Small home · Licensed for 6 · La Mesa
Compassionate Care for Seniors 1
8100 Binney Pl., La Mesa, CA 91942Licensed since 2020
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 27, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Hospiceup to 3 residents
- Bedriddenup to 4 residents
Not on file: dementia approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 4 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN IN BEDROOMS 4, 5, 6 AND 7. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 3.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 27, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 27, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Compassionate Care for Seniors 1: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,600a month to start
Likely $4,600–$6,900
From 16 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,600likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$5,600likely $4,600–$6,900
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,600–$7,050
- $5,600
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,400–$10,200
- $8,100
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes16 nearby homes publish starting rates of $4,000 to $7,000
16 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,400–$6,650.
- Right Choice Senior Living LLC - La MesaLa Mesa · 0.5 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Lake Murray Health Care CenterSan Diego · 0.8 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Green VillaSan Diego · 0.9 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Silvercreek Home CareSan Diego · 1.1 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Renaissance LivingLa Mesa · 1.2 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Peppertree Guest Home IILa Mesa · 1.6 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Lucie's Shady RestSan Diego · 1.9 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- La Mesa Elder CareSan Diego · 2.5 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Pine Tree Home 2El Cajon · 2.6 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Noble Living IIEl Cajon · 2.6 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Del Cerro Elder CareSan Diego · 2.7 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Jobeth Home CareEl Cajon · 2.7 mi · Small home$4,650Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sierra Sunshine CareEl Cajon · 2.8 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Acorn Oaks Manor IIISan Diego · 2.9 mi · Small home$5,800Listed on its own website · assisted living · seen October 5, 2026
- Comfort & Joy LivingSan Diego · 2.9 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Oasis Village CareLa Mesa · 3.0 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
8100 Binney Pl., La Mesa, CA 91942Address from the public record · October 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Grossmont HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 27, 2026 · License #374604336 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 3 of 7 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Unsubstantiated”.
20261 state visit · 1 document
May 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee did not timely arrange medical care for resident. Licensee did not give resident medication as prescribed.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted an unannounced visit to investigate and deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Administrator Laith Sarsam. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. On April 29, 2026, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint alleging that the licensee did not timely arrange medical care for the resident and did not give the resident medication as prescribed, more specifically Resident #1 (R1) reported requesting medical attention for an extended period without receiving assistance and further reported experiencing long waits for pain medication at night. (Continued on LIc9099C) Unsubstantiated Department interviews with staff and residents report responding to resident needs throughout the day and night, stated they were unaware of delays in care, and confirmed medication was administered as prescribed. Department interviews with R1 revealed staff respond but not as quickly as desired. Department interviews with outside sources reveal R1 has made similar complaints at previous facilities and confirmed this has been a pattern at multiple prior placement's due to R1's inability to be satisfied. Department records review reveals the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and interviews with staff confirm all medications are being administered per physician prescription. LPA observations reveal staff were present and responding to residents and medication systems and storage appeared to be in compliance. Based on interviews, direct LPA observations, and records review, a preponderance of evidence does not exist to prove that the alleged violations occurred; therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Laith Sarsam, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 7, 2026 · control 08-AS-20260429150146
20251 state visit · 1 document
Sep 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA Rodgers was welcomed by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensee/Administrator Maja Bacinski . According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity of six (6) clients, all of whom can non- ambulatory of which 4 may be bedridden. This facility does not feature a secured perimeter or delayed egress doors. LPA accompanied by Licensee/Administrator, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows and screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, fireplaces, or open-faced heaters accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water were observed on the premises. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed multiple staff and clients. LPA reviewed multiple staff and client records/files. The interviews did not raise any significant licensing concerns. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Maja Bacinski, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 19, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Sep 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA Domingo was welcomed by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Maja Bacinski . According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity of six (6) clients, all of whom must be ambulatory. During today’s inspection, there were a total of four (4) clients in care. This facility does not feature a secured perimeter or delayed egress doors. LPA, accompanied by Administrator, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows and screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was 110 F. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were all compliant: Kitchen sink was 111 F, Bathroom #1 sink was 110 F, and Bathroom #2 sink was 110 F. Refrigerator temperature was 35 F and freezer temperature was 0 F. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, fireplaces, or open-faced heaters accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] No pools or bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per the licensee's staff, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPAs interviewed multiple staff and clients. LPA reviewed multiple staff and client records/files. The interviews did not raise any significant licensing concerns. The reviewed files contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. Licensee's staff also presented proof of current/active business liability insurance and surety bond. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Maja Bacinski, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 4 documents
20231 state visit · 1 document
Aug 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident sustained pressure injury while in care. Resident is left in bed for an extended period of time. Staff do not assist resident when needed.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings to the above mentioned complaint allegations. LPA Domingo identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Maja Bacinski. The Department’s investigation consisted of record reviews, interviews with staff and outside sources. It was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) sustained pressure injury while in care. (See LIC811 list of confidential list of identification). Interview with Outside Source (OS1) stated that R1 had pressure injuries on the lower extremities. OS1 stated that there were pictures of the pressure injuries. On 08/15/2022 LPA requested information verifying pressure injuries of R1. [Continue on LIC9099C] Unsubstantiated [Continued from LIC9099] On 10/13/2022 LPA reached out to OS1 requesting the information regarding R1. On 11/08/2022 LPA Domingo reached out via e mail requesting the information regarding R1. The requested information was not made available to the LPA after several attempts to obtain the information. Based on the review of R1's records, there was no documentation of pressure injuries. Based on staff interviews there was no pressure injuries on R1. It was alleged that the Resident 1 (R1) was left in bed for an extended period of time. Interview with Outside Source (OS2) stated that there are no concerns regarding residents left in bed for an extended period of time. Staff 1 (S1) provided training documentation regarding caring for the elderly of all the staff that was working during the time of the complaint. Based on the facility schedule there were staff providing care throughout a 24 hour period. It was alleged that Staff do not assist resident when needed. Interview with R1 and Resident 2 (R2) did not provide any evidence of staff not assisting residents when needed. R1 and R2 collectively stated that all the staff provide good care and attention to their needs. Outside Source 3 (SO3) was interviewed and there were no concerns regarding staff assisting the residents when needed. Outside Source 4 (OS4) confirmed during an interview that there are no concerns regarding resident care and meeting the resident's needs. The Department has investigated the above mentioned allegation and the preponderance of the evidence standard has not been met. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. A copy of this report along with Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) was provided to the Licensee and the signature on this form confirms receipt of these rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2023 · control 08-AS-20220809090925
20222 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 21, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo conducted an unannounced Required 1 - Year Visit. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was greeted by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Maja Bacinski Licensee. All staff that LPA encountered have a current criminal record clearance. LPA conducted a brief tour of the facility and interacted with staff and residents. In accordance with the Department’s Infection Control, LPA provided technical assistance and observed and evaluated the facility's implementation of their COVID-19 Mitigation Plan and Infection Control Plan to include disinfection, screening protocols, and the use of personal protective equipment. No deficiencies were cited or observed on this date. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report and Licensee Rights LIC 9058 (3/22) were left with the Licensee, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 21, 2022
Aug 16, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not adhering to Covid-19 infection Control Guidance
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo and Interim Assistant Program Administrator (IAPA) Icela Estrada conducted an unannounced visit to open a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA and IAPA identified themselves, discussed the purpose of the visit, and met with Administrator, Maja Bacinski. The Department’s investigation consisted of observations and an interview with the administrator. It was alleged that facility staff are not adhering to COVID-19 Infection Control Guidance. During today’s complaint investigation visit, LPA and IAPA observed three staff, to include Administrator, Maja Bacinski not wearing a face mask. Interview with Administrator Bacinski revealed that all staff and residents have been vaccinated and masks are not worn because they hinder communication with residents. Residents have a difficulty understanding staff. Administrator did acknowledge that masks must be worn by staff while in the facility. During the visit, all staff put surgical masks on. Substantiated Based on observations and interview, the above allegation is determined to be substantiated. A substantiated finding means the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. A deficiency is cited per Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations and is listed on form LIC 9099-D. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Bacinski which included developing a plan of correction for the deficiency. A copy of this report, LIC 9099, LIC 9099-D, LIC 811 Confidential Names List, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 01/16) were provided at the conclusion of the visit. The administrator’s signature on the forms confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 16, 2022 · control 08-AS-20220809090925
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 31, 2022
Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations and interview, the licensee did not accord healthful accommodations in 6 of 6 persons in care in which posed a potiential health and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 16, 2022
Plan of correction: The licensee agrees to having the County of San Diego HAI team come out to provide an assessment and PPE training to staff. LIcensee will provide LPA with a sign in sheet of staff that attended the PPE training.
The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20211 state visit · 1 document
Jul 27, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an unannounced Required 1 - Year Visit. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was greeted by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Caregiver Monica Galindo. Administrator Maja Bacinski arrived later during the visit. LPA conducted a brief tour of the facility and observed the residents in care. In accordance with the Department’s Infection Control, LPA provided technical assistance and observed and evaluated the facility's implementation of their COVID-19 Mitigation Plan, to include disinfection, screening protocols, and the use of personal protective equipment. All staff encountered have a current criminal record clearance. No deficiencies were cited on this date. An exit interview was conducted with Bacinski, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided via E-mail.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 27, 2021
5 of 6 beds were occupied at the May 7, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Bjm Prosper LLC, licensed since 2020.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2020, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 6
- Total complaints
- 2
- Substantiated allegations
- 1
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 1
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2020, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 1 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 1 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 2 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Compassionate Care for Seniors 1
Is Compassionate Care for Seniors 1 licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
How many residents is Compassionate Care for Seniors 1 licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
Has Compassionate Care for Seniors 1 been cited?
0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026. Those records count 6 state visits over the same years.
Is Compassionate Care for Seniors 1 still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Compassionate Care for Seniors 1 cost?
$5,600 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,600–$6,900. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 198 other homes of a similar licensed size across San Diego County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 198 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Compassionate Care for Seniors 1 take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Bjm Prosper LLC, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Grossmont Hospital is 1 mile away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Compassionate Care for Seniors 1 keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
Compassionate Care for Seniors 1 license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “COMPASSIONATE CARE FOR SENIORS 1”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #374604336. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
- Licensed to Bjm Prosper LLC, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2020, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
- 6 state inspection visits since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026. The same records count 6 state visits in that period.
- 2 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is May 7, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Diego County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$4,813 a month to start
Listed by the home on A Place for Mom · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$2,195 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$6,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,650 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,650–$6,950On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,600 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,600–$6,900On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,600 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,550–$6,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Diego County