Sagebrook Senior Living At San Francisco is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Francisco, San Francisco County, California — state license #385600423, licensed for 111 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 32 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated March 27, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

14 homes in view

Sagebrook Senior Living At San Francisco

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 111 residents · San Francisco, CA · San Francisco County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #385600423, held since 2018 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
2750 Geary Blvd · San Francisco, San Francisco County
Phone
(415) 346-0246
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 111 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 10 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 & OVER; APPROVED FOR 111 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN; APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS; HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 10 CLIENTS; NEW MGMT CO; INTEGRAL SENIOR LIVING MGMT LLC; EFFECTIVE 10/01/2024State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 36 times and filed 32 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated March 27, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 13, 2026
Occupancy at the January 8, 2025 visit
62 of 111 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 9 documents with transcribed findings, dated November 3, 2021 to April 10, 2025. 9 of the 9 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (5). 9 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 9 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 17 of 32 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 4 documents
Mar 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 11, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 11, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20254 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained multiple injuries due to neglect/lack of supervision

On 4/10/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and was greeted by Executive Director, Peter Nixdorff. LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and outside parties and reviewed resident records during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges resident sustained multiple injuries due to neglect/lack of supervision. Based upon review of R1’s records it is determined that R1 had sustained three separate incidents in which R1 had been involved in multiple unwitnessed falls. The facility completed an updated care appraisal, implementing an increased level of care for more frequent room checks, staff escort to activities and common spaces, transferring from sitting to standing and use of a walker due to the identified high fall risk, confusion and diagnoses of Parkinson's and major neurocognitive disorder. Facility however, failed to update R1's medical assessment corresponding to R1's updatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 10, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250113143203
Apr 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature for residents in care Facility is in disrepair

On 1/8/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and was greeted by Executive Director, Peter NIxdorff (S1). LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff, resident and outside party, reviewed facility records and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature for residents in care after facility heating system had become damaged. Based upon tour of the facility, LPA found that the heating system only allows an "on and off" control with no thermostat to indicate exact temperature. During LPA's multiple facility visits, the facility was found to be at a comfortable temperature and not observed to be cold or signs of residents in discomfort. In addition, the facility had provided additional blankets and individual space heaters to residents affected. Interviews with Maintenance Director (S2) it was found that bedrooms 300, 301, 3the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 8, 2025 · control 14-AS-20241120150635
Jan 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20244 state visits · 6 documents
Sep 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Lack of Supervision

On 9/13/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted an unannounced visit to delivery the complaint investigation findings. LPA met with Program Director, Peter Nixdorff and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding to the allegation of lack of supervision- the reporting party stated that memory care staff leaves the residents in the lunch hall for an extended periods of time so they don't have to move the residents back and forth from their rooms, and if the residents soiled themselves while waiting, the staff leaves the residents until after lunch to change them. The reporting party also reported that a resident with vision problem isolates him/herself in the room because its the only environment that he/she can navigate independently. In addition, a resident slipped out of the wheelchair while getting fresh air. As part of the investigation, LPA Han and LPA Tobola interviewed Memory Care Director, facility staff, resident #1(R1), resident #2(R2), and other residents. Contthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 13, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240731085313
Sep 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 31, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 31, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Aug 15, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not repair resident's window.

On August 15, 2023, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Murial Han and LPA John Calandra conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint inspection. LPAs met with Sales Director, David Estrada and explained the purpose of today's visit. The administrator and maintenance director arrived shortly thereafter and assisted with the rest of the inspection. During today's visit, LPAs toured resident-in-question (R1)'s room, tested the bathroom window, interviewed administrator and maintenance director. Regarding to allegation of - staff did not repair resident's window, during the initial reporting, the reporting party stated that R1's bathroom window is very hard to open and close and the reporting party is worried that R1 would get hurt while doing that. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 15, 2023 · control 14-AS-20230808165248
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 1
Type B citations3typical 1
Substantiated complaints8typical 2
Total complaints9typical 7
State visits on file36typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2018.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202634020254612024460202367220222202021570
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — San Francisco County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (415) 346-0246

Is Sagebrook Senior Living At San Francisco licensed?

Yes — Sagebrook Senior Living At San Francisco is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Francisco (San Francisco County): California license #385600423, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 111 residents. State records list 32 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated March 27, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Sagebrook Senior Living At San Francisco care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Sagebrook Senior Living At San Francisco with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 & OVER; APPROVED FOR 111 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN; APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS; HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 10 CLIENTS; NEW MGMT CO; INTEGRAL SENIOR LIVING MGMT LLC; EFFECTIVE 10/01/2024

How much does Sagebrook Senior Living At San Francisco cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Sagebrook Senior Living At San Francisco's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Francisco County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Sagebrook Senior Living At San Francisco accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Sagebrook Senior Living At San Francisco is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

62 of 111 beds occupied (56%) when the state visited on January 8, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Sagebrook Senior Living At San Francisco?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 36 state visits and 32 dated documents since 2021 for Sagebrook Senior Living At San Francisco; 9 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 10, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

9 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained multiple injuries due to neglect/lack of supervision
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 4/10/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and was greeted by Executive Director, Peter Nixdorff. LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and outside parties and reviewed resident records during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges resident sustained multiple injuries due to neglect/lack of supervision. Based upon review of R1’s records it is determined that R1 had sustained three separate incidents in which R1 had been involved in multiple unwitnessed falls. The facility completed an updated care appraisal, implementing an increased level of care for more frequent room checks, staff escort to activities and common spaces, transferring from sitting to standing and use of a walker due to the identified high fall risk, confusion and diagnoses of Parkinson's and major neurocognitive disorder. Facility however, failed to update R1's medical assessment corresponding to R1's updatedCDSS inspection report, April 10, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250113143203
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not maintain a comfortable temperature for residents in care Facility is in disrepair
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 1/8/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tobola arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering complaint investigation findings and was greeted by Executive Director, Peter NIxdorff (S1). LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff, resident and outside party, reviewed facility records and made observations during the course of the investigation. Complaint alleges staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature for residents in care after facility heating system had become damaged. Based upon tour of the facility, LPA found that the heating system only allows an "on and off" control with no thermostat to indicate exact temperature. During LPA's multiple facility visits, the facility was found to be at a comfortable temperature and not observed to be cold or signs of residents in discomfort. In addition, the facility had provided additional blankets and individual space heaters to residents affected. Interviews with Maintenance Director (S2) it was found that bedrooms 300, 301, 3CDSS inspection report, January 8, 2025 · control 14-AS-20241120150635

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLack of Supervision
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 9/13/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted an unannounced visit to delivery the complaint investigation findings. LPA met with Program Director, Peter Nixdorff and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding to the allegation of lack of supervision- the reporting party stated that memory care staff leaves the residents in the lunch hall for an extended periods of time so they don't have to move the residents back and forth from their rooms, and if the residents soiled themselves while waiting, the staff leaves the residents until after lunch to change them. The reporting party also reported that a resident with vision problem isolates him/herself in the room because its the only environment that he/she can navigate independently. In addition, a resident slipped out of the wheelchair while getting fresh air. As part of the investigation, LPA Han and LPA Tobola interviewed Memory Care Director, facility staff, resident #1(R1), resident #2(R2), and other residents. ContCDSS inspection report, September 13, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240731085313

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not repair resident's window.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On August 15, 2023, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Murial Han and LPA John Calandra conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint inspection. LPAs met with Sales Director, David Estrada and explained the purpose of today's visit. The administrator and maintenance director arrived shortly thereafter and assisted with the rest of the inspection. During today's visit, LPAs toured resident-in-question (R1)'s room, tested the bathroom window, interviewed administrator and maintenance director. Regarding to allegation of - staff did not repair resident's window, during the initial reporting, the reporting party stated that R1's bathroom window is very hard to open and close and the reporting party is worried that R1 would get hurt while doing that. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 15, 2023 · control 14-AS-20230808165248
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not repair resident's window. Facility radiator heater is leaking. Facility placed a hazardous item next to resident's bed.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 5/31/2023 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the findings to complaint # 14-AS-20230427140227. LPA Han met with administrator and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding to allegation of - facility did not repair resident's window, the reporting party stated that resident #1 (R1) has been residing at the facility for 2 years and the window in the room has never operated correctly. The responsible party and the reporting party has made many requests verbally and in writing to fix the window but it is still inoperable. As part of the investigation, LPA toured R1's room, interviewed maintenance director, administrator and reviewed written communication correspondences. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 31, 2023 · control 14-AS-20230427140227
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFood service is inadequate Facility staff failed to meet residents' needs Facility staff mismanaged resident's medication
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit in order to deliver findings regarding the above allegations. LPA met with health and wellness director Jennine Chan and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the investigation LPA conducted multiple interviews, reviewed pertient complaint documents, and obtained photos. The above allegations could not be proved or disporved by LPA during the investigation process. LPA could not meet the perponderance of evidence standard to prove that they did take place. These allegations are unsubstantiated. Report is reviewed with Jennine Chan. No citations issued. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 24, 2023 · control 14-AS-20200803161119
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff illegally evicted resident
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 5/3/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the findings to complaint # 14-AS-20230309165530. LPA Han met with sales director and LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding to allegation of- staff illegally evicted resident, the reporting party stated that he/she did not report it. However, CCL received this complaint, and LPA conducted an investigation. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed facility administrator, and R1's case manager. LPA interviewed the administrator who denied the eviction and stated that R1 was admitted from a hospital with a plan to stay at the facility for 30 days then return home. After the 30 days, the facility was directed by R1's case manager that R1 wanted to return home as planned and the facility worked with R1's case manager to get R1 home. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, May 3, 2023 · control 14-AS-20230309165530
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to provide adequate food service
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 3/15/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the findings to complaint # 14-AS-20221230101902. LPA Han met with the Sales Director and the resident service director. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding allegation of - facility failed to provide adequate food service, the reporting party stated that, resident -in- question (R1) reported that the facility served bad hamburger and uncooked hot dogs, the facility did not provide the foods that R1 had requested for and instead, provided the foods that R1 did not order and R1 was told by staff that there was no snacks available. LPA interviewed the administrator who denied the allegation and stated that R1 did not like hamburger as R1 did not eat it until 4 hours later and the hot dog was fully cooked but the way it was cooked left the center a little pinkish. The administrator also stated that there is always snacks such as chips, cookies and fruits in the dining room bistrCDSS inspection report, March 15, 2023 · control 14-AS-20221230101902

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 36 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
8
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
9
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
36
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(415) 346-0246
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Sagebrook Senior Living At San Francisco? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.