Southbay Maxi Care?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 8 state visits and 8 dated documents since 2022 for Southbay Maxi Care; 3 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 11, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

3 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not ensure residents were provided food of good quality.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At 7:30am on 04/11/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeffries arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct the initial investigation visit to the allegation to this complaint. LPA met with Administrator, Lita Lazo announce who he is and the reason for the visit. LPA conducted interviews, conducted a physical tour of the facility focusing on the kitchen and food supply. LPA made observations and took photographs. LPA requested documentation to support the final finding of the allegation to this complaint that were issued on this visit. As to the allegation of, “Licensee did not ensure residents were provided food of good quality.” It was alleged that in the late morning of 04/08/2025, a reliable witness (a person with license or credentials indicating expertise training and/or experience) observed, “a handful of rotting, shriveled carrots with brown spots and one rotting squash.” a photograph of said vegetables was provided. It was discovered on 04/11/2025 that Licensing Program ACDSS inspection report, April 11, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250410114231

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not provide a refund to resident's responsible person
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 12/17/24 at 9:45 am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rankin conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility above to review allegations of complaint. LPA met with Administrator Lita Lazo and explained the purpose of the visit. On the allegations: Licensee did not provide a refund to resident's responsible person It was alleged by the reporting party that the licensee failed to refund the pro-rated amount of the monthly payment after the passing of Resident #1 (R1). Investigation consists of facility admission agreement with resident, interview with administrator and responsible person. LPA learned that R1 moved in in June of 2021 and passed away on 05/08/24. Interviews revealed that resident’s belongings were removed the same day on 05/08/24 by responsible party and 2 witnesses. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 17, 2024 · control 29-AS-20241210132533

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedMasking protocols are not being followed.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Anaylst (LPA) De Leon conducted a 10-day Complaint visit to the facility above. LPA met with Administrator Lita Lazo and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Requested a Staff Roster and Resident Roster. LPA conducted Interviews Staff 1 (S1) and Staff 2 (S2). On the allegation: Masking protocols are not being followed. LPA interviewed crediable witness (W1) which revealed that W1 visited the facility on 03/16/2022 and a staff answered the door not wearing a mask. LPA observed at 2:10 pm on 03/25/2022 a staff in the facility not wearing a mask. Interview with staff 2 (S2) revealed S2 had just got done eating and did not put mask back on before LPA came to visit. Continued 9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 25, 2022 · control 29-AS-20220323093738

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 8 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
3
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
8
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Southbay Maxi Care?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Lazo, Lita C., who operates 2 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(805) 528-1725
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Southbay Maxi Care? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.