Fahima Care Home 1 is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego, San Diego County, California — state license #374603755, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 17 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 8, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

11 homes in view

Fahima Care Home 1

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · San Diego, CA · San Diego County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #374603755, held since 2017 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
8554 Capricorn Way · San Diego, San Diego County
Phone
(858) 800-7455
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 6 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 1 resident

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN TO RESIDE IN ROOM #2,3 OR 5 ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 21 times and filed 17 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on May 8, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
May 8, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
4 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 11 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 19, 2021 to May 8, 2026. 11 of the 11 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (7). 11 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 11 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 9 of 17 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20265 state visits · 5 documents
May 8, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not meet residents needs Staff did not treat residents with dignity

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a telephone visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA spoke with Administrator, Raushon Ahmed. During the investigation, the facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged that staff did not meet the residents needs by not providing hygiene and grooming care services. Some residents require and receive assistance with hygiene and grooming. Residents interviewed confirmed receiving those care services. Outside sources that visit the facility on a regular basis stated the residents were receiving hygiene and grooming services. Staff stated they provide hygiene and grooming to residents that require assistance. It was also alleged that staff did not treat residents with dignity by yelling and handling them in a rough manner. Staff denied handling residents in a rough manner. Residents that receive direct cthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 8, 2026 · control 08-AS-20260429090717
May 7, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 14, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not treat resident with dignity

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with Administrator, Raushon Ahmed. During the investigation, the facility was toured, records reviewed and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged staff did not treat resident with dignity. It was reported that the caregivers expressed they don’t want male residents at the facility and have been mean to male residents. It was also reported the caregivers were grabbing and pulling the arms of the male residents to prevent them from going outside to smoke a cigarette. Staff interviews revealed they do not want residents to smoke outside as it can be viewed negatively by the community. The facility has a covered patio area with a ramp leading outside. The patio area can be viewed by people walking or driving by. Staff also reported the male residents used wheelchairs and it was diffthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 14, 2026 · control 08-AS-20251230120533
Jan 6, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unlawful eviction

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with Staff, Petra Galindez. LPA discussed allegation with the administrator, Raushon Ahmed via telephone while at the facility. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, and interviews conducted with staff, residents and outside sources. It was alleged that R1 was unlawfully evicted. Outside source #1’s (OS1) interview revelaed R1 went to the hospital on 06/07/21 for a mental condition. R1 was discharged from the hospital on 06/09/21. However, the administrator denied R1’s return to the facility. The administrator confirmed they denied the return of R1 due to being worried R1 may attempt to hurt themselves. The administrator also stated the facility was not equipped to handle that type of mental condition. A 30 day eviction notice in writing was not provided to R1. Continued on an LIC 9099C. Substantiathe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 23, 2025 · control 08-AS-20210609155427
May 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
May 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not afford resident dignity.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to continue investigation of the above allegation. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Caregiver Petra Gelindec. LPA also spoke with Administrator Raushon Ahmed via phone during today’s visit. The Complainant alleged Licensee did not afford Resident #1 (R1) dignity because Licensee's staff moved R1’s personal belongings within/inside their bedroom, without R1’s consent. During today’s visit, LPA briefly toured the facility and interviewed residents in care. CCLD’s investigation also involved a prior unannounced facility tour / welfare check and review of pertinent care and administrative records. The Department also interviewed R1 and relevant staff. [CONTINUED ON LIC 9099-C, 1 of 2] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 6, 2024 · control 08-AS-20210420105842
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations3typical 0
Substantiated complaints3typical 0
Total complaints12typical 0
State visits on file21typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2017.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202655120252212024220202322120223402021120
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — San Diego County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (858) 800-7455

Is Fahima Care Home 1 licensed?

Yes — Fahima Care Home 1 is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Diego (San Diego County): California license #374603755, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 17 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 8, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Fahima Care Home 1 care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Fahima Care Home 1 with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN TO RESIDE IN ROOM #2,3 OR 5 ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.

How much does Fahima Care Home 1 cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Fahima Care Home 1's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Diego County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Fahima Care Home 1 accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Fahima Care Home 1 is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

4 of 6 beds occupied (67%) when the state visited on May 8, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Fahima Care Home 1?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 21 state visits and 17 dated documents since 2021 for Fahima Care Home 1; 11 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 8, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

11 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not meet residents needs Staff did not treat residents with dignity
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted a telephone visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegations. LPA spoke with Administrator, Raushon Ahmed. During the investigation, the facility was toured, records reviewed, and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged that staff did not meet the residents needs by not providing hygiene and grooming care services. Some residents require and receive assistance with hygiene and grooming. Residents interviewed confirmed receiving those care services. Outside sources that visit the facility on a regular basis stated the residents were receiving hygiene and grooming services. Staff stated they provide hygiene and grooming to residents that require assistance. It was also alleged that staff did not treat residents with dignity by yelling and handling them in a rough manner. Staff denied handling residents in a rough manner. Residents that receive direct cCDSS inspection report, May 8, 2026 · control 08-AS-20260429090717
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not treat resident with dignity
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with Administrator, Raushon Ahmed. During the investigation, the facility was toured, records reviewed and interviews conducted with staff, residents, and outside sources. It was alleged staff did not treat resident with dignity. It was reported that the caregivers expressed they don’t want male residents at the facility and have been mean to male residents. It was also reported the caregivers were grabbing and pulling the arms of the male residents to prevent them from going outside to smoke a cigarette. Staff interviews revealed they do not want residents to smoke outside as it can be viewed negatively by the community. The facility has a covered patio area with a ramp leading outside. The patio area can be viewed by people walking or driving by. Staff also reported the male residents used wheelchairs and it was diffCDSS inspection report, April 14, 2026 · control 08-AS-20251230120533

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnlawful eviction
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Natasha Persaud conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with Staff, Petra Galindez. LPA discussed allegation with the administrator, Raushon Ahmed via telephone while at the facility. During the investigation, the facility was briefly toured, and interviews conducted with staff, residents and outside sources. It was alleged that R1 was unlawfully evicted. Outside source #1’s (OS1) interview revelaed R1 went to the hospital on 06/07/21 for a mental condition. R1 was discharged from the hospital on 06/09/21. However, the administrator denied R1’s return to the facility. The administrator confirmed they denied the return of R1 due to being worried R1 may attempt to hurt themselves. The administrator also stated the facility was not equipped to handle that type of mental condition. A 30 day eviction notice in writing was not provided to R1. Continued on an LIC 9099C. SubstantiaCDSS inspection report, July 23, 2025 · control 08-AS-20210609155427

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not afford resident dignity.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dang Nguyen conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to continue investigation of the above allegation. LPA was welcomed by, identified himself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Caregiver Petra Gelindec. LPA also spoke with Administrator Raushon Ahmed via phone during today’s visit. The Complainant alleged Licensee did not afford Resident #1 (R1) dignity because Licensee's staff moved R1’s personal belongings within/inside their bedroom, without R1’s consent. During today’s visit, LPA briefly toured the facility and interviewed residents in care. CCLD’s investigation also involved a prior unannounced facility tour / welfare check and review of pertinent care and administrative records. The Department also interviewed R1 and relevant staff. [CONTINUED ON LIC 9099-C, 1 of 2] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 6, 2024 · control 08-AS-20210420105842

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 21 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
3
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
12
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
21
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(858) 800-7455
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Fahima Care Home 1? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.