Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Say You're Home Too
Small home·Licensed for 6·La Mesa, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$5,550 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,550–$6,850
- Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedJanuary 14, 2026 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitMay 12, 2026CDSS inspection record
Say You're Home Too is a small care home in La Mesa — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2023. Dementia care is not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Say You're Home Too
Is Say You're Home Too licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Say You're Home Too licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Say You're Home Too been cited?
1 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 7 state visits over the same years.
Is Say You're Home Too still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Say You're Home Too cost?
$5,550 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,550–$6,850. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 195 other homes of a similar licensed size across San Diego County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 195 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Say You're Home Too take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Say You're Home Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to Say You're Home Inc. — at least 2 on the state roster.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Grossmont Hospital is 1 mile away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Say You're Home Too keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Say You're Home Too license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “SAY YOU'RE HOME TOO”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #374604649. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed to Say You're Home Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 7 state inspection visits since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 7 state visits in that period.
- 1 complaint and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is May 12, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
- Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
- BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
4 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation not on file
Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,550a month to start
Likely $4,550–$6,850
From 15 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$5,550a month
Likely $4,550–$7,000
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$5,550likely $4,550–$6,850
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,550–$7,000
- $5,550
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,300–$10,050
- $7,550
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
15 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,200–$6,750.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 15 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Right Choice Senior Living LLC - La MesaLa Mesa · 0.5 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Lake Murray Health Care CenterSan Diego · 0.7 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Green VillaSan Diego · 0.7 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Silvercreek Home CareSan Diego · 0.9 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Renaissance LivingLa Mesa · 1.3 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Lucie's Shady RestSan Diego · 1.7 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Peppertree Guest Home IILa Mesa · 1.8 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- La Mesa Elder CareSan Diego · 2.0 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Pine Tree Home 2El Cajon · 2.4 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Noble Living IIEl Cajon · 2.5 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Jobeth Home CareEl Cajon · 2.6 mi · Small home$4,650Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Del Cerro Elder CareSan Diego · 2.7 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sierra Sunshine CareEl Cajon · 2.8 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Care Plus MansionEl Cajon · 2.9 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Comfort & Joy LivingSan Diego · 2.9 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 5977 Lake Murray Blvd, La Mesa, CA 91942Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2023, the state has filed 6 documents for this home, and its records count 7 visits since 2023. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 12, 2026.
- On file since
- 2023
- State visits
- 7
- Most recent visit
- May 12, 2026
- Occupied · January 14, 2026 visit
- 6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated January 14, 2026. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations1typical 0
- Type B citations1typical 0
- Substantiated allegations2typical 0
- Total complaints1typical 0
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2023.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 4 of 6 documents
May 12, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers, made an unannounced visit to conduct the required Annual Inspection. LPA Rodgers was granted entry into the facility Licensee Lisa Sayre after identifying herself and stating the purpose of the inspection. According to the facility’s license, the facility serves six non-ambulatory elderly residents: ages 60 and above of which one (1) can be bedridden. LPA was accompanied by staff during a tour of the facility, which was conducted inside and out and included a sample of resident bedrooms, common area, dining area. Exterior and interior passageways were free from obstructions. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, or open-faced heaters accessible to clients. Resident’s room temperatures were within a comfortable range. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to residents were all compliant. Each resident had clean and sufficient bed linens, towels, and washcloths. All residents’ rooms were equipped with required furnishings and appropriate lighting to ensure the comfort and safety of residents. Residents’ bathrooms were observed to be sanitary and operational. Toilets and showers were equipped with grab bars. Non-skid mats are present in the showers. Facility has a two-day supply of perishable and a seven-day supply of nonperishable food items. Medications are locked in a locked closet, not accessible to residents. Medications were labeled and kept in compliance with label instructions. LPA interviewed staff and clients. LPA reviewed multiple staff and client records/files. The interviews did not raise any significant licensing concerns. The reviewed files contained all required documents. No deficiencies were observed or cited at the time of visit An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and Licensee/Appeal Rights - LIC 9058 (rev. 03/22) was provided to the , Licensee Lisa Sayre whose signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 12, 2026
Jan 14, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee did not ensure staff were associated to facility Licensee did not keep medications stored in original packaging.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to invistagte and deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Lisa Sayre. On January 06, 2026, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint alleging that the Licensee did not ensure staff were associated with the facility and that the Licensee did not keep medications stored in their original packaging. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. Substantiated (Continued from LIC9099) Regarding the allegation, the Licensee did not ensure that the staff were associated with the facility. More specifically, Staff #1 does not have Department background clearance and is employed at the facility. It was discovered through Department interviews with staff and residents, as well as records reviews. Staff #1 (S1) is currently employed at the facility. Review of the Department’s background clearance database revealed S1 was not associated to the facility and did not have a background clearance. Based on the evidence obtained, the deficiency was cited in an LIC 9099-D form. An immediate five-hundred-dollar ($500) civil penalty was assessed in an LIC 421BG form. Regarding the allegation, Licensee did not keep medications stored in their original packaging. More specifically, It was reported that staff fill medication containers designated for residents and place the medications into 7-day pill organizers. During the facility tour LPA observed medications being stored in plastic containers with different sections for morning, noon, evening, and bed time. An interview with Staff #2 (S2) revealed that S2 transfers medications into the corresponding time residents are supposed to receive their medication. These medications were not stored in the original medication packages. LPA explained to the licensee that medications must not be transferred into different containers in this way and in accordance with licensing guidelines must stay in their original packaging. Based on evidence obtained , the licensee did not store medication in original containers, the deficiency was cited in an LIC 9099-D Based on relevant interviews and records review, the preponderance of evidence has been met that alleged violation(s) occurred and are therefore substantiated. Deficiencies are cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the attached LIC 9099-D) and an immediate civil penalty was assessed. A Plan of Correction was jointly developed with the licensee. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Lisa Sayre, to whom a copy of this report, the LIC811 Confidential Names List, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided. (Continued from LIC9099) Regarding the allegation that staff did not provide incontinence care to residents. More specially, It was alleged that staff failed to provide timely incontinence care to R1 as outlined in the care plan. Department interviews with staff revealed inconsistent responses—some staff stated care was provided as required, while others were unsure or gave conflicting accounts. Department interviews with outside sources indicated they had not observed any issues related to incontinence care for any residence. OS1 reported frequent visits to the facility, including body checks for R1, and stated they had not noticed any urine odors in the facility or from other residents. Regarding the allegation that staff did not reposition bedridden resident(s) per care plan. More specifically, it was alleged that staff failed to reposition R2 according to the care plan schedule. Department interviews with staff revealed that all staff agreed they were following repositioning schedules and care plans, and that R2 was assisted out of bed almost daily. Department interviews with outside sources indicated they had not observed any problems related to repositioning. They further reported frequent visits to the facility and noted no skin issues concerning R2. Regarding the allegation that staff #3 (S3) may have consumed alcohol while at the facility. Department interviews with staff indicated they did not witness S3 providing care while under the influence. Department interviews with staff indicated they did not observe S3 providing care while impaired or under the influence to a degree that would affect job performance, safety, or effectiveness, as prohibited by CCLD regulations. Interviews revealed that alcohol was present during a celebratory events at the facility, and some staff reported witnessing brief toasts. There was no indication that any staff, including S3, were impaired or that resident care was negatively impacted. Department interviews with outside sources indicated they had not observed any staff appearing impaired or under the influence of alcohol Based on interviews, direct LPA observations, and records review, a preponderance of evidence does not exist to prove that the alleged violations occurred. Therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Lisa Sayre to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2026 · control 08-AS-20260106153022
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(b)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 14, 2026
87355 Criminal Record Clearance (e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (2) Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by the Department... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, and review of records, the Licensee did not ensure S1 had a criminal records clearance, which posed an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to 6 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to obtain criminal records clearances for all new staff prior to employment. LIcensee stated S1 will no longer work at the facility until cleared. The LPA did not observe S1 at the facility, therefore, the POC was cleared on today's date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(5) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 16, 2026
87465(h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored:(5)Each resident's medication shall be stored in its originally received container. No medications shall be transferred between containers. Based on records reviewed and interviews the licensee did not store medication in original containers which poses an potential Safety risk to 5 persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee states they will schedule outside source medication training and provide proof to LPA by POC.
Apr 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Amy Domingo conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensee, Lisa Sayre. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity of six (6) clients, all of whom can be non-ambulatory. This facility does not feature a secured perimeter or delayed egress doors. LPA, accompanied by licensee, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows and screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry and visitation. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was compliant. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were all compliant. Refrigerator and Freezer temperature were complaint. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, fireplaces, or open-faced heaters accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. [Continued on 809-C] [Continued on 809] No pools or bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per the licensee no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were in working order. First aid was complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed staff and clients. LPA reviewed multiple staff and client records/files. The interviews did not raise any significant licensing concerns. The reviewed files contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. Licensee's staff also presented proof of current/active business liability insurance. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Lisa Sayre, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2025
Apr 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensee, Lisa Sayre. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity of six (6) clients, all of whom can be non-ambulatory. This facility does not feature a secured perimeter or delayed egress doors. LPA, accompanied by licensee, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows and screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry and visitation. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was compliant. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were all compliant. Refrigerator and Freezer temperature were complaint. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, fireplaces, or open-faced heaters accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. [Continued on 809-C] [Continued on 809] No pools or bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per the licensee no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were in working order. First aid was complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed multiple staff and clients. LPA reviewed multiple staff and client records/files. The interviews did not raise any significant licensing concerns. The reviewed files contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. Licensee's staff also presented proof of current/active business liability insurance. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Lisa Sayre, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2024
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in San Diego County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Say You're Home
La Mesa · Small home · 0.0 mi away
$5,600 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Compassionate Care for Seniors 1
La Mesa · Small home · 0.2 mi away
$5,500 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Wellspring Assisted Living
San Diego · Small home · 0.4 mi away
$5,600 a month to start · Covelight estimate
The Montera
La Mesa · Large community · 0.4 mi away
$4,813 a month to start · Listed by the home
Right Choice Senior Living LLC - La Mesa
La Mesa · Small home · 0.5 mi away
$6,000 a month to start · Listed by the home
Lake Murray Health Care Center
San Diego · Small home · 0.7 mi away
$4,000 a month to start · Listed by the home