Psalm Residential Care Home is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Francisco, San Francisco County, California — state license #385600432, with a licensed capacity of 22, listed as probationary license in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 40 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated July 14, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

The state record lists this home as on probation. The dated documents behind that status are published below; we do not include homes on probation in family match shortlists.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

16 homes in view

Psalm Residential Care Home

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 22 residents · San Francisco, CA · San Francisco County
On probation — see recordWheelchair not on fileMemory care not on fileHospice not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #385600432, held since 2018 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
565 Grove St · San Francisco, San Francisco County
Phone
(415) 621-8505
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file — ask the home
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
LICENSE REVOCATION IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS OF STIPULATION EFFECTIVE APRIL 22, 2025. PROBATION LICENSE THRU APRIL 22, 2028. AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 22 AMBULATORY. HOPSICE WAIVER FOR 2 RESIDENTS.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 47 times and filed 40 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 14, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 14, 2026
Occupancy at the August 21, 2025 visit
16 of 22 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 7 documents with transcribed findings, dated December 19, 2022 to August 21, 2025. 7 of the 7 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 7 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 7 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 29 of 40 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20266 state visits · 8 documents
Jul 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 28, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202510 state visits · 15 documents
Dec 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 1, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 1, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure food served is of good quality to residents in care

On 08/21/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian conducted an unnannounced 10-day complaint visit. LPA met with administrator, Anna Villanuva-Aoay, LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that facility staff do not ensure food served is of good quality, the reporting party claimed that staff have been serving expired and spoiled food to residents. During the visit, LPA inspected the kitchen and food storage areas, observing all food to be properly stored, labeled, and within expiration dates, with no expired or spoiled items present. A review of 30-day menus showed meals were balanced, and interviews with staff confirmed regular food deliveries, proper discarding of expired items. Resident interviews indicated that none reported receiving spoiled or expired food, and 4 out of 5 residents expressed satisfaction with the meals provided. Base on interviews, and observations during the course of investigation, this allegation is unsubstantiated. Althoughthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250820091316
Jul 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not preventing physical altercations between residents

On 07/29/2025, Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian arrived at the facility to deliver conclusionary finding for this complaint received by the Department. LPA was greeted by administrator, Anna Villanuva-Aoay, and explained the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA conducted interviews with staffs and client. Regarding the allegation that Facility staff are not preventing physical altercations between residents. The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based upon interivews with staff and residents, there is contradicting information received.The resident involved in the incident confirmed during the interview that staff intervened during the physical altercation, and that the residents involved have since been separated and are no longer roommates. The allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250606160420
Jul 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee is not ensuring there is one working shower for every ten persons

On 07/24/2025, Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian and Dominic Tobola arrived at the facility to deliver conclusionary finding for this complaint received by the Department. LPA was greeted by administrator, Anna Villanuva-Aoay, and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that licensee is not ensuring there is one working shower for every ten persons. The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on observations and interviews, the facility has three bathrooms with showering capacity, but only two are functional, serving 16 residents and three staff members. Based upon interivews with staff and residents, there is contradicting information received.The allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Report is reviewed with administrator and a copy is provided. Unsubstantthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 24, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250611094444
Jul 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20245 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 11, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations11typical 1
Type B citations5typical 1
Substantiated complaints14typical 2
Total complaints11typical 7
State visits on file47typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2018.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202668020251015020245502023810220221112021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — San Francisco County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

If end-of-life care were ever needed, could they stay here? What’s the plan?
Ask how the 2023 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (415) 621-8505

Is Psalm Residential Care Home licensed?

Yes — Psalm Residential Care Home is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Francisco (San Francisco County), currently on state probation: California license #385600432, shown as “Probationary License” in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 22 residents. State records list 40 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 14, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Psalm Residential Care Home care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists no specialized-care clearances for Psalm Residential Care Home (wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden are not on file). A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordLICENSE REVOCATION IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS OF STIPULATION EFFECTIVE APRIL 22, 2025. PROBATION LICENSE THRU APRIL 22, 2028. AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 22 AMBULATORY. HOPSICE WAIVER FOR 2 RESIDENTS.

How much does Psalm Residential Care Home cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Psalm Residential Care Home's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Francisco County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Psalm Residential Care Home accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Psalm Residential Care Home is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

16 of 22 beds occupied (73%) when the state visited on August 21, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Psalm Residential Care Home?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 47 state visits and 40 dated documents since 2021 for Psalm Residential Care Home; 7 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated August 21, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

7 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure food served is of good quality to residents in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 08/21/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian conducted an unnannounced 10-day complaint visit. LPA met with administrator, Anna Villanuva-Aoay, LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that facility staff do not ensure food served is of good quality, the reporting party claimed that staff have been serving expired and spoiled food to residents. During the visit, LPA inspected the kitchen and food storage areas, observing all food to be properly stored, labeled, and within expiration dates, with no expired or spoiled items present. A review of 30-day menus showed meals were balanced, and interviews with staff confirmed regular food deliveries, proper discarding of expired items. Resident interviews indicated that none reported receiving spoiled or expired food, and 4 out of 5 residents expressed satisfaction with the meals provided. Base on interviews, and observations during the course of investigation, this allegation is unsubstantiated. AlthoughCDSS inspection report, August 21, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250820091316
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not preventing physical altercations between residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 07/29/2025, Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian arrived at the facility to deliver conclusionary finding for this complaint received by the Department. LPA was greeted by administrator, Anna Villanuva-Aoay, and explained the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA conducted interviews with staffs and client. Regarding the allegation that Facility staff are not preventing physical altercations between residents. The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based upon interivews with staff and residents, there is contradicting information received.The resident involved in the incident confirmed during the interview that staff intervened during the physical altercation, and that the residents involved have since been separated and are no longer roommates. The allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unCDSS inspection report, July 29, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250606160420
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee is not ensuring there is one working shower for every ten persons
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 07/24/2025, Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian and Dominic Tobola arrived at the facility to deliver conclusionary finding for this complaint received by the Department. LPA was greeted by administrator, Anna Villanuva-Aoay, and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that licensee is not ensuring there is one working shower for every ten persons. The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on observations and interviews, the facility has three bathrooms with showering capacity, but only two are functional, serving 16 residents and three staff members. Based upon interivews with staff and residents, there is contradicting information received.The allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Report is reviewed with administrator and a copy is provided. UnsubstantCDSS inspection report, July 24, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250611094444

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility allowed excluded individual into facility Resident selling drugs to another resident
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On August 11, 2023, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Komal Charitra and John Calandra conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint visit. LPAs met with Caregiver, Jay Tacras and Licensee/Administrator, William Encarnacion joined shortly thereafter. Regarding the allegation facility allowed excluded individual into the facility, according to the reporting party, an excluded individual is coming inside the facility. During the investigation, LPA interviewed the Licensee, facility staff and residents. According to the Licensee, it was acknowledged that he is aware that an excluded individual is coming to the facility everyday, multiple times a day and has contact with the residents in care, however does not contact the excluded individuals' responsible party. In addition, according to the Licensee, he indicated that he instructed his staff that if the excluded individual comes to the facility, to either call the police or ask the excluded individual to leave. According to 4/5 residents inteCDSS inspection report, August 11, 2023 · control 14-AS-20230807114635
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is mishandling the residents personal funds while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 06/20/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato and Komal Charitra met with administrator, William Encarnacion to deliver the findings for the above allegation. It was reported that residents are not able to receive their monthly personal needs and incidental money (PNI). Based on the interview with the administrator, the residents have access and are provided their PNI money when they ask for it. Any amount provided to the residents are logged in on a sheet of paper and signed by the resident. The logs were reviewed and stated the amount given to residents. Out of the 6 residents that were interviewed, everyone stated that they do get their PNI money when they ask for it. Whenever the residents request the administrator to buy items like cigarette cartons or medicines, the administrator provides the items requested to be bought. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 20, 2023 · control 14-AS-20230420142536
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents overdosed on drugs Facility failed to report incident to CCL Facility staff took resident's money Facility administrator failed to follow Title 22 licensing requirements
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On May 16, 2023, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Komal Charitra and Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced complaint visit with Investigator Victoria McIntosh to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPAs and Investigator met with Licensee/Administrator, William Encarnacion and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation residents overdosed on drugs, according to the reporting party, it was reported that two residents, Resident 1 (R1) and Resident 2 (R2) overdosed on Fentanyl. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews, collected documents, reviewed R1 and R2’s medical records, and conducted a facility sweep. Based on interviewed conducted, the Licensee, a staff member (S1), and two other residents, stated that R1 and R2 use drugs (fentanyl, methamphetamine, and marijuana) at the facility, amongst other residents. In addition, during a facility sweep conducted by the Department, drug paraphernalia was observed in the resident’s rooms, such as piCDSS inspection report, May 16, 2023 · control 14-AS-20230106144444

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident hit another resident while in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit in delivering the findings on the above allegation. LPA met with licensee/administrator William Encarnacion and exlpained the purpose of today's visit. During the course of the investigation it was discovered through medical diagnosis, and interviews conducted, that R1 did suffer facial fracture due to trauma to the face. Through interviews conducted with the resident, and medical records reviewed, it was determined that R1 was hit in the face with a closed fist by another resident R2. This allegation is substantiated. Based on LPA interviews and items letters received, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, are being cited on the attached LIC9099D. Report is reviewed with the licensee William Encarnacion. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 19, 2022 · control 14-AS-20211014120141

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 47 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
11
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
5
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
14
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
11
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
47
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(415) 621-8505
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Psalm Residential Care Home? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.