Oaks At Inglewood Assisted Living, The is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Stockton, San Joaquin County, California — state license #392700475, licensed for 86 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 26 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated February 25, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

10 homes in view

Oaks At Inglewood Assisted Living, The

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 86 residents · Stockton, CA · San Joaquin County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #392700475, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
6725 Inglewood Ave · Stockton, San Joaquin County
Phone
(209) 957-6257
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 86 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 10 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 86 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 25 times and filed 26 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated February 25, 2026.

Most recent state visit
February 25, 2026
Occupancy at the December 15, 2025 visit
78 of 86 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 6 documents with transcribed findings, dated January 12, 2023 to December 15, 2025. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 6 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 20 of 26 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 3 documents
Feb 25, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 28, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20258 state visits · 8 documents
Dec 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure the facility fire alarm was not in disrepair

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson arrived at facility unannounced to deliver findings for the above listed allegation. After reviewing records and conducting inspections, we found that the facility promptly addressed the issue with the alarm system. The necessary repairs were completed, and after a thorough inspection, the system was cleared as safe for residents. As part of the service request, the facility was required to temporarily disable the smoke detector located in the main hall on the second floor. During this period, a safe alternative was provided to ensure continued protection for all residents until the replacement detector was installed. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 15, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250908122642
Oct 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are billing for services not rendered.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson arrived at facility unannounced to deliver findings for the above listed allegation. Based on records reviewed and interviews with the facility staff, the facility did not reassess R1 before requiring R1 to stop self administration of their medication and requiring R1 to receive medication assistance for antibiotics and other existing medications. R1 was discharged on 8/3/2025 and returned to the facility with new orders. The facility did not receive information in the discharge papers that would have changed the doctor's support of R1 taking and/or controlling their medication. The facility followed the wishes of a family member; this family member had Power of Attorney over financial not medical and therefore did not have the right to change or request to change the way medications are given or not given. SUBSTANTIATED California Code of regulations, Title 22 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview conducted and a copythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 30, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250825154337
Aug 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are charging resident for a higher level of care than what is received

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson arrived at facility unannounced to open a complaint investigation into the above listed allegation and deliver findings. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted the facility is not following their approved plan of operation. The facility's plan of operation submitted to the department has been amended to include a new level of care description and fees. The facility has implemented this new level of care descriptions and fees without submitting to the licensing agency for approval prior to implementation. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. The facility has been cited for this violation on 5/08/2025 control number 27-AS-20250508090354. Therefore a 9099D pages will not be included in this report. The facility will include this finding into the plan of correction for the complaint dated 5/8/2025. Exit inthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250513191306
May 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff are charging a resident for services not received

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson arrived at facility unannounced to amend the finding to unfounded. The Department reviewed documents received and information obtained through interviews. It was found that residents and their responsible parties were provided a 60-day notice of a price increase and there were no significant changes to the Plan of Operation that needed to be provided to the licensing agency for approval. Based on the above, the facilities' appeal has been granted, and the deficiency will be dismissed. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 8, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250508090354
Feb 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20249 state visits · 9 documents
Nov 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not properly cleaning facility kitchen

Based on observation on 6/21/2024, 8/22/2024, and records reviewed the facility is not in compliance with the regulatory requirement to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen with storage of food, expired food, unlabeled food, bread storage area not clean and open containers observed. Based on staffing for the kitchen the facility is required to have consultation services for food services. The facility is out of compliance with this requirement. The last quarterly visit was on 8/30/2023, during the visit on 8/30/2023 the consultant identified several action items, including repeat problems and sanitation hazardous. The facility is actively looking for a Dietitians to conduct the quarterly visits to assist the facility in coming back into compliance with this requirement. (Advisory Given) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240620163357
Aug 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints2typical 2
Total complaints5typical 7
State visits on file25typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202623020258822024991202322120221102021330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — San Joaquin County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (209) 957-6257

Is Oaks At Inglewood Assisted Living, The licensed?

Yes — Oaks At Inglewood Assisted Living, The is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Stockton (San Joaquin County): California license #392700475, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 86 residents. State records list 26 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated February 25, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Oaks At Inglewood Assisted Living, The care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Oaks At Inglewood Assisted Living, The with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 86 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10.

How much does Oaks At Inglewood Assisted Living, The cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Oaks At Inglewood Assisted Living, The's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Joaquin County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Oaks At Inglewood Assisted Living, The accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Oaks At Inglewood Assisted Living, The is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

78 of 86 beds occupied (91%) when the state visited on December 15, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Oaks At Inglewood Assisted Living, The?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 25 state visits and 26 dated documents since 2021 for Oaks At Inglewood Assisted Living, The; 6 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 15, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

6 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure the facility fire alarm was not in disrepair
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson arrived at facility unannounced to deliver findings for the above listed allegation. After reviewing records and conducting inspections, we found that the facility promptly addressed the issue with the alarm system. The necessary repairs were completed, and after a thorough inspection, the system was cleared as safe for residents. As part of the service request, the facility was required to temporarily disable the smoke detector located in the main hall on the second floor. During this period, a safe alternative was provided to ensure continued protection for all residents until the replacement detector was installed. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 15, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250908122642
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are billing for services not rendered.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson arrived at facility unannounced to deliver findings for the above listed allegation. Based on records reviewed and interviews with the facility staff, the facility did not reassess R1 before requiring R1 to stop self administration of their medication and requiring R1 to receive medication assistance for antibiotics and other existing medications. R1 was discharged on 8/3/2025 and returned to the facility with new orders. The facility did not receive information in the discharge papers that would have changed the doctor's support of R1 taking and/or controlling their medication. The facility followed the wishes of a family member; this family member had Power of Attorney over financial not medical and therefore did not have the right to change or request to change the way medications are given or not given. SUBSTANTIATED California Code of regulations, Title 22 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview conducted and a copyCDSS inspection report, September 30, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250825154337
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are charging resident for a higher level of care than what is received
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson arrived at facility unannounced to open a complaint investigation into the above listed allegation and deliver findings. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted the facility is not following their approved plan of operation. The facility's plan of operation submitted to the department has been amended to include a new level of care description and fees. The facility has implemented this new level of care descriptions and fees without submitting to the licensing agency for approval prior to implementation. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. The facility has been cited for this violation on 5/08/2025 control number 27-AS-20250508090354. Therefore a 9099D pages will not be included in this report. The facility will include this finding into the plan of correction for the complaint dated 5/8/2025. Exit inCDSS inspection report, May 15, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250513191306
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are charging a resident for services not received
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Albert Johnson arrived at facility unannounced to amend the finding to unfounded. The Department reviewed documents received and information obtained through interviews. It was found that residents and their responsible parties were provided a 60-day notice of a price increase and there were no significant changes to the Plan of Operation that needed to be provided to the licensing agency for approval. Based on the above, the facilities' appeal has been granted, and the deficiency will be dismissed. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, May 8, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250508090354

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not properly cleaning facility kitchen
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Based on observation on 6/21/2024, 8/22/2024, and records reviewed the facility is not in compliance with the regulatory requirement to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen with storage of food, expired food, unlabeled food, bread storage area not clean and open containers observed. Based on staffing for the kitchen the facility is required to have consultation services for food services. The facility is out of compliance with this requirement. The last quarterly visit was on 8/30/2023, during the visit on 8/30/2023 the consultant identified several action items, including repeat problems and sanitation hazardous. The facility is actively looking for a Dietitians to conduct the quarterly visits to assist the facility in coming back into compliance with this requirement. (Advisory Given) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 24, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240620163357

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not following infection control protocol
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 1/12/23 at approximately 9:35am Licensing Program Analyst Licensing (LPA) Maja Jensen arrived at facility unannounced to continue a complaint investigation in to the above listed allegation. LP Jensen met with Brittany Andrews and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to arrival LPA Jensen reviewed the facilitiesd COVID Mitigation Plan which was apprioved by the Department. Upon arrival LPA Jensen observed the front desk staff to be wearing a surgical mask incorrectly as it was not covering the staff member's nose. LPA Jensen observed a second staff member also not wearing their mask correctly. Based on a line list that was received LPA Jensen toured the facility with Administrator, LPA Jensen observed only one resident room with PPE outside of it. LPA Jensen came across staff 1 (S1) and asked for a donning and doffing demonstration which was performed in compliance with Public Health Department recommendations. LPA Jensen asked S1 how long COVID positive residents isolate for aCDSS inspection report, January 12, 2023 · control 27-AS-20221219094841

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 25 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
5
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
25
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Oaks At Inglewood Assisted Living, The?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Welltower Pegasus Tenant Llc;psl Assocaites Llc, who operates 2 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(209) 957-6257
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Oaks At Inglewood Assisted Living, The? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.