Small home · Licensed for 6 · San Diego
P & P Homes
146 Wedgewood Drive, San Diego, CA 92114Licensed since 2017
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 2 residents
- Bedriddenup to 6 residents
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 6 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for P & P Homes: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,600a month to start
Likely $3,750–$5,650
From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,600likely a month
Starting monthly rate$4,600likely $3,750–$5,650
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,750–$5,850
- $4,600
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,450–$9,050
- $7,100
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes8 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,000 to $7,000
8 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,750–$7,000.
- Ohana Care HomeSan Diego · 0.2 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on its own website · monthly service fee · seen October 27, 2026
- Mayflower Home CareSan Diego · 0.8 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Archangel's Residential CareSan Diego · 1.1 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Chhina's Senior Guest HouseSpring Valley · 1.2 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Angel Genesis Guest HomeSpring Valley · 1.5 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Ohana Care Home IILemon Grove · 1.6 mi · Mid-size home$7,000Listed on its own website · monthly service fee · seen October 27, 2026
- Villa Victoria Care HomeSan Diego · 2.3 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Seniors Dignity Home and CareSan Diego · 2.9 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
146 Wedgewood Drive, San Diego, CA 92114Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Paradise Valley HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list3.6 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #374603761 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 7 of 11 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Unsubstantiated” and 1 not transcribed yet.
20262 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit and, in conjunction, conducted this case management visit. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Lead Caregiver Jonathan Luciano. LPA stated the purpose of the visit with Administrator Paulo Ordinanza, Lead Caregiver Jonathan Luciano, and Administrator’s Assistant Jevi Soriano. During the visit conducted by LPA on 09/23/26 to render findings, LPA observed that one of resident #1's (R1's) eye drops and a multivitamin containing only one of 3 vitamins were not on the resident's MAR and were not being provided to the resident. According to staff #1 (S1), the single vitamin they had received was from R1's former facility. According to R1's medication list, dated 08/05/2026, there was to be a 3-part multivitamin and not a single vitamin being provided to R1. According to S1, they had not received the resident's eye drops from their third-party agency. There was a deficiency observed and cited during today’s visit which may be found on the LIC809-D page of this report. The report was discussed, plan of correction was jointly developed, and an exit interview was conducted with Administrator Paulo Ordinanza, Lead Caregiver Jonathan Luciano, and Administrator’s Assistant Jevi Soriano. A copy of this report, along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22) were provided to Administrator Ordinanza at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 23, 2026
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(d) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 30, 2026
87465 (d) Incidental Medical and Dental Care (d) If the resident is unable to determine his/her own need for a prescription or nonprescription PRN medication, and is unable to communicate his/her symptoms clearly, facility staff designated by the licensee, shall be permitted to assist the resident with self-administration provided,… this requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on records review and observations, staff did not have the resident's eye drops and multivitamin for resident #1, which posed a potential health risk to the resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 23, 2026
Plan of correction: The facility will reconile R1s medication with R1s PCP and ensure they have been provided an updated medication list and place all the medications on the MAR to reflect the new medication list and submit both the medication list and MAR to LPA by POC due date, 09/30/2026.
Sep 23, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file
We haven’t transcribed this report yet. The complete document is on the state’s site.
May 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by caregiver Maria Cruz. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with lead caregiver Jonathan Luciano and Licensee Paulo Ordinanza, who later arrived and joined the visit. According to the facility’s license, there may be a maximum of 6 residents, all of whom may be non-ambulatory of which 6 may be bedridden at any given time at the facility site. The facility is approved for 2 hospice residents. During today’s inspection, the facility’s current census is 6 residents living at the facility. There were 5 residents present at the facility site during the inspection. LPA inspected the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, toilets, and showers were clean and in working order. The facility maintained extra linens and hygiene supplies. Personal Protective Equipment was complete and maintained in an accessible area. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was comfortable and compliant, at 76.6ºF. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to residents was compliant and maintained within the allotted temperature ranges as stipulated by regulations. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] There were at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days of non-perishable food present. The facility-maintained cooking, dining equipment, and utensils are all safely stored. There were no toxic chemicals or poisons accessible to residents. Medications were properly labeled, as required, and stored in a locked cabinet, which LPA inspected. The facility-maintained medication logs, which LPA reviewed. There were no pools or bodies of water on the premises. Per licensee Ordinanza, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and the facility telephone were all in working order. Fire extinguisher was present (01) and serviced within the last 12 months. The first aid kit was complete and readily accessible. LPA reviewed staff and resident records. LPA’s visit did not raise any licensing concerns. The files that LPA reviewed contained the required documents. Confidential records were stored in a locked area. Required licensing postings were observed in a visible area of the facility. There were no deficiencies observed or cited during today's annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Paulo Ordinanza and lead caregiver Jonathan Luciano, to whom a copy of this report, along with the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22), were provided at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms that the documents were received. The Licensee had submitted an updated Emergency Disaster Plan (LIC610-E) to the Department. During the visit LPA received a current Designation of Administrative Responsibility (LIC 308), and Personnel Report (LIC 500).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 8, 2026
20251 state visit · 3 documents
May 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: - Staff financially abusing residents in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Jonathan Luciano, caregiver. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and reviewed the findings of the complaint with Licensee Paulo Ordinanza who later arrived and joined the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources and a records review of relevant documents pertinent to this investigation. On December 6, 2024, it was alleged that the facility staff financially abused residents in care. It was alleged staff #1 (S1) and staff #2 (S2) were misappropriating the funds for resident #1 (R1) and resident #2 (R2) through withdrawal transactions. According to an Outside Source (OS1), R1 and R2 were taken to their respective banking institution on 11/14/2024, where their funds were deposited. Shortly thereafter, there was a withdrawal with an additional charge to R1's account. (Continuation on LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiated (Continuation of LIC9099) During the same visit, R2 modified their debit card information. S1 was present and instructed both R1 and R2 on the response to the financial institution staff. After the visit, interviews and bank surveillance revealed that S1 and S2 made withdrawals totaling $5,300, between November 2024 through January 2025, which was unusual account activity compared to the resident’s account history. The Department reviewed facility records which included admission agreements, physician’s reports, and Individual Service Plans (IPP) for both R1 and R2. Based on record review, R1 and R2 were not able to manage their own cash resources due to underlying cognitive medical conditions. The Department interviewed S1 who reported that the cash was withdrawn to purchase items for R1. R2 receives supplemental income through a third-party source. It was noted that R2 owed the facility funds for rent. According to financial statements, admission agreement and baking records, R2 lived at the facility since February 2023, but they did not receive their supplementary income until October 2024, after which the facility collected R2's supplementary income to satisfy invoices for past rent owed until November 2024. Facility invoices were inspected which revealed three separate payments for R1’s “SSI portion” in the amount of $1,398.07 on 11/19/25, 11/27/25, and 12/7/25. Three additional payments were recorded in the amount of $1,420.07 on 1/6/25, 2/6/25, and 3/6/25, which indicated that the amounts of the withdrawals did not exceed the amount R2 owed for November 2024 to January 2025. Based on the Department’s investigation of the above-mentioned allegation and the evidence obtained during staff and outside source interviews, and records reviewed, there is insufficient evidence to meet the preponderance of evidence standard. Therefore, the above allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated. The report was discussed, and an exit interview was conducted with Licensee Paulo Ordinanza. A copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22) were provided to Licensee Ordinanza at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2025 · control 08-AS-20241206160415
May 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA Lopez identified herself, was granted entry by caregiver Jonathan Luciano. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with caregiver Luciano. Licensee Paulo Ordinanza later arrived and joined the visit. According to the facility’s license, there may be a maximum of six (6) residents all of whom may be non-ambulatory of which 6 may be bedridden in at any given time at the facility site. The facility is approved for 2 hospice residents. During today’s inspection, the facility’s current census is five (5) residents living at the facility. There were 4 residents present at the facility site during the inspection. LPA, accompanied by caregiver Luciano, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was in clean, sanitary and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was comfortable and compliant, at 72.1 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were also compliant: kitchen sink measured hot water at 108.5 degrees F; sink in restroom #1 delivered hot water at 113.4 degrees F; and sink in restroom #2 delivered hot water at 109.8 degrees F. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present. Cooking, dining equipment and utensils were present, and all safely stored. There were no toxic chemicals or poisons accessible to residents. Medications were properly labeled, as required, and stored in locked cabinet that LPA inspected. The facility-maintained medication logs which LPA reviewed. No pools or bodies of water on the premises. Per licensee, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher was present (01) and serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kits were completed and readily accessible. LPA spoke with staff and residents, and reviewed staff and resident records. During today’s visit there were 4 residents on the facility premise. LPA conversations did not raise any licensing concerns. The files which LPA reviewed contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in a locked area. Required licensing postings were observed in a visible area of the facility. There were deficiencies observed and cited and a technical advisory provided to the facility during today's annual inspection and can be found on the LIC809-D and LIC9102TA page of this report. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Paulo Ordinanza to whom a copy of this report along with the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the documents were received. LPA requested Licensee Ordinanza to submit a current copy of their Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC 308, Personnel Report LIC 500, and Emergency Disaster Plan LIC 610-E, to the licensing office within 10 business days. Forms are available at www.ccld.ca.gov. LPA also requested to have their Plan of Operation updated and submitted to the licensing office.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2025
The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
May 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings and in conjunction conducted this case management visit. LPA Lopez identified herself and was granted entry by caregiver Jonathan Luciano. LPA Lopez stated the purpose and reviewed basic elements of the case management visit with licensee Paulo Ordinanza who later arrived to join the visit. The Department reviewed facility records, which included admission agreements, Physician’s Report’s, and Individual Service Plans (IPP) for Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2 (R2). Based on records review, R1 and R2 were not able to manage their own cash resources due to underlying cognitive medical conditions. According to R2’s admission agreement, they were responsible for partial payment toward their rent which was to be paid from their SSI funds. The Department obtained financial statements and bank surveillance from 11/2024 through 01/2025 which indicated that withdrawals were made for R1 and R2 with the assistance of Staff #1 (S1) and Staff #2 (S2). The Department interviewed S1 who reported that $171.86 cash was withdrawn to purchase items for R1. On 04/08/2025, the Department requested receipts from S1 for the items purchased for R1, however they were unable to provide receipts after searching for the documents. Facility invoices were subsequently inspected for R2 which revealed that three separate payments for R2’s “SSI portion” were made to the facility in the amount of $1,398.07 on 11/19/25, 11/27/25, and 12/7/25. Three additional payments were recorded in the amount of $1,420.07 on 1/6/25, 2/6/25, and 3/6/25. The Department inspected the facility’s Record of Client’s/Resident’s Safeguarded Cash Resources (LIC405) for R1 and R2 dated 2/22/23 – 11/9/2024 which revealed that entries were not made for the aforementioned expenditures. (Continuation on LIC809-C) (Continuation of LIC809) There were deficiencies cited during today’s visit and may be found on the LIC809-D page of this report. An exit interview, and a plan of correction was jointly developed, with licensee Paulo Ordinanza. A copy of this report, along with the Licensee Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided to licensee Ordinanza at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the documents were received.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87217(a)(1)(A) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 20, 2025
87217 Safeguards for Residents Cash, Personal Property, and Valueables: (A) An acceptable receipt where cash is provided to residents from their respective accounts, includes: the resident's signature or mark, or responsible party's full signature, and a statement acknowledging receipt of the amount and date received. An acceptable form of receipt would include:... this requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on records review the facility's documents for R1 and R2 did not have 2 of 5 updated cash resources form for residents which posed potential personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2025
Plan of correction: The Licensee agreed to repay and deposit the amount of $171.86 to to R1's respective banking institution and document it on their P&I Funds form.
20241 state visit · 1 document
Apr 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Carmen Lopez conducted an unannounced required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA Lopez identified herself, was granted entry by caregivers Editha Cuizon and Jonathan Luciano. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with Licensee Precy Ordinanza-Hulburd. Administrator Paulo Ordinanza later arrived and joined the visit. According to the facility’s license, there may be a maximum of six (6) residents all of whom may be non-ambulatory of which 6 may be bedridden; and hospice waiver is approved for 2, in at any given time at the facility site. During today’s inspection, the facility’s current census is 5 residents living at the facility. There were 5 residents present at the facility site during the inspection. LPA, accompanied by Licensee Ordinanza-Hulburd and Administrator Ordinanza, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was comfortable and compliant, at 70.7 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Hot water temperature at taps accessible to residents were also compliant: kitchen sink was delivered hot water at 112.8 degrees F; sink in restroom #1 delivered hot water at 109.4 degrees F; and sink in restroom #2 delivered hot water at 109.4 degrees F. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present, and all safely stored. There were no toxic chemicals/poisons accessible to residents. Medications were properly labeled, as required, and stored in a locked area. LPA inspected the office area where the medication cabinet was located and found that medications were properly labeled and stored in a locked cabinet. The facility-maintained medication logs which LPA reviewed. No pools or bodies of water on the premises. Per Administrator Ordinanza, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were present (01) and serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. LPA interviewed staff and resident, and reviewed staff and resident records. During today’s visit there were 5 residents on the facility premise. LPA interviews did not raise any licensing concerns. The files which LPA reviewed contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in a locked area. Required licensing postings were observed in a visible area of the facility. There were no deficiencies observed or cited during today's annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Paulo Ordinanza and Licensee Precy Ordinanza-Hulburd to whom a copy of this report along with the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the documents were received. LPA requested Administrator Paulo Ordinanza to submit a current Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC 308, and Personnel Report LIC 500, to the licensing office within 10 business days. Forms are available at www.ccld.ca.gov. The facility provided an updated copy of the Emergency Disaster Plan LIC 610-E to LPA during the inspection.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 18, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 4 documents
20231 state visit · 1 document
May 1, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an unannounced Case Management visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Paulo Ordinanza. Today's visit was in response to the self-reported death of Resident #1 (R1) received in the CCLD San Diego Regional Office on 04/28/2023. [See LIC 811 Confidential Names List for a description of R1]. R1 passed away on 04/26/2023. LPA performed a facility tour / welfare check, spoke with staff, and collected pertinent records. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted with Paulo Ordinanza, to whom a copy of this report, the LIC811 Confidential Names List, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visitthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2023
20222 state visits · 2 documents
May 12, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Carmen Lopez, made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct an annual required licensing inspection. LPA identified herself and was granted entry by Rosario Diamat, Caretaker. LPA met with Licensee Paulo Ordinanza and discussed the purpose of today’s visit. A tour of the facility was conducted inside and out. LPA, accompanied by Licensee Ordinanza, conducted a general overall inspection, with specific focus on infection control protocols. During today's inspection LPA observations include the following: Symptom screening procedures for staff, residents and visitors; posted signs regarding visitor policy, promoting hand washing, cough and sneeze etiquette and other infection control procedures; Hand hygiene practices is being prompted and done with staff, clients, and visitors; testing plan and procedures; plans for containing infections, PPE supplies procedures and training; and disinfection procedures. Based on today’s inspection, no deficiencies were observed. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Ordinanza. A copy of this report, along with the Licensee Rights (01/2016) was provided to Paulo Ordinanza, Licensee at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the receipt of these documents. LPA requested Licensee Ordinanza to submit a current Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC 308, Personnel Report LIC 500 and Emergency Disaster Plan LIC 610-E to the licensing office within 10 business days. Forms available at www.ccld.ca.gov.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 12, 2022
The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Jan 27, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - COVID-19Report on file
Type of visit: Case Management - COVID-19
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dawn Segura conducted an announced Case Management visit, accompanied by nurse Sandra Brackman from the Healthcare Acquired Infection (HAI) team of San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency. LPA and Sandra Brackman introduced themselves and met with Paulo Ordinanza, Administrator. The Department conducted an on-site visit to provide technical assistance and to evaluate the facility's mitigation efforts to include disinfection, testing, vaccination, screening protocols, and the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). During the visit, the administrator was interviewed, and the team conducted a walk-though of the facility. A debriefing was conducted with the administrator at the conclusion of the visit. During today's visit, no deficiencies were cited. A copy of this report, along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 01/16), were provided to Paulo Ordinanza, via electronic mail, following the visit. An electronic receipt of confirmation was requested to be sent upon receipt of the documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 27, 2022
20211 state visit · 1 document
Dec 16, 2021Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Unlawful eviction.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dawn Segura conducted an unannounced visit to conduct an investigation into the above listed complaint allegation. LPA was granted entry into the facility by Editha Cuizon, Staff. The administrator, Paolo Ordinanza, arrived a short time later, to whom LPA disclosed the reason for the visit. Community Care Licensing (CCL) has investigated the above listed allegation. The investigation consisted of a tour of the facility, review of records, and interviews of facility staff and outside sources. It was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) [Administrator was provided an LIC 811 Confidential Names List that identifies the resident] was sent to the emergency room of a local hospital after being placed on a Welfare and Institution Code 5150 psychiatric hold (5150). After being medically and psychiatrically assessed and cleared for discharge, hospital staff contacted the facility’s administrator to inform that R1 was cleared for Substantiated discharge. The administrator refused to accept R1 back into the facility, indicating that R1 was too hard to manage and too loud for the other residents. After back and forth exchanges between hospital staff and facility staff, R1 was admitted into the hospital because of the administrator’s and staff's refusal to accept the resident back into the home. During the course of the investigation, interviews and records reviewed revealed that on December 3, 2021, around midday, R1 was transported to the hospital on a 5150 following a behavioral outburst. Approximately six hours later, the facility’s administrator was called and notified that R1 had been cleared by medical and psychiatric staff to return to the facility. The administrator expressed that he would not accept R1 back into the facility at that time. The administrator was called by hospital personnel again around 8:55 PM and 9:25 PM, advising that R1 was ready to be discharged and transportation had been arranged to return R1 to the home. The administrator notified the hospital that he'd found another hospital to assess the resident and possibly admit R1; however, there was no confirmation that the psychiatric hospital would accept or provide a bed for the resident. At approximately 10:00 PM, the administrator received a call from hospital staff, again informing that R1 was cleared and ready to return to the facility. Due to the administrator’s continued refusal to accept R1 back into the home, the doctor decided to admit the resident into the hospital because there was no safe place for R1 to go at that time. On December 6, 2021, 3 days after being notified that the resident was cleared and ready for discharge from the hospital, after consultation with LPA and staff of San Diego Regional Center, Administrator agreed to accept R1 back into the home. Based on the lack of issuance of a formal, written eviction notice and the administrator’s refusal, for 3 days, to accept R1 into the home, after being repeatedly notified that the resident was cleared and ready to be discharged to the home, the allegation is substantiated. This finding means that the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met and the allegation is valid. Deficiency is cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 and noted on the attached LIC 9099-D. An exit interview was conducted with Paulo Ordinanza, Administrator. Following the visit, the administrator will be provided a copy of this report and Licensee Appeal Rights, via electronic mail. An electronic receipt of confirmation was requested to be sent to LPA upon receipt of the documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2021 · control 08-AS-20211206101520
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87224(a) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 17, 2021
Eviction Procedures. The licensee may evict a resident for one or more of the reasons listed in Section 87224(a)(1) through (5). Thirty (30) days written notice to the resident is required except as otherwise specified in paragraph (5). This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not provide R1 with a written 30-day eviction notice prior to leaving R1 at the hospital for 3 days following discharge. This posed a potential personal rights violation to 1 of 5 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2021
Plan of correction: R1 was accepted back into the facility on 12/6/2021. Deficiency is cleared.
5 of 6 beds were occupied at the May 20, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
P & P Homes Inc., licensed since 2017.
Operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- P & P Homes 2 · San Diego
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2017, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 11
- Total complaints
- 3
- Substantiated allegations
- 1
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 1
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2017, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 1 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 1 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 3 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about P & P Homes
Is P & P Homes licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is P & P Homes licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has P & P Homes been cited?
0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.
Is P & P Homes still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does P & P Homes cost?
$4,600 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,750–$5,650. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 51 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Diego that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 51 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does P & P Homes take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by P & P Homes Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to P & P Homes Inc. — at least 3 on the state roster.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Paradise Valley Hospital is 3.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can P & P Homes keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
P & P Homes license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “P & P HOMES INC”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #374603761. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to P & P Homes Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 11 state inspection visits since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
- 3 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is September 23, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Diego County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$7,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on its own website · October 27, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$4,500 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,750 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,900–$5,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,900 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,000On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$3,950 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,250–$4,900On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,250 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Diego County