Summerfield Of Roseville is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Roseville, Placer County, California — state license #312700641, licensed for 64 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 17 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated May 20, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

16 homes in view

Summerfield Of Roseville

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 64 residents · Roseville, CA · Placer County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #312700641, held since 2020 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
110 Sterling Court · Roseville, Placer County
Phone
(916) 772-6500
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 64 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 12 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 10 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 64 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 12. APPROVED FOR SECURED PERIMETER AND DELAYED EGGRESS. NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY NORTHSTAR SENIOR LIVING MANAGEMENT LLC EFFECTIVE 4/22/26.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 21 times and filed 17 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 20, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 23, 2026
Occupancy at the March 13, 2026 visit
38 of 64 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 7 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 16, 2022 to March 13, 2026. 7 of the 7 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 7 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 7 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 8 of 17 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
May 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff are not following universal precautions to prevent the spread of scabies

On 03/13/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Graham Gunby arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings into the allegation listed above and met with Executive Director, Neil Torres. Based on observation, record review, and statement reviewed, the facility was following infection control requirements. Public Health was contacted and they stated since it was only one client, they were not going to get involved. The administrator did submit an incident report to the department. As a precaution, during the first sign of a rash, facility puts out PPE outside the resident room, notifies staff of the potential of scabies, and an in-service to staff is reviewed on proper handwashing and universal precautions. Facility encouraged residents to stay in their room during the episode. It was observed facility had required PPE outside the resident room; therefore, the allegation is UNFOUNDED. A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened anthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 13, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260127151401
20253 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Resident needs are not being met due to insufficient staffing

On 08/26/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Lavinia Muscan arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings into the allegations listed above and met with Administrator May Ramos. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: The department has reviewed facility schedules and conducted interviews. Documents reviewed showed that shifts are covered by multiple staff. There is no evidence to support the allegation that needs are not being met due to staffing. The department learned that there are four (4) direct care staff and one (1) Med Tech available during each shift. The department finds no evidence that the current staff level is insufficient. Therefore, the allegation is UNFOUNDED. A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted. Report left withe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 26, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250722131426
May 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained multiple unwitnessed falls due to staff neglect

On May 7, 2025 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Lavinia Muscan and Talwinder Bains arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings into the allegations listed above and met with Jane Scaparro - Marketing Director. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: **Report continued on 9099-C** Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 7, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250204100350
May 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations4typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints5typical 2
Total complaints7typical 7
State visits on file21typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2020.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262202025341202422020234512022441
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Placer County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 772-6500

Is Summerfield Of Roseville licensed?

Yes — Summerfield Of Roseville is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Roseville (Placer County): California license #312700641, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 64 residents. State records list 17 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated May 20, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Summerfield Of Roseville care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Summerfield Of Roseville with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 64 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 12. APPROVED FOR SECURED PERIMETER AND DELAYED EGGRESS. NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY NORTHSTAR SENIOR LIVING MANAGEMENT LLC EFFECTIVE 4/22/26.

How much does Summerfield Of Roseville cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Summerfield Of Roseville's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Placer County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Summerfield Of Roseville accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Summerfield Of Roseville is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

38 of 64 beds occupied (59%) when the state visited on March 13, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Summerfield Of Roseville?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 21 state visits and 17 dated documents since 2022 for Summerfield Of Roseville; 7 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 13, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unfounded. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

7 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not following universal precautions to prevent the spread of scabies
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 03/13/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Graham Gunby arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings into the allegation listed above and met with Executive Director, Neil Torres. Based on observation, record review, and statement reviewed, the facility was following infection control requirements. Public Health was contacted and they stated since it was only one client, they were not going to get involved. The administrator did submit an incident report to the department. As a precaution, during the first sign of a rash, facility puts out PPE outside the resident room, notifies staff of the potential of scabies, and an in-service to staff is reviewed on proper handwashing and universal precautions. Facility encouraged residents to stay in their room during the episode. It was observed facility had required PPE outside the resident room; therefore, the allegation is UNFOUNDED. A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened anCDSS inspection report, March 13, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260127151401

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResident needs are not being met due to insufficient staffing
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 08/26/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Lavinia Muscan arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings into the allegations listed above and met with Administrator May Ramos. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: The department has reviewed facility schedules and conducted interviews. Documents reviewed showed that shifts are covered by multiple staff. There is no evidence to support the allegation that needs are not being met due to staffing. The department learned that there are four (4) direct care staff and one (1) Med Tech available during each shift. The department finds no evidence that the current staff level is insufficient. Therefore, the allegation is UNFOUNDED. A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted. Report left wiCDSS inspection report, August 26, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250722131426
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained multiple unwitnessed falls due to staff neglect
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On May 7, 2025 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Lavinia Muscan and Talwinder Bains arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings into the allegations listed above and met with Jane Scaparro - Marketing Director. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: **Report continued on 9099-C** SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 7, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250204100350

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Resident forced to take medication against her will. - Resident Restrained.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
This report was amended on 03/07/2023. Administrator listed above is not the facility's administrator. Current administrator is Harumi Hurrianko. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarena Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced 02/3/2023 to deliver final finding for a complaint Community Care Licensing (CCL) received on 11/04/2022. LPA met with Resident Service Director, Jasmine Juchniewicz, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Surgical Mask. Additionally, LPA was screened by facility staff upon entering the facility. Throughout the course of the complaint investigation the Department conducted interviews and obtained pertinent documents, such as resident’s (R1) physician's report, identification, and emergency information, needs and services plan, SOC 341, medication list, admission agreement, unusual incident/injury report, facility’s abuse policyCDSS inspection report, February 3, 2023 · control 25-AS-20221104151132

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 21 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
4
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
5
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
7
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
21
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Summerfield Of Roseville?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Snh Cal Tenant Llc; Northstar Senior Living, Inc., who operates 4 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 772-6500
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Summerfield Of Roseville? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.