Ranchview Senior Assisted Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Encinitas, San Diego County, California — state license #374604538, licensed for 42 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 18 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated July 31, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

1 home in view

Ranchview Senior Assisted Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 42 residents · Encinitas, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374604538, held since 2022 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
350 Cole Ranch Road · Encinitas, San Diego County
Phone
(760) 753-5082
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 42 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 8 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 42 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 8 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. DELAYED EGRESS AND SECURED PERIMETER APPROVED. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20 RESIDENTS. SECOND FLOOR IS FOR STAFF USE ONLY WITH NO RESIDENT ACCESS.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 20 times and filed 18 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 31, 2025.

Most recent state visit
July 31, 2025
Occupancy at the July 3, 2025 visit
23 of 42 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 13 documents with transcribed findings, dated November 17, 2022 to July 3, 2025. 13 of the 13 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (12). 13 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 13 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 12 of 18 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20255 state visits · 5 documents
Jul 31, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not administer resident's medication resulting in seizure. Staff left resident in soiled diaper for extended period of time. Neglect/lack of supervision resulted in sexual activity between residents. Licensee did not answer communications from resident's representative promptly. Staff did not have proper training to administer medications.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations made on 03/06/2025. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Marketing Manager Maria Flores. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, outside sources, and records review. It was alleged that staff did not administer medication to Resident 1 (R1), resulting in a seizure. Staff interviews revealed that the correct medication and dosage was administered to R1 at the correct time. Staff informed that the color of medications changed at times due to pharmacy preparation or generic versions of the same prescription. An independent investigation was conducted by an outside source protective agency. The outside source informed that their investigation did not produce evidence that a medication error occurred. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) forthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 3, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250306134947
Mar 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff refused to provide assistive device to resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to initiate a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Marketing Manager/Administrator Maria Flores. On 03/14/25 it was alleged that staff refused to provide an assistive device to a resident. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, interviews with facility staff, outside sources, and records review. Three (3) staff members with medication technician training who worked morning and evening shifts were interviewed regarding the allegation. Staff interviews did not corroborate the allegation, as staff informed that Resident 1 (R1) used the CPAP machine at night and staff always assisted or attempted to assist them with it. Staff informed that R1 maintained the ability to place the CPAP machine on themselves, and sometimes refused staff assistance. Staff interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250314154803
Feb 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not meet resident's incontinence needs.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced 10-day visit to initiate a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Administrator Genoveva Guerrero and Marketing Manager Maria Flores. On 02/21/2025 it was alleged that Licensee did not meet a resident's incontinence needs. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, interviews with facility staff, resident, outside sources, and records review. It was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) arrived at an outside care agency with soiled clothing, indicating that the Licensee had not provided incontinence care to the resident. The three staff members who were involved with preparing R1 for transport the day of the incident were privately interviewed. All three staff members provided a consistent timeline of events leading up to R1's transport at the facility. All staff members inforthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250221111631
Jan 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect resulted in bodily injury. Staff did not seek medical attention for resident. Licensee did not report resident's change in condition to responsible party.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Marketing Manager Maria Flores. On 2/21/23 it was alleged that staff neglect resulted in bodily injury, staff did not seek medical attention for a resident, and Licensee did not report a resident's change in condition to responsible party. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. Regarding the allegation, "Staff neglect resulted in bodily injury ", it was alleged that neglectful care led to significant bruising of Resident 1 (R1). Eight (8) of 8 staff involved and/or with knowledge of the incident consistently reported the circumstances of the event. (Continued on LIC9099-C p.2) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2024 · control 08-AS-20230221091854
Dec 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not treat resident with dignity.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Marketing Manager Maria Flores. On 10/03/2024 it was alleged that staff did not treat Resident 1 (R1) with dignity. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. Staff interviews revealed that management had not received reports from residents or staff about lack of dignity or rough handling by a staff member. Staff interviews revealed that the staff member named in the complaint was a per diem caregiver and had not had a shift at the facility since October 2023; this information was corroborated by staff schedules. Staff interviews further revealed that due to R1's gender preference, certain caregivers typically did not provide care to R1, which reduced the likelihood thatthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2024 · control 08-AS-20241003111853
Dec 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not treat resident with dignity. Staff handled resident in a rough manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Marketing Manager Maria Flores. On 6/12/2024 it was alleged that staff did not treat a resident with dignity and staff handled a resident in a rough manner. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. Staff interviews did not corroborate the allegations. Five (5) of five staff members interviewed did not observe any staff member handle Resident 1 (R1) roughly or interact with R1 in a way that did not maintain their dignity. Staff interviews consistently revealed that R1 exhibited aggressive and manipulative behaviors toward staff, and was frequently resistant to being provided care. (Continued on LIC9099-C p.2) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240612143814
Jun 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff inappropriately touched resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to initiate a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Marketing Manager Maria Flores and Manager Wendy Diaz. On 3/8/24 it was alleged that staff inappropriately touched resident 1 (R1). CCLD’s investigation involved an unannounced facility visit, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and LPA observations. Staff interviews did not corroborate the allegation, staff members interviewed consistently stated that they had never been informed of or observed any staff inappropriately touching a resident. Staff interviews revealed that R1 has had increased agitation and hallucinations about things that did not, or could not possibly have happened. Outside source interviews did not corroborate the allegation, outside sources informed no knthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240308153356
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 21, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect resulting in resident being severely malnourished Neglect resulting in resident suffering dehydration Neglect resulting in resident sustaining multiple pressure injuries Neglect resulting in resident sustaining serious injury Staff did not observe change in condition

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Marketing Manager Maria Flores. On 7/12/23 the following allegations were made against the Licensee regarding Resident 1 (R1): neglect resulting in resident being severely malnourished, neglect resulting in resident suffering dehydration, neglect resulting in resident sustaining multiple pressure injuries, neglect resulting in resident sustaining serious injury, staff did not observe change in condition. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and direct observations. (Continued on LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 21, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230712162633
Nov 29, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are using a belt to restrain resident in a chair

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the finding in the above mention complaint allegations. LPA Domingo identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Manager Wendy Diaz. During the investigation, LPA Domingo collected pertinent resident records as well as facility documentation and conducted interviews with staff, residents and outside sources. It was alleged that staff were using a belt to restrain a resident in a chair. LPA Domingo observed 4 Residents during meal time. Resident 1 (R1) through Resident 3 (R3) (See LIC811 Confidential Names list). Resident 1 (R1) was observed with a soft positioning foam. R1's medical record was reviewed and there was an order for the soft positioning foam to be used. Continue on LIC9099C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 29, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231020145534
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints0typical 2
Total complaints13typical 7
State visits on file20typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2022.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2025550202435020235502022330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (760) 753-5082

Is Ranchview Senior Assisted Living licensed?

Yes — Ranchview Senior Assisted Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Encinitas (San Diego County): California license #374604538, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 42 residents. State records list 18 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 31, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Ranchview Senior Assisted Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Ranchview Senior Assisted Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 42 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 8 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. DELAYED EGRESS AND SECURED PERIMETER APPROVED. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20 RESIDENTS. SECOND FLOOR IS FOR STAFF USE ONLY WITH NO RESIDENT ACCESS.

How much does Ranchview Senior Assisted Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Ranchview Senior Assisted Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Ranchview Senior Assisted Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Ranchview Senior Assisted Living is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

23 of 42 beds occupied (55%) when the state visited on July 3, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Ranchview Senior Assisted Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 20 state visits and 18 dated documents since 2022 for Ranchview Senior Assisted Living; 13 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated July 3, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

13 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not administer resident's medication resulting in seizure. Staff left resident in soiled diaper for extended period of time. Neglect/lack of supervision resulted in sexual activity between residents. Licensee did not answer communications from resident's representative promptly. Staff did not have proper training to administer medications.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations made on 03/06/2025. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Marketing Manager Maria Flores. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, outside sources, and records review. It was alleged that staff did not administer medication to Resident 1 (R1), resulting in a seizure. Staff interviews revealed that the correct medication and dosage was administered to R1 at the correct time. Staff informed that the color of medications changed at times due to pharmacy preparation or generic versions of the same prescription. An independent investigation was conducted by an outside source protective agency. The outside source informed that their investigation did not produce evidence that a medication error occurred. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) forCDSS inspection report, July 3, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250306134947
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff refused to provide assistive device to resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to initiate a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Marketing Manager/Administrator Maria Flores. On 03/14/25 it was alleged that staff refused to provide an assistive device to a resident. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, interviews with facility staff, outside sources, and records review. Three (3) staff members with medication technician training who worked morning and evening shifts were interviewed regarding the allegation. Staff interviews did not corroborate the allegation, as staff informed that Resident 1 (R1) used the CPAP machine at night and staff always assisted or attempted to assist them with it. Staff informed that R1 maintained the ability to place the CPAP machine on themselves, and sometimes refused staff assistance. Staff interviewCDSS inspection report, March 21, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250314154803
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not meet resident's incontinence needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced 10-day visit to initiate a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Administrator Genoveva Guerrero and Marketing Manager Maria Flores. On 02/21/2025 it was alleged that Licensee did not meet a resident's incontinence needs. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, interviews with facility staff, resident, outside sources, and records review. It was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) arrived at an outside care agency with soiled clothing, indicating that the Licensee had not provided incontinence care to the resident. The three staff members who were involved with preparing R1 for transport the day of the incident were privately interviewed. All three staff members provided a consistent timeline of events leading up to R1's transport at the facility. All staff members inforCDSS inspection report, February 27, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250221111631

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect resulted in bodily injury. Staff did not seek medical attention for resident. Licensee did not report resident's change in condition to responsible party.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Marketing Manager Maria Flores. On 2/21/23 it was alleged that staff neglect resulted in bodily injury, staff did not seek medical attention for a resident, and Licensee did not report a resident's change in condition to responsible party. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. Regarding the allegation, "Staff neglect resulted in bodily injury ", it was alleged that neglectful care led to significant bruising of Resident 1 (R1). Eight (8) of 8 staff involved and/or with knowledge of the incident consistently reported the circumstances of the event. (Continued on LIC9099-C p.2) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 20, 2024 · control 08-AS-20230221091854
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not treat resident with dignity.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Marketing Manager Maria Flores. On 10/03/2024 it was alleged that staff did not treat Resident 1 (R1) with dignity. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. Staff interviews revealed that management had not received reports from residents or staff about lack of dignity or rough handling by a staff member. Staff interviews revealed that the staff member named in the complaint was a per diem caregiver and had not had a shift at the facility since October 2023; this information was corroborated by staff schedules. Staff interviews further revealed that due to R1's gender preference, certain caregivers typically did not provide care to R1, which reduced the likelihood thatCDSS inspection report, December 20, 2024 · control 08-AS-20241003111853
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not treat resident with dignity. Staff handled resident in a rough manner.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Marketing Manager Maria Flores. On 6/12/2024 it was alleged that staff did not treat a resident with dignity and staff handled a resident in a rough manner. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. Staff interviews did not corroborate the allegations. Five (5) of five staff members interviewed did not observe any staff member handle Resident 1 (R1) roughly or interact with R1 in a way that did not maintain their dignity. Staff interviews consistently revealed that R1 exhibited aggressive and manipulative behaviors toward staff, and was frequently resistant to being provided care. (Continued on LIC9099-C p.2) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 20, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240612143814
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff inappropriately touched resident.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to initiate a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Marketing Manager Maria Flores and Manager Wendy Diaz. On 3/8/24 it was alleged that staff inappropriately touched resident 1 (R1). CCLD’s investigation involved an unannounced facility visit, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and LPA observations. Staff interviews did not corroborate the allegation, staff members interviewed consistently stated that they had never been informed of or observed any staff inappropriately touching a resident. Staff interviews revealed that R1 has had increased agitation and hallucinations about things that did not, or could not possibly have happened. Outside source interviews did not corroborate the allegation, outside sources informed no knCDSS inspection report, March 14, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240308153356

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedNeglect resulting in resident being severely malnourished Neglect resulting in resident suffering dehydration Neglect resulting in resident sustaining multiple pressure injuries Neglect resulting in resident sustaining serious injury Staff did not observe change in condition
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Marketing Manager Maria Flores. On 7/12/23 the following allegations were made against the Licensee regarding Resident 1 (R1): neglect resulting in resident being severely malnourished, neglect resulting in resident suffering dehydration, neglect resulting in resident sustaining multiple pressure injuries, neglect resulting in resident sustaining serious injury, staff did not observe change in condition. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and direct observations. (Continued on LIC9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 21, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230712162633
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are using a belt to restrain resident in a chair
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the finding in the above mention complaint allegations. LPA Domingo identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Manager Wendy Diaz. During the investigation, LPA Domingo collected pertinent resident records as well as facility documentation and conducted interviews with staff, residents and outside sources. It was alleged that staff were using a belt to restrain a resident in a chair. LPA Domingo observed 4 Residents during meal time. Resident 1 (R1) through Resident 3 (R3) (See LIC811 Confidential Names list). Resident 1 (R1) was observed with a soft positioning foam. R1's medical record was reviewed and there was an order for the soft positioning foam to be used. Continue on LIC9099C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 29, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231020145534
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLack of supervision resulted in resident injury.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Maria Flores, Marketing Manager. On 7/11/23 it was alleged that facility staff's lack of supervision resulted in an injury to R1 (See LIC811 Confidential list of names) when they were pushed by another resident. The Department’s investigation consisted of two unannounced facility visits, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and LPA direct observations. Staff interviews revealed that staff presence was higher during the timeframe of the complaint due to an event. Interview revealed that an internal investigation was conducted by management regarding the incident and no staff observed any physical altercations between any residents on the day in question. Interviews revealed that R1 identified two different residentCDSS inspection report, July 21, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230711153142
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff chemically restrained resident Uncleared staff working at facility Unlawful eviction Licensee not following reporting requirements Staff forged documents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Ryan Ament, Operations Assistant. On 10/14/2022 it was alleged that the facility staff chemically restrained a resident, had uncleared staff working at the facility, illegally evicted a resident, did not follow reporting requirements, and forged documents. The Department’s investigation consisted of 3 unannounced facility tours, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff and outside sources, and LPA direct observations. Regarding the first allegation, “Staff chemically restrained resident”, it was alleged that management instructed staff to give medication to a resident to induce their behaviors. Continued on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 20, 2023 · control 08-AS-20221014090428
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is in disrepair Licensee did not address pest issue
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Marketing Manager Maria Flores. On 10/20/2022 it was alleged that the facility was in disrepair and that the Licensee did not address a pest issue. The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility tours, review of facility and outside source records, interviews with facility staff and outside sources, and LPA direct observations. Regarding the first allegation, direct observation by LPA as well as outside source records and interviews, showed that the facility was in the process of repairing an HVAC malfunction, as well as remodeling to upgrade the aesthetics of the facility. (Continue...) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 1, 2023 · control 08-AS-20221020093638

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 20 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
13
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
20
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(760) 753-5082
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Ranchview Senior Assisted Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.