Summerfield Of Encinitas is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Encinitas, San Diego County, California — state license #374604227, licensed for 56 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 23 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 20, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Summerfield Of Encinitas

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 56 residents · Encinitas, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374604227, held since 2020 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1350 S. El Camino Real · Encinitas, San Diego County
Phone
(760) 479-1818
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 56 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 & OVER.APPROVED FOR FIFTY-SIX NON-AMBULATORY.APPROVED FOR SECURED PERIMETER.APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TWENTY (20).NEW MANAGMENT COMPANY,NORTHSTAR SENIOR LIVING INC,EFFECTIVE 3/30/22. NEW MGT CO NORTHSTAR SENIOR LIVING MANAGEMENT LLC EFFECTIVE 4/22/26.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 25 times and filed 23 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 20, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 20, 2026
Occupancy at the November 14, 2025 visit
37 of 56 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 10 documents with transcribed findings, dated May 12, 2022 to November 14, 2025. 10 of the 10 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (6). 10 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 10 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 14 of 23 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
May 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 12, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20254 state visits · 7 documents
Nov 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained an unwitnessed fall resulting in injury Staff does not ensure resident's toenails are maintained

On 11/14/2025 at 02:00 PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) J. Clancy-Czuleger meet virtually via Teams to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA explained the purpose of the visit with Administrator Mercedes Margritz. During the course of the investigation, The Department conducted interviews with staff, residents, and witnesses. The Department collected and reviewed the following documents: Resident’s (R1) podiatry authorization form, incident report for R1, R1’s resident assessment, R1’s admission record, R1’s physicians report, and R1’s medical records. On the allegation: Resident sustained an unwitnessed fall resulting in injury. R1 was observed in bed at 6:00am, at 8:00am S2 Changed R1’s diaper got R1 dressed and took R1 to Continued on LIC 9099C... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 14, 2025 · control 08-AS-20240819150239
May 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Untrained staff administered medication to residents.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Chris Tharp. On 04/22/2025 it was alleged that an untrained staff member administered medications to a resident. The Department's investigation involved unannounced facility visits, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and LPA direct observations. Staff interviews revealed that the facility suffered threee (3) call-outs the day of the incident due to the Easter holiday, including the PM Medication Technician (Med Tech) on duty. Staff interviews further revealed that the staff in question, S1, was working as a concierge but had a significant medical background with adequate medication administration training from another state. S1 agreed to administer medications the evening in question, and tthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250422092257
May 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not ensure resident(s) private information remained confidential.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Chris Tharp. On 01/03/2025 it was alleged that Licensee did not ensure resident(s) private information remained confidential. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, review of facility and outside source records, and interviews with facility staff. Staff interviews corroborated the allegation. During and unannounced facility visit on 01/10/2025, LPA was notified by a staff member that an outside person, not affiliated with the facility, had contacted them inquiring about things that had happened at the facility the same day during the visit. The outside source named a resident relevant to LPA's complaint investigation, advising that they were told LPA was investigating a situation regarding the resident. The staff member informethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 4, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250103132436
Feb 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure resident's oxygen tank was changed in a timely manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Chris Tharp. On 10/08/24 it was alleged that staff did not ensure resident's oxygen tank was changed in a timely manner. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and LPA direct observations. Staff interviews revealed that staff were aware of Resident 1 (R1)'s continuous oxygen prescription and oxygen needs. Staff informed that the facility primarily used an oxygen concentrator for R1 at the facility, but there were times when a portable oxygen tank was used, particularly when R1 was taken for walks away from the facility with an approved Outside Individual (OI). Staff informed that the facility preferred to used the concentrthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 21, 2025 · control 08-AS-20241008163510
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 5, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not administer medication as prescribed. Licensee did not maintain medication administration record.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced facility visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Resident Services Director Richard Mariona. On 8/30/2023 it was alleged that staff did not administer medication as prescribed, and Licensee did not maintain a medication administration record. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and LPA direct observations. Regarding the allegation, "Staff did not administer medication as prescribed", it was alleged that a resident's (R1) medications were not given on multiple occasions. Staff interview revealed that there have been no medication errors for R1. (Continued on LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 5, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230830162510
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints2typical 2
Total complaints9typical 7
State visits on file25typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2020.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202633020254722024330202345020224412021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (760) 479-1818

Is Summerfield Of Encinitas licensed?

Yes — Summerfield Of Encinitas is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Encinitas (San Diego County): California license #374604227, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 56 residents. State records list 23 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated May 20, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Summerfield Of Encinitas care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Summerfield Of Encinitas with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 & OVER.APPROVED FOR FIFTY-SIX NON-AMBULATORY.APPROVED FOR SECURED PERIMETER.APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TWENTY (20).NEW MANAGMENT COMPANY,NORTHSTAR SENIOR LIVING INC,EFFECTIVE 3/30/22. NEW MGT CO NORTHSTAR SENIOR LIVING MANAGEMENT LLC EFFECTIVE 4/22/26.

How much does Summerfield Of Encinitas cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Summerfield Of Encinitas's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Summerfield Of Encinitas accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Summerfield Of Encinitas is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

37 of 56 beds occupied (66%) when the state visited on November 14, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Summerfield Of Encinitas?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 25 state visits and 23 dated documents since 2021 for Summerfield Of Encinitas; 10 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated November 14, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

10 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained an unwitnessed fall resulting in injury Staff does not ensure resident's toenails are maintained
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 11/14/2025 at 02:00 PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) J. Clancy-Czuleger meet virtually via Teams to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA explained the purpose of the visit with Administrator Mercedes Margritz. During the course of the investigation, The Department conducted interviews with staff, residents, and witnesses. The Department collected and reviewed the following documents: Resident’s (R1) podiatry authorization form, incident report for R1, R1’s resident assessment, R1’s admission record, R1’s physicians report, and R1’s medical records. On the allegation: Resident sustained an unwitnessed fall resulting in injury. R1 was observed in bed at 6:00am, at 8:00am S2 Changed R1’s diaper got R1 dressed and took R1 to Continued on LIC 9099C... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 14, 2025 · control 08-AS-20240819150239
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedUntrained staff administered medication to residents.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Chris Tharp. On 04/22/2025 it was alleged that an untrained staff member administered medications to a resident. The Department's investigation involved unannounced facility visits, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and LPA direct observations. Staff interviews revealed that the facility suffered threee (3) call-outs the day of the incident due to the Easter holiday, including the PM Medication Technician (Med Tech) on duty. Staff interviews further revealed that the staff in question, S1, was working as a concierge but had a significant medical background with adequate medication administration training from another state. S1 agreed to administer medications the evening in question, and tCDSS inspection report, May 1, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250422092257
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not ensure resident(s) private information remained confidential.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Chris Tharp. On 01/03/2025 it was alleged that Licensee did not ensure resident(s) private information remained confidential. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, review of facility and outside source records, and interviews with facility staff. Staff interviews corroborated the allegation. During and unannounced facility visit on 01/10/2025, LPA was notified by a staff member that an outside person, not affiliated with the facility, had contacted them inquiring about things that had happened at the facility the same day during the visit. The outside source named a resident relevant to LPA's complaint investigation, advising that they were told LPA was investigating a situation regarding the resident. The staff member informeCDSS inspection report, February 4, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250103132436
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure resident's oxygen tank was changed in a timely manner.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Chris Tharp. On 10/08/24 it was alleged that staff did not ensure resident's oxygen tank was changed in a timely manner. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and LPA direct observations. Staff interviews revealed that staff were aware of Resident 1 (R1)'s continuous oxygen prescription and oxygen needs. Staff informed that the facility primarily used an oxygen concentrator for R1 at the facility, but there were times when a portable oxygen tank was used, particularly when R1 was taken for walks away from the facility with an approved Outside Individual (OI). Staff informed that the facility preferred to used the concentrCDSS inspection report, January 21, 2025 · control 08-AS-20241008163510

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not administer medication as prescribed. Licensee did not maintain medication administration record.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced facility visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Resident Services Director Richard Mariona. On 8/30/2023 it was alleged that staff did not administer medication as prescribed, and Licensee did not maintain a medication administration record. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and LPA direct observations. Regarding the allegation, "Staff did not administer medication as prescribed", it was alleged that a resident's (R1) medications were not given on multiple occasions. Staff interview revealed that there have been no medication errors for R1. (Continued on LIC9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 5, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230830162510
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was allowed to wander outside of designated wing Facility failed to follow reporting requirements
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Business Office Manager Janelle Harris and we discussed the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegation. The investigation consisted of LPA observation, records review, interviews with facility staff and outside agency. It was reported to CCL that on December 12, 2021 Resident 1 (R1) (an LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to the facility representative to identify the resident) was allowed to wander outside of their designated wing. It was also alleged that the facility failed to report this incident to CCL. LPA visit to the facility on December 21, 2021 revealed the entire facility is memory care. LPA toured the facility and witnessed residents moving throughout the circular shaped building which included an indoor patio area. The building layout allows alCDSS inspection report, June 22, 2023 · control 08-AS-20211216095955
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not follow resident's care plan, resulting in a fall. Resident was not provided a modified diet, as prescribed.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Heather Myers, Executive Director. On 3/27/23 it was alleged that staff did not follow a resident's care plan which resulted in a fall, and that a resident was not provided a modified diet, as prescribed. The Department’s investigation consisted of two unannounced facility tours, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff, residents, and outside sources, and LPA direct observations. Regarding the allegation, "Staff did not follow resident's care plan, resulting in a fall", it was alleged that staff did not perform a 2-person assist for a resident during a transfer, which resulted in a fall in the shower. Staff interview revealed that all caregivers have been trained with 2-person assist transfer protocols for residents and are aware of each resideCDSS inspection report, June 16, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230327152133
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedInadequate staffing to meet the needs of residents. Staff were not properly trained. Facility is in disrepair. Facility did not ensure resident(s) had access to personal care supplies.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Executive Director Heather Myers. On 2/13/23 it was alleged that the facility had inadequate staffing to meet the needs of residents, staff were not properly trained, the facility was in disrepair, and the facility did not ensure that resident(s) had access to personal care supplies. The Department’s investigation consisted of 3 unannounced facility tours, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff, residents, and outside sources, and LPA direct observations. Regarding the allegation "Inadequate staffing to meet the needs of residents", interviews with staff, outside sources, and residents revealed that while the facility suffered from staffing inconsistencies, residents' basic needs continued to be met during the timeframe of the complaint. (ContCDSS inspection report, June 16, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230213114748
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is aggressive with resident in care. Staff is under the influence on facility grounds.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Executive Director Heather Myers and we discussed the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above allegations. The investigation consisted of LPA interviews with residents and facility staff and records review. It was reported to CCL that residents were being handled aggressively by Staff #1 (S1) Complainant also reported that they observed S1 dragging residents by the arm. Resident 1(R1) and Resident 2 (R2)[an LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to the facility representative to identify the residents.]. Interview with Staff #2 (S2) revealed no knowledge of any staff member acting aggressively or abusing any residents in care. Staff further stated that they have never seen any staff member under the influence of drugs or alcohol at the facility. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 27, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230303092056

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff failed to provide resident's records to authorized representative.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Correia conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigative findings on the above listed complaint allegation. LPA Correia met with Executive Director (ED) Myers to whom was explained the purpose for the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of a resident record review and staff and outside source interviews. It was alleged facility staff failed to produce Resident’s (R1) (See Confidential Names List LIC 811) records when requested by R1’s authorized representative. A record review revealed on June 5, 2020 a records request was submitted to the facility for R1. An interview with facility staff revealed R1’s facility file was sent to Administrative staff to fulfill the record request. An additional interview with the facility Administrative staff corroborated receiving the file containing R1’s records and the record request. The interview also confirmed the record request was never processed and provided to the requesting party. SubstantiateCDSS inspection report, May 12, 2022 · control 08-AS-20200611160446

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 25 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
9
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
25
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Summerfield Of Encinitas?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Snh Cal Tenant Llc; Northstar Senior Living, Inc., who operates 4 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(760) 479-1818
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Summerfield Of Encinitas? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.