Courtyard At Rio Las Palmas, The is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Stockton, San Joaquin County, California — state license #392700640, licensed for 80 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 26 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated April 3, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

7 homes in view

Courtyard At Rio Las Palmas, The

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 80 residents · Stockton, CA · San Joaquin County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #392700640, held since 2020 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
877 East March Lane · Stockton, San Joaquin County
Phone
(209) 957-4711
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 80 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 10 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 80 AMBULATORY OF WHICH 80 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10.NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY WELLQUESTCA 2 LLC EFFECTIVE 11/14/25.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 29 times and filed 26 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated April 3, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 17, 2026
Occupancy at the October 21, 2025 visit
57 of 80 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 10 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 7, 2021 to October 21, 2025. 10 of the 10 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (6). 10 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 10 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 18 of 26 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 4 documents
Apr 3, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 3, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 11, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 7, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20255 state visits · 5 documents
Oct 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff not providing authorize representative with resident’s medical file.

LPA Johnson made an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the allegation listed. LPA met with Resident Care Coordinator. Based on records reviewed the facility provided the responsible party (RP) with the requested information on 8/25/2025. The facility's legal counsel sent a letter to the RP and confirmed in the letter to the family dated 9/4/2025 that the facility had met the request to have the completed records copied and available. The RP confirmed receipt the same day 8/25/2025. The department has investigated the complaint allegation and determined that the complaint was UNFOUNDED, A finding of UNFOUNDED means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Nothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 21, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250821110444
Sep 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are charging resident for a higher level of care than what is received Facility staff do not ensure annual health assessments are conducted for residents in care Facility staff falsified residents records

The findings have been amended based on new information. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson arrived at facility unannounced to open a complaint investigation into the above listed allegations. Allegation: Staff are charging resident for a higher level of care than what is received. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted the facility is not following their approved plan of operation. The facility's plan of operation submitted to the department has been amended to include a new level of care description and fees. The facility has implemented this new level of care descriptions and fees without submitting to the licensing agency for approval prior to implementation. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 12, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250616092736
Jan 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20248 state visits · 8 documents
Jun 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not dispensing medication as prescribed.

On 6/17/2024, LPA Johnson made an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the allegation listed. LPA met with Admininstrator. Allegation: Facility staff are not dispensing medication as prescribed. Based on records reviewed, visual inspection of the controlled medication and interviews with the staff, The department was able to confirmed that the facility has an established check and balance for medications . The facility also provides random inspections of the medication carts and medication logs. There has been no record or report of any medication missing or medication not being dispensed as prescribed. LPA was able to review and inspect the carts and logs. As a result the department was unable to identify that the facility is not dispensing medication as prescribed. The allegation is unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240429123705
Jun 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not assisting resident with bathing

On this 6/3/2024, LPA Johnson delivered findings for the above allegation. Based on records review, interviews with staff, residents in care, and RP. It was determined by the department that facility records indicate that residents did get their scheduled showers. Resident (R1) has refused showers in the past and confirmed that a staff that is no longer working at the facility would encourage R1 to wait until the next shift or the next day on some occasions to take a shower. R1 stated that she believes this is because that staff did not want to assist in helping to take a shower. Staff interviewed state that residents in the care get showers twice a week or as necessary. Residents interviewed state they did get showers twice a week or as necessary. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 3, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240424143520
May 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff speaks inappropriately to residents in care Facility staff forces residents to take medications. Facility staff left residents in soiled clothing. Staff are not according privacy to residents in care

On ,5/23/2024 LPA Johnson arrived unannounced to deliver findings. LPA was met by Administrator. Allegation: Staff speak inappropriately to residents in care. It was alleged that staff speak inappropriately to residents in care. During the course of this investigation, the LPA conducted 5 staff and 5 resident interviews. 5 staff interviews were conducted. 5 out of 5 staff members denied that they speak inappropriately to the residents in care. 5 out of 5 staff members stated that they have not heard any other staff members speak inappropriately to residents in care. Continued Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240412131625
Apr 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 28, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not follow the needs and services plan.

On 04/02/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA Pascua met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Lizeth Guerrero and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current census was 60. A brief interview with FDA Guerrero was conducted. It was alleged that the facility staff did not follow the needs and services plan. During the course of this investigation, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. Based on interviews conducted it was learned that R1 and their responsible party moved into this facility in September 2023. Throughout the months, it was found that R1 needed a higher level of care due to their ambulatory status, frequent hospitalization, and increased services need for their health and safety. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 28, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240227125752
Jan 31, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 29, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure facility is free from roaches. Licensee does not ensure facility is in good repair.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson arrived to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Lizeth Guerrero and explained the purpose of the visit. Allegation: Licensee does not ensure facility is free from roaches. Based on records reviewed, interviews with residents, staff and a tour of the kitchen including the dining room; the facility has not had any identified pest or rodent activity. This information was confirmed by ECOLAB customer service invoice reports for the months of October and November of 2023. The facility has a continued service agreement with ECOLAB to provide pest and rodent control. No visual or signs of activity of pest were observed by investigating LPA. Continued Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 29, 2023 · control 27-AS-20231009140814
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations3typical 1
Substantiated complaints5typical 2
Total complaints11typical 7
State visits on file29typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2020.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202634020255512024880202346020221202021220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — San Joaquin County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (209) 957-4711

Is Courtyard At Rio Las Palmas, The licensed?

Yes — Courtyard At Rio Las Palmas, The is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Stockton (San Joaquin County): California license #392700640, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 80 residents. State records list 26 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated April 3, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Courtyard At Rio Las Palmas, The care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Courtyard At Rio Las Palmas, The with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 80 AMBULATORY OF WHICH 80 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10.NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY WELLQUESTCA 2 LLC EFFECTIVE 11/14/25.

How much does Courtyard At Rio Las Palmas, The cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Courtyard At Rio Las Palmas, The's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Joaquin County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Courtyard At Rio Las Palmas, The accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Courtyard At Rio Las Palmas, The is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

57 of 80 beds occupied (71%) when the state visited on October 21, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Courtyard At Rio Las Palmas, The?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 29 state visits and 26 dated documents since 2021 for Courtyard At Rio Las Palmas, The; 10 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 21, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unfounded. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

10 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff not providing authorize representative with resident’s medical file.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
LPA Johnson made an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the allegation listed. LPA met with Resident Care Coordinator. Based on records reviewed the facility provided the responsible party (RP) with the requested information on 8/25/2025. The facility's legal counsel sent a letter to the RP and confirmed in the letter to the family dated 9/4/2025 that the facility had met the request to have the completed records copied and available. The RP confirmed receipt the same day 8/25/2025. The department has investigated the complaint allegation and determined that the complaint was UNFOUNDED, A finding of UNFOUNDED means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. NoCDSS inspection report, October 21, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250821110444
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are charging resident for a higher level of care than what is received Facility staff do not ensure annual health assessments are conducted for residents in care Facility staff falsified residents records
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
The findings have been amended based on new information. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson arrived at facility unannounced to open a complaint investigation into the above listed allegations. Allegation: Staff are charging resident for a higher level of care than what is received. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted the facility is not following their approved plan of operation. The facility's plan of operation submitted to the department has been amended to include a new level of care description and fees. The facility has implemented this new level of care descriptions and fees without submitting to the licensing agency for approval prior to implementation. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 12, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250616092736

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not dispensing medication as prescribed.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 6/17/2024, LPA Johnson made an unannounced visit to deliver findings for the allegation listed. LPA met with Admininstrator. Allegation: Facility staff are not dispensing medication as prescribed. Based on records reviewed, visual inspection of the controlled medication and interviews with the staff, The department was able to confirmed that the facility has an established check and balance for medications . The facility also provides random inspections of the medication carts and medication logs. There has been no record or report of any medication missing or medication not being dispensed as prescribed. LPA was able to review and inspect the carts and logs. As a result the department was unable to identify that the facility is not dispensing medication as prescribed. The allegation is unsubstantiated. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 17, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240429123705
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not assisting resident with bathing
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this 6/3/2024, LPA Johnson delivered findings for the above allegation. Based on records review, interviews with staff, residents in care, and RP. It was determined by the department that facility records indicate that residents did get their scheduled showers. Resident (R1) has refused showers in the past and confirmed that a staff that is no longer working at the facility would encourage R1 to wait until the next shift or the next day on some occasions to take a shower. R1 stated that she believes this is because that staff did not want to assist in helping to take a shower. Staff interviewed state that residents in the care get showers twice a week or as necessary. Residents interviewed state they did get showers twice a week or as necessary. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 3, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240424143520
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff speaks inappropriately to residents in care Facility staff forces residents to take medications. Facility staff left residents in soiled clothing. Staff are not according privacy to residents in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On ,5/23/2024 LPA Johnson arrived unannounced to deliver findings. LPA was met by Administrator. Allegation: Staff speak inappropriately to residents in care. It was alleged that staff speak inappropriately to residents in care. During the course of this investigation, the LPA conducted 5 staff and 5 resident interviews. 5 staff interviews were conducted. 5 out of 5 staff members denied that they speak inappropriately to the residents in care. 5 out of 5 staff members stated that they have not heard any other staff members speak inappropriately to residents in care. Continued UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 23, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240412131625
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not follow the needs and services plan.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 04/02/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arielle Pascua arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA Pascua met with Facility Designated Administrator (FDA), Lizeth Guerrero and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit was to deliver complaint findings for the allegations above. Current census was 60. A brief interview with FDA Guerrero was conducted. It was alleged that the facility staff did not follow the needs and services plan. During the course of this investigation, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. Based on interviews conducted it was learned that R1 and their responsible party moved into this facility in September 2023. Throughout the months, it was found that R1 needed a higher level of care due to their ambulatory status, frequent hospitalization, and increased services need for their health and safety. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 28, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240227125752

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee does not ensure facility is free from roaches. Licensee does not ensure facility is in good repair.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson arrived to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Lizeth Guerrero and explained the purpose of the visit. Allegation: Licensee does not ensure facility is free from roaches. Based on records reviewed, interviews with residents, staff and a tour of the kitchen including the dining room; the facility has not had any identified pest or rodent activity. This information was confirmed by ECOLAB customer service invoice reports for the months of October and November of 2023. The facility has a continued service agreement with ECOLAB to provide pest and rodent control. No visual or signs of activity of pest were observed by investigating LPA. Continued UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 29, 2023 · control 27-AS-20231009140814
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility elevator is in disrepair
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kesha Lewis arrived to investigate a complaint. LPA met with Executive Director Lizeth Guerrero and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA took copies of elevator trouble call logs and invoices from TKE elevator. There are 3 elevators in the facility and elevator 1 is in question. Elevator 1 was turned off by facility staff on 01/03/2023 and 01/19/2023, TKE elevator was called the same day to come for repairs. LPA took copies of most current invoices from TKE elevator they are billed with a month lead time. Therefore, this complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted with facility director aCDSS inspection report, January 26, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230118144555
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not provide resident with an admissions agreement
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kesha Lewis conducted an unannounced visit to open a 10-day complaint investigation on 1/26/2023. LPA met with Administrator Lizeth Gurerro , Jennifer Almendarez Director of resident care and Jennifer Cumby office manager and explained the purpose of the visit to investigate the allegations: Licensee did not provide resident with an admissions agreement. LPA requested copies of R1'S admissions agreement, facility provided two (2) admissions agreements one from 2020 when R1 was in assisted living and one from 2021 when R1 moved to independent living. LPA attempted to interview R1 but R1 had left the facility with family and when R1 returned before LPA could conduct an interview R1 had fallen asleep. Continued on 9099-C UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, January 26, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230118163105

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 29 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
5
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
11
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
29
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(209) 957-4711
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Courtyard At Rio Las Palmas, The? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.